Young urologists and kidney transplantation training: A survey designed by the French Transplantation Committee of the French Association of Urology (CTAFU) and the French Association of Urologists in training (AFUF).

OBJECTIVE: In France, kidney transplantations (KT) are mainly performed by urologist. Young urologists and residents are involved in this activity mostly performed in emergency. How do they feel about KT training? Is KT an attractive part of the urologist activity? METHODS: This survey has been designed in the form of a questionnaire by the French Committee of Kidney Transplantation (CTAFU) and the French Association of Urologists in training (AFUF). It has been sent by e-mail to all the AFUF members. Interest in KT and performance of the training were evaluated. RESULTS: In total, 126 members filed the form. Among the residents, 51.5% feel secure to perform KT at the end of their residency. KT is considered as an interesting surgery for 92.1% of the participants: 76.5% are willing to get involved in KT during their residency/fellowship. Among the participants, 44% are willing to continue a long-term involvement. Among the residents, 65.9% consider their practical training insufficient: 56.8% have been supervised for a KT performance during their residency and 86% declare a lack of practical training and had a patient-based learning. Among the residents, 92.1% declare an insufficient theorical training. Among the residents, 33.3% say the schedules of transplantation limit their interest in KT. Among the participants, 34.4% receive a transplant bonus in addition to the usual on-call salary. CONCLUSION: Young urologists wish to continue their involvement in KT activity, but improved theoretical and practical training are essential. In addition, the conditions under which this activity is performed and remunerated are a matter of concern.

[Current state of knowledge of urology residents and fellows on the neuro-urological management of spina bifida patients in France]. / État des lieux des connaissances des internes et chefs de clinique d'urologie sur la prise en charge neuro-urologique des patients spina bifida en France.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the current knowledge of French urology residents and fellows about neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction and their management in patients with spina bifida. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A 7-question questionnaire, covering the responder's experience and the various stages in the neuro-urological management of spina bifida, was drafted by an expert urologist. Responses were collected within 5days of being e-mailed to members of the Association française des urologues en formation (AFUF), and a descriptive analysis was carried out. RESULTS: Of the 448 members, 155 completed the questionnaire. Of the participants, 83.8% said they knew the definition of spina bifida, and 76.8% had already had to care for a spina bifida patient. Of the participants, 48.4% correctly estimated the number of spina bifida patients in France. Neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction to look for and the specificities of management seemed to have been acquired by a majority of respondents (correct response rates of 70.7% and 75.4%, respectively), unlike the extra-urological aspects (53.9%), and the choice of examinations useful for the initial work-up and follow-up (55.8%). CONCLUSION: While the expected neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction and the specificities of therapeutic management of spina bifida patients appear to be well known to urologists in training, knowledge of extra-urological symptoms and the choice of examinations could be improved. These results could be used to adjust the teaching given to French urologists in training on the urological management of spina bifida patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Grade 4.

Cut-off time for surgery and prediction of orchiectomy in spermatic cord torsion: a retrospective multicentric study over 15 years.

PURPOSE: Cut-off time to avoid orchiectomy relies on small series of patients. The objective was to determine the cut-off time to avoid orchiectomy in torsion of the spermatic cord in a large cohort. METHODS: We performed a retrospective multicenter study (TORSAFUF cohort) of patients with suspected spermatic cord torsion between 2005 and 2019. All patients aged > 12 years who were suspected of having a torsion of the spermatic cord in 14 University Hospitals in France were included (n = 2986). Patients for whom data on pain duration were not available (n = 923) or for whom the final diagnosis was not torsion of the spermatic cord (n = 807) were excluded. The primary outcome was orchiectomy. The secondary outcomes were testicular survival time and the prediction of orchiectomy with the duration of pain. RESULTS: 1266 patients were included with an orchiectomy rate of 12% (150 patients). The mean age was 21.5 years old in the salvage group and 23.7 years old in the orchiectomy group (p = 0.01), respectively. The median time from the onset of pain to surgery was 5.5 (IQR = 5) hours in the salvage group and 51.1 (IQR = 70) hours in the orchiectomy group (p < 0.0001). The risk of orchiectomy increased after a time cut-off of 6 h 30. A delay of 15 h 30 in pain duration was found to predict orchiectomy (sensitivity: 0.81; specificity: 0.87). CONCLUSIONS: Pain duration can predict the probability of salvaging the testicles and performing orchiectomy. Rapid intervention should be recommended, regardless of the time elapsed from the onset of pain.

Prostatic arterial embolization versus holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: 1-year outcomes.

PURPOSE: Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) and Prostatic Artery Embolization (PAE) are novel techniques for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia lower urinary tract symptoms (BPH-LUTS). The objective of this study was to describe and compare the functional results and complications of these two techniques at one year follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective, monocentric study of all patients consecutively treated in our center with HoLEP or PAE for symptomatic or complicated BPH between January 2016 and December 2019. Data regarding patient and perioperative characteristics, follow-up biological results, functional questionnaires and uroflowmetry were collected from medical records. RESULTS: A total of 490 and 57 patients were treated with HoLEP and PAE, respectively. The demographic and clinical characteristics of the two groups were similar. The operative time was significantly higher for PAE (p < 0.001) and hospitalization time longer after HoLEP (p = 0.0006). The urinary catheterization time was longer after PAE (p < 0.001). The prostatic volume treated was higher with HoLEP than with PAE (56% versus 26%, p < 0.001). The mean difference in IPSS from baseline to 12 months was significantly higher after HoLEP than after PAE: - 17.58 versus - 8 (p < 0.001). The mean difference in QoL-IPSS from baseline to 12 months was significantly higher after HoLEP: - 4.09 versus - 2.27 (p < 0.001). The rate of postoperative adverse events in the first three months was similar between the two groups:35% after HoLEP and 33% after PAE (p = 0.88). CONCLUSIONS: HoLEP and PAE both significantly improved BPH-LUTS, with HoLEP having an advantage over PAE.

En Bloc Kidney Transplantation: A Retrospective Study of an 18-year Experience in a Single Institution.

Background: Renal transplantation is facing a shortage of grafts. En bloc kidney transplantation (EBKT) from pediatric donors could increase the number of available grafts. Objective: To describe the surgical technique as well as the long-term functional and morphological results of EBKT. Design setting and participants: We performed a retrospective study of all the EBKT procedures performed in Lyon between 2002 and 2020. Electronic medical records were checked with an analysis of demographics, and peri- and postoperative results. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: A descriptive analysis of donor and recipient characteristics, perioperative data, complications, and renal function was performed. Results and limitations: Between 2002 and 2020, 21 EBKT procedures were performed. Donors had a mean weight of 8.6 kg and a mean age of 12 mo, with a mean cold ischemia time of 11 h and 30 min. Receivers had a mean age of 30 yr and a body mass index of 20. The mean follow-up time was 62 mo, with patient survival of 100% and graft survival of 95%. There were 13 reinterventions comprising one early unilateral transplantectomy for thrombosis. Renal function was excellent, and the morphological findings described an important growth in size in the first 2 yr before attaining the adult size. This study's limitations include its retrospective nature and a small number of participants. Conclusions: The present study reports excellent results with EBKT and supports the pursuit and spread of this technique. Patient summary: In this report, we describe the technique and results of en bloc kidney transplantation. We found that results are excellent for renal function and patient survival. We conclude that en bloc kidney transplantation should be considered to increase the number of grafts.

The Use of Doppler Ultrasound for Suspected Testicular Torsion: Lessons Learned from a 15-Year Multicentre Retrospective Study of 2922 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Use of Doppler ultrasonography (DUS) for patients with suspected testicular torsion (TT) is highly controversial and remains debated, as it can delay surgery and its performance may vary. OBJECTIVE: To assess the role, impact, safety, and performance of DUS in the management of patients with suspected TT before scrotal exploration. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The TORSAFUF cohort retrospectively included patients older than 12 yr who underwent surgery for suspected TT in 14 academic hospitals between 2005 and 2019. Perioperative data and surgical and DUS reports were collected. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Clinical factors influencing DUS utilisation were analysed using multivariate logistic regression. The orchidectomy rate and delay to surgery were compared by group with and without DUS receipt using one-to-one propensity score (PS) matching to assess imaging safety. For the group with preoperative imaging, DUS performance was evaluated using a contingency table. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Overall, 2922 patients were included, of whom 956 (32.7%) underwent DUS before surgery. DUS was more likely to be performed in older patients (odds ratio [OR] 1.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-1.2), those who experienced progressive onset of pain (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1-2), and patients who presented at the emergency department more than 6 h after their first scrotal symptoms (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.9-2.8). After PS matching, DUS receipt was not significantly associated with orchidectomy but the delay to surgery was 1 h longer. DUS demonstrated strong sensitivity of 85.2% (95% CI 82.1-88.3%) and specificity of 52.7% (95% CI 48.8-56.6%). The performance was better for younger patients and for those with time since onset of pain of >6 h. CONCLUSIONS: In this large retrospective study, DUS before surgery was safe, feasible, and useful in selected cases with suspected TT, but it should not delay or replace surgery in cases with a strong clinical suspicion. PATIENT SUMMARY: We analysed the performance and safety of an ultrasound scan of the scrotum before surgery for patients with a suspected twisted testicle (TT). This scan before surgery was not associated with a higher risk of negative outcomes but was only moderate in accurately diagnosing TT. Surgery to correct TT should not be delayed.

Enhanced Recovery after Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy for Cancer: Is it Better for Patients to Have a Quick Discharge?

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy and safety of an enhanced recovery program (ERP) after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for cancer. METHODS: It was a monocentric, retrospective, comparative study. An ERP after RAPN was introduced at our institution in 2015 and proposed to all consecutive patients admitted for RAPN. The control group for this study was composed of patients managed immediately before the introduction of the ERP. We collected information on patient characteristics, tumor sizes, ischemia times, biology, hospital length of stays, postoperative (≤30 days) complications, and readmission rates. Group comparisons were made using the Pearson χ2 test for qualitative data and the Student t test for quantitative data. RESULTS: Between 2015 and 2017, 112 patients were included in the ERP group. Fifty patients were included in the control group. Ninety patients in the ERP group (80.4%) were discharged at or before postoperative day (POD) 2 versus 10 patients (20%) in the control group (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the ERP and control groups for the urinary retention rate (respectively 3.6 vs. 2%; p = 0.593). Resumption of normal bowel function was significantly shorter in the ERP group (94.6% at POD1 vs. 69.6% in the control group, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences for postoperative complications (15.2% in the ERP group vs. 20% in the control group, p = 0.447) or readmissions within 30 days (8.04 vs. 0.2%, p = 0.140). CONCLUSIONS: ERP after RAPN seems to reduce postoperative length of stay without increasing postoperative complications or readmissions.