ABSTRACT
According to a population-based estimate, chronic pelvic pain (CPP) affects approximately 15% of women aged 18-50. The psychosocial impact of CPP is reflected in mood disturbance, disruption of normal activity and relationships as well as pain. Identification of psychosocial factors as cause or effect remains problematic. Results of a study of 105 women with CPP using the British version of the SF-36 Health Survey Questionnaire are presented, together with analyses of face validity and reliability. While generally reflecting health status, specific problems with the questionnaire are identified related to the episodic nature of pelvic pain, and avoidance as a means of preventing pain exacerbations. Health economic analyses relating to CPP are reviewed and the implications for future directions in treatment strategy are discussed in the context of limited options of proven efficacy.
Subject(s)
Pelvic Pain/economics , Pelvic Pain/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child Abuse, Sexual/psychology , Child, Preschool , Chronic Disease , Female , Health Care Costs , Health Status Indicators , Humans , Middle Aged , Mood Disorders/complications , Psychophysiologic Disorders/complications , Quality of Life , Surveys and Questionnaires , United KingdomABSTRACT
We aimed to document the demographic and clinical characteristics of women referred by primary care physicians for investigation of chronic pelvic pain to a university hospital gynecology outpatient clinic and to test the hypothesis that specific patient features and the quality of doctor/patient communication at the initial consultation would influence pain outcomes. A clinical questionnaire, visual analog scales for pain, and instruments for hostility and the experience of the consultation were administered at the initial clinic attendance to 105 consecutive women. Follow-up pain scores were obtained 6 months later from 98 women. The mean hostility score was highly significantly elevated compared with normative data (p < 0.001). In a logistic regression model, a favorable patient rating of the initial consultation was associated with complete recovery at follow-up and interacted significantly with whether or not exercise was impaired (p < 0.005). For those in whom symptoms persisted, significant factors found by multiple regression models to predict continuing pain levels were the initial level of pain, the number of functions of daily life impaired, endometriosis, and the doctor who carried out the initial consultation. Patient hostility scores and the doctor's level of experience or gender were not significantly associated with continuing pain. This study highlights the importance of good communication as a basis for successful treatment of a group of hostile patients and indicates the influence in individual doctors of subtle attitudinal and personality factors that modify patients' experience of the medical consultation.
