ABSTRACT
Aims: Post-traumatic periprosthetic acetabular fractures are rare but serious. Few studies carried out on small cohorts have reported them in the literature. The aim of this work is to describe the specific characteristics of post-traumatic periprosthetic acetabular fractures, and the outcome of their surgical treatment in terms of function and complications. Methods: Patients with this type of fracture were identified retrospectively over a period of six years (January 2016 to December 2021). The following data were collected: demographic characteristics, date of insertion of the prosthesis, details of the intervention, date of the trauma, characteristics of the fracture, and type of treatment. Functional results were assessed with the Harris Hip Score (HHS). Data concerning complications of treatment were collected. Results: Our series included 20 patients, with a mean age of 77 years (46 to 90). All the patients had at least one comorbid condition. Radiographs showed that 75% of the fractures were pure transverse fractures, and a transverse component was present in 90% of patients. All our patients underwent surgical treatment: open reduction and internal fixation, revision of the acetabular component, or both. Mean follow-up was 24 months, and HHS at last follow-up was 75.5 (42 to 95). The principal complications observed were dislocations of the prosthesis (30%) and infections (20%). A need for revision surgery was noted in 30% of patients. No dislocation occurred in patients undergoing osteosynthesis with acetabular reconstruction. We did not note either mechanical loosening of the acetabular component nor thromboembolic complications. In all, 30% of patients presented acute anemia requiring transfusion, and one death was reported. Conclusion: Post-traumatic periprosthetic acetabular fractures frequently have a transverse component that can destabilize the acetabular implant. The frequency of complications, principally dislocations, led to a high rate of revision surgery. Improvements in preoperative planning should make it possible to codify management to reduce this high rate of complications. The best results were obtained when the surgical strategy combined osteosynthesis with acetabular reconstruction.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The loss of correct relationships between the sesamoid and the first metatarsal is one of the architectural consequences of the hallux valgus (HV). The reduction of this dislocation by lateral soft tissue release (LSTR) is one of the objectives of surgery. AIM: To study the relationship between postoperative position of sesamoid and clinical outcome at one-year postoperative follow-up. METHODS: It's a retrospective study including patients operated for evolved HV performed in la Rabta orthopedic department in Tunis. These patients had a Scarf osteotomy associated with at least one Weil osteotomy. The functional evaluation was based on the AOFAS score (American-orthopedic-foot-and-ankle-society). We classified the sesamoid position according to 3 scores: Hardy & Clapham , RCAOFAS and the Agrawal. We compared each score of the sesamoid position to the clinical outcome. RESULTS: We collected 46 cases of HV in 45 patients. The mean AOFAS score increased from 60,9 to 85,5/100 postoperatively. Our patients were divided into 2 groups: group A whose result was excellent and group B whose result was good, fair and poor. The analytical study of this work concluded that there was no relationship between the postoperative sesamoid position and the clinical outcome, regardless of the radiological classification used (p=0,361, p=0,222, p=0,260). CONCLUSION: Sesamoids that remain in postoperative dislocation are not necessarily predictive of a poor clinical outcome at one year of the surgical cure.