The Effect of Electroencephalography Leads on Image Quality in Cerebral Perfusion SPECT and 18F-FDG PET/CT.

Cerebral perfusion SPECT and 18F-FDG PET/CT are commonly performed diagnostic procedures for patients with epilepsy. Individuals undergoing these tests are often inpatients with electroencephalography leads. We have routinely removed these leads because of concern that they would lead to imaging artifacts. The leads would then be replaced at the conclusion of the scan. The goal of our study was to determine whether the electroencephalography leads actually do cause artifacts that can lead to erroneous scan interpretation or make the scan uninterpretable. Methods: 18F-FDG PET/CT and 99mTc-pertechnetate SPECT were performed on a 2-dimensional brain phantom. The phantom was scanned with standard leads, CT/MR-compatible leads, and no leads. The quality of the images was ranked by 3 experienced nuclear medicine physicians, who then determined whether they could differentiate each of the scans from a scan in which it was known that no leads were present. Results: No differences could be detected between scans obtained without leads and scans obtained with either set of leads. The standard electroencephalography leads did create artifacts in the CT portion of the PET/CT images, whereas the CT/MR-compatible leads did not. Conclusion: This phantom study suggests that electroencephalography leads, whether standard or CT/MR-compatible, do not need to be removed for SPECT or PET procedures. Further study evaluating the effect on actual patient scans would be of value to support this conclusion.

Reporting guidance for oncologic 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging.

The written report (or its electronic counterpart) is the primary mode of communication between the physician interpreting an imaging study and the referring physician. The content of this report not only influences patient management and clinical outcomes but also serves as legal documentation of services provided and can be used to justify medical necessity, billing accuracy, and regulatory compliance. Generating a high-quality PET/CT report is perhaps more challenging than generating a report for other imaging studies because of the complexity of this hybrid imaging modality. This article discusses the essential elements of a concise and complete oncologic (18)F-FDG PET/CT report and illustrates these elements through examples taken from routine clinical practice.

Radiation dose estimates in humans for (11)C-acetate whole-body PET.

UNLABELLED: 11C-Acetate is currently being investigated as a new tracer for imaging neoplasms, most notably prostate cancer and its metastases. Previously reported dose estimates for (11)C-acetate prepared by the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) were based on a simple 3-compartment model in which all activity not measured in blood or excretion via breath was assumed to reside in the heart. Because all organs are involved in acetate metabolism to some extent, these estimates might overestimate heart and underestimate other organ dosimetry. Dynamic whole-body (11)C-acetate PET was therefore performed on 6 healthy human volunteers. Measured dose estimates for all target organs were compared with the existing ORISE values. METHODS: After transmission scanning had been performed for measured attenuation, 525 MBq of (11)C-acetate were injected intravenously, and 5 sequential whole-body emission scans were obtained from the head to mid thighs. Regions of interest were drawn to encompass the entire activity in all visible organs at each time point. Time-activity data were fit in a least-squares sense to obtain residence times. Absorbed dose estimates were determined using MIRDOSE3.1 software. RESULTS: The effective dose was 0.0049 mSv/MBq. The organs receiving the highest absorbed doses were the pancreas (0.017 mGy/MBq), bowel (0.011 mGy/MBq), kidneys (0.0092 mGy/MBq), and spleen (0.0092 mGy/MBq). No urinary excretion of tracer was measurable. CONCLUSION: Using these new estimates for (11)C-acetate dosimetry, the maximum injected activity under Radioactive Drug Research Committee limits can be raised up to 5-fold over the limit imposed by the previous ORISE estimates. A higher injected activity would improve counting statistics and, it is hoped, overall image quality and tumor detection with whole-body (11)C-acetate PET.

The impact of PET on the management of lung cancer: the referring physician's perspective.

UNLABELLED: (18)F-FDG PET is a molecular whole-body imaging modality that is increasingly being used for diagnosing, staging, and restaging cancer. The objective of this study was to determine referring physicians' perspectives on the impact of (18)F-FDG PET on staging and management of lung cancer. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to the 292 referring physicians of 744 consecutive patients with known or suspected lung cancer who were evaluated with PET. Questionnaires on 274 patients were returned (response rate, 37%). Management changes were categorized as intermodality (e.g., surgery to medical, surgery to radiation, and medical to no treatment) or intramodality (e.g., altered medical, surgical, or radiotherapy approach). RESULTS: The primary reasons for PET referral were staging of lung cancer in 61% of patients, diagnosis in 20%, and monitoring of therapy or the course of disease in 6%. Physicians reported that PET caused them to change their decision on clinical stage in 44% of all patients: The disease was upstaged in 29% and downstaged in 15%. PET resulted in intermodality management changes in 39% of patients, whereas 15% had an intramodality change. CONCLUSION: This survey-based study of referring physicians suggests that PET has a major impact on staging and management of lung cancer.