Somatic Tumor Testing in Prostate Cancer: Experience of a Tertiary Care Center Including Pathologist-Driven Reflex Testing of Localized Tumors at Diagnosis.

Somatic tumor testing in prostate cancer (PCa) can guide treatment options by identifying clinically actionable variants in DNA damage repair genes, including acquired variants not detected using germline testing alone. Guidelines currently recommend performing somatic tumor testing in metastatic PCa, whereas there is no consensus on the role of testing in regional disease, and the optimal testing strategy is only evolving. This study evaluates the frequency, distribution, and pathologic correlates of somatic DNA damage repair mutations in metastatic and localized PCa following the implementation of pathologist-driven reflex testing at diagnosis. A cohort of 516 PCa samples were sequenced using a custom next-generation sequencing panel including homologous recombination repair and mismatch repair genes. Variants were classified based on the Association for Molecular Pathology/American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guidelines. In total, 183 (35.5%) patients had at least one variant, which is as follows: 72 of 516 (13.9%) patients had at least 1 tier I or tier II variant, whereas 111 of 516 (21.5%) patients had a tier III variant. Tier I/II variant(s) were identified in 27% (12/44) of metastatic biopsy samples and 13% (61/472) of primary samples. Overall, 12% (62/516) of patients had at least 1 tier I/II variant in a homologous recombination repair gene, whereas 2.9% (10/516) had at least 1 tier I/II variant in a mismatch repair gene. The presence of a tier I/II variant was not significantly associated with the grade group (GG) or presence of intraductal/cribriform carcinoma in the primary tumor. Among the 309 reflex-tested hormone-naive primary tumors, tier I/II variants were identified in 10% (31/309) of cases, which is as follows: 9.2% (9/98) GG2; 9% (9/100) GG3; 9.1% (4/44) GG4; and 13.4% (9/67) GG5 cases. Our findings confirm the use of somatic tumor testing in detecting variants of clinical significance in PCa and provide insights that can inform the design of testing strategies. Pathologist-initiated reflex testing streamlines the availability of the results for clinical decision-making; however, pathologic parameters such as GG and the presence of intraductal/cribriform carcinoma may not be reliable to guide patient selection.

Genetic testing practices among specialist physicians who treat prostate cancer A Canadian, cross-sectional survey.

INTRODUCTION: In patients with prostate cancer (PCa), the identification of an alteration in genes associated with homologous recombination repair (HRR) has implications for prognostication, optimization of therapy, and familial risk mitigation. The aim of this study was to assess the genomic testing landscape of PCa in Canada and to recommend an approach to offering germline and tumor testing for HRR-associated genes. METHODS: The Canadian Genitourinary Research Consortium (GURC) administered a cross-sectional survey to a largely academic, multidisciplinary group of investigators across 22 GURC sites between January and June 2022. RESULTS: Thirty-eight investigators from all 22 sites responded to the survey. Germline genetic testing was initiated by 34%, while 45% required a referral to a genetic specialist. Most investigators (82%) reported that both germline and tumor testing were needed, with 92% currently offering germline and 72% offering tissue testing to patients with advanced PCa. The most cited reasons for not offering testing were an access gap (50%), uncertainties around who to test and which genes to test, (33%) and interpreting results (17%). A majority reported that patients with advanced PCa (74-80%) should be tested, with few investigators testing patients with localized disease except when there is a family history of PCa (45-55%). CONCLUSIONS: Canadian physicians with academic subspecialist backgrounds in genitourinary malignancies recognize the benefits of both germline and somatic testing in PCa; however, there are challenges in accessing testing across practices and specialties. An algorithm to reduce uncertainty for providers when ordering genetic testing for patients with PCa is proposed.

Development of a comprehensive approach to adult hereditary cancer testing in Ontario.

BACKGROUND: Genetic testing for hereditary cancer susceptibility has advanced over time due to the discovery of new risk genes, improved technology and decreased cost. In the province of Ontario, testing eligibility criteria were initially developed to include hereditary breast, ovarian and colorectal cancer syndromes. The rapid evolution of genetic technologies has facilitated the ability to interrogate a large number of genes concurrently. This, coupled with new knowledge about risk genes, necessitated a coordinated approach to expanding the scope of genes and indications tested and synchronisation of access and test utilisation across the province as required in a publicly funded universal healthcare system. METHODS: Ontario Health-Cancer Care Ontario convened expert working groups to develop a standardised and comprehensive cancer gene list for adults and accompanying hereditary cancer testing (HCT) criteria using an evidence-based framework and broad laboratory and clinical genetics engagement. RESULTS: A standardised 76-cancer-gene panel, organised into 13 larger disease site panels and 25 single/small gene panels, was developed and endorsed by the working groups. Provincial genetic testing eligibility criteria were updated to align with the new panels and to guide clinical decision-making. In the first year following the implementation of these changes, 10 564 HCT panels were performed with an overall mutation detection rate of 12.2%. CONCLUSION: Using an evidence framework and broad clinical engagement to develop and endorse an updated guidance document, cancer genetic testing for adults in Ontario is now standardised and coordinated across the province.

Recommendations for the implementation of genetic testing for metastatic prostate cancer patients in Canada.

INTRODUCTION: Genetic testing in advanced prostate cancer is rapidly moving to become standard of care. Testing for genetic alterations in genes involved in DNA repair pathways, particularly those implicated in the homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway, in patients with metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) can inform selection of optimal therapies, as well as provide information about familial cancer risks; however, there are currently no consistent Canadian guidelines in place for genetic testing in mPCa. METHODS: A multidisciplinary steering committee guided the process of an environmental scan to define the current landscape, as well as the perceived challenges, through interviews with specialists from 14 sites across Canada. The challenges most commonly identified include limited testing guidelines and protocols, inadequate education and awareness, and insufficient resources. Following the environmental scan, an expert multidisciplinary working group with pan-Canadian representation from medical oncologists, urologists, medical geneticists, genetic counsellors, pathologists, and clinical laboratory scientists convened in virtual meetings to discuss the challenges in implementation of genetic testing in mPCa across Canada. RESULTS: Key recommendations from the working group include implementation of germline and tumor HRR testing for all patients with mPCa, with a mainstreaming model in which non-geneticist clinicians can initiate germline testing. The working group defined the roles and responsibilities of the various healthcare providers (HCPs) involved in the genetic testing pathway for mPCa patients. In addition, the educational needs for all HCPs involved in the genetic testing pathway for mPCa were defined. CONCLUSIONS: As genetic testing for mPCa becomes standard of care, additional resources and investments will be required to implement the changes that will be needed to support the necessary volume of genetic testing, to ensure equitable access, and to provide education to all stakeholders.

Targeting the FGFR Pathway in Urothelial Carcinoma: the Future Is Now.

OPINION STATEMENT: As we come to better understand cancer genomics, we are increasingly shifting towards precision medicine. FGFR has been elucidated as one of the oncogenic driver pathways in urothelial carcinoma, leading to exciting targeted drug development. Although many agents are being investigated, erdafitinib is the only FGFR inhibitor currently approved by the FDA for treating platinum-refractory metastatic urothelial carcinoma harboring susceptible FGFR2/3 alterations, with seemingly higher response rates than second-line chemotherapy or immunotherapy. In this review, we summarize the clinical data supporting FGFR inhibition, ways to optimize its use in routine clinical practice including FGFR testing, dosing, and toxicity management. We also highlight ongoing efforts evaluating combination strategies and testing in earlier treatment settings to further expand this targeted therapeutic approach in urothelial carcinoma.

Comprehensive genomic profiling of treatment resistant metastatic castrate sensitive prostate cancer reveals high frequency of potential therapeutic targets.

INTRODUCTION: While comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) data is becoming increasingly important in the management of prostate cancer, it remains under-utilized in the setting of metastatic castrate sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). We aimed to explore the feasibility and potential utility of CGP in mCSPC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with mCSPC were prospectively recruited at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre to the OCTANE trial (NCT02906943). The objective was to assess the feasibility of profiling archival standard diagnostic tumor tissue using next generation sequencing with a custom hybridization capture DNA-based or a targeted DNA/RNA amplicon-based panel. Clinical data were extracted from electronic health records. RESULTS: Among 39 mCSPC patients enrolled, 21 (54%) had sufficient archival tissue for CGP. Most had high volume (71%) or de novo (71%) mCSPC, with the majority being androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) naïve. In total, 62% of patients had a pathogenic and/or a likely pathogenic variant, many of which involved DNA damage repair (DDR, 19%), cell cycle (24%), and Androgen Receptor (AR, 10%) pathways. After median follow-up of 32.1 months, 18 of 21 patients progressed, with median time to mCRPC of 14.3 months (95% CI 10.2-21.0). Patients with AR and DDR variants seemed to have shorter median time to mCRPC; 10.2 (95% CI 9.50-NR) and 10.3 months (95% CI 6.6-14.3) respectively. CONCLUSION: In this cohort of highly treatment resistant mCSPC, most of which were ADT-naïve, CGP using archival tumor tissue was feasible for over half of patients, and 62% of patients profiled had a pathogenic and/or a likely pathogenic variant. The presence of de novo variants provides biological basis for evaluating intensification strategies of systemic therapy. This highlights the potential role of routine CGP in biomarker development and clinical trial design in the setting of mCSPC.

Genomic characterization of non-schistosomiasis-related squamous cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder: A retrospective exploratory study.

BACKGROUND: Non-schistosomiasis related-squamous cell carcinoma of urinary bladder (NSR-SCCUB) is a rare tumor subtype distinct from urothelial carcinoma (UC). Studies assessing molecular biomarkers in bladder cancer have generally focused on UC, and genomic data of NSR-SCCUB is limited. We aim to provide additional insight into the molecular underpinnings of this rare entity. METHODS: NSR-SCCUB patients were identified retrospectively at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre between 2002 and 2017. Demographics, disease characteristics, therapeutic approaches, and outcomes were collected. Tissue samples were interrogated using the Oncomine Comprehensive Assay v3 (ThermoFisher). Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the disease-free survival and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Overall, 11 patients with NSR-SCCUB were identified between 2002 and 2017 with adequate tissue samples. Median age was 71 years (45-86), predominantly male (63.6%). At time of diagnosis, 9 patients (81.8%) had muscle-invasive disease, 1 (9.1%) had non-muscle invasive, and 1 (9.1%) had advanced disease. Nine (81.8%) patients had radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph nodes dissection. Eight (72.7%) patients had pT3 or pT4 with N0, and 5 (45.5%) were grade 3. Median OS was 12.5 months (95% CI 7.7-17.2 months). Single nucleotide variants or insertion/deletions were identified in TP53, TERT, PIK3CA, PTEN, CREBBP, FBXW7, and FGFR3. Amplifications were found in CCND1, and EGFR. CONCLUSIONS: NSR-SCCUB has potentially actionable genomic alterations with anticancer agents and many of these aberrations are also seen in UC. The recruitment of NSR-SCCUB patients harboring such mutations should be considered in biomarker driven urinary bladder cancer studies.

A Pan-Canadian Validation Study for the Detection of EGFR T790M Mutation Using Circulating Tumor DNA From Peripheral Blood.

INTRODUCTION: Genotyping circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a promising noninvasive clinical tool to identify the EGFR T790M resistance mutation in patients with advanced NSCLC with resistance to EGFR inhibitors. To facilitate standardization and clinical adoption of ctDNA testing across Canada, we developed a 2-phase multicenter study to standardize T790M mutation detection using plasma ctDNA testing. METHODS: In phase 1, commercial reference standards were distributed to participating clinical laboratories, to use their existing platforms for mutation detection. Baseline performance characteristics were established using known and blinded engineered plasma samples spiked with predetermined concentrations of T790M, L858R, and exon 19 deletion variants. In phase II, peripheral blood collected from local patients with known EGFR activating mutations and progressing on treatment were assayed for the presence of EGFR variants and concordance with a clinically validated test at the reference laboratory. RESULTS: All laboratories in phase 1 detected the variants at 0.5 % and 5.0 % allele frequencies, with no false positives. In phase 2, the concordance with the reference laboratory for detection of both the primary and resistance mutation was high, with next-generation sequencing and droplet digital polymerase chain reaction exhibiting the best overall concordance. Data also suggested that the ability to detect mutations at clinically relevant limits of detection is generally not platform-specific, but rather impacted by laboratory-specific practices. CONCLUSIONS: Discrepancies among sending laboratories using the same assay suggest that laboratory-specific practices may impact performance. In addition, a negative or inconclusive ctDNA test should be followed by tumor testing when possible.

DNA Methylation-Based Classification of Small B-Cell Lymphomas: A Proof-of-Principle Study.

Although most small B-cell lymphomas (SBCLs) can be diagnosed using routine methods, challenges exist. For example, marginal zone lymphomas (MZLs) can be difficult to rule-in, in large part because no widely-used, sensitive, and specific biomarker is available for the marginal zone cell of origin. In this study, it was hypothesized that DNA methylation array profiling can assist with the classification of SBCLs, including MZLs. Extramedullary SBCLs, including challenging cases, were reviewed internally for pathology consensus and profiled. By combining the resulting array data set with data sets from other groups, a set of 26 informative probes was selected and used to train machine learning models to classify 4 common SBCLs: chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, and MZL. Prediction probability cutoff was used to separate classifiable from unclassifiable cases, and show that the trained model was able to classify 95% of independent test cases (n = 264/279). The concordance between model predictions and pathology diagnoses was 99.6% (n = 262/263) among classifiable test cases. One validation reference test case was reclassified based on model prediction. The model was also used to predict the diagnoses of two challenging SBCLs. Although the differential examined and data on difficult cases are limited, these results support accurate methylation-based classification of SBCLs. Furthermore, high specificities of predictions suggest that methylation signatures can be used to rule-in MZLs.

MDS/MPN-Unclassifiable with t(X;17)(q28;q21) and KANSL1-MTCP1/CMC4 Fusion Gene.

Myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm, unclassifiable (MDS/MPN-U) is a poorly characterized entity among overlap myeloid syndromes. Recent studies have shown heterogeneous mutational profiles in this group being able to subclassify them into entities closely related to the more well-established disorders under the umbrella term of the MDS/MPN group. Recurrent cytogenetic alterations are, nonetheless, rare in MDS/MPN-U. Here, for the first time, we report a case of MDS/MPN-U with a t(X;17)(q28;q21) chromosomal rearrangement leading to the KANSL1-MTCP1 fusion gene.

Alpha-1-antitrypsin molecular testing in Canada: A seven year, multi-centre comparison.

BACKGROUND: Laboratory confirmation of alpha-1-antitrypsin (A1AT) deficiency may be achieved by multiple methods. Here, we compare the relative comprehensiveness and efficiency of pathogenic variant (PV) detection of four different protocols utilized at different diagnostic centres in Canada. METHODS: Diagnostic results from 2011 to 2018 at clinical laboratories in British Columbia (BC), Alberta (AB), Ontario (ON), and Québec (QC) were reviewed. The four labs utilize the following protocols: BC-CGID (serum A1AT Concentration/Genotyping/Isoelectric focussing (IEF)/SERPINA1 DNA sequencing), AB-CID (serum A1AT Concentration/IEF/DNA sequencing), ON-CD (serum A1AT Concentration/DNA sequencing), and QC-G (Genotyping). As the respective catchment areas varied in size and ethnic composition, the comprehensiveness of PV detection was assessed by comparing the frequency of individual genotypes to the ZZ genotype, which is clearly identified by all protocols. RESULTS: Collectively 5399 index patients were tested identifying 396 ZZ genotypes. Serum A1AT concentration as a determinant of further testing efficiently identified PV. ON-CD had the highest detection rate for PV; genotypes with at least one PV, other than S, Z or F, were identified at 0.67/ZZ as compared to <0.2/ZZ (all others). However, ON-CD had the highest rates of undefined molecular variants (UMV) (0.16/ZZ) or likely benign variants (LBV) (0.08/ZZ), compared to all others (<0.12/ZZ and < 0.06/ZZ, respectively). The F variant was identified at 0.10/ZZ, only in the ON-CD and the AB-CID protocols. Collectively, MMalton was the next most common variant, identified as a compound heterozygous genotype at 0.04/ZZ, only in the ON-CD and BC-CGID protocols. CONCLUSION: Strategies which readily detect variants across the full coding sequence of SERPINA1 detect more PV as well as more UMV and LBV.

Functional validation of metabolic genes that distinguish Gleason 3 from Gleason 4 prostate cancer foci.

BACKGROUND: Gleason grade is among the most powerful clinicopathological classification systems used to assess risk of lethal potential in prostate cancer, yet its biologic basis is poorly understood. Notably, pure low-grade cancers, comprised predominantly of Gleason pattern 3 (G3) are typically indolent, with lethal potential emerging with the progression of higher-grade Gleason patterns 4 (G4) or 5. One of the hallmarks of more aggressive cancer phenotypes is the stereotyped set of metabolic characteristics that transformed cells acquire to facilitate unregulated growth. In the present study, we profiled expression signatures of metabolic genes that are differentially expressed between G3 and G4 cancer foci and investigated the functional role of two of the profiled genes, PGRMC1 and HSD17B4, in prostate cancer cells. METHODS: Gene expression profiling was conducted using 32 G3 and 32 G4 cancer foci from patients with 3+3 and ≥4+3 tumors, respectively. A 95-gene Nanostring probe set was used to probe genes associated with energy metabolism. Two out of five genes (PGRMC1 and HSD17B4) that significantly distinguish between G3 and G4 were functionally validated in vitro using established prostate cancer cells (PC3, DU145). Expression of PGRMC1 and HSD17B4 was knocked down and subsequent studies were performed to analyze cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and apoptosis. Mechanistic studies that explored the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathway were performed by Western blot. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis identified five metabolic genes that were differentially expressed between G3 and G4 stroma (P < .05). Functional validation studies revealed that knockdown of PGRMC1 and HSD17B4 significantly decreased cell proliferation, migration, and invasion, and increased apoptosis in PC3 and DU145 cells. Mechanistic studies showed that these effects, after PGRMC1 knockdown, were possibly mediated through alterations in downstream components of the EGFR, protein kinase B, and nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells pathways. CONCLUSION: The following study provides evidence supporting the use of metabolic genes PGRMC1 and HSD17B4 as a prognostic biomarker for the distinction between G3 and G4 prostate cancers.

Reliability and performance of commercial RNA and DNA extraction kits for FFPE tissue cores.

Cancer biomarker studies often require nucleic acid extraction from limited amounts of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues, such as histologic sections or needle cores. A major challenge is low quantity and quality of extracted nucleic acids, which can limit our ability to perform genetic analyses, and have a significant influence on overall study design. This study was aimed at identifying the most reliable and reproducible method of obtaining sufficient high-quality nucleic acids from FFPE tissues. We compared the yield and quality of nucleic acids from 0.6-mm FFPE prostate tissue cores across 16 DNA and RNA extraction protocols, using 14 commercially available kits. Nucleic acid yield was determined by fluorometry, and quality was determined by spectrophotometry. All protocols yielded nucleic acids in quantities that are compatible with downstream molecular applications. However, the protocols varied widely in the quality of the extracted RNA and DNA. Four RNA and five DNA extraction protocols, including protocols from two kits for dual-extraction of RNA and DNA from the same tissue source, were prioritized for further quality assessment based on the yield and purity of their products. Specifically, their compatibility with downstream reactions was assessed using both NanoString nCounter gene expression assays and reverse-transcriptase real-time PCR for RNA, and methylation-specific PCR assays for DNA. The kit deemed most suitable for FFPE tissue was the AllPrep kit by Qiagen because of its yield, quality, and ability to purify both RNA and DNA from the same sample, which would be advantageous in biomarker studies.

Preparation of Formalin-fixed Paraffin-embedded Tissue Cores for both RNA and DNA Extraction.

Formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tissue (FFPET) represents a valuable, well-annotated substrate for molecular investigations. The utility of FFPET in molecular analysis is complicated both by heterogeneous tissue composition and low yields when extracting nucleic acids. A literature search revealed a paucity of protocols addressing these issues, and none that showed a validated method for simultaneous extraction of RNA and DNA from regions of interest in FFPET. This method addresses both issues. Tissue specificity was achieved by mapping cancer areas of interest on microscope slides and transferring annotations onto FFPET blocks. Tissue cores were harvested from areas of interest using 0.6 mm microarray punches. Nucleic acid extraction was performed using a commercial FFPET extraction system, with modifications to homogenization, deparaffinization, and Proteinase K digestion steps to improve tissue digestion and increase nucleic acid yields. The modified protocol yields sufficient quantity and quality of nucleic acids for use in a number of downstream analyses, including a multi-analyte gene expression platform, as well as reverse transcriptase coupled real time PCR analysis of mRNA expression, and methylation-specific PCR (MSP) analysis of DNA methylation.

Molecular characterization of Gleason patterns 3 and 4 prostate cancer using reverse Warburg effect-associated genes.

BACKGROUND: Gleason scores (GS) 3+3 and 3+4 prostate cancers (PCa) differ greatly in their clinical courses, with Gleason pattern (GP) 4 representing a major independent risk factor for cancer progression. However, Gleason grade is not reliably ascertained by diagnostic biopsy, largely due to sampling inadequacies, subjectivity in the Gleason grading procedure, and a lack of more objective biomarker assays to stratify prostate cancer aggressiveness. In most aggressive cancer types, the tumor microenvironment exhibits a reciprocal pro-tumorigenic metabolic phenotype consistent with the reverse Warburg effect (RWE). The RWE can be viewed as a physiologic response to the epithelial phenotype that is independent of both the epithelial genotype and of direct tumor sampling. We hypothesize that differential expression of RWE-associated genes can be used to classify Gleason pattern, distinguishing GP3 from GP4 PCa foci. METHODS: Gene expression profiling was conducted on RNA extracted from laser-capture microdissected stromal tissue surrounding 20 GP3 and 21 GP4 cancer foci from PCa patients with GS 3+3 and GS ≥4+3, respectively. Genes were probed using a 102-gene NanoString probe set targeted towards biological processes associated with the RWE. Differentially expressed genes were identified from normalized data by univariate analysis. A top-scoring pair (TSP) analysis was completed on raw gene expression values. Genes were analyzed for enriched Gene Ontology (GO) biological processes and protein-protein interactions using STRING and GeneMANIA. RESULTS: Univariate analysis identified nine genes (FOXO1 (AUC: 0.884), GPD2, SPARC, HK2, COL1A2, ALDOA, MCT4, NRF2, and ATG5) that were differentially expressed between GP3 and GP4 stroma (p<0.05). However, following correction for false discovery, only FOXO1 retained statistical significance at q<0.05. The TSP analysis identified a significant gene pair, namely ATG5/GLUT1. Greater expression of ATG5 relative to GLUT1 correctly classified 77.4 % of GP3/GP4 samples. Enrichment for GO-biological processes revealed that catabolic glucose processes and oxidative stress response pathways were strongly associated with GP3 foci but not GP4. FOXO1 was identified as being a primary nodal protein. CONCLUSIONS: We report that RWE-associated genes can be used to distinguish between GP3 and GP4 prostate cancers. Moreover, we find that the RWE response is downregulated in the stroma surrounding GP4, possibly via modulation of FOXO1.

HER2 as a target in invasive urothelial carcinoma.

We evaluated primary tumors from two cohorts, Spain (N = 111) and Greece (N = 102), for patients who were treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients were tested for HER2 status (IHC score of 3+ or FISH ratio of ≥ 2.2) by immunohistochemistry (IHC), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), DNA copy number, mRNA expression, and mutation status in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC), and its impact on survival. ERBB2 mutation was determined by hotspot sequencing. mRNA expression was assessed using NanoString counting. Association of overall survival (OS) and HER2 status was assessed by a Cox regression model. NIH-3T3 cells containing HER2 V777L were assessed for growth, invasion, and HER2 kinase activation. In all, 22% of Spanish and 4% of Greek cohorts had 3+ HER2 staining by IHC. FISH amplification was identified in 20% of Spanish and 4% of Greek cohorts. Kappa coefficient between FISH and IHC was 0.47. HER2 status was not associated with OS in univariate (Spanish P = 0.34; Greek P = 0.11) or multivariate (Spanish P = 0.49; Greek P = 0.12) analysis. HER2-positive tumors expressed higher levels of HER2 mRNA than HER2-negative tumors (P < 0.001). HER2 mutations (V777L and L755S) were identified in two (2%) patients. In vitro analysis of V777L results in transformation of NIH-3T3 cells, leading to increased growth, invasion on soft agar, and HER2 kinase constitutive activation. In summary, HER2 overexpression or amplification in the primary tumor did not predict OS in patients with metastatic UC. HER2 positivity rates can differ between different populations. Further trials in genomically screened patients are needed to assess HER2-targeted therapies in UC.

Prevalence of germline mutations in cancer predisposition genes in patients with pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: We investigated the prevalence of germline mutations in APC, ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CDKN2A, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PALB2, PMS2, PRSS1, STK11, and TP53 in patients with pancreatic cancer. METHODS: The Ontario Pancreas Cancer Study enrolls consenting participants with pancreatic cancer from a province-wide electronic pathology database; 708 probands were enrolled from April 2003 through August 2012. To improve the precision of BRCA2 prevalence estimates, 290 probands were selected from 3 strata, based on family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer, pancreatic cancer, or neither. Germline DNA was analyzed by next-generation sequencing using a custom multiple-gene panel. Mutation prevalence estimates were calculated from the sample for the entire cohort. RESULTS: Eleven pathogenic mutations were identified: 3 in ATM, 1 in BRCA1, 2 in BRCA2, 1 in MLH1, 2 in MSH2, 1 in MSH6, and 1 in TP53. The prevalence of mutations in all 13 genes was 3.8% (95% confidence interval, 2.1%-5.6%). Carrier status was associated significantly with breast cancer in the proband or first-degree relative (P < .01), and with colorectal cancer in the proband or first-degree relative (P < .01), but not family history of pancreatic cancer, age at diagnosis, or stage at diagnosis. Of patients with a personal or family history of breast and colorectal cancer, 10.7% (95% confidence interval, 4.4%-17.0%) and 11.1% (95% confidence interval, 3.0%-19.1%) carried pathogenic mutations, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A small but clinically important proportion of pancreatic cancer is associated with mutations in known predisposition genes. The heterogeneity of mutations identified in this study shows the value of using a multiple-gene panel in pancreatic cancer.

Identification of ALK gene alterations in urothelial carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) genomic alterations have emerged as a potent predictor of benefit from treatment with ALK inhibitors in several cancers. Currently, there is no information about ALK gene alterations in urothelial carcinoma (UC) and its correlation with clinical or pathologic features and outcome. METHODS: Samples from patients with advanced UC and correlative clinical data were collected. Genomic imbalances were investigated by array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). ALK gene status was evaluated by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). ALK expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and high-throughput mutation analysis with Oncomap 3 platform. Next generation sequencing was performed using Illumina Genome Analyzer IIx, and Illumina HiSeq 2000 in the FISH positive case. RESULTS: 70 of 96 patients had tissue available for all the tests performed. Arm level copy number gains at chromosome 2 were identified in 17 (24%) patients. Minor copy number alterations (CNAs) in the proximity of ALK locus were found in 3 patients by aCGH. By FISH analysis, one of these samples had a deletion of the 5'ALK. Whole genome next generation sequencing was inconclusive to confirm the deletion at the level of the ALK gene at the coverage level used. We did not observe an association between ALK CNA and overall survival, ECOG PS, or development of visceral disease. CONCLUSIONS: ALK genomic alterations are rare and probably without prognostic implications in UC. The potential for testing ALK inhibitors in UC merits further investigation but might be restricted to the identification of an enriched population.