Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Biomedicines ; 11(8)2023 Aug 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37626794

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Iatrogenic hypoparathyroidism following thyroidectomy is one of the most common complications significantly reducing patients' quality of life. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to analyze the risk factors for calcium-phosphate disorders following thyroidectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study group consisted of 211 patients who underwent thyroidectomy for different conditions in 2018-2020. Demographic, clinical and surgical risk factors were analyzed against hypoparathyroidism and hypocalcemia. RESULTS: Hypoparathyroidism occurred in 15.63% of patients, and hypocalcemia occurred in 45% of those operated on. There was statistical significance between hypoparathyroidism and the extent of thyroid surgery: thyroidectomy vs. lobectomy (p = 0.02, OR = 4.5) and surgeon experience (p = 0.016, OR = 6.9). Low preoperative PTH levels were associated with a higher incidence of hypoparathyroidism (p = 0.055, OR = 0.9). There was a statistically significant correlation between the occurrence of hypocalcemia and preoperative vitamin D deficiency (p = 0.04, OR = 3.5). Low calcium levels before surgery were associated with a higher incidence of hypocalcemia (p = 0.051, OR = 0.5). Meta-analyses of selected risk factors confirmed that the most significant factor in the incidence of hypocalcemia was a decrease in PTH levels (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The extent of thyroid surgery and the experience of the surgeon are the most significant risk factors for hypoparathyroidism. Hypocalcemia is much more common than hypoparathyroidism. Among the risk factors for hypocalcemia, in addition to the decrease in parathormone levels due to iatrogenic parathyroid damage, we should mention vitamin D deficiency in the preoperative period.

2.
J Clin Med ; 11(15)2022 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35956107

ABSTRACT

Deviations in laboratory tests assessing liver function in patients with COVID-19 are frequently observed. Their importance and pathogenesis are still debated. In our retrospective study, we analyzed liver-related parameters: aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT), total bilirubin (TBIL), albumin, comorbidities and other selected potential risk factors in patients admitted with SARS-CoV-2 infection to assess their prognostic value for intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation necessity and mortality. We compared the prognostic effectiveness of these parameters separately and in pairs to the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as an independent risk factor of in-hospital mortality, using the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). Data were collected from 2109 included patients. We created models using a sample with complete laboratory tests n = 401 and then applied them to the whole studied group excluding patients with missing singular variables. We estimated that albumin may be a better predictor of the COVID-19-severity course compared to NLR, irrespective of comorbidities (p < 0.001). Additionally, we determined that hypoalbuminemia in combination with AST (OR 1.003, p = 0.008) or TBIL (OR 1.657, p = 0.001) creates excellent prediction models for in-hospital mortality. In conclusion, the early evaluation of albumin levels and liver-related parameters may be indispensable tools for the early assessment of the clinical course of patients with COVID-19.

3.
J Clin Med ; 11(7)2022 Mar 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35407430

ABSTRACT

Gastrointestinal manifestations may accompany the respiratory symptoms of COVID-19. Abdominal pain (AP) without nausea and vomiting is one of the most common. To date, its role and prognostic value in patients with COVID-19 is still debated. Therefore, we performed a retrospective analysis of 2184 individuals admitted to hospital due to COVID-19. We divided the patients into four groups according to presented symptoms: dyspnea, n = 871 (39.9%); AP, n = 97 (4.4%); AP with dyspnea together, n = 50 (2.3%); and patients without dyspnea and AP, n = 1166 (53.4%). The patients with AP showed tendency to be younger than these with dyspnea, but without AP (63.0 [38.0−70.0] vs. 65.0 [52.0−74.0] years, p = 0.061), and they were more often females as compared to patients with dyspnea (57.7% vs. 44.6%, p = 0.013, for females). Patients with AP as a separate sign of COVID-19 significantly less often developed pneumonia as compared to individuals with dyspnea or with dyspnea and AP together (p < 0.0001). Patients with AP or AP with dyspnea were significantly less frequently intubated or transferred to the intensive care unit (p = 0.003 and p = 0.031, respectively). Individuals with AP alone or with dyspnea had significantly lower rate of mortality as compared to patients with dyspnea (p = 0.003). AP as a separate symptom and also as a coexisting sign with dyspnea does not predispose the patients with COVID-19 to the worse clinical course and higher mortality.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...