Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 86
Filter
2.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant ; 25(3): 594-598, 2019 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30448456

ABSTRACT

In recent years, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) colonization is being increasingly encountered in transplant recipients, and VRE has become one of the leading causes of bacteremia early after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Data are sparse on the effect of empiric VRE therapy for febrile, neutropenic allo-HSCT recipients colonized with VRE. All allo-HSCT recipients aged ≥18years who developed VRE bacteremia (VREB) between 2005 and 2014 were identified and categorized as to whether they received empiric or directed VRE therapy. There were 434 (33%) VRE-colonized and 872 (67%) non-VRE-colonized patients during the study period, and 172 of the 434 (40%) VRE-colonized patients received empiric therapy. There was no significant difference in incidence of VREB among colonized patients who did or did not receive empiric therapy (28 of 172 [16%] vs 55 of 262 [21%]; P = .22). There were 95 patients with VREB, of which the majority (83 of 95; 87%) was known to be VRE-colonized. Of the 95 VREB episodes, 29 (31%) were treated with empiric VRE therapy, whereas 66 (69%) were treated with directed therapy. No significant differences in clinical outcomes, including median duration of bacteremia (2 days vs 2 days; P = .39), recurrent VREB (3 of 29 [10%] vs 5 of 66 [8%]; P = .65), 30-day all-cause mortality (1 of 29 [3%] vs 4 of 66 [6%]; P = .62), or VRE-attributable mortality (1 of 29 [3%] vs 1 of 66 [2%]; P = .55), were observed between the empiric therapy and directed therapy groups. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis showed no significant difference in survival at 30days in allo-HSCT recipients with VREB who received empiric therapy and those who received directed therapy (97% vs 94%; P = .62). Based on our data, we recommend against empiric use of VRE-active agents for fever and neutropenia in VRE-colonized patients undergoing allo-HSCT.


Subject(s)
Bacteremia/drug therapy , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci/drug effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacteremia/mortality , Fever/drug therapy , Fever/etiology , Humans , Neutropenia/drug therapy , Neutropenia/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Survival Analysis , Transplantation, Homologous/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Vancomycin Resistance
3.
AIDS Patient Care STDS ; 32(5): 181-190, 2018 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29750551

ABSTRACT

We examined care engagement and viral suppression (VS) over a 1- to 5-year period among persons re-engaged in HIV care using retrospective cohort study and longitudinal follow-up. The population comprised five cohorts of persons re-engaged in care from 2009 to 2013. We used surveillance data [CD4 T cell count or HIV viral load (VL) RNA] to measure four outcomes 1-5 years post-care engagement. Engagement-in-care indicated persons with laboratory reports in each follow-up year. Continuous engagement or sustained engagement, respectively, included persons with ≥1 or ≥2 (separated by 90 days) CD4 or VL reports in each follow-up year. VS indicated persons living with HIV (PLWH) re-engaged in care with VL ≤200 copies/mL in any follow-up year, and we measured re-engaged PLWH who subsequently became out of care (OOC) in each follow-up year. Overall, 84-86% PLWH were engaged in care in any follow-up year. The proportions of PLWH cohorts continuously engaged in care [86% (1 year), 77% (2 years), 72% (3 years), 67% (4 years), and 63% (5 years)] declined over time. Thirty-four percent of the PLWH who were re-engaged in care were subsequently OOC in the follow-up years. Most re-engaged PLWH became OOC in their first (40%) and second (30%) follow-up years. In follow-up years (1-5 years), fewer PLWH continuously engaged in care with ≥1 CD4 or VL reports in the registry had VS ≤200 copies/mL: 65%, 58%, 49%, 44%, and 42%, respectively. Encouragingly, higher proportions had VL ≤1500 copies/mL in follow-up years (1-5): (75%, 72%, 73%, 75%, and 70%), likely reflecting levels of HIV treatment. Our results support the use of surveillance data to identify and re-engage OOC PLWH in care. However, structures and programs are needed to support retention in care and reduce repeat OOC.


Subject(s)
Continuity of Patient Care/organization & administration , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV Infections/virology , Patient Compliance , Patient Navigation/organization & administration , Adult , Anti-HIV Agents , Female , Follow-Up Studies , HIV Infections/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Dropouts , Patient-Centered Care , Public Health , Retrospective Studies
4.
J Oncol Pract ; 13(1): 33-34, 2017 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28084877
5.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr ; 71(3): e73-8, 2016 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26536317

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The evidence has begun to mount for diminishing the frequency of CD4 count testing. To determine whether these observations were applicable to an urban US population, we used New York City (NYC) surveillance data to explore CD4 testing among stable patients in NYC, 2007-2013. METHODS: We constructed a population-based retrospective open cohort analysis of NYC HIV surveillance data. HIV+ patients aged ≥ 13 years with stable viral suppression (≥ 1 viral load the previous year; all <400 copies per milliliter) and immune status (≥ 1 CD4 the previous year; all ≥ 200 cells per cubic millimeter) entered the cohort the following year beginning January 1, 2007. Each subsequent year, eligible patients not previously included entered the cohort on January 1. Outcomes were annual frequency of CD4 monitoring and probability of maintaining CD4 ≥ 200 cells per cubic millimeter. A multivariable Cox model identified factors associated with maintaining CD4 ≥ 200 cells per cubic millimeter. RESULTS: During 1.9 years of observation (median), 62,039 patients entered the cohort. The mean annual number of CD4 measurements among stable patients was 2.8 and varied little by year or characteristic. Two years after entering, 93.4% and 97.8% of those with initial CD4 350-499 and CD4 ≥ 500 cells per cubic millimeter, respectively, maintained CD4 ≥ 200 cells per cubic millimeter. Compared to those with initial CD4 ≥ 500 cells per cubic millimeter, those with CD4 200-349 cells per cubic millimeter and CD4 350-499 cells per cubic millimeter were more likely to have a CD4 <200 cells per cubic millimeter, controlling for sex, race, age, HIV risk group, and diagnosis year. CONCLUSIONS: In a population-based US cohort with well-controlled HIV, the probability of maintaining CD4 ≥ 200 cells per cubic millimeter for ≥ 2 years was >90% among those with initial CD4 ≥ 350 cells per cubic millimeter, suggesting that limited CD4 monitoring in these patients is appropriate.


Subject(s)
CD4 Lymphocyte Count , HIV Infections/epidemiology , HIV Infections/immunology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , CD4 Lymphocyte Count/methods , CD4 Lymphocyte Count/standards , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , New York City/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Young Adult
6.
Med Care ; 53(7): 646-52, 2015 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26035043

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Identifying unwarranted variation in health care can highlight opportunities to reduce harm. One often discretionary process in oncology is use of implanted ports to administer intravenous chemotherapy. While there are benefits, ports carry risks. This study's objective was to assess provider-driven variation in port use among cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. RESEARCH DESIGN: Retrospective assessment using population-based SEER-Medicare data to assess differences in port use across health care providers of older adults with cancer. Participants included over 18,000 patients ages 66 and older diagnosed with breast, colorectal, lung, or pancreatic cancer in 2005-2007, treated by approximately 2900 providers. We identified port use for patients receiving treatment from hospital outpatient facilities versus physicians' offices. Our main analysis assessed the likelihood of a patient receiving a port given port use by the provider's last patient. For a subset of high-use providers, we examined individual provider-level variation by estimating the risk-adjusted likelihood of insertion. RESULTS: Patients receiving chemotherapy in hospital outpatient facilities were significantly less likely to receive a port than those treated in physicians' offices, with adjusted odds ratios (AOR) varying from 0.50 to 0.75 across cancer sites. Implanting a port was associated with increased likelihood of port insertion in the provider's next patient (AOR varied from 1.71 to 2.25). Significant between-provider variation was found among providers with at least 10 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the idea that there is provider-driven variation in the use of ports for chemotherapy administration. This variation highlights an opportunity to standardize practice and reduce unnecessary use.


Subject(s)
Catheters, Indwelling , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Ambulatory Care Facilities/statistics & numerical data , Female , Health Services Research , Humans , Male , Medicare , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Physicians' Offices/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , SEER Program , United States/epidemiology
7.
J Clin Oncol ; 32(22): 2351-6, 2014 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24982458

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Long-term central venous catheters (CVCs) are often used in patients with cancer to facilitate venous access to administer intravenous fluids and chemotherapy. CVCs can also be a source of bloodstream infections, although this risk is not well understood. We examined the impact of long-term CVC use on infection risk, independent of other risk factors such as chemotherapy, in a population-based cohort of patients with cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis using SEER-Medicare data for patients age > 65 years diagnosed from 2005 to 2007 with invasive colorectal, head and neck, lung, or pancreatic cancer, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, or invasive or noninvasive breast cancer. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to examine the relationship between CVC use and infections, with CVC exposure as a time-dependent predictor. We used multivariable analysis and propensity score methods to control for patient characteristics. RESULTS: CVC exposure was associated with a significantly elevated infection risk, adjusting for demographic and disease characteristics. For patients with pancreatic cancer, risk of infections during the exposure period was three-fold greater (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 2.93; 95% CI, 2.58 to 3.33); for those with breast cancer, it was six-fold greater (AHR, 6.19; 95% CI, 5.42 to 7.07). Findings were similar when we accounted for propensity to receive a CVC and limited the cohort to individuals at high risk of infections. CONCLUSION: Long-term CVC use was associated with an increased risk of infections for older adults with cancer. Careful assessment of the need for long-term CVCs and targeted strategies for reducing infections are critical to improving cancer care quality.


Subject(s)
Catheter-Related Infections/epidemiology , Central Venous Catheters/microbiology , Neoplasms/microbiology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , SEER Program , United States/epidemiology
8.
J Infect ; 68(3): 225-30, 2014 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24321561

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Ommaya reservoirs (OmR) are used in the treatment of cancer yet risk factors and outcome of infection are not well characterized. We therefore examined our experience with this device. METHODS: Using administrative databases, we identified all patients with OmR in situ between 1993 and 2008 at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Charts were reviewed for laboratory, demographic, and clinical information. RESULTS: During the study period, 616 patients with OmRs received care at MSKCC comprising 462,467 Ommaya-days. 34 patients with OmR infection were identified (5.5% of patients, 0.74 infections per 10,000 Ommaya-days). 32% of infections occurred within 30 days of OmR placement. Most (74%) OmR infections occurring after 30 days post-placement were associated with OmR access in the preceding 30 days. Recovered organisms included coagulase-negative staphylococci (56%) and Propionibacterium acnes (24%). 70% of patients had fever and/or headache and 69% had cerebrospinal fluid pleocytosis. 50% of patients had the reservoir removed during treatment of the infection. CONCLUSIONS: OmR infection occurs in one of every 20 persons with the device. A third of the infections appear related to OmR placement while the remainder may occur at any time and usually are associated with recent reservoir access. Treatment often includes device removal.


Subject(s)
Bacteremia/epidemiology , Catheter-Related Infections/epidemiology , Catheters, Indwelling/adverse effects , Meningitis/epidemiology , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacteremia/microbiology , Catheter-Related Infections/microbiology , Female , Humans , Male , Meningitis/microbiology , Middle Aged , Neutropenia , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome
9.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 34(12): 1318-20, 2013 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24225619

ABSTRACT

Using Clostridium difficile as an example, we calculated the impact that reduced inpatient-day denominators resulting from implementation of hospital observation units would have on hospital-acquired infection rates. Using proposed scenarios of reduced inpatient-days, we estimated an increase in the hospital-acquired C. difficile infection rate of up to 12%.


Subject(s)
Clostridioides difficile , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous/epidemiology , Hospital Units/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Cross Infection/diagnosis , Cross Infection/microbiology , Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous/diagnosis , Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous/microbiology , Humans , Observation , Statistics as Topic
12.
J Adolesc Health ; 53(2): 222-7, 2013 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23628136

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To determine if sexually active heterosexual HIV-infected 15- to 24-year-old youth have different sexual or other risk behaviors depending on whether they were infected perinatally or heterosexually. METHODS: We compared youth aged 15 to 24 years who acquired HIV perinatally or sexually and were interviewed in-person or by phone for partner services by the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. We included heterosexually active youth with at least one sexual partner of the opposite sex in the past 12 months, and excluded men who have sex with men and injection drug users. We used χ(2) tests and t tests to compare demographics, sexual risk behaviors, partner services outcomes, and viral loads. RESULTS: Both groups reported few partners (median 1, mean 2), and only 12% of partners of perinatally infected youth were previously diagnosed (18% of sexually infected youths' partners). A minority reported always using condoms. Both groups had similar rates of sexually transmitted infections and median HIV plasma RNA (perinatally infected: 5,140 copies/mL; sexually infected: 6,835 copies/mL). Despite these similarities, among tested partners not previously HIV diagnosed, none of 17 named by perinatally infected youth was newly HIV diagnosed, whereas 21% (8/39, p = .09) of those named by sexually infected youth were newly diagnosed. CONCLUSIONS: Though perinatally infected youth did not transmit HIV infection to previously undiagnosed partners, they had similar HIV-related risk behaviors to youth infected sexually who reported on risks that led to their infection. HIV prevention among HIV-infected youth remains a critical challenge.


Subject(s)
Adolescent Behavior/psychology , HIV Infections/transmission , Heterosexuality , Sexual Behavior/psychology , Adolescent , Female , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Male , Pregnancy , Risk-Taking , Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Viral/transmission , Viral Load , Young Adult
13.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 34(5): 479-86, 2013 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23571364

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE. Healthcare-acquired infections (HAIs) cause substantial patient morbidity and mortality. Items in the environment harbor microorganisms that may contribute to HAIs. Reduction in surface bioburden may be an effective strategy to reduce HAIs. The inherent biocidal properties of copper surfaces offer a theoretical advantage to conventional cleaning, as the effect is continuous rather than episodic. We sought to determine whether placement of copper alloy-surfaced objects in an intensive care unit (ICU) reduced the risk of HAI. DESIGN. Intention-to-treat randomized control trial between July 12, 2010, and June 14, 2011. SETTINg. The ICUs of 3 hospitals. PATIENTS. Patients presenting for admission to the ICU. METHODS. Patients were randomly placed in available rooms with or without copper alloy surfaces, and the rates of incident HAI and/or colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) or vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) in each type of room were compared. RESULTS. The rate of HAI and/or MRSA or VRE colonization in ICU rooms with copper alloy surfaces was significantly lower than that in standard ICU rooms (0.071 vs 0.123; P = .020). For HAI only, the rate was reduced from 0.081 to 0.034 (P = .013). CONCLUSIONs. Patients cared for in ICU rooms with copper alloy surfaces had a significantly lower rate of incident HAI and/or colonization with MRSA or VRE than did patients treated in standard rooms. Additional studies are needed to determine the clinical effect of copper alloy surfaces in additional patient populations and settings.


Subject(s)
Copper , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Disinfectants , Fomites/microbiology , Intensive Care Units , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Colony Count, Microbial , Copper/pharmacology , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Disinfectants/pharmacology , Disinfection/methods , Enterococcus , Environmental Microbiology , Female , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/prevention & control , Humans , Incidence , Intention to Treat Analysis , Male , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus , Middle Aged , Patients' Rooms , Staphylococcal Infections/prevention & control , Vancomycin Resistance
14.
AIDS Behav ; 17(6): 2180-4, 2013 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23479003

ABSTRACT

Understanding prior knowledge and experience with pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among men who have sex with men (MSM) is critical to its implementation. In fall 2011, NYC MSM were recruited via banner advertisements on six popular dating websites and asked questions about their knowledge and use of PrEP (n = 329). Overall, 123 (38%) respondents reported knowledge of PrEP, of whom two (1.5%) reported PrEP use in the past 6 months. Knowledge of PrEP was associated with high educational attainment, gay identity and recent HIV testing, suggesting an uneven dissemination of information about PrEP and missed opportunities for education. To avoid disparities in use during scale-up, MSM should be provided with additional information about PrEP.


Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Homosexuality, Male/psychology , AIDS Serodiagnosis/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Data Collection , Educational Status , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical data , Homosexuality, Male/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , New York City/epidemiology , Young Adult
15.
N Engl J Med ; 368(6): 533-42, 2013 Feb 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23388005

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Results of previous single-center, observational studies suggest that daily bathing of patients with chlorhexidine may prevent hospital-acquired bloodstream infections and the acquisition of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs). METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, cluster-randomized, nonblinded crossover trial to evaluate the effect of daily bathing with chlorhexidine-impregnated washcloths on the acquisition of MDROs and the incidence of hospital-acquired bloodstream infections. Nine intensive care and bone marrow transplantation units in six hospitals were randomly assigned to bathe patients either with no-rinse 2% chlorhexidine-impregnated washcloths or with nonantimicrobial washcloths for a 6-month period, exchanged for the alternate product during the subsequent 6 months. The incidence rates of acquisition of MDROs and the rates of hospital-acquired bloodstream infections were compared between the two periods by means of Poisson regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 7727 patients were enrolled during the study. The overall rate of MDRO acquisition was 5.10 cases per 1000 patient-days with chlorhexidine bathing versus 6.60 cases per 1000 patient-days with nonantimicrobial washcloths (P=0.03), the equivalent of a 23% lower rate with chlorhexidine bathing. The overall rate of hospital-acquired bloodstream infections was 4.78 cases per 1000 patient-days with chlorhexidine bathing versus 6.60 cases per 1000 patient-days with nonantimicrobial washcloths (P=0.007), a 28% lower rate with chlorhexidine-impregnated washcloths. No serious skin reactions were noted during either study period. CONCLUSIONS: Daily bathing with chlorhexidine-impregnated washcloths significantly reduced the risks of acquisition of MDROs and development of hospital-acquired bloodstream infections. (Funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Sage Products; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00502476.).


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents, Local/therapeutic use , Bacteremia/prevention & control , Baths , Chlorhexidine/therapeutic use , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Bacteremia/epidemiology , Bacteremia/microbiology , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross-Over Studies , Enterococcus/drug effects , Enterococcus/isolation & purification , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/prevention & control , Humans , Incidence , Intensive Care Units , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Proportional Hazards Models , Staphylococcal Infections/prevention & control , Vancomycin Resistance
16.
Clin Infect Dis ; 56(11): 1604-12, 2013 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23408681

ABSTRACT

Recent FDA approval of tenofovir-emtricitabine for prevention of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) as a form of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has led to concern about implementation of this strategy. Fifty years ago, a very similar national and international debate occurred when the oral contraceptive pill ("the Pill" or "OCP") was approved. Contentious issues included OCP safety, cost, and the potential impact on sexual behavior--many of the same concerns being voiced currently about PrEP. In this article, we review the social and medical history of OCP, drawing parallels with the current PrEP debate. We also explore the key areas where PrEP differs from its forbear: lower efficacy, presence of drug resistance, and a more circumscribed (and marginalized) target population. A thoughtful approach to PrEP implementation, bearing in mind the historical insights gained from the 1960s, might serve as well as we begin this new chapter in the control of the HIV epidemic.


Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents/history , Contraceptives, Oral/history , HIV Infections/history , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Clinical Trials as Topic , HIV Infections/drug therapy , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration
18.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 188(4): 422-31, 2013 Aug 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23262514

ABSTRACT

Immunocompromised persons with latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) are at increased risk for tuberculosis reactivation compared with the general population. The tuberculin skin test, the traditional assay for diagnosing LTBI, has reduced accuracy in immunocompromised patients. IFN-γ release assays (IGRAs) are in vitro blood tests that measure T-cell release of IFN-γ after stimulation with antigens unique to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Here we review the data for the use of QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube and T-SPOT.TB, the two currently available IGRAs, in immunocompromised adults, including persons infected with HIV, patients with immune-mediated inflammatory disorders, candidates for treatment with tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors, patients receiving hemodialysis, solid-organ transplant recipients, and patients with cancer. On the basis of the available data, IGRAs have advantages over the tuberculin skin test in specific patient populations and in certain situations. Further studies are needed to more accurately define the usefulness of IGRAs in immunocompromised patients.


Subject(s)
Immunocompromised Host , Interferon-gamma/blood , Latent Tuberculosis/diagnosis , Comorbidity , Guidelines as Topic , HIV Infections/epidemiology , Humans , Kidney Failure, Chronic/epidemiology , Latent Tuberculosis/epidemiology , Lymphocyte Activation , Organ Transplantation , Risk Factors , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/antagonists & inhibitors
19.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 33(11): 1162-5, 2012 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23041818

ABSTRACT

A multicenter survey of 11 cancer centers was performed to determine the rate of hospital-onset Clostridium difficile infection (HO-CDI) and surveillance practices. Pooled rates of HO-CDI in patients with cancer were twice the rates reported for all US patients (15.8 vs 7.4 per 10,000 patient-days). Rates were elevated regardless of diagnostic test used.


Subject(s)
Clostridioides difficile/isolation & purification , Clostridium Infections/epidemiology , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Neoplasms , Cancer Care Facilities , Cross Infection/etiology , Cross Infection/microbiology , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Neoplasms/drug therapy , United States/epidemiology
20.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 33(9): 869-74, 2012 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22869259

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The success of central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) prevention programs in intensive care units (ICUs) has led to the expansion of surveillance at many hospitals. We sought to compare non-ICU CLABSI (nCLABSI) rates with national reports and describe methods of surveillance at several participating US institutions. DESIGN AND SETTING: An electronic survey of several medical centers about infection surveillance practices and rate data for non-ICU patients. PARTICIPANTS: Ten tertiary care hospitals. METHODS: In March 2011, a survey was sent to 10 medical centers. The survey consisted of 12 questions regarding demographics and CLABSI surveillance methodology for non-ICU patients at each center. Participants were also asked to provide available rate and device utilization data. RESULTS: Hospitals ranged in size from 238 to 1,400 total beds (median, 815). All hospitals reported using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) definitions. Denominators were collected by different means: counting patients with central lines every day (5 hospitals), indirectly estimating on the basis of electronic orders ([Formula: see text]), or another automated method ([Formula: see text]). Rates of nCLABSI ranged from 0.2 to 4.2 infections per 1,000 catheter-days (median, 2.5). The national rate reported by the CDC using 2009 data from the National Healthcare Surveillance Network was 1.14 infections per 1,000 catheter-days. CONCLUSIONS: Only 2 hospitals were below the pooled CLABSI rate for inpatient wards; all others exceeded this rate. Possible explanations include differences in average central line utilization or hospital size in the impact of certain clinical risk factors notably absent from the definition and in interpretation and reporting practices. Further investigation is necessary to determine whether the national benchmarks are low or whether the hospitals surveyed here represent a selection of outliers.


Subject(s)
Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Catheterization, Central Venous/adverse effects , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Hospitals, University/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Urban/statistics & numerical data , Infection Control/methods , Tertiary Care Centers/statistics & numerical data , Catheter-Related Infections/epidemiology , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Infection Control/statistics & numerical data , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL