Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Emerg Med ; 83: 163.e1-163.e3, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38514357

ABSTRACT

Endometriosis is a debilitating chronic condition often accompanied by severe pelvic pain and infertility issues. When outpatient medical management is not adequate, controlling pain can be challenging for providers in the acute setting. We report the case of a 23-year-old female with a past medical history of endometriosis who presented to a freestanding emergency department with a chief complaint of 10/10 pelvic pain on a numeric rating scale. She had tried non-steroidal inflammatory medications and heat with no success. The patient had medication intolerances to opioid analgesics and was given ketorolac intramuscularly with no relief of her pain. The emergency physician discussed and offered to perform an erector spinae plane nerve block (ESPB) for pain relief. Ultrasonography was utilized for visualization of landmarks with a curvilinear transducer; a 20-gauge Pajunk® Sonoplex needle was used to inject a total of 100 mg bupivacaine 0.25% without epinephrine along with dexamethasone 10 mg under the bilateral erector spinae fascial planes at the T9 level. Post-procedure, the patient had significant improvement in pain and rated it a 2/10. Utilizing nerve blocks for endometriosis and other chronic pelvic pain in the acute care setting can serve as an effective alternative to opioids. In patients with multiple medication intolerances and for providers navigating pain control in the setting of a nationwide opioid crisis, ESPB blocks can help alleviate acute pain or exacerbations of chronic pain. This case demonstrates the first known use of an ESPB to relieve endometriosis pain in the emergency department.


Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Local , Emergency Service, Hospital , Endometriosis , Nerve Block , Pelvic Pain , Ultrasonography, Interventional , Humans , Female , Endometriosis/complications , Nerve Block/methods , Ultrasonography, Interventional/methods , Young Adult , Pelvic Pain/etiology , Pelvic Pain/therapy , Pelvic Pain/drug therapy , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Local/therapeutic use , Bupivacaine/administration & dosage , Bupivacaine/therapeutic use , Pain Management/methods , Paraspinal Muscles/innervation , Paraspinal Muscles/diagnostic imaging , Pain Measurement
2.
Am J Emerg Med ; 74: 100-103, 2023 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37801999

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Computed tomography (CT) is routinely used in the emergency department (ED) due to its ease of access and its ability to rapidly rule in or out many serious conditions. Freestanding emergency departments (FSEDs) have become increasingly used as an alternative to hospital-based emergency departments (HBEDs). The objective of this study was to investigate if the utilization rate of CT differs between FSEDs and HBEDs for chest pain. METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of patients presenting to 17 EDs within a large integrated healthcare system between May 1, 2019 - April 30, 2021 with a chief complaint chest pain. Categorical variables are presented as frequencies and percentages. Continuous variables are presented as mean and standard deviation. Multiple logistic regression was used to assess the effect of facility on CT utilization for chest pain. RESULTS: There were 67,084 patient encounters included in the study. Patients were predominately female (55%), white (61%), and insured through Medicare/Medicaid (59%). After controlling for predictive variables which included Charlson Comorbidity Index, ESI, age, sex, and race, patients who presented to FSEDs with chest pain were less likely to have a CT than those who presented to a HBED (AOR = 0.85, CI (0.81-0.90). CONCLUSION: CT scans of the chest are utilized less frequently at FSEDs compared to HBEDs for patient presenting with chest pain.


Subject(s)
Medicare , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Humans , United States , Female , Aged , Retrospective Studies , Chest Pain/diagnostic imaging , Chest Pain/etiology , Thorax , Emergency Service, Hospital
4.
Am J Emerg Med ; 50: 815.e1-815.e2, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34229940

ABSTRACT

Myocarditis following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination has recently been reported to health authorities in the United States and other countries. Cases predominately occur in young adult males within four days following the second dose of either the Moderna (mRNA-1273) or Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2) vaccines. Although the number of cases reported have been small in comparison with the large number of people vaccinated, myocarditis may be a rare adverse reaction to the COVID-19 vaccination that is now only becoming apparent due to the widespread use of the vaccine. In this article, we present a case of a 20-year-old male with no prior medical history who presented to the emergency department (ED) with chest pain. He had received the BNT162b2 vaccine two days prior to his presentation to the ED. The patient had an elevated troponin at 89 ng/L which increased on repeat examination. His electrocardiogram showed diffuse concave ST segment elevations and a later MRI confirmed the diagnosis of myocarditis. Based on these findings, the patient was diagnosed with myocarditis. The patient had a previous infection with SARS-CoV-2 approximately two months prior to the onset of his symptoms, but since he had fully recovered before the time of his presentation to the ED, it is unlikely that the infection caused the myocarditis. To our knowledge, this is the first published case of myocarditis following BNT162b3 vaccination.


Subject(s)
BNT162 Vaccine/adverse effects , Myocarditis/chemically induced , Myocarditis/diagnosis , Electrocardiography , Humans , Male , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL