Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Environ Sci Technol ; 57(33): 12259-12269, 2023 08 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37556313

ABSTRACT

Despite extensive research and technology to reduce the atmospheric emission of Pb from burning coal for power generation, minimal attention has been paid to Pb associated with coal ash disposal in the environment. This study investigates the isotopic signatures and output rates of Pb in fly ash disposal in China, India, and the United States. Pairwise comparison between feed coal and fly ash samples collected from coal-fired power plants from each country shows that the Pb isotope composition of fly ash largely resembles that of feed coal, and its isotopic distinction allows for tracing the release of Pb from coal fly ash into the environment. Between 2000 and 2020, approx. 236, 56, and 46 Gg Pb from fly ash have been disposed in China, India, and the U.S., respectively, posing a significant environmental burden. A Bayesian Pb isotope mixing model shows that during the past 40 to 70 years, coal fly ash has contributed significantly higher Pb (∼26%) than leaded gasoline (∼7%) to Pb accumulation in the sediments of five freshwater lakes in North Carolina, U.S.A. This implies that the release of disposed coal fly ash Pb at local and regional scales can outweigh that of other anthropogenic Pb sources.


Subject(s)
Coal Ash , Coal , United States , Coal/analysis , Bayes Theorem , Lead , Isotopes/analysis , China , Power Plants
2.
Environ Sci Technol ; 56(20): 14723-14733, 2022 10 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36190271

ABSTRACT

Elevated concentrations of toxic elements in coal ash pose human and ecological health risks upon release to the environment. Despite wide public concerns about water quality and human health risks from catastrophic coal ash spills and chronic leaking of coal ash ponds, coal ash disposal has only been partially regulated, and its impacts on aquatic sediment quality and ecological health have been overlooked. Here, we present a multiproxy approach of morphologic, magnetic, geochemical, and Sr isotopic analyses, revealing unmonitored coal ash releases over the past 40 to 70 years preserved in the sediment records of five freshwater lakes adjacent to coal-fired power plants across North Carolina. We detected significant sediment contamination and potential chronic ecological risks posed by the occurrence of hundreds of thousands of tons of coal ash solids mainly resulting from high-magnitude stormwater runoff/flooding and direct effluent discharge from coal ash disposal sites. The proximity of hundreds of disposal sites to natural waterways across the U.S. implies that such contamination is likely prevalent nationwide and expected to worsen with climate change.


Subject(s)
Lakes , Water Pollutants, Chemical , Coal , Coal Ash , Ecosystem , Environmental Monitoring , Humans , Water Pollutants, Chemical/analysis
3.
Environ Pollut ; 174: 179-88, 2013 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23266939

ABSTRACT

An estimated 229,000 m(3) of coal fly ash remains in the river system after dredging to clean-up the 2008 Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) spill in Kingston, Tennessee. The ash is heterogeneous with clear, orange and black spheres and non-spherical amorphous particles. Combustion produces iron oxides that allow low field magnetic susceptibility (χ(LF)) and percent frequency dependent susceptibility (χ(FD)%) to be used to discriminate between coal fly ash and sediments native to the watershed. Riverbed samples with χ(LF) greater than 3.0 × 10(-6) m(3)/kg, have greater than 15% ash measured by optical point counting. χ(LF) is positively correlated with total ash, allowing ash detection in riverbed sediments and at depth in cores. The ratio of ash sphere composition is altered by river transport introducing variability in χ(LF). Measurement of χ(LF) is inexpensive, non-destructive, and a reliable analytical tool for monitoring the fate of coal ash in this fluvial environment.


Subject(s)
Coal Ash/chemistry , Environmental Monitoring/methods , Water Pollutants, Chemical/chemistry , Chemical Hazard Release , Coal Ash/analysis , Environmental Restoration and Remediation , Magnetics , Rivers , Tennessee , Water Pollutants, Chemical/analysis , Water Pollution, Chemical/statistics & numerical data
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...