Multicenter Study of Long-Term Safety of Tolvaptan in Later-Stage Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Tolvaptan slows kidney function decline in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) at risk of rapid progression. In the 3-year Tolvaptan Efficacy and Safety in Management of ADPKD and Its Outcomes (TEMPO) 3:4, 2-year extension to TEMPO 3:4 (TEMPO 4:4), and 1-year Replicating Evidence of Preserved Renal Function: An Investigation of Tolvaptan Safety and Efficacy in ADPKD (REPRISE) trials, aquaretic adverse events were common. Serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) elevations occurred in all three studies. Three patients met Hy Law criteria (ALT or AST more than three times and total bilirubin more than two times the upper limit of normal) for severe drug-induced liver injury (two in TEMPO 3:4 and one in TEMPO 4:4). In REPRISE, liver enzyme monitoring frequency was increased to monthly, with no Hy Law cases. A long-term, phase 3 safety study has further characterized tolvaptan safety. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Subjects who completed TEMPO 4:4, REPRISE, or other tolvaptan trials could enroll in this prospective, multinational, open-label safety study. Assessments included monthly liver enzyme testing during the first 18 months of tolvaptan exposure and every 3 months thereafter. RESULTS: Among 1803 subjects, median tolvaptan exposure during the extension was 651 days (interquartile range, 538-924), and cumulative exposure (extension and previous trials) was ≤11 years. Subjects entering from REPRISE placebo experienced more aquaretic adverse events compared with subjects from TEMPO 4:4 or REPRISE tolvaptan (i.e., patients with prior long-term tolvaptan exposure). Liver enzyme elevations also occurred more frequently in subjects from REPRISE placebo. Percentages experiencing ALT ≥3/≥5/ ≥10/≥20 times the upper limit of normal were 3.2%/2.1%/0.9%/0.7%, respectively, in subjects from REPRISE placebo and 0.6%-1.1%/0.0%-0.1%/0%/0%, respectively, in those from REPRISE tolvaptan and TEMPO 4:4. Percentages experiencing AST ≥3/ ≥5/≥10/≥20 times the upper limit of normal were 6.9%/3.8%/2.3%/0.8%, respectively, in subjects from REPRISE placebo and 0.9%-2.0%/0.0%-1.0%/0%/0%, respectively, in those from REPRISE tolvaptan and TEMPO 4:4. No Hy Law cases occurred. CONCLUSIONS: No new safety signals emerged during this long-term extension. Monthly liver function testing for the first 18 months of treatment appeared to enable effective detection and management of transaminase elevations. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER: Open Label Extension of TEMPO 3:4, NCT02251275.

A Randomized Trial of Modified-Release Versus Immediate-Release Tolvaptan in ADPKD.

INTRODUCTION: Tolvaptan, for treatment of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD), is provided as immediate-release (IR) tablets administered twice daily in split-dose regimens to suppress urine osmolality to <300 mOsm/kg. A modified-release (MR) formulation was developed for once-daily (QD) dosing to increase compliance and mitigate urinary symptom burden. This phase 2, dose-ranging study (NCT01210560) compared pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and tolerability of several MR regimens with IR in patients with ADPKD. METHODS: This was a multicenter, parallel-arm, randomized, crossover, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Each of 2 study arms had 12 subjects and 3 crossover periods. Dose regimens were administered for 7 days; placebo-masked QD versus split-dose treatments. Endpoints included pharmacokinetic parameters, percentage of subjects with urine osmolality <300 mOsm/kg, urine volume, number of daily urine voids, and tolerability. RESULTS: Tolvaptan MR 20 to 120 mg exhibited dose-proportional pharmacokinetics. Percentage of subjects with spot urine osmolality <300 mOsm/kg increased with dose, with tolvaptan MR 120 mg and IR 90+30 mg each suppressing 91.7% of subjects below this level. Urinary burden on the ADPKD Nocturia Quality of Life, ADPKD Urinary Urgency, and ADPKD Urinary Frequency Questionnaires correlated with tolvaptan exposure, with high interindividual variability in responses. Changes in questionnaire scores were sensitive to changes in urine volume but not proportional to volume change, reflecting differences in subject tolerance to increased urine volume. CONCLUSION: Tolvaptan MR exhibited predictable and dose-proportional pharmacokinetics and no improvement in tolerability versus tolvaptan IR. Tolerability of the urinary effects of treatment within the high-dose MR and IR groups exhibited substantial interindividual variability.

The NOCTURNE Randomized Trial Comparing 2 Tolvaptan Formulations.

INTRODUCTION: Tolvaptan, a treatment for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD), inhibits vasopressin V2 receptor signaling, which causes aquaretic adverse events (AAEs). The short-term efficacy and tolerability of a once-daily, modified-release (MR) formulation was assessed relative to the twice-daily, immediate-release (IR) formulation. METHODS: This Phase 2 multicenter, randomized (1:1:1:1), placebo-controlled, double-blind, placebo-masked, parallel-group study (NCT01451827) compared tolvaptan MR 50 mg once daily or tolvaptan MR 80 mg once daily with tolvaptan IR 60/30 mg daily split dose and placebo over 8 weeks in 177 subjects. The primary endpoint was percent change from baseline in total kidney volume (TKV) at week 3. Other endpoints included tolerability, assessed by adverse events and quality of life (QOL) measures. RESULTS: Mean percentage decreases in TKV at week 3 were observed for the pooled group of all (MR+IR) tolvaptan-treated subjects (-2.07%), tolvaptan MR 80 mg (-2.55%), and tolvaptan MR 50 mg (-2.46%) versus placebo (0.09%; P < 0.02 for each comparison with placebo), whereas the decrease with tolvaptan IR 60/30 mg (-1.17%; P = 0.24) did not reach significance. All tolvaptan regimens were associated with AAEs, but scores on ADPKD-specific and generic patient-reported outcome assessments showed little impact based on dosage on overall health-related QOL versus placebo. CONCLUSION: Tolvaptan MR and tolvaptan IR demonstrated similar short-term efficacy, tolerability, and safety, with low impact on multiple measures of QOL. Conclusions regarding long-term efficacy are limited by the short duration of follow-up.

A Post Hoc Analysis of Statin Use in Tolvaptan Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease Pivotal Trials.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Tolvaptan is approved to slow kidney function decline in adults with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) at risk of rapid progression. Because in vitro studies indicated that the tolvaptan oxobutyric acid metabolite inhibits organic anion-transporting polypeptide (OATP)1B1 and OATP1B3, United States prescribing information advises avoiding concurrent use with OATP1B1/1B3 substrates, including hepatic hydroxymethyl glutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins). This post hoc analysis of the pivotal phase 3 tolvaptan trials (Tolvaptan Efficacy and Safety in Management of Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease and Its Outcomes [TEMPO] 3:4 trial [NCT00428948] and Replicating Evidence of Preserved Renal Function: an Investigation of Tolvaptan Safety and Efficacy in ADPKD [REPRISE] trial [NCT02160145]) examined the safety of concurrent tolvaptan/statin use. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: The trials randomized a combined total of 2815 subjects with early- to late-stage ADPKD to tolvaptan (n=1644) or placebo (n=1171) for 3 years (TEMPO 3:4) and 1 year (REPRISE). Statin use was unrestricted, and 597 subjects (21.2% overall; 332 [20.2%] tolvaptan, 265 [22.6%] placebo) received statins. Statin use (duration, dose change, statin change, permanent discontinuation), incidences of statin-related adverse events, and hepatic transaminase elevations were determined for subjects who received tolvaptan+statin, placebo+statin, tolvaptan alone, and placebo alone. RESULTS: No differences in statin use parameters between tolvaptan- and placebo-treated subjects were observed. No statistically significant increases in commonly reported statin-related adverse events (e.g., musculoskeletal disorders, gastrointestinal symptoms) were seen between subjects receiving tolvaptan+statin and placebo+statin. For example, in TEMPO 3:4, frequencies were 5.4% and 7.8%, respectively, for myalgia (difference -2.4%; 95% confidence interval, -11.2% to 6.4%) and 9.3% and 7.8%, respectively, for abdominal pain (difference 1.5%; -7.9% to 10.9%). In an analysis that excluded participants concurrently using allopurinol, the frequency of alanine transaminase or aspartate transaminase >3× upper limit of normal in the pooled study populations was 3.6% for the tolvaptan+statin group and 2.3% for the placebo+statin group (difference 1.4%; -2.0% to 4.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Tolvaptan has been used safely in combination with statins in clinical trials. PODCAST: This article contains a podcast at https://www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/CJASN/2020_04_06_CJN.08170719.mp3.

Tolvaptan in Later-Stage Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease.

BACKGROUND: In a previous trial involving patients with early autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD; estimated creatinine clearance, ≥60 ml per minute), the vasopressin V2-receptor antagonist tolvaptan slowed the growth in total kidney volume and the decline in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) but also caused more elevations in aminotransferase and bilirubin levels. The efficacy and safety of tolvaptan in patients with later-stage ADPKD are unknown. METHODS: We conducted a phase 3, randomized withdrawal, multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. After an 8-week prerandomization period that included sequential placebo and tolvaptan run-in phases, during which each patient's ability to take tolvaptan without dose-limiting side effects was assessed, 1370 patients with ADPKD who were either 18 to 55 years of age with an estimated GFR of 25 to 65 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 of body-surface area or 56 to 65 years of age with an estimated GFR of 25 to 44 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive tolvaptan or placebo for 12 months. The primary end point was the change in the estimated GFR from baseline to follow-up, with adjustment for the exact duration that each patient participated (interpolated to 1 year). Safety assessments were conducted monthly. RESULTS: The change from baseline in the estimated GFR was -2.34 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 (95% confidence interval [CI], -2.81 to -1.87) in the tolvaptan group, as compared with -3.61 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 (95% CI, -4.08 to -3.14) in the placebo group (difference, 1.27 ml per minute per 1.73 m2; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.68; P<0.001). Elevations in the alanine aminotransferase level (to >3 times the upper limit of the normal range) occurred in 38 of 681 patients (5.6%) in the tolvaptan group and in 8 of 685 (1.2%) in the placebo group. Elevations in the aminotransferase level were reversible after stopping tolvaptan. No elevations in the bilirubin level of more than twice the upper limit of the normal range were detected. CONCLUSIONS: Tolvaptan resulted in a slower decline than placebo in the estimated GFR over a 1-year period in patients with later-stage ADPKD. (Funded by Otsuka Pharmaceuticals and Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development and Commercialization; REPRISE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02160145 .).

Rationale and Design of a Clinical Trial Investigating Tolvaptan Safety and Efficacy in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease.

BACKGROUND: In TEMPO 3:4, the vasopressin V2-receptor antagonist tolvaptan slowed kidney growth and function decline in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) patients with relatively preserved kidney function. METHODS: Prospective, phase 3b, multi-center, randomized-withdrawal, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of tolvaptan in ADPKD patients with late stage 2 to early stage 4 chronic kidney disease (CKD). The primary endpoint was estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) change from pre-treatment baseline to post-treatment follow-up. Secondary endpoints included annualized eGFR slope, incidence of ADPKD complications, and overall and hepatic safety profiles. Participants were 18-55 year-old ADPKD patients with baseline eGFR ≥25 and ≤65 mL/min/1.73 m2 or 56-65 year-old with eGFR ≥25 and ≤44 mL/min/1.73 m2 and evidence of eGFR decline >2.0 mL/min/1.73 m2 per year. Daily split doses of tolvaptan were titrated to tolerance (30/15, 45/15, 60/30, or 90/30 mg) and maintained for 12 months, after an 8-week pre-randomization period to screen out subjects unable to tolerate at least 60/30 mg for 3 weeks. RESULTS: Of 1,495 subjects who entered the tolvaptan titration period, 125 (8.4%) discontinued the study before randomization. One thousand three hundred seventy subjects (684 tolvaptan, 686 placebo) from 213 centers across 21 countries were randomized. Baseline demographics were well balanced across treatment arms. Information collected during the study included eGFR, survey scores (PKD history and outcome), adverse events, vital signs, hematology, urinalysis, and serum chemistry tests. CONCLUSION: Replicating Evidence of Preserved Renal Function: An Investigation of Tolvaptan Safety and Efficacy (REPRISE) determines whether tolvaptan administered over 1 year exhibits disease-modifying properties in ADPKD patients with late stage 2 to early stage 4 CKD, which provides an important therapeutic advancement for this difficult-to-treat disease.

Challenges to enrollment and randomization of the Frequent Hemodialysis Network (FHN) Daily Trial.

BACKGROUND: The US National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) sponsored a randomized clinical trial comparing six versus three times per week in-center hemodialysis (the Frequent Hemodialysis Network [FHN] Daily Trial), to test the effects of frequent hemodialysis on an array of intermediate outcomes. Herein we report challenges to enrollment and randomization into the trial. METHODS: Screening and enrollment was tracked at all participating dialysis clinics and specific reasons for dropout after baseline assessment were recorded for all enrolled subjects. Reasons for consent refusal were recorded in a subset of (10 out of 65) sites. RESULTS: The trial screened 6276 hemodialysis patients on three times weekly hemodialysis in 65 hemodialysis clinics, 3481 (55%) were considered eligible for enrollment, and 3124 (90%) were approached for consent; 378 (12%) consented and 245 were randomized (65% of those enrolled). Prospective subjects chose not to participate primarily because of the anticipated time required for three extra treatments per week and the difficulties in following the protocol. CONCLUSIONS: Recruitment into the FHN Daily Trial proved challenging but the goal of 250 randomized subjects was almost met.

Effects of citrate acid concentrate (citrasate®) on heparin N requirements and hemodialysis adequacy: a multicenter, prospective noninferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Citrasate®, citric acid dialysate (CD), contains 2.4 mEq of citric acid (citrate), instead of acetic acid (acetate) as in standard bicarbonate dialysate. Previous studies suggest CD may improve dialysis adequacy and decrease heparin requirements, presumably due to nonsystemic anticoagulant effects in the dialyzer. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 277 hemodialysis patients in eight outpatient facilities to determine if CD with reduced heparin N (HN) would maintain dialyzer clearance. Subjects progressed through four study periods [baseline (B): bicarbonate dialysate + 100% HN; period 1 (P1): CD + 100% HN; period 2 (P2): CD + 80% HN; period 3 (P3): CD + 66.7% HN]. The predefined primary endpoint was noninferiority (margin -8%) of the percent change in mean dialyzer conductivity clearance between baseline and P2. RESULTS: Subjects were 57.4% male, 41.7% white, 54.3% black, and 44.4% diabetic; mean age was 59 ± 14.4 years; mean time on dialysis was 1,498 ± 1,165 days; 65.7% had arteriovenous fistula, 19.9% arteriovenous graft, 14.4% catheters, and 27.8% used antiplatelet agents. Mean dialyzer clearance increased 0.9% (P1), 1.0% (P2), and 0.9% (P3) with CD despite heparin reduction. SpKt/V remained stable (B: 1.54 ± 0.29; P1: 1.54 ± 0.28; P2: 1.55 ± 0.27; P3: 1.54 ± 0.26). There was no significant difference in dialyzer/dialysis line thrombosis, post-HD time to hemostasis, percent of subjects with adverse events (AEs), or study-related AEs. CONCLUSIONS: CD was safe, effective, and met all study endpoints. Dialyzer clearance increased approximately 1% with CD despite 20-33% heparin reduction. Over 92% of P3 subjects demonstrated noninferiority of dialyzer clearance with CD and 33% HN reduction. There was no significant difference in dialyzer clotting, bleeding, or adverse events.

Sodium gradient: a tool to individualize dialysate sodium prescription in chronic hemodialysis patients?

Low dialysate sodium concentrations have been associated with intradialytic symptoms such as muscle cramps and hypotensive episodes. High dialysate sodium concentrations lead to sodium loading, thirst and subsequent increase in interdialytic weight gain and hypertension. The optimal dialysate sodium concentration for an individual depends on the serum sodium concentration. The difference between the dialysate sodium concentration and the predialysis serum sodium concentration has been defined as the sodium gradient. In this article, the role of the sodium gradient in fluid overload, hypertension, intradialytic symptoms and clinical outcome is discussed. Absolute serum sodium levels should always be taken into account when interpreting the relation between sodium gradient and clinical outcomes. Alignment of the dialysate sodium with the serum sodium concentration may be beneficial in many patients.

In-center hemodialysis six times per week versus three times per week.

BACKGROUND: In this randomized clinical trial, we aimed to determine whether increasing the frequency of in-center hemodialysis would result in beneficial changes in left ventricular mass, self-reported physical health, and other intermediate outcomes among patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to undergo hemodialysis six times per week (frequent hemodialysis, 125 patients) or three times per week (conventional hemodialysis, 120 patients) for 12 months. The two coprimary composite outcomes were death or change (from baseline to 12 months) in left ventricular mass, as assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and death or change in the physical-health composite score of the RAND 36-item health survey. Secondary outcomes included cognitive performance; self-reported depression; laboratory markers of nutrition, mineral metabolism, and anemia; blood pressure; and rates of hospitalization and of interventions related to vascular access. RESULTS: Patients in the frequent-hemodialysis group averaged 5.2 sessions per week; the weekly standard Kt/V(urea) (the product of the urea clearance and the duration of the dialysis session normalized to the volume of distribution of urea) was significantly higher in the frequent-hemodialysis group than in the conventional-hemodialysis group (3.54±0.56 vs. 2.49±0.27). Frequent hemodialysis was associated with significant benefits with respect to both coprimary composite outcomes (hazard ratio for death or increase in left ventricular mass, 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.46 to 0.82; hazard ratio for death or a decrease in the physical-health composite score, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.92). Patients randomly assigned to frequent hemodialysis were more likely to undergo interventions related to vascular access than were patients assigned to conventional hemodialysis (hazard ratio, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.08 to 2.73). Frequent hemodialysis was associated with improved control of hypertension and hyperphosphatemia. There were no significant effects of frequent hemodialysis on cognitive performance, self-reported depression, serum albumin concentration, or use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. CONCLUSIONS: Frequent hemodialysis, as compared with conventional hemodialysis, was associated with favorable results with respect to the composite outcomes of death or change in left ventricular mass and death or change in a physical-health composite score but prompted more frequent interventions related to vascular access. (Funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00264758.).

Noninvasive measurement of cardiac output in hemodialysis patients by task force monitor: a comparison with the Transonic System.

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients. The Transonic (TRS; Transonic Systems, Ithaca, NY) device is frequently used for determination of cardiac output (CO) by an indicator dilution technique. The Task Force Monitor (TFM; CN Systems, Graz, Austria) has gained attention as noninvasive tool for continuous beat-to-beat assessment of cardiovascular variables, including CO by impedance cardiography. Despite its use in cardiology and intensive care settings, the TFM has yet not been validated in dialysis patients. This study compares CO measurements in 12 MHD patients by TFM and TRS. Bland-Altman and regression analysis were used. CO was measured simultaneously by TRS and TFM. Average CO was 5.4 L/min by TRS and 5.0 L/min by TFM, respectively. Bland-Altman analysis revealed no significant systematic differences between the two methods (mean difference: 0.4 L/min; SD: 0.6; p > 0.05). Linear regression analysis showed significant correlation between both techniques (r = 0.802, p = 0.002). The SD of mean individual CO values was 1.1 L/min with TRS and 0.8 L/min with TFM, respectively.CO measured by TFM and TRS does not differ significantly, thus making the TFM an attractive noninvasive tool for the continuous beat-to-beat assessment of CO in MHD patients.

Effective diffusion volume flow rates (Qe) for urea, creatinine, and inorganic phosphorous (Qeu, Qecr, QeiP) during hemodialysis.

In vivo solute clearances can be estimated from dialyzer blood (Qb) and dialysate (Qd) flow rates and a solute- and dialyzer-specific overall permeability membrane area product (KoA). However, these calculations require knowledge of the flow rate of the effective solute distribution volume in the flowing bloodstream (Qe) in order to calculate in vivo clearances and KoAs. We have determined Qe for urea, creatinine, and inorganic phosphorus from changes in concentrations across the blood compartment and mass balance between the blood and dialysate streams. We made four serial measurements over one dialysis in 23 patients and found that Qeu equals the total blood water flow rate, Qecr equals the plasma water flow rate plus 61% of red cell water flow rate, and QeiP is limited to the plasma water flow rate. Equations are derived to calculate Qe for each of these solutes from Qb and hematocrit and in vivo KoAs for each solute were calculated.

A kinetic model of inorganic phosphorus mass balance in hemodialysis therapy.

BACKGROUND: There is growing evidence that inorganic phosphorus (iP) accumulation in tissues (dTiP/dt) is a risk factor for cardiac death in hemodialysis therapy (HD). The factors controlling iP mass balance in HD are dietary intake (GiP), removal by binders (JbiP) and removal by dialysis (JdiP). If iP accumulation is to be minimized, it will be necessary to regularly monitor and optimize GiP, JbiP and JdiP in individual patients. We have developed a kinetic model (iPKM) designed to monitor these three parameters of iP mass balance in individual patients and report here preliminary evaluation of the model in 23 HD patients. METHODS: GiP was calculated from PCR measured with urea kinetics; JdiP was calculated from the product of dialyzer plasma water clearance (K(pwiP)) and time average plasma iP concentration (TACiP) and treatment time (t); a new iP concentration parameter (nTAC(iP), the TACiP normalized to predialysis CoiP) was devised and shown to be a highly predictable function of the form nTAC(iP) = 1 - alpha(1 - exp[-betaK(pwiP). t/ViP]), where the coefficients alpha and beta are calculated for each patient from 2 measure values for nTAC(iP), K(pwiP).t/ViP early and late in dialysis; we measured 8-10 serial values for nTAC(iP), K(pwiP). t/ViP over a single dialysis in 23 patients; the expression derived for iP mass balance is DeltaTiP = 12(PCR) - [K(pwiP)(t) (N/7)][CoiP(1 - alpha(1 - exp[-beta(Kt/ViP)]))] - k(b).Nb. RESULTS: Calculated nTAC(iP) = 1.01(measured nTAC(iP)), r = 0.98, n = 213; calculated JdiP = 0.66(measured total dialysate iP) + 358, n = 23, r = 0.88, p < 0.001. Evaluation of 10 daily HD patients (DD) and 13 3 times weekly patients with the model predicted the number of binders required very well and showed that the much higher binder requirement observed in these DD patients was due to much higher NPCR (1.3 vs. 0.96). CONCLUSION: These results are very encouraging that it may be possible to monitor the individual effects of diet, dialysis and binders in HD and thus optimize these parameters of iP mass balance and reduce phosphate accumulation in tissues.

Noninvasive transcutaneous access flow measurement before and after hemodialysis: impact of hematocrit and blood pressure.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The dialysis outcome is strongly affected by the function of the vascular access. It has been suggested that access clotting may be related to increased hematocrit (Hct) or excessive ultrafiltration during dialysis. The present study was designed to evaluate the changes of vascular access flow during hemodialysis in 18 end-stage renal disease patients with native arteriovenous fistulas and the possible correlations with Hct and mean arterial pressure (MAP). METHODS: We utilized a noninvasive vascular access flow measurement technique, based on a transcutaneous optical sensor, to evaluate the flow in the access before and after a single hemodialysis session. At the beginning and at the end of the session, the blood flow was measured noninvasively, placing the sensor approximately 2 in from the point of insertion of the arterial needle. At the same time, Hct and MAP were measured directly. All patients were on hemodialysis for more than 3 months. RESULTS: There was a significant increase in Hct, likely due to ultrafiltration and consequent hemoconcentration, from the beginning to the end of the dialysis session. In detail, the Hct increased from 32.6 +/- 1.9 to 35.4 +/- 1.8% (p < 0.001), while the MAP did not present significant variations. The blood flow did not show significant variations, increasing from 780 +/- 312 to 919 +/- 411 ml/min after the session. Because of the stability of the MAP, we could dissociate the effects of the Hct from those of the MAP on blood flow variations. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that the blood flow in native fistulas is not affected by the acute rise in Hct due to ultrafiltration during hemodialysis. The transcutaneous access flow measurement technique appears to be reliable and accurate, and it could represent an important diagnostic tool.