Cardiovascular outcomes of complex bifurcation lesions following double kissing crush or nano-crush techniques: The multicenter EVOLUTE-CRUSH V study.

BACKGROUND: Double kissing crush (DKC) and nano-crush (NC) techniques are frequently used, but the comparison for both techniques is still lacking. The goal of this multicenter study was to retrospectively assess the midterm clinical results of DKC and NC stenting in patients with complex bifurcation lesions (CBLs). METHODS: A total of 324 consecutive patients [male: 245 (75.6%), mean age: 60.73 ± 10.21 years] who underwent bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention between January 2019 and May 2023 were included. The primary endpoint defined as the major cardiovascular events (MACE) included cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TVMI), or clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR). Inverse probability weighting (IPW) was performed to reduce treatment selection bias. This is the first report comparing the clinical outcomes of DKC and NC stenting in patients with CBL. RESULTS: The initial revascularization strategy was DKC in 216 (66.7%) cases and NC in 108 (33.3%) patients. SYNTAX scores [25.5 ± 6.73 vs. 23.32 ± 6.22, p = 0.005] were notably higher in the NC group than the DKC group. The procedure time (76.98 ± 25.1 vs. 57.5 ± 22.99 min, p = 0.001) was notably higher in the DKC group. The incidence of MACE (18.5 vs. 9.7%, p = 0.025), clinically driven TLR (14.8 vs. 6%, p = 0.009), and TVMI (10.2 vs. 4.2%, p = 0.048) were notably higher in the NC group than in the DKC group. The midterm MACE rate in the overall population notably differed between the NC group and the DKC group (adjusted HR (IPW): 2.712, [95% CI: 1.407-5.228], p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: In patients with CBLs, applying the DKC technique for bifurcation treatment had better ischemia-driven outcomes than the NC technique.

Cre8 Drug Eluting Stent Performance in Daily Cardiology Practice.

Background: In patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), drug eluting stents (DES) are currently the standard of care. Stent design and alloy composition, biocompatibility of the drug-eluting polymer coating, the antiproliferative agent properties and release are the three main characteristics that affects DES performance. Cre8 (Alvimedica, Istanbul, Turkey) is a polymer-free amphilimus-eluting stents (PF-AES). In this study, we aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of Cre8 DES in daily cardiology practice. Methods: Patients presenting with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) or acute coronary syndrome (ACS) including unstable angina pectoris (USAP), myocardial infarction with and without ST-segment elevation and treated with PCI using Cre8 DES between December 2015 and 2016 were retrospectively analyzed in this study. Results: Between December 2015 and 2016, 808 lesions of 664 patients treated with Cre8 DES in a single center were included in this retrospective analysis. The mean age of study group was 60 years (between 33 and 93 years) and were predominantly consisting of male patients (79.4%). The median follow-up duration was 487 days (min: 30 days, max: 919 days) and two-thirds of all patients presented with ACS. The culprit lesion was on left anterior descending artery (LAD) (40.5%) and right coronary artery (RCA) (25.9%) in most of the patients. The procedural success rate was 97.3%. Most of the lesions were type B1 (40.6%) according to American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) coronary lesion classification. The device oriented primary end-point defined as target lesion failure (TLF) occurred in 52 (6.4%) of 808 lesions. The primary safety end-point was cardiac death in 20 patients (3.0%) and target vessel myocardial infarction in 2 patients (0.3%). Target vessel revascularization (TVR) occurred in 29 patients (4.4%) as primary safety endpoint. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed diabetes mellitus and ejection fraction as the predictors of mortality and device oriented primary end-point. Conclusions: This trial revealed clinical efficacy and safety of Cre8 stents in real world practice. Device oriented primary end points were similar with previous studies which are randomized, open label in nature and showed the efficacy and safety of Cre8 stent towards latest generation DES.

A descriptive analysis of abstracts presented at the Turkish National Cardiology Congresses between 2011 and 2015.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the scientific publication performance of the abstracts presented at the annual Turkish National Cardiology Congress (TNCC) between 2011 and 2015 and to analyze the variables associated with publication. METHODS: The accepted abstracts of five congresses (2011-2015) were screened using the title and names of all authors in English via PubMed and Google Scholar databases. The parameters recorded included presentation type, publication rate, time to publication, affiliated institution, journal name and average impact factor, and average citation number per year for each publication. RESULTS: A total of 2897 abstracts (966 oral presentations and 1931 poster presentations) were accepted in five meetings and 23.4% (n=680) of these were published in national or international peer-reviewed journals. Of the published articles, 32.6% (n=222) were oral presentations and 67.4% (n=458) were poster presentations. The mean time to publication of oral and poster presentations were similar [9 (0-58) vs. 8 (0-62) months, p = 0.150]. According to the type of institution, university hospitals had the highest ratio of publication (58.6%) (p<0.001). All publications were published in 148 journals from 37 different countries. The average citation number of publications was significantly higher than the average impact factor of the journals [1.4 (0-30.1) vs. 1.29 (0.11-19.8), p<0.001]. CONCLUSION: Compared with other national-based literature in other medical fields, the overall publication rate was found to be similar while the time to publication was shorter. The significant difference between citation number and impact factor may be interpreted as positive indicator in terms of high level scientific value for cardiology publications presented in the TNCC.