From triggers to treatment: An epidemiological exploration of anaphylaxis in a lower middle-income area in Colombia.

In this cross-sectional, descriptive, and observational study conducted at Fundación Valle del Lili in Colombia, the clinical and sociodemographic characteristics of anaphylaxis were investigated in a cohort of 80 patients who sought medical care between January 2021 and December 2022. With a median age of 16 years and a notable prevalence among individuals aged below 18 years, the study revealed that 63.8% of patients had concomitant allergic diseases. Medications emerged as the primary triggers for anaphylaxis, followed by food. The mucocutaneous system was predominantly affected in 55% of cases, with respiratory involvement observed in 37.5%. Alarmingly, anaphylactic shock occurred in 17.5%, and 7.5% experienced biphasic anaphylaxis. Intramuscular adrenaline was administered in 88.8% of cases, with 75% of patients not receiving an allergy consultation upon discharge, and 52.5% lacking follow-up for allergy care. Considering that in Colombia epidemiological data on the clinical and sociodemographic aspects of anaphylaxis remain largely unknown, this study documents the features of anaphylaxis in both adult and pediatric populations and highlights the urgent need for improved awareness, timely evaluation by allergists, and comprehensive follow-up care for individuals experiencing anaphylaxis.

Monoclonal antibodies in idiopathic chronic eosinophilic pneumonia: a scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic chronic eosinophilic pneumonia (ICEP) is a rare disease characterized by pulmonary radiological alterations, peripheral eosinophilia, and demonstrated pulmonary eosinophilia. Oral steroids (OSs) are the standard management, but relapses occur in up to 50% of patients during the decrease or suspension of steroids, usually requiring reinitiation of treatment, exposing patients to secondary events derived from the management. Management with monoclonal antibodies has been proposed in these cases to control the disease and limit the secondary effects. The objective is to describe the extent and type of evidence regarding the use of monoclonal antibodies for ICEP. METHODS: A panoramic review of the literature was performed. Observational and experimental studies of pediatric and adult populations that managed recurrent ICEP with monoclonal antibodies were included. Data search, selection, and extraction were performed by two independent reviewers. RESULTS: 937 studies were found. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 37 titles remained for the final analysis: a retrospective, observational, real-life study, two case series publications, and 34 case reports published in academic poster sessions and letters to the editor. In general, the use of monoclonal antibodies approved for severe asthma could be useful for the control of ICEP, since most of the results show a good response for clinical and radiological outcomes. Biological drugs seem to be a safer option for controlling relapses in ICEP, allowing lowering/suspension of OSs, and sometimes replacing them in patients intolerant to them, patients with significant comorbidities, and patients who have already developed adverse events. CONCLUSION: The extent of the evidence supporting management of ICEP with monoclonal antibodies against IL-5 and IgE (omalizumab) is limited, but it could be promising in patients who present frequent relapses, in cortico-dependent individuals, or in patients in whom the use of steroids is contraindicated. The extent of the evidence for management with dupilumab is more limited. Studies with better design and structure are needed to evaluate quality of life and outcomes during a clear follow-up period. To our knowledge, this is the first scoping review of the literature showing the extent of the evidence for the management of ICEP with monoclonal antibodies.

Characterization of a group of children with eosinophilic esophagitis in Cali, Colombia

Purpose: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an immunologically mediated chronic disease of the gastrointestinal tract. The objective of this study was to clinically and demographically describe a child population with EoE diagnosed in a high-complexity hospital in Cali, Colombia. Methods: A retrospective study was carried out. The clinical histories of patients between 0 and 18 years with clinical suspicion and a histological diagnosis of EoE were analyzed. All patients underwent an allergy study, either by measurement of specific immunoglobulin (Ig) E and/or an intraepidermal skin-prick test. Results: Thirty-five patients were included in the study, of which 21 (60%) women. The median age was 8 years (interquartile range [IQR] 5–12), and the age of onset of symptoms was 5 years (IQR 2–10). Thirty patients (85.7%) reported a history of allergic disease, with rhinitis being the most frequent (n = 25, 71.4%). Only one patient reported with food allergy mediated by IgE. The main symptoms in patients included abdominal pain (17 [48.6%]), refractory gastroesophageal reflux (16 [45.7%]), and choking (9 [25.7%]). Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was normal in 10 patients (38.5%). The median number of eosinophils in the biopsy was 42 (IQR 31–92). Allergenic sensitization was verified in 25 of 35 patients (71.4%). Of these, dust mite allergy was positive in 21 patients (84%), while the most frequent food allergy was toward cow’s milk, in five patients (31.3%). Conclusions: The majority of patients with EoE were females. The most frequent symptom was abdominal pain. Endoscopic abnormalities were also observed frequently, and the prevalence of other allergic diseases (especially rhinitis) and allergenic sensitization (especially to mites) was high (AU)

Characterization of a group of children with eosinophilic esophagitis in Cali, Colombia.

PURPOSE: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an immunologically mediated chronic disease of the gastrointestinal tract. The objective of this study was to clinically and demographically describe a child population with EoE diagnosed in a high-complexity hospital in Cali, Colombia. METHODS: A retrospective study was carried out. The clinical histories of patients between 0 and 18 years with clinical suspicion and a histological diagnosis of EoE were analyzed. All patients underwent an allergy study, either by measurement of specific immunoglobulin (Ig) E and/or an intraepidermal skin-prick test. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were included in the study, of which 21 (60%) women. The median age was 8 years (interquartile range [IQR] 5-12), and the age of onset of symptoms was 5 years (IQR 2-10). Thirty patients (85.7%) reported a history of allergic disease, with rhinitis being the most frequent (n = 25, 71.4%). Only one patient reported with food allergy mediated by IgE. The main symptoms in patients included abdominal pain (17 [48.6%]), refractory gastroesophageal reflux (16 [45.7%]), and choking (9 [25.7%]). Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was normal in 10 patients (38.5%). The median number of eosinophils in the biopsy was 42 (IQR 31-92). Allergenic sensitization was verified in 25 of 35 patients (71.4%). Of these, dust mite allergy was positive in 21 patients (84%), while the most frequent food allergy was toward cow's milk, in five patients (31.3%). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients with EoE were females. The most frequent symptom was abdominal pain. Endoscopic abnormalities were also observed frequently, and the prevalence of other allergic diseases (especially rhinitis) and allergenic sensitization (especially to mites) was high.

Food allergy spectrum in the tropic: clinical and epidemiological profiles in a colombian hospital. A cross-sectional study.

Introduction: Food allergy affects 2-10% of the general population; it is more frequent among children than among adults, and it is one of the leading causes of anaphylaxis. Diagnosis of food allergy requires a detailed medical history, skin tests, specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) tests for the food involved, and an oral challenge as final confirmation. Objectives: This study aimed to describe the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of patients who underwent oral food challenges for suspected food allergies in a reference center in Colombia. Methodology: An observational, descriptive, cross-sectional and retrospective study was conducted. Data were retrospectively collected from patients who were evaluated in the allergology service and suspected of food allergy from 2011 to 2018. Quantitative variables are presented as means or medians depending on the normality of the distribution (assessed by the Shapiro-Wilk test), and categorical variables are presented as frequencies and percentages. Results: A total of 215 controlled open challenges were performed on 176 patients, most of whom were children (69%). Thirty-one patients (17%) required another oral challenge with a second food, and 11 (6.25%) required another oral challenge with three foods. Twelve oral challenges (5.58%) were positive. Of these, five challenges were positive for cow's milk, 5 were positive for shrimp, and 2 were positive for legumes (peanuts and lentils). Conclusion: The frequency of confirmed food allergies and the profile of food allergies in our population differs from that reported in other parts of the world.

Descriptive Analysis of Cross-Reactive Anaphylaxis as a Different Clinical Subtype of Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug (NSAID) Hypersensitivity.

INTRODUCTION: The European Network of Drug Allergy and the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology have classified hypersensitivity reactions induced by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) into 5 phenotypes according to the pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, number of drugs involved, and the presence of underlying diseases. This classification does not include anaphylaxis as part of NSAID cross-reactivity. The objective of this study was to characterize a group of patients with anaphylactic NSAID cross-reactivity. METHOD: This was a retrospective, descriptive, observational study. Patients who developed anaphylaxis to one NSAID plus another acute reaction (anaphylactic or not) to at least one other NSAID of a different chemical group were included. Demographic and clinical characteristics and the diagnostic approach were studied. RESULTS: A total of 38 patients were included, 28 (73.7%) of whom were women. The mean age was 40 ± 17.7 years. The main organs affected in the anaphylactic reaction were the skin and the respiratory system, occurring in 35 (92.1%) and 33 (86.8%) patients, respectively. Thirty-two (84.3%) patients presented with cutaneous and respiratory involvement simultaneously. The main anti-inflammatory agent involved in anaphylactic reactions was acetylsalicylic acid in 9 (23.7%) patients, followed by dipyrone in 8 (21.1%). The most frequent allergic comorbidity was rhinitis in 20 (52%) patients. Skin tests were performed in 15 (39.5%) patients, showing positivity in 12 (80%), mainly to mites. A total of 36 of 38 patients were challenged with alternative drugs, and 35 (97.2%) tolerated meloxicam and/or etoricoxib. CONCLUSION: In the present study, NSAID cross-anaphylaxis was more frequent in women, and acetylsalicylic acid and dipyrone were the main triggers. Rhinitis was the main allergic comorbidity, and there was a high incidence of atopy. The majority tolerated selective COX-2 NSAIDs.

Grandes dosis de corticoides sistémicos en pacientes con síndrome de Stevens-Johnson y necrólisis epidérmica tóxica: descripción de siete casos y revisión de la literatura / Treating Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis with high dose of glucocorticosteroids: report of seven cases and review of the literature

Antecedentes: El síndrome de Stevens-Johnson y la necrólisis epidérmica tóxica hacen parte del espectro de reacciones medicamentosas graves caracterizadas por una destrucción progresiva de la piel y las mucosas, y que son mediadas por una respuesta inmunitaria exagerada. A pesar de los múltiples avances en el entendimiento de su fisiopatología, no existe un tratamiento farmacológico que tenga suficiente evidencia clínica como para respaldar su uso de manera rutinaria. No obstante, a través de los años, varios investigadores han utilizado esteroides, con diferentes resultados. El objetivo del presente trabajo fue describir nuestra experiencia con el uso de esteroides en dosis grandes, para el manejo del síndrome de Stevens-Johnson y la necrólisis epidérmica tóxica. Materiales y métodos: Se revisaron las historias clínicas de todos los pacientes mayores de 18 años que ingresaron a la Fundación Valle Lili (Cali, Colombia) con diagnóstico de síndrome de Stevens-Johnson o necrólisis epidérmica tóxica, entre el 1 de enero de 2006 y el 31 de mayo de 2010. Se registraron datos clínicos, epidemiológicos y resultados de pruebas de laboratorio solicitados a su ingreso al servicio de urgencias; se excluyeron los pacientes con un tiempo mayor de 10 días, desde el inicio de los síntomas hasta su ingreso a la institución. Resultados: Se incluyeron siete pacientes, con una edad promedio de 44 años (rango, 27 a 56 años), de los cuales, cinco eran mujeres; se registraron seis casos del síndrome de Stevens-Johnson y uno de necrólisis epidérmica tóxica. La mayoría de los pacientes presentaron una reacción cutánea generalizada, uno presentó un importante compromiso de las mucosas exclusivamente. En promedio, los esteroides se iniciaron 4,4 días después del inicio de los síntomas, con una duración del tratamiento de 3,7 días (rango, 3 a 5 días) y una estancia hospitalaria total promedio de 10,2 días (rango,4 a 19 días). El efecto secundario más común fue hipopotasiemia leve (6 de los 7 pacientes); una paciente presentó hiperglucemia, que requirió manejo con insulina, y bradicardia asociada al uso de metilprednisolona al tercer día de iniciado el tratamiento. Dos pacientes presentaron sepsis sin aislamiento del germen, lo que conllevó a una mayor estancia hospitalaria en uno de ellos. Conclusión: En nuestra serie de pacientes, el uso de grandes dosis de esteroides se asoció a una rápida resolución de las manifestaciones cutáneas, teniendo como efecto secundario más frecuente la hipopotasiemia leve que mejoró de forma adecuada con la reposición.