Impact of preoperative left pulmonary artery stenting on the Fontan procedure: a retrospective multicentre study.

OBJECTIVES: Left pulmonary artery (LPA) or bifurcation stenoses at Fontan palliation can be very challenging to treat and may also require cardioplegia and aortic transection. Moreover, the low pressure of Fontan circulation and the bulkiness of the aorta increase the risk of a patch angioplasty collapse. Pre-Fontan LPA stenting of stenotic LPAs overcomes those drawbacks therefore the present study aimed to evaluate its advantageous impact on Fontan surgery. METHODS: A multicentre retrospective analysis was performed on 304 consecutive Fontan patients. The study population was divided into 2 groups (LPA stented, n = 62 vs not stented, n = 242); pre-and postoperative data were compared. RESULTS: LPA-stented patients had a higher prevalence of systemic right ventricle (P = 0.01), hypoplastic left heart syndrome (P = 0.042), complex neonatal palliations (Norwood/Damus-Kaye-Stansel) and surgical LPA patch repair at Glenn (P < 0.001). No differences were found in cross-clamp rates, early (P = 0.29) and late survival (94.6% vs 98.4, P = 0.2) or complications (P = 0.14). Complex palliations on ascending aorta/aortic arch (P = 0.013) and surgical LPA repair at Glenn (P < 0.001) proved to be risk factors for LPA stenting before Fontan at multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The LPA-stented group showed similar outcomes in terms of survival and complications rate compared to patients without LPA stenosis; however, they significantly differ in their higher preoperative risk profile and in their more complex anatomy. Complex neonatal palliations involving ascending aorta or aortic arch may increase the risk of pulmonary branches stenosis requiring stenting; therefore, preoperative stenting of LPA stenoses could help to reduce the surgical risk of complex Fontan procedure by avoiding the need for cross-clamp or complex mediastinal dissections to perform a high-risk surgical repair.

Left cervical and circumflex aortic arch with aberrant right subclavian artery arising from a Kommerell diverticulum: A rare vascular ring.

We report a rare case of vascular ring due to a left cervical circumflex aortic arch with aberrant right subclavian artery arising from a Kommerell diverticulum. This is a very rare case of vascular ring in a newborn with stridor and stenosis of the left pulmonary artery. A cardiac catheterization and an angio-computed tomography scan were helpful to clarify the diagnosis. The surgical correction was performed with division of the arterial duct, reimplantation of the right subclavian artery, aortic and tracheal suspension, and pulmonary arterial plasty. The patient was asymptomatic at discharge and 1-year follow-up.

Total Arch versus Hemiarch Replacement for Type A Acute Aortic Dissection: A Single-Center Experience.

We retrospectively evaluated early and intermediate outcomes of aortic arch surgery in patients with type A acute aortic dissection (AAD), investigating the effect of arch surgery extension on postoperative results. From January 2006 through July 2013, 201 patients with type A AAD underwent urgent corrective surgery at our institution. Of the 92 patients chosen for this study, 59 underwent hemiarch replacement (hemiarch group), and 33 underwent total arch replacement (total arch group) in conjunction with ascending aorta replacement. The operative mortality rate was 22%. Total arch replacement was associated with a 33% risk of operative death, versus 15% for hemiarch (P=0.044). Multivariable analysis found these independent predictors of operative death: age (odds ratio [OR]=1.13/yr; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.23; P=0.002), body mass index >30 kg/m2 (OR=9.9; 95% CI, 1.28-19; P=0.028), postoperative low cardiac output (OR=10.6; 95% CI, 1.18-25; P=0.035), and total arch replacement (OR=8.8; 95% CI, 1.39-15; P=0.021) The mean overall 5-year survival rate was 59.3% ± 5.5%, and mean 5-year freedom from distal reintervention was 95.4% ± 3.2% (P=NS). In type A AAD, aortic arch surgery is still associated with high operative mortality rates; hemiarch replacement can be performed more safely than total arch replacement. Rates of distal aortic reoperation were not different between the 2 surgical strategies.