ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Chronic wounds are frequently colonized or infected with multiple bacterial or fungal species, which can both promote or inhibit each other. Network analyses are helpful to understand the interplay of these species in polymicrobial infections. Our aim was to analyse the network of bacterial and fungal species in chronic wounds. METHODS: Swabs (n = 163) from chronic wound infections (Masanga, Sierra Leone, 2019-2020) were screened for bacterial and fungal species using non-selective agars. Some of these wounds were suspected but not confirmed Buruli ulcer. Species identification was done with MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Network analysis was performed to investigate co-occurrence of different species within one patient. All species with n ≥ 10 isolates were taken into account. RESULTS: Of the 163 patients, 156 had a positive wound culture (median of three different species per patient; range 1-7). Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 75) was the dominating species with frequent co-detections of Klebsiella pneumoniae (21 cases; OR = 1.36, 95%CI: 0.63-2.96, p = 0.47), Staphylococcus aureus (14 cases; OR = 1.06, 95%CI: 0.44-2.55, p = 1) and Proteus mirabilis (13 cases; OR = 0.84, 95%CI: 0.35-1.99, p = 0.69). CONCLUSION: The culturome of chronic wounds in Sierra Leonean patients is highly diverse and characterized by the co-occurrence of P. aeruginosa, K. pneumoniae and S. aureus.
Subject(s)
Coinfection , Staphylococcal Infections , Wound Infection , Humans , Staphylococcus aureus , Sierra Leone/epidemiology , Coinfection/epidemiology , Coinfection/microbiology , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Wound Infection/epidemiology , Wound Infection/microbiology , Bacteria , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Pseudomonas aeruginosaABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Chronic wounds are frequently caused by, or super-infected with, a broad spectrum of bacteria. To guide treatment, healthcare providers need to know the bacterial spectrum and antimicrobial resistance rates to be anticipated. As these data are largely missing for Sierra Leone, we performed a microbiological study on chronic wound infections. METHODS: Wound swabs were analysed for bacteria using culture-based methods. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was done with Vitek2® automated system and EUCAST clinical breakpoints. Selected resistance phenotypes were confirmed by molecular methods (e.g. mecA/C) and genotyping. RESULTS: Of 163 included patients, 156 (95.7%) had a positive wound culture. Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 75), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 42), Proteus mirabilis (n = 31), Staphylococcus aureus-related complex (n = 31) were predominant. Among Gram-negative rods, resistance rates were high for piperacillin/tazobactam (3-67%), cefotaxime (19-71%), and ciprofloxacin (13-60%). Among isolates of the S. aureus-related complex, 55% were methicillin resistant (CC8, PVL-negative). CONCLUSION: The high antimicrobial resistance rates in bacteria from chronic wounds strongly speaks against the use of empirical systemic antibiotic therapy if patients do not show signs of systemic infections, and supports the strategy of local wound care.