Ultra-low dose computed tomography protocols using spectral shaping for lung cancer screening: Comparison with low-dose for volumetric LungRADS classification.

PURPOSE: To compare Low-Dose Computed Tomography (LDCT) with four different Ultra-Low-Dose Computed Tomography (ULDCT) protocols for PN classification according to the Lung Reporting and Data System (LungRADS). METHODS: Three hundred sixty-one participants of an ongoing lung cancer screening (LCS) underwent single-breath-hold double chest Computed Tomography (CT), including LDCT (120kVp, 25mAs; CTDIvol 1,62 mGy) and one ULDCT among: fully automated exposure control ("ULDCT1"); fixed tube-voltage and current according to patient size ("ULDCT2"); hybrid approach with fixed tube-voltage ("ULDCT3") and tube current automated exposure control ("ULDCT4"). Two radiologists (R1, R2) assessed LungRADS 2022 categories on LDCT, and then after 2 weeks on ULDCT using two different kernels (R1: Qr49ADMIRE 4; R2: Br49ADMIRE 3). Intra-subject agreement for LungRADS categories between LDCT and ULDCT was measured by the k-Cohen Index with Fleiss-Cohen weights. RESULTS: LDCT-dominant PNs were detected in ULDCT in 87 % of cases on Qr49ADMIRE 4 and 88 % on Br49ADMIRE 3. The intra-subject agreement was: κULDCT1 = 0.89 [95 %CI 0.82-0.96]; κULDCT2 = 0.90 [0.81-0.98]; κULDCT3 = 0.91 [0.84-0.99]; κULDCT4 = 0.88 [0.78-0.97] on Qr49ADMIRE 4, and κULDCT1 = 0.88 [0.80-0.95]; κULDCT2 = 0.91 [0.86-0.96]; κULDCT3 = 0.87 [0.78-0.95]; and κULDCT4 = 0.88 [0.82-0.94] on Br49ADMIRE 3. LDCT classified as LungRADS 4B were correctly identified as LungRADS 4B at ULDCT3, with the lowest radiation exposure among the tested protocols (median effective doses were 0.31, 0.36, 0.27 and 0.37 mSv for ULDCT1, ULDCT2, ULDCT3, and ULDCT4, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: ULDCT by spectral shaping allows the detection and characterization of PNs with an excellent agreement with LDCT and can be proposed as a feasible approach in LCS.

Volumetric Measurements in Lung Cancer Screening Reduces Unnecessary Low-Dose Computed Tomography Scans: Results from a Single-Center Prospective Trial on 4119 Subjects.

This study aims to compare the low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) outcome and volume-doubling time (VDT) derived from the measured volume (MV) and estimated volume (EV) of pulmonary nodules (PNs) detected in a single-center lung cancer screening trial. MV, EV and VDT were obtained for prevalent pulmonary nodules detected at the baseline round of the bioMILD trial. The LDCT outcome (based on bioMILD thresholds) and VDT categories were simulated on PN- and screenee-based analyses. A weighted Cohen's kappa test was used to assess the agreement between diagnostic categories as per MV and EV, and 1583 screenees displayed 2715 pulmonary nodules. In the PN-based analysis, 40.1% PNs were included in different LDCT categories when measured by MV or EV. The agreements between MV and EV were moderate (κ = 0.49) and fair (κ = 0.37) for the LDCT outcome and VDT categories, respectively. In the screenee-based analysis, 46% pulmonary nodules were included in different LDCT categories when measured by MV or EV. The agreements between MV and EV were moderate (κ = 0.52) and fair (κ = 0.34) for the LDCT outcome and VDT categories, respectively. Within a simulated lung cancer screening based on a recommendation by estimated volumetry, the number of LDCTs performed for the evaluation of pulmonary nodules was higher compared with in prospective volumetric management.

Lung cancer screening by nodule volume in Lung-RADS v1.1: negative baseline CT yields potential for increased screening interval.

OBJECTIVES: The 2019 Lung CT Screening Reporting & Data System version 1.1 (Lung-RADS v1.1) introduced volumetric categories for nodule management. The aims of this study were to report the distribution of Lung-RADS v1.1 volumetric categories and to analyse lung cancer (LC) outcomes within 3 years for exploring personalized algorithm for lung cancer screening (LCS). METHODS: Subjects from the Multicentric Italian Lung Detection (MILD) trial were retrospectively selected by National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) criteria. Baseline characteristics included selected pre-test metrics and nodule characterization according to the volume-based categories of Lung-RADS v1.1. Nodule volume was obtained by segmentation with dedicated semi-automatic software. Primary outcome was diagnosis of LC, tested by univariate and multivariable models. Secondary outcome was stage of LC. Increased interval algorithms were simulated for testing rate of delayed diagnosis (RDD) and reduction of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) burden. RESULTS: In 1248 NLST-eligible subjects, LC frequency was 1.2% at 1 year, 1.8% at 2 years and 2.6% at 3 years. Nodule volume in Lung-RADS v1.1 was a strong predictor of LC: positive LDCT showed an odds ratio (OR) of 75.60 at 1 year (p < 0.0001), and indeterminate LDCT showed an OR of 9.16 at 2 years (p = 0.0068) and an OR of 6.35 at 3 years (p = 0.0042). In the first 2 years after negative LDCT, 100% of resected LC was stage I. The simulations of low-frequency screening showed a RDD of 13.6-21.9% and a potential reduction of LDCT burden of 25.5-41%. CONCLUSIONS: Nodule volume by semi-automatic software allowed stratification of LC risk across Lung-RADS v1.1 categories. Personalized screening algorithm by increased interval seems feasible in 80% of NLST eligible. KEY POINTS: • Using semi-automatic segmentation of nodule volume, Lung-RADS v1.1 selected 10.8% of subjects with positive CT and 96.87 relative risk of lung cancer at 1 year, compared to negative CT. • Negative low-dose CT by Lung-RADS v1.1 was found in 80.6% of NLST eligible and yielded 40 times lower relative risk of lung cancer at 2 years, compared to positive low-dose CT; annual screening could be preference sensitive in this group. • Semi-automatic segmentation of nodule volume and increased screening interval by volumetric Lung-RADS v1.1 could retrospectively suggest a 25.5-41% reduction of LDCT burden, at the cost of 13.6-21.9% rate of delayed diagnosis.

Unexpected detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in the prepandemic period in Italy.

There are no robust data on the real onset of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and spread in the prepandemic period worldwide. We investigated the presence of SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain (RBD)-specific antibodies in blood samples of 959 asymptomatic individuals enrolled in a prospective lung cancer screening trial between September 2019 and March 2020 to track the date of onset, frequency, and temporal and geographic variations across the Italian regions. SARS-CoV-2 RBD-specific antibodies were detected in 111 of 959 (11.6%) individuals, starting from September 2019 (14%), with a cluster of positive cases (>30%) in the second week of February 2020 and the highest number (53.2%) in Lombardy. This study shows an unexpected very early circulation of SARS-CoV-2 among asymptomatic individuals in Italy several months before the first patient was identified, and clarifies the onset and spread of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Finding SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in asymptomatic people before the COVID-19 outbreak in Italy may reshape the history of pandemic.

Correction: Circulating microRNA signature as liquid-biopsy to monitor lung cancer in low-dose computed tomography screening.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.5210.].

Inflammatory status and lung function predict mortality in lung cancer screening participants.

Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening trials have based their risk selection algorithm on age and tobacco exposure, but never on pulmonary risk-related biomarkers. In the present study, the baseline inflammatory status, measured by C-reactive protein (CRP) level, and lung function, measured by forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), were tested as independent predictors of all-cause mortality in LDCT-screening participants. Between 2000 and 2010, 4413 volunteers were enrolled in two LDCT-screening trials, with evaluable baseline CRP and FEV1 values: 2037 were included in the discovery set and 2376 were included in the validation set. The effect of low FEV1 or high CRP alone or combined was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier mortality curves and hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) by fitting Cox proportional hazards models. The overall mortality risk was significantly higher in participants with FEV1 of up to 90% (HR: 2.13, CI: 1.43-3.17) or CRP more than 2 mg/l (HR: 3.38, CI: 1.60-3.54) and was still significant in the fully adjusted model. The cumulative 10-year probability of death was 0.03 for participants with FEV1 of more than 90% and CRP up to 2 mg/l, 0.05 with only FEV1 of up to 90% or CRP above 2 mg/l, and 0.12 with FEV1 of up to 90% and CRP above 2 mg/l. This predictive performance was confirmed in the two external validation cohorts with 10-year mortality rates of 0.06, 0.12, and 0.14, and 0.03, 0.07, and 0.14, respectively. Baseline inflammatory status and lung function reduction are independent predictors of all-cause long-term mortality in LDCT-screening participants. CRP and FEV1 could be used to select higher-risk individuals for future LDCT screening and preventive programs.

Mutational Profile from Targeted NGS Predicts Survival in LDCT Screening-Detected Lung Cancers.

BACKGROUND: The issue of overdiagnosis in low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening trials could be addressed by the development of complementary biomarkers able to improve detection of aggressive disease. The mutation profile of LDCT screening-detected lung tumors is currently unknown. METHODS: Targeted next-generation sequencing was performed on 94 LDCT screening-detected lung tumors. Associations with clinicopathologic features, survival, and the risk profile of a plasma microRNA signature classifier were analyzed. RESULTS: The mutational spectrum and frequency observed in screening series was similar to that reported in public data sets, although a larger number of tumors without mutations in driver genes was detected. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of patients with and without mutations in the tumors were 66% and 100%, respectively (p = 0.015). By combining the mutational status with the microRNA signature classifier risk profile, patients were stratified into three groups with 5-year OS rates ranging from 42% to 97% (p < 0.0001) and the prognostic value was significant after controlling for stage (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Tumor mutational status along with a microRNA-based liquid biopsy can provide additional information in planning clinical follow-up in lung cancer LDCT screening programs.

Lung cancer screening with low-dose spiral computed tomography: evidence from a pooled analysis of two Italian randomized trials.

The benefits and harms of lung cancer (LC) screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) are debatable. Positive results from the US National Lung Screening Trial were not evident in the European trials, possibly due to their smaller sample sizes. To address this issue, we conducted a patient-level pooled analysis of two Italian randomized controlled trials. Data from DANTE and MILD trials were combined for a total of 3640 individuals in the LDCT arm and 2909 in the control arm. LC and overall mortality were analyzed using multivariate hazard ratios (HRs) and log-rank tests stratified by study. The median follow-up was 8.2 years, with a total of 30 480 person-years in the LDCT arm and 22 157 in the control arm. A total of 192 patients developed LC in the LDCT arm and 105 in the control arm. Half of the LC cases in the LDCT arm had stage IA or IB cancer, as compared with 21% in the control arm. Overall mortality rates/100 000 person-years were 925 in the LDCT arm and 1074 in the control arm, and LC mortality rates were 299 and 357, respectively. The multivariate pooled overall mortality HR was 0.89 (95% confidence interval: 0.74-1.06) and the LC mortality HR was 0.83 (95% confidence interval: 0.61-1.12) for the LDCT arm as compared with the control arm. The present pooled analysis shows a nonsignificant 11% reduction in overall mortality in individuals undergoing LDCT screening as compared with the control arm. A pooled analysis of all European trials would be a useful contribution to assess the real benefit of LDCT screening.

[Lung cancer screening in high-risk subjects: early detection with LDCT and risk stratification using miRNA-based blood test]. / Screening per il tumore polmonare in soggetti ad alto rischio: diagnosi precoce con TC spirale associata a stratificazione del rischio con miRNA circolanti.

Lung cancer still remains a high mortality disease in the face of developments in diagnostic and therapeutic methods that occurred in the last 20 years. The analysis of the experiences from the first studies - in which chest X-ray (CXR) was adopted, associated or not with sputum cytology - has failed to show a reduction in lung cancer specific mortality. Subsequent screening studies that have introduced the use of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) have revealed a large number of early-stage lung cancers, thus potentially curable; however, this has not allowed us to demonstrate a decrease in lung cancer-specific mortality. With the results of the American study National Lung ScreeningTrial (NLST), published in 2011, for the first time a lung cancer-specific mortality reduction by 20% thanks to the use of LDCT compared to RXT, was highlighted. However, a false discovery rate of 96.4% was also described with an overdiagnosis that can be up to 78.9% for bronchioalveolar lung cancer. Due to the high sensitivity of LDCT, able to identify a non-calcified pulmonary nodule in one subject on two, it becomes necessary to avail instruments to more accurately identify suspicious nodules. Until some time ago, the possible use of lung tumour markers was not viable in view of the poor organ specificity. The study and development was, then, pushed to organ- and tissue-specific markers such as microRNA (miRNA), noncoding RNA sequences involved in many processes and expression of oncogenic activity of the microenvironment. The use of biomarkers such as circulating miRNA implemented in LDCT screening has highlighted a reduction of 5 times for the rate of false positives, going from 19.4% to 3.7%, with a sensitivity of 87%, a specificity of 81%, and a negative predictive value of 99%. The need to appropriately use the available resources commensurate with the disease to treat will push more and more towards the implementation of LDCT biomarkers based screenings, stable and easily reproducible, as circulating miRNAs, obviating to problems such as false positives, unnecessary procedures of invasive surgery for benign lesions, and optimizing the cost benefit ratios.The development of new specific biomarkers appears to offer new promising prospects.

Stopping Smoking Reduces Mortality in Low-Dose Computed Tomography Screening Participants.

INTRODUCTION: The National Lung Screening Trial has achieved a 7% reduction in total mortality with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening as compared with in the chest radiography arm. Other randomized trials are under way, comparing LDCT screening with no intervention. None of these studies was designed to investigate the impact of smoking habits on screening outcome. In the present study, we tested the effect of stopping smoking on the overall mortality of participants undergoing repeated LDCT screening for many years. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2010, 3381 smokers aged 50 years or older were enrolled in two LDCT screening programs. On the basis of the last follow-up information, subjects were divided into two groups: current smokers throughout the screening period and former smokers. RESULTS: With a median follow-up time of 9.7 years and a total of 32,857 person-years (PYs) of follow-up, a total of 151 deaths were observed in the group of 1797 current smokers (17,846 PYs) versus 109 among 1584 former smokers (15,011 PYs), corresponding to mortality rates of 8.46 and 7.26 for every 1000 PYs, respectively. Compared with current smokers, former smokers had an adjusted mortality hazard ratio of 0.61 (95% confidence interval: 0.44-0.83), with a 39% reduction in mortality. A similar reduction in mortality was observed in the subset of 712 late quitters, with a hazard ratio of 0.65 (95% confidence interval: 0.44-0.96). CONCLUSIONS: Stopping smoking significantly reduces the overall mortality of smokers enrolled in LDCT screening programs. The beneficial effect of stopping smoking on total mortality appears to be threefold to fivefold greater than the one achieved by earlier detection in the National Lung Screening Trial.

Screening with Low-Dose Computed Tomography Does Not Improve Survival of Small Cell Lung Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) constitutes a distinct component of symptomatic or advanced-stage lung cancers in clinical practice and in lung cancer screening trials. The purpose of this study was to describe the outcome of SCLC in lung cancer screening trials and compare the frequency of SCLC in our cohort with that in the major lung cancer screening trials. METHODS: Subjects with a diagnosis of SCLC were selected from two lung cancer screening trials by low-dose computed tomography (LDCT), and their demographic characteristics, clinical parameters, tumor stage at diagnosis, therapy, and survival times were recorded. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Ten cases of SCLC were reported in 45,141 person-years (22 in 100,000 person-years), representing the 6% of all lung cancer cases. Cumulative tobacco consumption was 82 pack-years compared with 39 and 46 pack-years for the overall study population and subjects with non-SCLC, respectively. Most of the neoplasms were in an advanced stage (seven in stage IV and one each in stages IIIb, IIIa, and Ia). Two subjects were treated with lobectomy for curative purposes and died of diffuse metastasis within 2 years of diagnosis. The median overall survival time in the LDCT arms was 20.6 months, with no survivors remaining at 3 years. CONCLUSIONS: Subjects in whom SCLC develops are a subgroup of smokers with extremely high cumulative tobacco consumption. Consequently, the frequency of SCLC in our population was lower than in other screening populations, with higher cumulative tobacco consumption. Screening for lung cancer by LDCT does not improve survival of SCLC, with no survivors remaining at 3 years after diagnosis.

Circulating microRNA signature as liquid-biopsy to monitor lung cancer in low-dose computed tomography screening.

Liquid biopsies can detect biomarkers carrying information on the development and progression of cancer. We demonstrated that a 24 plasma-based microRNA signature classifier (MSC) was capable of increasing the specificity of low dose computed tomography (LDCT) in a lung cancer screening trial. In the present study, we tested the prognostic performance of MSC, and its ability to monitor disease status recurrence in LDCT screening-detected lung cancers.Between 2000 and 2010, 3411 heavy smokers enrolled in two screening programmes, underwent annual or biennial LDCT. During the first five years of screening, 84 lung cancer patients were classified according to one of the three MSC levels of risk: high, intermediate or low. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed according to MSC and clinico-pathological information. Follow-up MSC analysis was performed on longitudinal plasma samples (n = 100) collected from 31 patients before and after surgical resection.Five-year survival was 88.9% for low risk, 79.5% for intermediate risk and 40.1% for high risk MSC (p = 0.001). The prognostic power of MSC persisted after adjusting for tumor stage (p = 0.02) and when the analysis was restricted to LDCT-detected cases after exclusion of interval cancers (p < 0.001). The MSC risk level decreased after surgery in 76% of the 25 high-intermediate subjects who remained disease free, whereas in relapsing patients an increase of the MSC risk level was observed at the time of detection of second primary tumor or metastatic progression.These results encourage exploiting the MSC test for lung cancer monitoring in LDCT screening for lung cancer.

Recent advances of microRNA-based molecular diagnostics to reduce false-positive lung cancer imaging.

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths in the world. Advances in early detection crucial to enable timely curative surgery have been made in recent years. Cost-benefit profiles of lung cancer screening in smokers by low-dose computed tomography are still under evaluation. In particular, the high false-positive rates of low-dose computed tomography, together with the issue of overdiagnosis and the overall costs of screening, prompted a focus on the development of noninvasive complementary biomarkers to implement lung cancer screening. MicroRNA are a new class of blood-based biomarkers useful for early lung cancer detection and prognosis definition. Here, we discuss the seminal publications that reported circulating microRNA signatures with the greatest potential to impact clinical activity and patient care.

Combined Use of TBNA and EBUS-TBNA in the Preoperative Staging of Lung Cancer Patients.

The identification of the optimal mediastinal staging strategy in lung cancer patients remains an important objective to improve their selection for appropriate treatment. The aim of this study was to analyze our experience with traditional transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) and endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) as minimally invasive alternative procedures to mediastinoscopy in the preoperative staging of lung cancer patients with positive mediastinal positron emission tomography. Forty-four patients staged N2 or N3 after positron emission tomography were included in the study. Traditional TBNA was used in 15 patients to puncture "easy" targets such as the subcarinal lymph nodes. EBUS-TBNA was used in 29 patients to puncture "difficult" targets such as the paratracheal stations. A malignant adenopathy was identified in 39 patients (89%) who avoided a mediastinoscopy and were referred for neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy according to their mediastinal status (N2 or N3), as determined on the positron emission tomography image. In the remaining 5 patients (11%), samples were nondiagnostic. These patients underwent mediastinoscopy and subsequent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (3 cases) or surgery (2 cases) according to the presence of an N2 or an N0 disease. The combined use of traditional and EBUS-TBNA avoided a mediastinoscopy in approximately 90% of lung cancer patients referred for surgery with positive mediastinal positron emission tomography, sparing the associated costs and risks of surgical procedures. Traditional and EBUS-TBNA should be considered as complementary methods in the preoperative staging of lung cancer.

Correlation of computed tomography densitometry and pathological grading of emphysema with the variation of respiratory function after lobectomy for lung cancer.

The presence of emphysema may lead to an underestimation of postoperative respiratory function after lobectomy when evaluated by standard functional assessment. The aim of the study was to assess the correlation between computed tomography (CT) densitometry, pathological grading of emphysema and variation of pulmonary function after lobectomy for lung cancer. Forty-one patients entered the study. Respiratory function was assessed preoperatively and after a mean period of 4.04 months following surgery. Postoperative function remained unchanged or increased after surgery in nine patients (Group A). In the remaining 32 patients (Group B) postoperative function was reduced after surgery. Preoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1))% was 68.5+/-13.1% in Group A and 91.7+/-21.0% in Group B. CT densitometry of the lobe to be resected was -877.8+/-57.6 HU in Group A and -827.5+/-64.4 HU in Group B. Pathological grading of emphysema of the resected lobe (range 0-10) was 4.1+/-2.2 in Group A and 3.1+/-1.2 in Group B. A significant correlation was observed (Spearman rank correlation) between the variation of FEV(1) and preoperative FEV(1) (P=0.003; r=-0.455), CT quantitative assessment (P=0.036; r=-0.430) and pathological grading (P=0.008; r=0.673). Patients with a higher degree of emphysema had a lower reduction of respiratory function after lobectomy and CT densitometry and pathological grading of emphysema correlated with the variation in respiratory function.