Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Int J Pharm Pract ; 31(1): 32-37, 2023 Mar 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36356049

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The Community Pharmacist Consultation Service launched in England in 2019. Patients requiring urgent care were referred from National Health Service-based telephone/digital triage or general practice to a community pharmacist, who provided a consultation, which could include a physical examination. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a learning programme to prepare community pharmacists for the service. METHODS: Learning programme participants were invited to complete an online survey shortly after the workshop and another survey 3 months later. The survey collected opinions on aspects of the programme, including Likert-type statements and free text questions. The 3-month follow-up survey explored how the programme had helped pharmacists change their practice. Data were analysed in SPSS (v.25; IBM) with inferential statistics used to compare subgroups. Open comments were analysed qualitatively. KEY FINDINGS: The learning programme addressed participants' learning needs including history-taking, clinically observing the patient, performing physical examinations, structuring a consultation, safety-netting, and documenting consultations. Barriers to using skills acquired included low service uptake and a lack of equipment to perform physical examinations. While many participants recognised the importance of skills to provide person-centred care, some participants did not appear to recognise the shift in policy to a more clinical role. CONCLUSIONS: The learning programme resulted in increased confidence and a recognition of a shift in the policy vision for community pharmacist roles. Although some pharmacists appeared to embrace this, others have yet to fully appreciate the need to adapt to be ready for the opportunities that this service can provide.


Subject(s)
Community Pharmacy Services , Pharmacists , Humans , State Medicine , Surveys and Questionnaires , Referral and Consultation , Professional Role
2.
Pharmacy (Basel) ; 10(5)2022 Sep 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36287438

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The NHS Community Pharmacist Consultation Service (CPCS) offers patients requiring urgent care a consultation with a community pharmacist, following referral from general practice or urgent care. The study explored the impact of undertaking a Centre for Pharmacy Postgraduate Education (CPPE) CPCS learning programme, and barriers and enablers to CPCS delivery. METHODS: CPPE distributed an online survey to those who had undertaken their CPCS learning. The survey explored participants' knowledge, confidence and application of taught skills/tools, including clinical history-taking, clinical assessment, record keeping, transfer of care, and Calgary-Cambridge, L(ICE)F and SBARD communication tools. Details on barriers and enablers to CPCS delivery were also included. RESULTS: One-hundred-and-fifty-nine responses were received (response rate 5.6%). Knowledge of, and confidence in, taught skills were high and respondents reported applying skills in CPCS consultations and wider practice. Barriers to CPCS included a lack of general practice referrals, staffing levels, workload, and GP attitudes. Enablers included a clear understanding of what was expected, minimal concerns over indemnity cover and privacy, and positive patient attitudes towards pharmacy. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that community pharmacists can extend their practice and contribute to the enhanced provision of urgent care in England. This study identified barriers, both interpersonal and infrastructural, that may hinder service implementation.

3.
Health Soc Care Community ; 28(5): 1671-1687, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32285994

ABSTRACT

The Greater Manchester Community Pharmacy Care Plan (GMCPCP) service provided tailored care plans to help adults with one or more qualifying long-term condition (hypertension, asthma, diabetes and COPD) to achieve health goals and better self-management of their long-term conditions. The service ran between February and December 2017. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of the service on patient activation, as measured by the PAM measure (primary outcome). Secondary outcomes included quality of life (EQ-5D-5L, EQ-VAS), medication adherence (MARS-5), NHS resource use and costs, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, HDL cholesterol ratio levels and body mass index (BMI). A before and after design was used, with follow-up at 6-months. A questionnaire was distributed at follow-up and telephone interviews with willing participants were used to investigate patient satisfaction with the service. The study was approved by the University of Manchester Research Ethics Committee. Quantitative data were analysed in SPSS v22 (IBM). A total of 382 patients were recruited to the service; 280 (73%) remained at follow-up. Ten patients were interviewed and 43 completed the questionnaire. A total of 613 goals were set; mean of 1.7 goals per patient. Fifty percent of goals were met at follow-up. There were significant improvements in PAM, EQ-5D-5L and EQ-VAS scores and significant reductions in systolic blood pressure, BMI and HDL cholesterol ratio at follow-up. Mean NHS service use costs were significantly lower at follow-up; with a mean decrease per patient of £236.43 (±SD £968.47). The mean cost per patient for providing the service was £203.10, resulting in potential cost-savings of £33.33 per patient (SD ± 874.65). Questionnaire respondents reported high levels of satisfaction with the service. This study suggests that the service is acceptable to patients and may lead to improvements in health outcomes and allows for modest cost savings. Limitations of the study included the low response rate to the patient questionnaire.


Subject(s)
Chronic Disease/therapy , Community Pharmacy Services/organization & administration , Health Resources/statistics & numerical data , Self-Management/methods , Aged , Blood Pressure , Body Mass Index , Chronic Disease/economics , Community Pharmacy Services/economics , England , Female , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Lipids/blood , Male , Medication Adherence , Middle Aged , Patient Participation/psychology , Patient Satisfaction , Quality of Life , Self-Management/economics , State Medicine , Surveys and Questionnaires
4.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 19(1): 325, 2019 May 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31118002

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Of the various types of medication administration error that occur in hospitals, dose omissions are consistently reported as among the most common. It has been suggested that greater involvement from pharmacy teams could help address this problem. A pilot service, called pharmacy TECHnician supported MEDicines administration (TECHMED), was introduced in an English NHS hospital for a four-week period in order to reduce preventable medication dose omissions. The objective of this study was to evaluate the implementation, delivery and impact of the pilot TECHMED service using qualitative methods. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews with pharmacy technicians, nursing staff and senior management involved with the pilot service were undertaken to evaluate TECHMED. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using the framework approach, guided by Weiss's Theory Based Evaluation model. RESULTS: Twenty-two stakeholder interviews were conducted with 10 ward-based pharmacy technicians, nine nurses and three members of senior management. Most technicians performed a range of activities in line with the service specification, including locating drugs from a variety of sources, and identified situations where they had prevented missing doses. Nurses reported positive impacts of TECHMED on workload. However, not all technicians fully adhered to the service specification in regard to directly following nursing staff during each medication round, citing reasons related to productivity or perceived intrusiveness towards nursing staff. Some participants also reported a perceived lack of impact of TECHMED on medicine omissions. Seventeen of the 22 interviewees supported an extension of the service. There were however, concerns about the impact on technician workload and some participants advocated support for targeted service extension to wards/rounds with high schedule dose volumes and omitted dose rates. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study suggest that the implementation of a pharmacy technician-supported medicines administration scheme to reduce omitted doses may be acceptable to staff in an NHS hospital, and that issues with service fidelity, staff resource/capacity and perceived interventions to avoid dose omissions have important implications for the feasibility of extending the service. The study has identified targets for future development in relation to individual and system factors to improve operationalisation of technician-led initiatives to reduce medicines omissions.


Subject(s)
Medication Errors/prevention & control , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Pharmacy Technicians/statistics & numerical data , England , Female , Hospitalization , Hospitals/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Pilot Projects , Program Evaluation , Qualitative Research , State Medicine , Workload/statistics & numerical data
5.
Health Soc Care Community ; 27(4): e459-e470, 2019 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30884013

ABSTRACT

Besides doctors and dentists, an increasing range of healthcare professionals, such as nurses, pharmacists and podiatrists, can become independent prescribers (IPs). As part of an evaluation for independent prescribing funded training, this study investigated views and experiences of IPs, their colleagues and patients about independent prescribing within primary care. Questionnaires capturing quantitative and qualitative data were developed for IPs, their colleagues and patients, informed by existing literature and validated instruments. IPs were identified following independent prescribing training funded by Health Education England Northwest in 2015-2017. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and qualitative data were analysed thematically. Twenty-four patients, 20 IPs and 26 colleagues responded to the questionnaires. Most patient respondents had a long-term medical condition (n = 17) and had regular medicines prescribed (n = 21). IPs were nurses (n = 14), pharmacists (n = 4), one podiatrist (n = 1) and one was unknown. Half of the IPs were current prescribers (n = 10), the other half were still training (to become) IPs (n = 10). Colleague respondents were doctors and nurses (n = 15) other healthcare professionals (n = 8) and practice managers (n = 3). Both current IPs (n = 9) and colleague respondents (n = 25) (strongly) agreed that independent prescribing improved the quality of care provided for patients. Nearly all colleagues were supportive of independent prescribing and believed that they worked well with IPs (n = 25). Patients' perceptions and experiences of their consultations with the IP were mostly positive with the vast majority of respondents (strongly) agreeing that they were very satisfied with their visit to the IP (n = 23). Key barriers and enablers to independent prescribing were centred on IPs' knowledge, competence and organisational factors such as workload, effective teamwork and support from their colleagues. Findings from this study were mainly positive but indicate a need for policy strategies to tackle longstanding barriers to independent prescribing. However, a larger sample size is needed to confirm findings.


Subject(s)
Allied Health Personnel , Drug Prescriptions , Primary Health Care , Professional Autonomy , Adult , Aged , Allied Health Personnel/psychology , England , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
6.
Health Soc Care Community ; 27(4): 999-1010, 2019 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30693998

ABSTRACT

Redesigned health systems could meet the rising demand for healthcare, with community pharmacy currently an underused resource for the treatment and management of patients requiring urgent care. This study aimed to investigate whether a training intervention delivered over 2 days to community pharmacists resulted in behaviour and practice change. Validated measures of psychological motivation and capability factors relevant to understanding behaviour and behaviour change were collected 1 week before, 1 week after and 2 months after training in a non-controlled before and after study design. Two targeted behaviours of the intervention were the primary outcome measures: taking a structured history and applying clinical examination techniques to patients requiring urgent care. Secondary outcomes measured participants' reported patient management behaviours to investigate possible bridging of gaps in the health system. Training was provided in 14 locations in the UK to 258 community pharmacists, with data collection occurring from July 2015 to September 2016. In total, 81 participants completed all three rounds of data collection (31.4%). Findings suggest that 1-week post-training significant changes in psychological capability had taken place, and that these were sustained 2 months later: of the eight domains influencing behaviour and stimulating behaviour change, knowledge, skills, professional role, beliefs about capabilities and goals all increased significantly between T1 and T2, and T1 and T3 (all p < 0.0001). At T3, participants were more likely to have taken a structured history than performed a clinical examination, and reported both managing patients themselves and changing referral practices to other healthcare providers. Participants reported workload and the need for liability insurance as structural and contextual barriers to implementation. While findings suggest the potential to transform models of care through training to extend community pharmacists' practice these barriers to successful implementation of the urgent care service would need to be addressed if this service is rolled out nationally.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care/organization & administration , Attitude of Health Personnel , Community Pharmacy Services/organization & administration , Pharmacists/organization & administration , Professional Role , Adult , Clinical Competence , Education, Pharmacy, Continuing/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Management , United Kingdom
7.
Arch Dermatol ; 143(9): 1175-9, 2007 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17875880

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine the extent to which the attributes of a treatment affect patients' choice of treatment for psoriasis and the magnitude and nature of trade-offs between risks and benefits of treatment. DESIGN: A questionnaire, including a stated-preference, discrete choice experiment, was used to elicit patients' preferences for the treatment of psoriasis. SETTING: Dermatology clinics in England. PATIENTS: A total of 126 patients with psoriasis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Preferences of patients for, and trade-offs between, the 6 attributes of time to moderate (50%) improvement, relapse, and risks of experiencing skin irritation, high blood pressure, liver damage, and skin cancer. RESULTS: The mean age of respondents was 47.6 years, and the mean duration of psoriasis was 23 years. All 6 attributes were important factors affecting choice of treatment. The results indicated that patients with psoriasis prioritized low risk of skin cancer (beta = -0.054; P < .01) and liver damage (beta = -0.054; P < .01) and preferred treatment that resulted in a shorter time to achieve a moderate improvement (beta = -0.034; P < .01) over a longer time to relapse (beta = 0.028; P < .01). Patients were most willing to wait longer for a treatment to work if the likelihood of skin cancer or liver damage was reduced. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that treatment attributes influence patients with psoriasis in their choice of treatment. The results of the discrete choice experiment presented herein indicate that most respondents would be willing to trade between different aspects of treatment to achieve improvements in their psoriasis and minimize the risks of adverse events.


Subject(s)
Patient Satisfaction , Psoriasis/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Dermatologic Agents , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Psoriasis/psychology , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires
8.
Pharm World Sci ; 29(3): 183-9, 2007 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17279450

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To elicit women's preferences for routes of supply for emergency hormonal contraception (EHC). The objectives were to identify which attributes of services women regard as important and to identify how women trade off reductions in one attribute for an improvement in another. METHOD: A stated preference discrete choice experiment. Women attending sexual health services in a Primary Care Trust in the North West of England were invited to complete a self-completion questionnaire. Each respondent completed a questionnaire containing nine pair-wise choices. Demographic data were also collected. Conditional logit models were used to analyse the data. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Women's preferences for, and trade-offs between, the attributes of opening hours, medical staff seen, cost of EHC, length of wait for an appointment, privacy of consultation and attitude of staff. RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty-nine women attending clinics (mean age 23.8 years, SD+/-8.69) completed the questionnaire. Almost two thirds of the sample had previously used EHC. All six attributes of EHC services were statistically significant factors influencing women's preferences for the supply of EHC. A significant proportion of women indicated on at least one occasion that they would risk pregnancy rather than choose one of the services offered to them. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the way in which a service is configured and presented to women is likely to influence which service is chosen. In this study, women prioritised visiting a service where they would be treated in a sympathetic and non-judgemental manner. They also prioritised privacy. The results also suggest that if women are dissatisfied with aspects of an EHC service, they may choose not to visit it, thereby risking an unwanted pregnancy.


Subject(s)
Contraceptives, Postcoital, Hormonal/therapeutic use , Family Planning Services/organization & administration , Patient Satisfaction , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Adolescent , Adult , Choice Behavior , Confidentiality , Emergency Medical Services/economics , Emergency Medical Services/organization & administration , England , Family Planning Services/economics , Female , Financing, Personal , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Medical Staff , Middle Aged , Pregnancy , Pregnancy, Unwanted , Primary Health Care/economics , Quality of Health Care
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...