Transdural retrieval of retropulsed transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cages.

Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions (TLIFs) are performed for various lumbar spine pathologies. Posterior migration of an interbody cage is a complication that may result in neurologic injury and require reoperation. Sparse information exists regarding the safety and efficacy of a transdural approach for cage retrieval. We describe a surgical technique, in which centrally retropulsed cages were safely retrieved transdurally. A patient with prior L3-S1 posterior lumbar fusion and L4-S1 TLIFs presented with radiculopathy and weakness in dorsiflexion. Imaging revealed posterior central migration of TLIF cages causing compression of the traversing L5 nerve root. Cages were removed transdurally; the correction was performed with an all-posterior T10-pelvis fusion. Aside from temporary weakness in right-sided dorsiflexion, the patient experienced complete resolution in their radiculopathy and strength returned to its presurgical state by 3 months. The transdural approach for interbody removal can be safely performed and should be a tool in the spine surgeon's armamentarium.

Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lateral Interbody Fusion for Symptomatic Pseudarthrosis in Neurofibromatosis 1-Associated Spinal Deformity.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of symptomatic pseudarthrosis via posterior-only approaches in the setting of neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) is challenging due to dural ectasias, resulting in erosion of the posterior elements. The purpose of this report is to illustrate a minimally invasive method for performing anterior thoracic fusion for pseudarthrosis in a patient with NF1-associated scoliosis and dysplastic posterior elements. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first documented case of using video-assisted thoracoscopic lateral interbody fusion to treat pseudarthrosis for NF1-associated spinal deformity. CASE DESCRIPTION: The patient underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic anterior spinal fusion via a direct lateral interbody approach with interbody cage placement at T10-T11 and T11-T12, followed by revision of his posterior spinal fusion and instrumentation. The patient had an uneventful postoperative course. At 6 months of follow-up, the patient had complete resolution of his preoperative symptoms and had returned to full-time work with no complaints. At 3 years postoperatively, the patient reported being satisfied with the operation and had continued to work full-time without restrictions. CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of pseudarthrosis in the setting of NF1-associated scoliosis treated via minimally invasive anterior thoracic fusion facilitated by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. This is a powerful technique that allows for safe access for anterior thoracic fusion in the setting of dysplastic posterior anatomy and poor posterior bone stock.

Representativeness of the American Spine Registry: a comparison of patient characteristics with the National Inpatient Sample.

OBJECTIVE: The American Spine Registry (ASR) is a collaborative effort between the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and the American Association of Neurological Surgeons. The goal of this study was to evaluate how representative the ASR is of the national practice with spinal procedures, as recorded in the National Inpatient Sample (NIS). METHODS: The authors queried the NIS and the ASR for cervical and lumbar arthrodesis cases performed during 2017-2019. International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision and Current Procedural Terminology codes were used to identify patients undergoing cervical and lumbar procedures. The two groups were compared for the overall proportion of cervical and lumbar procedures, age distribution, sex, surgical approach features, race, and hospital volume. Outcomes available in the ASR, such as patient-reported outcomes and reoperations, were not analyzed due to nonavailability in the NIS. The representativeness of the ASR compared to the NIS was assessed via Cohen's d effect sizes, and absolute standardized mean differences (SMDs) of < 0.2 were considered trivial, whereas > 0.5 were considered moderately large. RESULTS: A total of 24,800 arthrodesis procedures were identified in the ASR for the period between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2019. During the same time period, 1,305,360 cases were recorded in the NIS. Cervical fusions comprised 35.9% of the ASR cohort (8911 cases) and 36.0% of the NIS cohort (469,287 cases). The two databases presented trivial differences in terms of patient age and sex for all years of interest across both cervical and lumbar arthrodeses (SMD < 0.2). Trivial differences were also noted in the distribution of open versus percutaneous procedures of the cervical and lumbar spine (SMD < 0.2). Among lumbar cases, anterior approaches were more common in the ASR than in the NIS (32.1% vs 22.3%, SMD = 0.22), but the discrepancy among cervical cases in the two databases was trivial (SMD = 0.03). Small differences were illustrated in terms of race, with SMDs < 0.5, and a more significant discrepancy was identified in the geographic distribution of participating sites (SMDs of 0.7 and 0.74 for cervical and lumbar cases, respectively). For both of these measures, SMDs in 2019 were smaller than those in 2018 and 2017. CONCLUSIONS: The ASR and NIS databases presented a very high similarity in proportions of cervical and lumbar spine surgeries, as well as similar distributions of age and sex, and distribution of open versus endoscopic approach. Slight discrepancies in anterior versus posterior approach among lumbar cases and patient race, and more significant discrepancies in geographic representation were also identified, yet decreasing trends in differences suggested the improving representativeness of the ASR over the course of time and its progressive growth. These conclusions are important to underline the external validity of quality investigations and research conclusions to be drawn from analyses in which the ASR is used.

Incidence, etiology and time course of delays to adult spinal deformity surgery: a single-center experience.

PURPOSE: We sought to determine the incidence, origin, and timeframe of delays to adult spinal deformity surgery so that institutions using preoperative multidisciplinary patient assessment teams might better anticipate and address these potential delays. METHODS: Complex spine procedures for treatment of adult spinal deformity from 1/1/18 to 8/31/21 were identified. Procedures for infection, tumor, and urgent/emergent cases were excluded. Operations delayed due to COVID or those that were performed outside of our established perioperative care pathway were also excluded. The electronic health record was used to identify the etiology and timeline of all pre- and peri-operative delays. RESULTS: Of 235 patients scheduled for complex spine surgery, 193 met criteria for inclusion. Of these patients, 35 patients experienced a surgical delay (18.1%) with a total of 41 delays recorded. Reasons for delay include medically unoptimized (25.6%), intraoperative complication (17.9%), patient directed delay (17.9%), patient illness/injury (15.4%), scheduling complication (10.3%), insurance delay/denial (5.1%), and unknown (2.6%). Twenty-four delays experienced by 22 individuals occurred within 7 days of their scheduled surgery date. CONCLUSION: At a single multidisciplinary center, most delays to adult spinal deformity surgery occur before a patient is admitted to the hospital, and for recommendations of additional medical workup/clearance. We suspect that the preoperative protocol might increase pre-admission delays for unoptimized patients, as the protocol is intended to ensure patients receive surgery only when they are medically ready. Further research is needed to determine the economic and system impact of delays related to a preoperative optimization protocol weighed against the reduction in adverse events these protocols can provide.

Use of Cannulated Reamers to Facilitate Thoracic Diskectomy Using a Minimally Invasive Retropleural Thoracotomy Approach-Surgical Technique.

BACKGROUND: The surgical treatment of symptomatic thoracic disk herniations is technically challenging. In the past decade, a minimally invasive retropleural thoracotomy approach has become more popular to treat this pathology. However, efficient bone removal to safely perform the diskectomy and spinal cord decompression is difficult with this technique because of the small incision size and long working distance in the thoracic cavity and the proximity of the compressed thoracic cord. OBJECTIVE: To describe a novel surgical technique for performing a thoracic diskectomy using a minimally invasive lateral approach using cannulated reamers to facilitate bone removal. METHODS: This technique was used in 7 consecutive patients who presented with thoracic myelopathy from a thoracic disk herniation. First, a standard lateral minimally invasive retropleural approach to the thoracic spine was performed. Partially threaded guide wires were placed in the posterior aspect of the vertebral bodies adjacent to the affected disk space, and sequential cannulated reamers were passed over the guidewires to perform partial corpectomies. The posterior annulus, posterior longitudinal ligament, and herniated disk material were then resected using Penfield dissectors and Kerrison rongeurs to complete the decompression. RESULTS: All 7 patients who underwent thoracic diskectomy using this approach had stable or improved neurologic function postoperatively. There were no complications related to the use of the cannulated reamer technique. CONCLUSION: The use of cannulated reamers provides a simple and efficient method for safe bone removal to facilitate minimally invasive thoracic diskectomy using a lateral approach. This is an easily reproducible technique using commonly available equipment.

Combining time-driven activity-based costing and lean methodology: an initial study of single-level lumbar fusion surgery to assess value-based healthcare in patients undergoing spine surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Measuring costs across entire episodes of care, time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) has recently been described as a novel cost accounting arm of value-based care organizations. Lean methodology is a system used to understand pathways of care at a granular level, allowing for standardization. The current work presents an attempt at combining the 2 methodologies to detect meaningful variation in a patient's care following single-level spine fusion. The objective of this study was to evaluate the combination of TDABC and lean methodologies in detecting meaningful variability in time-based care in patients undergoing single-level spine fusion surgery. METHODS: This study is a consecutive case series of patients who underwent single-level spine fusion performed by 1 of 5 fellowship-trained spine surgeons. Patients were diagnosed with either lumbar stenosis or spondylolisthesis. Additional inclusion criteria included inpatient stays from 1 to 3 days, discharge to home, and no readmission within 30 days of surgery. Patient demographic data were obtained. Time spent on activities for each personnel role was aggregated in 15-minute increments occurring preoperatively, intraoperatively, and postoperatively. Patients were analyzed in 3 groups based on the duration of their in-hospital stay. RESULTS: Patients discharged on postoperative day (POD) 3 had statistically significantly more total time spent than those discharged on POD 2. Patients discharged on POD 1 had less total time than those in the former 2 groups. The amount of time spent with patients did not differ for personnel in either preoperative or postanesthesia care unit phases of care. There was a statistically significant difference in time spent in surgery for surgeons, anesthesia attendings, circulators, and scrub technicians. CONCLUSIONS: In a healthcare setting run by lean methodology, TDABC may detect meaningful variability in an episode of care for single-level spine fusion. Clinicians and administrators can use this combination to allocate costs appropriately, optimize value care streams, and help improve patient care.

Appropriate Telemedicine Utilization in Spine Surgery: Results From a Delphi Study.

STUDY DESIGN: Delphi expert panel consensus. OBJECTIVE: To obtain expert consensus on best practices for appropriate telemedicine utilization in spine surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Several studies have shown high patient satisfaction associated with telemedicine during the COVID-19 peak pandemic period as well as after easing of restrictions. As this technology will most likely continue to be employed, there is a need to define appropriate utilization. METHODS: An expert panel consisting of 27 spine surgeons from various countries was assembled in February 2021. A two-round consensus-based Delphi method was used to generate consensus statements on various aspects of telemedicine (separated as video visits or audio visits) including themes, such as patient location and impact of patient diagnosis, on assessment of new patients. Topics with ≥75% agreement were categorized as having achieved a consensus. RESULTS: The expert panel reviewed a total of 59 statements. Of these, 32 achieved consensus. The panel had consensus that video visits could be utilized regardless of patient location and that video visits are appropriate for evaluating as well as indicating for surgery multiple common spine pathologies, such as lumbar stenosis, lumbar radiculopathy, and cervical radiculopathy. Finally, the panel had consensus that video visits could be appropriate for a variety of visit types including early, midterm, longer term postoperative follow-up, follow-up for imaging review, and follow-up after an intervention (i.e., physical therapy, injection). CONCLUSION: Although telemedicine was initially introduced out of necessity, this technology most likely will remain due to evidence of high patient satisfaction and significant cost savings. This study was able to provide a framework for appropriate telemedicine utilization in spine surgery from a panel of experts. However, several questions remain for future research, such as whether or not an in-person consultation is necessary prior to surgery and which physical exam maneuvers are appropriate for telemedicine.Level of Evidence: 4.

Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in spine surgery: recommendations for use and alternative bone substitutes-a narrative review.

Background and Objective: Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) has been extensively studied in preclinical, animal, and human studies and has been used widely in spine fusion surgery. Evidence demonstrates that fusion rates with rhBMP-2 are similar to or higher than those achieved with autologous bone graft. However, there have been concerns regarding the cost, optimal dosage, and potential complications of rhBMP-2 use in spine surgery. The objective of this paper is to provide a current review of the available evidence regarding rhBMP-2 and other bone graft substitutes used for spinal surgery. Methods: We searched Ovid Medline, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, American College of Physicians Journal Club, and Database of Abstracts of Review of Effectiveness for 2 studies regarding physiology of bone fusion in spine surgery, formulations and indications of rhBMP-2, cancer risk of rhBMP-2, and alternatives to rhBMP-2 published from 1965 to 2022 in English. Key Content and Findings: The debate regarding indications and cost effectiveness of rhBMP-2 is presented based on increasing data and use criteria. Here, we focus on the effectiveness and economic costs (both direct and indirect) of rhBMP-2 and alternative bone graft substitutes. Based on the cumulative literature, we provide recommendations for rhBMP-2 use in spine surgery. Conclusions: Based on our review of the literature, we recommend the following: (I) clear informed consent processes between surgeons and patients regarding current evidence of the benefits and risks of using rhBMP-2 and available alternative bone graft substitutes. (II) Consideration of rhBMP-2 for spinal fusion surgery (excluding anterior cervical procedures), especially adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery, lumbar surgery for multilevel degenerative disease, revision surgery for pseudoarthrosis, and surgery in patients with a low-quantity or low-quality autograft. (III) Regulatory oversight of the type, volume, and dose of bone graft substitute (both per level and per procedure) to ensure appropriate indications, prevent excessive usage, and thereby enhance cost containment.

Utilizing Lean Methodology and Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing Together: An Observational Pilot Study of Hip Replacement Surgery Utilizing a New Method to Study Value-Based Health Care.

BACKGROUND: Time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) has been suggested as the cost-accounting arm of value-based care organizations seeking to address costing challenges from the bottom up by studying the actual processes used in patient care. Lean methodology is a system in which the care pathway is understood at a granular level. In the current study, we attempt to combine these 2 methodologies, providing a robust mechanism to detect meaningful variation. First, we used data from a single surgeon and examined differences in time and cost for patients released on postoperative days 1 or 2. Next, we compared the data from patients discharged on postoperative day 1 with those of patients who underwent an operation by a different surgeon and were also discharged on postoperative day 1. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent an anterior hip arthroplasty performed by 1 of 2 surgeons and who had degenerative pathology of the hip, an inpatient stay of 1 or 2 days, discharge to home, and no readmission within 30 days of the surgical procedure were identified. We obtained data on patient demographic characteristics and time spent on activities for each personnel role in 15-minute increments occurring during 4 time points of a surgical episode of care (preoperative bay, surgical procedure, post-anesthesia care unit, and inpatient). Personnel costs were set as a ratio relative to the cost of a registered nurse (RN). RESULTS: Consistent with our hypotheses, both RNs and nursing assistants-certified (NA-Cs) spent more time with patients released on postoperative day 2 compared with those released on postoperative day 1. Also consistent with our hypotheses, we only found significant differences for the time that personnel spent in the surgical procedures. CONCLUSIONS: For patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty for degenerative conditions, we demonstrate that, in the setting of lean methodology, TDABC can detect variability in a meaningful and predictable way. This combination may further enable clinicians and administrators to improve processes, to allocate appropriate resources to specific process steps, and to optimize various treatments across episodes of care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic and Decision Analysis Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Is there bias in the treatment of degenerative spine disease? Analysis of anonymous voting via a multidisciplinary conference.

Many institutions have developed shared decision-making conferences as a mechanism for reducing treatment costs and improving patient outcomes. Little is known about the process of shared decision-making that takes place in these conferences, and there is the possibility of bias among surgeons and nonsurgeons for treatment within their respective specialties. This study was conducted to determine who is contributing to the decision-making process in a multidisciplinary spine conference and to what extent treatment biases exist among the surgical and nonsurgical members of this conference. Voting data were collected during weekly multidisciplinary spine conferences. Descriptive statistics were calculated on the cases presented and the number and type of physicians voting for each case. The likelihood of a particular vote in the surgeon and nonsurgeon cohorts was evaluated using relative risk calculation and multinomial logistic regression. A total of 262 consecutive cases were analyzed. No significant differences in treatment recommendation were observed between surgery and nonsurgical management (relative risk, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.97-1.25) when comparing votes from the surgeon and nonsurgeon cohorts. Multinomial logistic regression showed the odds of nonsurgeons recommending nonsurgical management over surgery was 20% greater than receiving that recommendation from their surgeon colleagues. Individual surgeon and nonsurgeon voters were evenly distributed above and below the mean for treatment recommendation. Individual and group biases exist among surgeons and nonsurgeons treating degenerative spine diseases. Multidisciplinary conferences may or may not level these biases, depending on how they are conducted.

Multidisciplinary approaches to complication reduction in complex spine surgery: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Complex spine surgery carries a high complication rate that can produce suboptimal outcomes for patients undergoing these extensive operations. However, multidisciplinary pathways introduced at multiple institutions have demonstrated a promising potential toward reducing the burden of complications in patients being treated for spinal deformities. To date, there has been no effort to systematically collate the multidisciplinary approaches in use at various institutions. PURPOSE: The present study aims to determine effective multidisciplinary strategies for reducing the complication rate in complex spine surgery by analyzing existing institutional multidisciplinary approaches and delineating common themes across multiple practice settings. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. METHODS: We followed guidelines established under the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). The studies reported on data from PubMed, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Web of Science and Cochrane. We included articles that described either approaches to, or results from, the implementation of multidisciplinary paradigms during the preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative phases of care for patients undergoing complex spine surgery. We excluded studies that only targeted one complication unless such an approach was in coordination with more extensive multidisciplinary planning at the same institution. RESULTS: A total of 406 unique articles were identified. Following an initial determination based on title and abstract, 22 articles met criteria for full-text review, and 10 met the inclusion criteria to be included in the review. Key aspects of multidisciplinary approaches to complex spine surgery included extensive preoperative workup and interdisciplinary conferencing, intraoperative communication and monitoring, and postoperative floor management and discharge planning. These strategies produced decreases in surgical duration and complication rates. CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the first to systematically analyze multidisciplinary approaches to reduce complications in complex spine surgery. This review provides a roadmap toward reducing the elevated complication rate for patients undergoing complex spine surgery.

Team Approach: Safety and Value in the Practice of Complex Adult Spinal Surgery.

Surgical management of complex adult spinal deformities is of high risk, with a substantial risk of operative mortality. Current evidence shows that potential risk and morbidity resulting from surgery for complex spinal deformity may be minimized through risk-factor optimization. The multidisciplinary team care model includes neurosurgeons, orthopaedic surgeons, physiatrists, anesthesiologists, hospitalists, psychologists, physical therapists, specialized physician assistants, and nurses. The multidisciplinary care model mimics previously described integrated care pathways designed to offer a structured means of providing a comprehensive preoperative medical evaluation and evidence-based multimodal perioperative care. The role of each team member is illustrated in the case of a 66-year-old male patient with previous incomplete spinal cord injury, now presenting with Charcot spinal arthropathy and progressive vertebral-body destruction resulting in lumbar kyphosis.

Helping spine surgeons detect pre-surgical psychological distress in complex spine patients: an observational pilot study.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. OBJECTIVE: Analysis of a standardized, pre-surgical psychological evaluation program for complex spine surgery. Adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients have a high rate of comorbid mental health conditions. Although there is a body of literature demonstrating the impact of psychological factors, including anxiety and depression, on spine surgery outcome, it is estimated that spine surgeons utilize a psychological assessment only about one third of the time prior to a patient's spine surgery. At this time, there is not a widely reported pre-surgical psychological evaluation program for ASD patients. METHODS: 129 consecutive complex spine surgery candidates receiving a pre-surgical psychological evaluation were analyzed between January 1st 2014 and December 31st 2018. Based on the available literature and professional experience in our facility, a color code for patients was developed from Green (low psychological or psychosocial co-morbidity) to Red (high psychological or psychosocial co-morbidity). Univariate analysis was used to evaluate between color grades and demographics, mental health disorders and outcomes. RESULTS: 83% of complex spine patients had at least one psychological disorder or psychosocial barrier. Only 17% had a combination of realistic expectations for surgery, a good support plan, and were without a history of mental illness. The pre-surgical psychological color criteria were validated in showing higher rates of major depression, anxiety disorder, and bipolar disorder in moderate to severe color grades (p < .001) in addition to higher PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores (p < .001). Patients having a more severe color grade had lower rates of a discharge home and were taking higher morphine equivalent dosages (MEDs) at their six-month follow-up, though both did not reach statistical significance (p = .07 and p = .08; respectively). CONCLUSION: A comprehensive pre-surgical psychological evaluation may be beneficial to risk stratify and counsel patients being evaluated for surgical reconstruction of adult spinal deformities. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Machine learning applications to clinical decision support in neurosurgery: an artificial intelligence augmented systematic review.

Machine learning (ML) involves algorithms learning patterns in large, complex datasets to predict and classify. Algorithms include neural networks (NN), logistic regression (LR), and support vector machines (SVM). ML may generate substantial improvements in neurosurgery. This systematic review assessed the current state of neurosurgical ML applications and the performance of algorithms applied. Our systematic search strategy yielded 6866 results, 70 of which met inclusion criteria. Performance statistics analyzed included area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Natural language processing (NLP) was used to model topics across the corpus and to identify keywords within surgical subspecialties. ML applications were heterogeneous. The densest cluster of studies focused on preoperative evaluation, planning, and outcome prediction in spine surgery. The main algorithms applied were NN, LR, and SVM. Input and output features varied widely and were listed to facilitate future research. The accuracy (F(2,19) = 6.56, p < 0.01) and specificity (F(2,16) = 5.57, p < 0.01) of NN, LR, and SVM differed significantly. NN algorithms demonstrated significantly higher accuracy than LR. SVM demonstrated significantly higher specificity than LR. We found no significant difference between NN, LR, and SVM AUC and sensitivity. NLP topic modeling reached maximum coherence at seven topics, which were defined by modeling approach, surgery type, and pathology themes. Keywords captured research foci within surgical domains. ML technology accurately predicts outcomes and facilitates clinical decision-making in neurosurgery. NNs frequently outperformed other algorithms on supervised learning tasks. This study identified gaps in the literature and opportunities for future neurosurgical ML research.

The Role of Potentially Modifiable Factors in a Standard Work Protocol to Decrease Complications in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Systematic Review, Part 1.

STUDY DESIGN: Structured Literature Review. OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate the peer-reviewed literature for potentially modifiable patient and surgical factors that could be incorporated into a Standard Work protocol to decrease complications in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Lean Methodology uses Standard Work to improve efficiency and decrease waste and error. ASD is known to have a high surgical complication rate. Several patient and surgical potentially modifiable factors have been suggested to affect complications, including preoperative hemoglobin, bone density, body mass index (BMI), age-appropriate realignment, preoperative albumin/prealbumin, and smoking status. We sought to evaluate the literature for evidence supporting these factors to include in a Standard Work protocol to decrease complications. METHODS: Each of these six factors was developed into an appropriate clinical question that included the patient population, surgical intervention, a comparison group, and outcomes measure (PICO question). A comprehensive literature search was then performed. The authors reviewed abstracts and analyzed data from included studies. From 456 initial citations with abstract, 173 articles underwent full-text review. The best available evidence for clinical questions regarding the influence of these factors was provided by 93 included studies. RESULTS: We found fair evidence supporting a low preoperative hemoglobin level associated with increased transfusion rates and decreased BMD and increased BMI associated with increased complication rates. Fair evidence supported low albumin/prealbumin associated with increased complications. There was fair evidence associating smoking exposure to increased reoperations, but conflicting evidence associating it with increased complications. There was no evidence in the literature evaluating age-appropriate realignment and complications. CONCLUSION: Preoperative hemoglobin, bone density, body mass index, preoperative albumin/prealbumin, and smoking status all are potentially modifiable risk factors that are associated with increased complications in the adult spine surgery population. Developing a Standard Work Protocol for patient evaluation and optimization should include these factors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

The Role of Potentially Modifiable Factors in a Standard Work Protocol to Decrease Complications in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Systematic Review, Part 2.

STUDY DESIGN: Structured literature review. OBJECTIVES: To review the current literature for potentially modifiable patient and surgical factors that could be incorporated into a Standard Work protocol to decrease complications in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Application of lean methodology to health care involves standardization of work flow. Successful implementation of LEAN management can lead to dramatic reduction in variability and waste. Frailty, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) concentration, vitamin D level, mental health status, intraoperative fluid management (IFM), and tranexamic acid (TXA) administration may be modified to reduce complications after ASD surgery. METHODS: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE/PubMed, Ovid, and Google Scholar databases were used to identify abstracts and citations for this review. Each topic was developed into an appropriate clinical question that included the patient population, surgical intervention, a comparison group, and outcomes measure (PICO question). From 373 initial citations with abstract, 134 articles underwent full-text review. The best available evidence for clinical questions regarding the influence of these factors was provided by 43 included studies. RESULTS: We found fair evidence supporting an association between preoperative mental health disorders, frailty, vitamin D deficiency, and higher HbA1c levels and increased complications. Conversely, we found good evidence supporting an association between the use of intraoperative TXA and an optimized intraoperative fluid management and decreased complications. CONCLUSION: Gaps in the existing literature limit our ability to evaluate if all of the patient and surgical factors selected for this review are associated with increased or decreased complications and reoperations in ASD surgery. However, for both intraoperative TXA usage and optimized intraoperative fluid management that were supported by good evidence, developing Standard Work Protocols may optimize care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Postoperative Ileus: Old and New Observations on Prevention and Treatment in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.

BACKGROUND: The reported incidence of postoperative ileus (POI) after spine surgery depends on the surgical approach and definition used. It is therefore possible that the overall incidence is substantially higher than previously thought. POI has consequences for both the patient and hospital resources, and can significantly increase health care costs. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients aged 18 years or older who underwent elective complex spine surgery at our tertiary referral institution from 2011 through 2017. Preoperative comorbidities, operating time and approach, estimated blood loss, postoperative complications, and length of stay (LOS) were analyzed for patients meeting the inclusion criteria. RESULTS: Of 174 patients included in the study, 32 patients (18.4%) developed POI, leading to a significant increase in their median LOS (9 vs. 7 days; P = 0.020). Total estimated blood loss (1649.5 ± 1266.2 vs. 1124.6 ± 936.3 mL; P = 0.009) and total surgical time (501.6 ± 170.5 vs. 388.4 ± 159.8 minutes; P < 0.001) were significantly higher in the POI cohort. The use of nonselective µ-opioid receptor antagonists in 66% of patients with POI did not significantly impact the median LOS (9 vs. 8 days; P = 0.477) compared with patients with POI who did not receive this intervention. The incidence of postoperative adverse events other than ileus was similar between the 2 patient groups. CONCLUSIONS: Despite use of early interventions, the median LOS remains significantly longer in patients who develop POI after complex spine surgery. Knowledge of the associated predictive risk factors could potentially assist with the development of rigorous, evidence-based preventative strategies.

Outcomes Surrounding Perioperative Transfusion Rates and Hemoglobin Nadir Values Following Complex Spine Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Optimal transfusion thresholds have been extensively studied for various surgical procedures; however, no transfusion threshold has been set for patients undergoing complex spine surgery. The aim of this study was to compare postoperative outcomes relative to perioperative hemoglobin (Hb) levels for patients undergoing complex spine surgery for adult spinal deformity and to evaluate impact of blood transfusion timing on clinical outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of patients with adult spinal deformity undergoing spine surgery lasting >6 hours or involving ≥6 levels of fusion was performed. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts based on whole hospitalization Hb nadir <9.0 g/dL versus ≥9.0 g/dL. RESULTS: Among 104 patients, 55 (52.9%) had Hb nadir <9.0 g/dL. Compared with the cohort with higher Hb nadir, patients with Hb nadir <9.0 g/dL were more likely to be female (84.5% vs. 65.3%, P = 0.016), present with lower preoperative Hb (12.6 [1.5] g/dL vs. 13.8 [1.2] g/dL, P < 0.001), experience greater change in Hb after surgery (4.4 [1.5] g/dL vs. 3.7 [1.5] g/dL, P = 0.030), receive a postoperative blood transfusion (69.1% vs. 44.9%, P = 0.013), and have a longer length of stay (9.1 [4.8] days vs. 6.2 [3.2] days, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with adult spinal deformity undergoing complex spine surgery, earlier targeted blood transfusions during surgery, rather than in the postoperative period, may lead to improved postoperative outcomes.

Improving Complex Pediatric and Adult Spine Care While Embracing the Value Equation.

INTRODUCTION: Value in health care is defined as the quotient of outcomes to cost. Both pediatric and adult spinal deformity surgeries are among the most expensive procedures offered today. With high variability in both outcomes and costs in spine surgery today, surgeons will be expected to consider long-term cost effectiveness when comparing treatment options. METHODS: We summarize various methods by which value can be increased in complex spine surgery, both through the improvement of outcomes and the reduction of cost. These methods center around standardization, team-based and collaborative approaches, rigorous outcomes tracking through dashboards and registries, and continuous process improvement. RESULTS: This manuscript reviews the expert opinion of leading spine specialists on the improvement of safety, quality and improvement of value of pediatric and adult spinal surgery. CONCLUSION: Without surgeon leadership in this arena, suboptimal solutions may result from the isolated intervention of regulatory bodies or payer groups. The cooperative development of standardized, team-based approaches in complex spine surgery will lead to the high-quality, high-value care for patients.