The introduction of wide-angle 270° laparoscopy through a novel laparoscopic camera system.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopy has enjoyed improvements over the last three decades primarily in achieving high definition, but the 70° field of view (FOV) remains unchanged. Complications related to events that take place out of the FOV continue to be reported. Additional problems leading to poor visualization are fogging and smoke accumulation. A novel laparoscopic system (SurroundScope, 270Surgical) was developed and dramatically expands the FOV from the 70° to 270° by adding side cameras at the distal tip of the laparoscope, while LED illumination eliminates fogging and improves smoke effects. This study describes the initial clinical experience with SurroundScope and its potential advantages over traditional laparoscopy. METHODS: SurroundScope was studied at Bnai Zion Medical Center in Israel and the Minnesota Institute for Minimally Invasive Surgery in America. 27 laparoscopic surgeries were performed, and at the end of each procedure, evaluations were completed by all surgeons and camera holders. RESULTS: All 27 cases were completed successfully without adverse events. No injuries occurred as a result of surgical tool manipulation outside of the central frame while 133 potentially adverse events were identified on side frames. There was no fogging across the 27 cases. The impact of smoke was negligible in all cases, as laparoscope removal or venting was never necessary. Surgeon respondents indicated that tools could be followed from the port to the site of surgery without camera manipulation. Most surgeons strongly agreed that the potential to identify bleeding was improved. Camera holders strongly agreed that the ergonomics were improved and that they moved the camera less than with a standard laparoscope. CONCLUSIONS: Initial results demonstrate numerous advantages for SurroundScope as compared to traditional laparoscopy. The important benefits of expanded FOV, complete lack of fogging, and negligible smoke may improve patient safety, reduce adverse events and the duration of surgery. Further investigation to quantify these benefits is recommended.

Can Rural Minimally Invasive Surgery Fellowships Provide Operative Experience Similar to Urban Programs?

OBJECTIVE: Operative experience in rural fellowship programs is largely unknown. The 2 of the most rural minimally invasive surgery (MIS)/bariatric fellowships are located in the upper Midwest. We hypothesized that these 2 programs would offer a similar operative experience to other U.S. programs in more urban locations. DESIGN: The 2011 to 2012 and 2012 to 2013 fellowship case logs from 2 rural Midwest programs were compared with case logs from 23 U.S. MIS/bariatric programs. All rural Midwest fellowship graduates completed a survey describing their fellowship experience and current practice. Statistical analysis included Wilcoxon rank-sum test. SETTING: Setting included the 2 rural Midwest U.S. MIS/bariatric fellowship programs. PARTICIPANTS: Graduates from MIS/bariatric fellowship programs participated in the study. RESULTS: Mean volumes for bariatric, foregut, abdominal wall, small intestine, and hepatobiliary cases for rural Midwest fellows vs. other U.S. programs were 123.8 ± 23.7 vs. 150.2 ± 49.2 (p = 0.20); 44.3 ± 19.4 vs. 66.3 ± 35.5 (p = 0.18); 48.3 ± 28.0 vs. 57.9 ± 27.8 (p = 0.58); 11.3 ± 1.9 vs. 12.0 ± 8.7 (p = 0.58); and 55.0 ± 34.8 vs. 48.1 ± 42.6 (p = 0.63), respectively. Mean endoscopy volume was significantly higher among rural Midwest fellows (451.0 ± 395.2 vs. 99.7 ± 83.4; p = 0.05). All rural Midwest fellows reported an adequate number of cases as operating surgeon during fellowship. A total of 60% of fellows currently practice in a rural area. In all, 87% and 13% reported that their fellowship training was extremely or somewhat beneficial to their current practice, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Rural MIS fellowship programs offer a similar operative experience to other U.S. programs. A greater volume of endoscopy cases was observed in rural Midwest fellowships.

Complications of adjustable gastric banding.

Adjustable gastric banding (AGB) has become increasingly used by bariatric surgeons and their patients as the surgical weight loss procedure of choice. The popularity of this procedure is in large part a result of the remarkable safety profile and low initial complication rate. Complications of AGB were initially believed to be minor and infrequent, but longer-term studies have increasingly described complications that lead to revisional surgery. In addition, a larger fraction of patients fail to lose weight than with other surgical weight loss procedures, frequently necessitating conversion to these other options.

Building and maintaining a successful surgery program in rural Minnesota.

For decades, it has been axiomatic that rural health care systems are crucial factors not only in the health of the populations that they serve but also in the viability of America's rural communities. Medical care, as it is delivered in rural America, is becoming increasingly problematic as national health care delivery models evolve. Increasing reimbursement pressures and changing practitioner lifestyle expectations have had negative effects on rural communities and resulted in rural hospital closings and a declining level of surgical care available. These two factors are interrelated, given the importance of surgical services to the revenue stream of any hospital.