Periprosthetic joint infection in total ankle replacement: which are the current diagnostic criteria?

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is among the most common complications of Total Ankle Replacement (TAR) and its management may be challenging. We set out to define which are the criteria currently used to diagnose PJI after TAR. METHODS: This PRISMA-compliant systematic review was registered in the Open Science Framework. Multiple databases were searched including clinical studies in which PJI after TAR was diagnosed and treated. Data were harvested regarding the cohort, the study design and the diagnostic criteria for PJI. Risk of bias was assessed using the modified Coleman Methodology Score (mCMS). RESULTS: Six papers (122 infected TARs) published between 2012 and 2022 were included in this review. Ankle pain with swelling and unexplained increased local temperature were the most common clinical findings leading to a suspicion of PJI. In 100% of cases the diagnosis was confirmed through synovial fluid analysis associated with positive blood tests. In all the revision surgeries intraoperative cultures (at least 3) were performed. In 109 ankles (90%) there was a microbiological isolation. Out of these, 38 (35%) were single organism infections by Staphylococcus coagulase negative and 37 (34%) were single organism infections by Staphylococcus Aureus. The mean mCMS was 37.6 out of 100. CONCLUSIONS: There is a lack of diagnostic criteria specific for PJI after TAR. Clinical and laboratory tests inspired to the knowledge in total knee and total hip arthroplasty are generally adopted in the field of ankle arthroplasty. The quality of evidence for studies included in this review was poor.

Does the Number of Screws Influence the Union Rate in Ankle Arthrodesis? A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the number of cannulated screws used during ankle arthrodesis (AA) might influence the union and complication rate. METHODS: In this Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-compliant PROSPERO-registered systematic review, multiple databases were searched including studies in which patients undergone AA using cannulated screws as exclusive fixation method were followed. Data were harvested regarding the cohort, the study design, the surgical technique, the nonunion, and complication rate at the longest follow-up. Risk of bias was assessed using the modified Coleman Methodology Score (mCMS). Two groups were built (arthrodeses fixed with 2 screws [group 1, G1] vs arthrodeses fixed with 3 screws [group 2 G2]) and compared. RESULTS: Fifteen series of patients from 15 studies (667 ankles) were selected (G1 = 458 ankles and G2 = 209). The pooled proportion estimate revealed a similar nonunion rate in the 2-screw group as compared with the 3-screw group (4% vs 3%; P = .68). The pooled proportion of complications was higher in G1 (19%) than in G2 (8%), but it was not significantly different either (P = .45). After exclusion of "symptomatic hardware and screw removal," the difference was still not significant (P = .28) although it resulted lower in G1 than in G2 (4% vs 8%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Using 3 cannulated screws during AA as compared with a 2-screw construct does not significantly reduce the risk of nonunion nor the risk of complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Systematic review of level IV.

Analysis of the 50 Most Cited Articles on Achilles Tendon Injury.

Background: Achilles tendon injuries represent one of the most common reasons for referral to orthopaedic surgeons. Purpose: To outline the characteristics, examine trends in publication, and evaluate the correlation between citations and study quality of the 50 most cited articles on Achilles tendon injury. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: After searching the Web of Science for articles published in orthopaedic journals, we identified the 50 most cited articles on Achilles tendon injury and abstracted their characteristics. Risk of bias was assessed using the modified Coleman Methodology Score (mCMS). Multiple bivariate analyses (Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficient) were used to evaluate the association among number of citations, citation rate (citations/year), 2020 journal impact factor (JIF), year of publication, level of evidence (LoE), study type (tendon rupture or chronic tendinopathy), sample size, and mCMS. Results: The top 50 articles were cited 12,194 times. Each article had a mean ± SD 244 ± 88.8 citations (range, 157-657) and a citation rate of 12.6 ± 5.4 per year (range, 3-28). A total of 35 studies (70%) were published between 2000 and 2010. The citation rate of the 16 most recent studies was almost double that of the 16 oldest studies (17.5 vs 9.9; P < .001). Nineteen studies (49%) were classified as having poor quality (mCMS <50 points). The mean JIF of the 9 journals that published the studies was 5.1. The citation rate correlated with the number of citations (r = 0.56; P < .001), publication year (r = 0.60; P < .001), and LoE (r = -0.44; P = .005). The publication year correlated with the LoE (r = -0.40; P = .01). Study quality in terms of mCMS correlated with the JIF (r = 0.35; P = .03) and LoE (r = -0.48; P = .003) but not the citation rate (P = .15). Conclusion: The mean LoE and the citation rate of the most cited articles on Achilles tendon injury both significantly increased over time. Although the JIF was positively correlated with study quality, almost half of the studies had poor-quality methodology.

Irritation from metalwork after ankle arthrodesis fixed using screws: a proportional meta-analysis and systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: Ankle arthrodesis (AA) is often fixed using cannulated screws. The irritation from metalwork is a relatively common complication, but there is no consensus regarding the need to remove the screws on a systematic basis. The aim of this study was to determine (1) the proportion of screws removed after AA and (2) whether predictors of screw removal could be identified. METHODS: This PRISMA-compliant systematic review was part of a larger previous protocol registered on the PROSPERO platform. Multiple databases were searched including studies in which patients undergone AA using screws as exclusive fixation method were followed. Data were harvested regarding the cohort, the study design, the surgical technique, the nonunion and complication rate at the longest follow-up. Risk of bias was assessed using the modified Coleman Methodology Score (mCMS). RESULTS: Forty-four series of patients from thirty-eight studies (1990 ankles, 1934 patients) were selected. The average follow-up was 40.8 months (range 12-110). In all studies, hardware was removed due to symptoms reported by patients and related to the screws. The pooled proportion of removal of metalwork was 3% (95% CI 2-4). The pooled proportion of fusion was 96% (95%CI 95-98), while the pooled proportion of complications and reoperations (excluding the removal of metalwork) stood at 15% (95% CI 11-18) and 3% (95% CI 2-4), respectively. The mean mCMS (50.8 ± 8.1, range 35-66) revealed only an overall fair quality of studies. The univariate analysis and the multivariate model showed that the year of publication (R = - 0.004; p = 0.01) and the number of screws (R = 0.08; p = 0.01) were associated with the screw removal rate. Specifically, we found that over time the removal rate decreased by 0.4% per year and that the use of three screws instead of two reduced the risk of removal of metalwork by 8%. CONCLUSIONS: In this review, removal of metalwork after ankle arthrodesis using cannulated screws was needed in 3% of cases at an average follow-up of 40.8 months. It was indicated only in case of symptoms related to soft tissue irritation from screws. The use of three screws was paradoxically related to a reduced risk of removal of screws as compared to two-screw constructs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of Level IV.

Treatment Approaches for Plantar Fasciopathy in Elite Athletes: A Scoping Review of the Literature.

Background: Plantar fasciopathy is a common orthopaedic condition that affects athletes and limits their performance. Purpose: To conduct a scoping review of the literature to summarize the evidence provided so far for the management of plantar fasciopathy in elite athletes and identify potential gaps in the current knowledge. Study Design: Scoping review; Level of evidence, 5. Methods: This scoping review followed the 6-stage methodological framework of Arksey and O'Malley and was registered in the Open Science Framework. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were used to identify eligible articles. After charting of data, studies were pooled into 3 categories: epidemiological/diagnostic studies, outcome research focused on plantar fasciitis or partial tears, and studies on the rupture of the plantar fascia. The modified Coleman Methodology Score was used to assess the quality of included articles. Results: Of 742 initial studies, 10 were selected (109 patients): 8 level 4 articles and 2 level 5 articles. In 4 studies (91 athletes), potential risk factors were discussed but not investigated (ie, preexistent thickening of the fascia, spike shoes, varus hindfoot/knee alignment). In 3 studies (6 athletes) focusing on plantar fasciitis, the nonsurgical treatment led to a satisfactory but poorly documented outcome. In 3 studies (12 athletes), the rupture of the fascia was treated nonoperatively with contrasting results, while surgery was performed only in 2 cases. The mean modified Coleman Methodology Score was 19 (range, 3-42), demonstrating overall poor methodology. Conclusion: The limited number of studies and their poor quality do not allow to define the gold standard treatment of plantar fasciopathy in elite athletes. Until high-quality studies are provided, clinicians have to rely on the available literature regarding the nonprofessional or nonathletic population to make the best evidence-based decision.