ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is mainly due to complement regulatory gene abnormalities with a dominant pattern but incomplete penetrance. Thus, healthy carriers can be identified in any family of aHUS patients, but it is unpredictable if they will eventually develop aHUS. METHODS: Patients are screened for 10 complement regulatory gene abnormalities and once a genetic alteration is identified, the search is extended to at-risk family members. The present cohort study includes 257 subjects from 71 families: 99 aHUS patients (71 index cases + 28 affected family members) and 158 healthy relatives with a documented complement gene abnormality. RESULTS: Fourteen families (19.7%) experienced multiple cases. Over a cumulative observation period of 7595 person-years, only 28 family members carrying gene mutations experienced aHUS (overall penetrance of 20%), leading to a disease rate of 3.69 events for 1000 person-years. The disease rate was 7.47 per 1000 person-years among siblings, 6.29 among offspring, 2.01 among parents, 1.84 among carriers of variants of uncertain significance, and 4.43 among carriers of causative variants. CONCLUSIONS: The penetrance of aHUS seems a lot lower than previously reported. Moreover, the disease risk is higher in carriers of causative variants and is not equally distributed among generations: siblings and the offspring of patients have a much greater disease risk than parents. However, risk calculation may depend on variant classification that could change over time.
ABSTRACT
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE: Patients with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) have long been considered ineligible for kidney transplantation (KTx) in several centers due to the high risk of disease recurrence, graft loss and life-threatening complications. The availability of Eculizumab (ECU) has now overcome this problem. However, the best approach towards timing, maintenance schedule, the possibility of discontinuation and patient monitoring has not yet been clearly established. STUDY DESIGN: This is a single center case series presenting our experience with KTx in aHUS. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: This study included 26 patients (16 females) with a diagnosis of aHUS, who spent a median of 5.5 years on kidney replacement therapy before undergoing KTx. We compared the aHUS relapse rate in three groups of patients who underwent KTx: patients who received no prophylaxis, patients who underwent plasma exchange, those who received Eculizumab prophylaxis. Complement factor H-related disease was by far the most frequent etiology (n = 19 patients). RESULTS: Untreated patients and patients undergoing pre-KTx plasma exchange prophylaxis had a relapse rate of 0.81 (CI 0.30-1.76) and 3.1 (CI 0.64-9.16) events per 10 years cumulative observation, respectively, as opposed to 0 events among patients receiving Eculizumab prophylaxis. The time between Eculizumab doses was tailored based on classic complement pathway activity (target to < 30%). Using this strategy, 12 patients are currently receiving Eculizumab every 28 days, 5 every 24-25 days, and 3 every 21 days. CONCLUSION: Our experience supports the prophylactic use of Eculizumab in patients with a previous history of aHUS undergoing KTx, especially when complement dysregulation is well documented by molecular biology.
Subject(s)
Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome , Kidney Transplantation , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome/diagnosis , Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome/drug therapy , Female , Humans , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , PlasmapheresisABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is a thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) characterized by platelet consumption, hemolysis, and organ damage. Eculizumab (ECU), a humanized antibody that blocks complement activity, has been successfully used in aHUS, but the best treatment schedule is not yet clear. METHODS: Here, we report our experience with ECU maintenance treatment and the interval between subsequent doses being extended based on global classical complement pathway (CCP) activity aimed at <30% for maintaining aHUS into remission. RESULTS: We report on 38 patients with aHUS, 13 children, 21 female, with a median age of 25.0 years (range 0.5-60) at disease onset treated with ECU standard schedule for a median of 2.6 months (range 0.4-24.6). Once stable TMA remission was obtained, the interval between ECU doses was extended based on complement function, with a target CCP activity of <30%. With this approach, 22 patients regularly receive ECU infusion every 28 days and 16 every 21. During a median observation period on ECU, an extended interval of 26.9 months (range 0.8-80.9), with a cumulative observation period of 1,208 months, none of the patients relapsed. CONCLUSION: Monitoring complement activity allows a safe reduction in the frequency of ECU administration in aHUS while keeping the disease in remission.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome/drug therapy , Complement Inactivating Agents/therapeutic use , Complement System Proteins/drug effects , Drug Monitoring/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Complement System Proteins/analysis , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Young AdultABSTRACT
Hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) is a rare disease characterized by microangiopathic hemolysis, platelet consumption and multiple organ failure with predominant renal involvement. In the most of cases (85-90%), it is associated with enteric infection due to Shiga-toxin or verocytotoxin (STEC-VTEC)-producer Escherichia coli. Rarely, in about 10-15% of cases, HUS develops in the presence of a disorder of alternative complement pathway regulation and it is defined atypical (aHUS). We describe the case of a 65-year-old man who came to our attention with a clinical presentation of aHUS and a clinical course characterized by rapidly progressive acute renal failure (ARF), which required renal replacement treatments, and by a stable clinical picture of hematological impairment as a marker of a non-severe and self-limiting form. The clinical and laboratory course allowed us not to perform specific therapies such as plasma exchange and/or block of the complement with eculizumab. Less than two weeks after hospital admission, there was a gradual recovery of renal function with spontaneous diuresis and hematological remission. Genetic screening has revealed a heterozygous mutation in the complement factor B (CFB) that is not described in the literature and therefore not yet characterized in the genotype/phenotype correlation, also for the extreme rarity of the forms associated with CFB alteration. In conclusion, the presence of a new mutation in the CFB, such as the one described in our case, is probably associated with the development of aHUS but has not led to a poor prognosis, as generally reported in the literature for known variants of the CFB.