Five years later: Can women in Los Angeles County, California, get adequate pill supplies?

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine if pharmacies in Los Angeles County had implemented 2017 legislation requiring insurance companies based in California to fully reimburse for 13 cycles of oral contraceptives dispensed at once. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a secret shopper telephone survey of Los Angeles County pharmacies nearly 5 years after the legislation went into effect. We chose the categorical state family program (Family PACT) to represent all programs covered by the legislation. Representative numbers of pharmacies were randomly selected in each of Los Angeles County's eight service planning areas in proportion to the number of women living in each area. We asked pharmacies if they would fill a prescription for a year's supply of contraception all at once for a patient enrolled in Family PACT. RESULTS: We contacted a total of 582 pharmacies and excluded the 150 unresponsive pharmacies. Of the 432 pharmacies contacted, only 3.2% said they would dispense a 1-year supply of pills at once to a patient enrolled in this representative program. Nearly 50% explicitly said they would not dispense 13 cycles at one time regardless of the prescription. CONCLUSIONS: Only 3.2% of surveyed pharmacies in Los Angeles County said they would comply with current legislation, which requires dispensing 1-year supply of pills at once. IMPLICATIONS: Collaboration among physicians, pharmacies, and patients along with enhanced insurance company oversight will be needed to improve dispensing practices to achieve the lower unintended pregnancy rates associated with providing adequate contraceptive supplies.

Perceptions of health risks associated with pregnancy compared to oral contraceptive use.

OBJECTIVE: To assess beliefs about the safety of oral contraceptives compared to pregnancy to determine if men and women possess accurate information to make informed choices. STUDY DESIGN: In each of six surveys conducted in Southern California from 2008 to 2017, participants were asked "Which do you think is more hazardous to a woman's health - birth control pills or pregnancy?" RESULTS: A total of 28.4% of all 1839 male and female respondents and 29.1% of the 1712 female respondents answered correctly that the health risks posed by pregnancy were greater. In subgroup analyses, 64.4%-81.9% rated oral contraceptives at least as hazardous to a woman's health as pregnancy. CONCLUSION: The vast majority of respondents incorrectly believed that oral contraceptives are more hazardous than pregnancy. IMPLICATIONS: Health decision making relies upon patients' understanding of the relative risks and benefits of each available option. Most sexually active women do not understand that there is no contraceptive method current guidelines would offer them that is as hazardous to their health as pregnancy. Such misconceptions can lead to risky decisions. Clinicians need to explicitly provide their sexually active patients more accurate and balanced information, putting contraception in the context of its probable alternative - pregnancy.

Contraceptive Beliefs and Practices of American Muslim Women.

Objective: To assess contraceptive beliefs and practices among American Muslim women residing in Southern California. Materials and Methods: English speaking Muslim women were approached in Southern California mosques and online and asked to participate in a survey about birth control. Primary outcome measures included the belief that Islam permitted use of contraceptives to prevent pregnancy, to treat menstrual disorders, and to suppress menstrual flow that would prevent attendance at religious rituals; personal contraceptive use was also assessed. Subgroup analysis investigated potential impacts of demographic variables. Results: The interview response rate was 88%. Among the convenience sample of 276 women, 64.4% were younger than 35 years of age, most were well educated, and had an above average income. Eighty percent of respondents believed that Islam allowed the use of contraception to prevent pregnancy, and 85.1% believed that it allowed for the treatment of menstrual disorders. Overall, 93.4% believed that Islam allowed the use of all reversible contraceptive methods, but 35% believed that Islam did not permit permanent contraceptive methods. Belief was related to higher income or educational level, headscarf use, and being Muslim from birth. Of the reproductive age sexually experienced participants, 96.5% reported ever using any contraceptive method. The most commonly ever-used methods included oral contraceptive pills (72.5%), male condoms (68.9%), coitus interruptus (39.9%), and intrauterine devices (21.2%). Conclusion: The vast majority of American Muslim women surveyed believe that their religion permits use of reversible contraceptive methods. They have used contraceptive methods at rates similar to other women in the United States.

Reproductive Life Planning and Preconception Care 2015: Attitudes of English-Speaking Family Planning Patients.

BACKGROUND: Reproductive life planning has become an essential element in programs designed to promote preconceptional care and increase utilization of effective contraceptive methods. This study sought to determine if women have reproductive life plans and what they think women should do to prepare for pregnancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Indigent English-speaking women in a family planning clinic were asked individually about their reproductive life plans, preparations needed for pregnancy, and the relative health risks of pregnancy compared to oral contraceptives. RESULTS: Of the 250 women interviewed, only 53% were confident how many pregnancies they wanted in their lifetime; 46.3% were confident about when they desired their next pregnancy. Although virtually all agreed that women should plan and prepare for pregnancy, only 25.8% of women mentioned that any medical preparations were necessary before pregnancy. Women's choice of contraception did not match their pregnancy intentions. Over 60% of women thought that the pill was at least as hazardous to a woman's health as pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, many English-speaking women had no distinct reproductive life plans. Most did not think that medical preparations are needed before pregnancy. New approaches may be useful to more productively identify women who need individualized counseling, preconception care, and/or more effective contraceptive methods.

Colorectal cancer video for the deaf community: a randomized control trial.

The Deaf community experiences multiple barriers to accessing cancer information. Deaf participants (n = 144) were randomly assigned to view a colorectal cancer education video or another program in American Sign Language. They completed surveys pre- and post-intervention and at 2 months post-intervention. By using a crossover model, control group participants were offered the option of seeing the intervention video. The experimental group gained and retained significantly more colorectal cancer knowledge than the control group, and the control group demonstrated the greatest knowledge gain after crossing into the experimental arm. This video effectively informed the Deaf community about colorectal cancer.