Basic Residues at Position 11 of α-Conotoxin LvIA Influence Subtype Selectivity between α3ß2 and α3ß4 Nicotinic Receptors via an Electrostatic Mechanism.

Understanding the determinants of α-conotoxin (α-CTX) selectivity for different nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) subtypes is a prerequisite for the design of tool compounds to study nAChRs. However, selectivity optimization of these small, disulfide-rich peptides is difficult not only because of an absence of α-CTX/nAChR co-structures but also because it is challenging to predict how a mutation to an α-CTX will alter its potency and selectivity. As a prototypical system to investigate selectivity, we employed the α-CTX LvIA that is 25-fold selective for the α3ß2 nAChR over the related α3ß4 nAChR subtype, which is a target for nicotine addiction. Using two-electrode voltage clamp electrophysiology, we identified LvIA[D11R] that is 2-fold selective for the α3ß4 nAChR, reversing the subtype preference. This effect is specifically due to the change in charge and not shape of LvIA[D11R], as substitution of D11 with citrulline retains selectivity for the α3ß2 nAChR. Furthermore, LvIA[D11K] shows a stronger reversal, with 4-fold selectivity for the α3ß4 nAChR. Motivated by these findings, using site-directed mutagenesis, we found that ß2[K79A] (I79 on ß4), but not ß2[K78A] (N78 on ß4), largely restores the potency of basic mutants at position 11. Finally, to understand the structural basis of this effect, we used AlphaFold2 to generate models of LvIA in complex with both nAChR subtypes. Both models confirm the plausibility of an electrostatic mechanism to explain the data and also reproduce a broad range of potency and selectivity structure-activity relationships for LvIA mutants, as measured using free energy perturbation simulations. Our work highlights how electrostatic interactions can drive α-CTX selectivity and may serve as a strategy for optimizing the selectivity of LvIA and other α-CTXs.

Interaction of α9α10 Nicotinic Receptors With Peptides and Proteins From Animal Venoms.

Unlike most neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) subunits, α7, α9, and α10 subunits are able to form functional homo- or heteromeric receptors without any ß subunits. While the α7 subtype is widely distributed in the mammalian brain and several peripheral tissues, α9 and α9α10 nAChRs are mainly found in the cochlea and immune cells. α-Conotoxins that specifically block the α9α10 receptor showed anti-nociceptive and anti-hyperalgesic effects in animal models. Hence, this subtype is considered a drug target for analgesics. In contrast to the α9α10-selective α-conotoxins, the three-finger toxin α-bungarotoxin inhibits muscle-type and α7 nAChRs in addition to α9α10 nAChRs. However, the selectivity of α-neurotoxins at the α9α10 subtype was less intensively investigated. Here, we compared the potencies of α-conotoxins and α-neurotoxins at the human α9α10 nAChR by two-electrode voltage clamp analysis upon expression in Xenopus oocytes. In addition, we analyzed effects of several α9α10-selective α-conotoxins on mouse granulocytes from bone marrow to identify possible physiological functions of the α9α10 nAChR subtype in these cells. The α-conotoxin-induced IL-10 release was measured upon LPS-stimulation. We found that α-conotoxins RgIA, PeIA, and Vc1.1 enhance the IL-10 expression in granulocytes which might explain the known anti-inflammatory and associated analgesic activities of α9α10-selective α-conotoxins. Furthermore, we show that two long-chain α-neurotoxins from the cobra Naja melanoleuca venom that were earlier shown to bind to muscle-type and α7 nAChRs, also inhibit the α9α10 subtype at nanomolar concentrations with one of them showing a significantly slower dissociation from this receptor than α-bungarotoxin.