Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Tex Heart Inst J ; 42(4): 385-8, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26413025

ABSTRACT

Many patients who are in cardiogenic shock need mechanical support for clinical stabilization after acute insults such as myocardial infarction. However, the placement of advanced devices can be hindered by anatomic constraints or the physiologic sequelae of shock, as we describe in this report. A 67-year-old woman with prior coronary artery bypass grafting and extensive chest-wall scarring from previous defibrillator implantations presented with myocardial infarction and refractory cardiogenic shock. The patient's vascular anatomy and prior surgery precluded conventional percutaneous implantation of an Impella 5.0 ventricular support device. We delivered the Impella device through the patient's tortuous, vasoconstricted axillary artery with use of a vascular sheath and other percutaneous techniques. The success of this approach suggests that combining the expertise of cardiologists and cardiovascular surgeons can improve the outcomes of patients with complex anatomic issues.


Subject(s)
Axillary Artery/surgery , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation , Catheterization, Peripheral/instrumentation , Heart-Assist Devices , Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Shock, Cardiogenic/therapy , Vascular Access Devices , Aged , Axillary Artery/diagnostic imaging , Axillary Artery/physiopathology , Blood Vessel Prosthesis , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Catheterization, Peripheral/methods , Female , Humans , Prosthesis Design , Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Radiography , Shock, Cardiogenic/diagnosis , Shock, Cardiogenic/physiopathology , Shock, Cardiogenic/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Vascular Patency , Vasoconstriction
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL