Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Pharm Sci ; 2024 Sep 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39243976

ABSTRACT

Hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose acetate succinate (HPMCAS) is one of the polymers of choice in formulating amorphous solid dispersions (ASDs) and helps to sustain high levels of drug supersaturation by delaying drug crystallization. Herein, the impact of HPMCAS chemistry on the solution crystallization kinetics of a fast-crystallizing lipophilic drug, posaconazole (PCZ), from the aqueous bulk phase and the drug-rich phase generated by liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS), was studied. Three grades of HPMCAS: L, M, and H, which differ in the degree of acetyl and succinoyl substitution (A/S ratio), were compared. The influence of the polymers on the nucleation induction time, and LLPS concentration of PCZ, as well as the size, ζ-potential and composition of the nano-sized drug-rich phase was determined. An increase in the nucleation induction time was observed with an increase in the polymer A/S ratio. A blue shift in the fluorescence emission spectrum of PCZ suggested a greater extent of interaction between PCZ and HPMCAS with an increase in the A/S ratio. More polymer partitioning into the drug-rich phase was also observed with an increase in the A/S ratio, resulting in smaller droplets. A greater extent of ionization of HPMCAS upon increasing the pH from 5.5 to 7.5 decreased the hydrophobicity of the polymer resulting in shorter nucleation induction times. The phase behavior of PCZ in ASD release studies was consistent with these observations, where the shortest duration of supersaturation was observed with the L grade. Although the H grade provided the best inhibition of crystallization, complete release was only observed at higher pH. HPMCAS grade thus influences the kinetics of PCZ crystallization following release from an ASD, as well as the extent of release at physiologically relevant pH conditions. This study provides insights into the role of HPMCAS chemistry and ionization as factors influencing its ability to act as a crystallization inhibitor.

2.
Pharm Res ; 37(11): 219, 2020 Oct 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33037471

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study aims to understand the impact of spray drying nozzles on particle surface composition and aerosol stability. METHODS: The combination formulations of colistin and azithromycin were formulated by 2-fluid nozzle (2 N) or 3-fluid (3 N) spray drying in a molar ratio of 1:1. A 3-factor, 2-level (23) factorial design was selected to investigate effects of flow rate, inlet temperature and feed concentration on yield of spray drying and the performance of the spray dried formulations for the 3 N. RESULTS: FPF values for the 2 N formulation (72.9 ± 1.9% for azithromycin & 73.4 ± 0.8% for colistin) were higher than those for the 3 N formulation (56.5 ± 3.8% for azithromycin & 55.1 ± 1.6% for colistin) when stored at 20% RH for 1 day, which could be attributed to smaller physical size for the 2 N. There was no change in FPF for both drugs in the 2 N formulation after storage at 75% RH for 90 days; however, there was a slight increase in FPF for colistin in the 3 N formulation at the same storage conditions. Surface enrichment of hydrophobic azithromycin was measured by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy for both 2 N and 3 N formulations and interactions were studied using FTIR. CONCLUSIONS: The 3-fluid nozzle provides flexibility in choosing different solvents and has the capability to spray dry at higher feed solid concentrations. This study highlights the impact of hydrophobic azithromycin enrichment on particle surface irrespective of the nozzle type, on the prevention of moisture-induced deterioration of FPF for hygroscopic colistin.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/chemistry , Azithromycin/chemistry , Colistin/chemistry , Technology, Pharmaceutical/instrumentation , Administration, Inhalation , Aerosols , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Azithromycin/administration & dosage , Colistin/administration & dosage , Drug Compounding , Drug Stability , Equipment Design , Humidity , Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions , Particle Size , Powders , Solubility , Solvents/chemistry , Surface Properties , Time Factors
3.
Int J Pharm ; 590: 119916, 2020 Nov 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32979452

ABSTRACT

Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) is frequently used to define the threshold of acceptable processing temperatures for hot melt extrusion. Herein, evaluation of chemical stability of amorphous drug and polymer systems was assessed by a critical evaluation of TGA nonisothermal and isothermal methods. Nonisothermal analysis of three crystalline APIs of high glass-forming ability (posaconazole, indomethacin, and bicalutamide), as well as six common polymers, identified a degradation onset temperature that ranged from 52 to 170 °C, depending on heating rate and degradation detection method employed. In particular, the tangent method significantly overestimated the onset of acceptable levels of degradation, while weight loss threshold criteria were more suitable. Isothermal analysis provided a more direct indication of chemical stability, however neat amorphous materials are likely to recrystallize. By forming an amorphous solid dispersion, the polymer can stabilize the amorphous drug against recrystallization, enabling isothermal analysis of chemical degradation. However, TGA mass loss of volatiles should be considered only as an approximate indicator of degradation, as actual potency loss is likely to be significantly higher; this was confirmed by high performance liquid chromatographic analysis of samples. TGA methods should be selected to generate highly sensitive outcomes, and caution should be applied when extrapolating suitability of processing conditions.


Subject(s)
Hot Melt Extrusion Technology , Hot Temperature , Drug Compounding , Drug Stability , Polymers , Solubility
4.
J Clin Diagn Res ; 10(7): ZC41-5, 2016 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27630951

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Tooth extraction is one of the most commonly performed procedures in dentistry. It is usually a traumatic procedure often resulting in immediate destruction and loss of alveolar bone and surrounding soft tissues. Various instruments have been described to perform atraumatic extractions which can prevent damage to the paradental structures. Recently developed physics forceps is one of the instruments which is claimed to perform atraumatic extractions. AIM: The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy of physics forceps with conventional forceps in terms of operating time, prevention of marginal bone loss & soft tissue loss, postoperative pain and postoperative complications following bilateral premolar extractions for orthodontic purpose. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective split-mouth study, outcomes of the 2 groups (n = 42 premolars) requiring extraction of premolars for orthodontic treatment purpose using Physics forceps and Conventional forceps were compared. Clinical outcomes in form of time taken, loss of buccal soft tissue and buccal cortical plate based on extraction defect classification system, postoperative pain and other complication associated with extraction were recorded and compared. RESULTS: Statistically significant reduction in the operating time was noted in physics forceps group. Marginal bone loss and soft tissue loss was also significantly lesser in physics forceps group when compared to conventional forceps group. However, there was no statistically significant difference in severity of postoperative pain between both groups. CONCLUSION: The results of the present study suggest that physics forceps was more efficient in reducing operating time and prevention of marginal bone loss & soft tissue loss when compared to conventional forceps in orthodontically indicated premolar extractions.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL