Fill levels, cost comparisons, and expulsion force requirements of commonly used topical ophthalmic nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

PURPOSE: To determine volume fill levels, estimated costs, and force expulsion requirements per bottle of topical ophthalmic nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) commonly perioperatively in the United States. SETTING: Tertiary care academic medical center. DESIGN: Prospective laboratory investigation. METHODS: 8 commercially available NSAIDs (3 branded, 5 generic) were tested: branded bromfenac 0.07%, generic bromfenac 0.09%, diclofenac 0.1%, flurbiprofen 0.03%, generic ketorolac 0.5%, branded ketorolac 0.5%, ketorolac 0.47%, and branded nepafenac 0.3%. 10 bottles of each medication were tested, with an additional bottle tested for expulsion force requirements. A double-blinded method was used to measure the actual bottle fill volume and number of drops per bottle. The total cost per drop was calculated using published cash prices. Force requirements were measured using a customized force gauge apparatus. Formulations were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by pairwise comparisons with the Dwass, Steel, Critchlow-Fligner Method. RESULTS: 2 branded NSAIDs (bromfenac and nepafenac) had slightly lower-than-sticker volumes while generics other than ketorolac had higher-than-sticker volumes. Diclofenac and branded bromfenac had the highest and lowest adjusted number of drops respectively. Generic bromfenac and generic ketorolac had the highest and lowest adjusted volume compared with sticker volume respectively. Branded bromfenac was the most expensive medication, while generic diclofenac was the least expensive. Force expulsion requirements varied significantly among generic and branded NSAIDs. CONCLUSIONS: Volume fill levels, patient-incurred costs, and expulsion force requirements per bottle of topical NSAID medications vary significantly. Surgeons may wish to consider these factors when deciding how best to use these medications perioperatively.

Fill levels, cost comparisons, and expulsion force requirements of commonly used topical ophthalmic steroids.

PURPOSE: To determine volume fill levels, estimated costs, and force expulsion requirements per bottle of topical ophthalmic steroids commonly used in the United States. SETTING: Tertiary care academic referral center. DESIGN: Prospective laboratory investigation. METHODS: 8 commercially available medications were tested: loteprednol 0.5%, loteprednol gel 0.5%, loteprednol gel 0.38%, difluprednate 0.05%, generic fluorometholone 0.1%, branded fluorometholone 0.1%, generic prednisolone 1.0%, and branded prednisolone 1.0%. 10 bottles of each medication were tested. A double-blinded method was used to measure actual bottle fill volume and number of drops dispensed per bottle. The total perioperative cost per drop was calculated for each medication using a mean cash price. Force requirements were measured using a customized force gauge apparatus. Formulations were compared using Kruskal-Wallis 1way analysis of variances. RESULTS: All formulations were able to cover postoperative periods commensurate with commonly used dosing regimens for cataract surgery. All medications had greater than sticker volume. Loteprednol 0.5% suspension and branded fluorometholone had the highest and lowest number of drops among the medications tested, respectively. Loteprednol 0.38% gel was the most expensive medication, whereas generic prednisolone 1.0% was the least expensive. Gel and branded formulations of ophthalmic steroids required less expulsion force compared with other tested formulations. CONCLUSIONS: Volume fill levels, patient-incurred costs, and expulsion force requirements per bottle of topical steroid medications vary widely. Clinicians may wish to consider these findings when determining their perioperative prescribing regimen.