ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine the cutoff of intertwin delivery intervals (IDIs) as a predictor for neonatal acidemia. METHOD: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single tertiary care center. Women attempting vaginal delivery of twins between 2010 and 2019 and who reached the second stage of labor were included. The cutoff point for prolonged IDI was established using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and Youden's J statistic. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were compared between short and prolonged IDI cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 461 women were included in the study. A cutoff time of 10 min was found to be the best predictor for neonatal acidemia (arterial cord pH ≤ 7.1), with a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 59%. Second twins delivered more than 10 min after the first twin were more likely to be acidemic and to have a 5-min Apgar score of 7 or less (13.5% vs 3.3%, P = 0.01, and 8.4% vs 3.2%, P = 0.02, respectively). An IDI of more than 10 min was also associated with increased rate of cesarean delivery and placental abruption (13.5% vs 0.8%, P < 0.001, and 3.4% vs 0.8%, P = 0.047, respectively). No other adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes were statistically significant between cohorts. CONCLUSION: An IDI of more than 10 min is associated with a higher risk for neonatal academia, with a low 5-min Apgar score, and higher cesarean delivery and placental abruption rates. These findings provide insights that are valuable when counseling and managing twin pregnancies attempting vaginal delivery. Interventions aimed at shortening the IDI should be considered to prevent adverse neonatal outcomes.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This work aimed to identify possible risk factors and the morbidity associated with prolonged intertwin delivery interval (IDI). STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study at a single tertiary care center. Women with twin gestations who reached the second stage of labor between January 2010 and December 2019 were included in the study. Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared between short IDI (≤15 minutes) and prolonged IDI (>15 minutes). The primary outcome was the rate of 5-minute Apgar score ≤ 7. RESULTS: A total of 461 women were included; 312 of whom were in the short IDI group and 149 were in the prolonged IDI group. Rates of 5-minute Apgar score ≤ 7 and neonatal acidemia were significantly higher in the prolonged IDI group (3.5 vs. 9.7%, p = 0.008; 4.3 vs. 15.7%, p = 0.01, respectively). Vaginal delivery was less likely to occur in the prolonged IDI group (75.8 vs. 93.3%). Placental abruption and hemoglobin drop ≥ 3 g/dL were more prevalent in the prolonged IDI group (4 vs. 1%, p = 0.03; 39.1 vs. 24.7%, p = 0.01, respectively). In the multivariate analysis, age ≥ 30 years (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.76, p = 0.01), nulliparity (aOR: 1.66, p = 0.03), and birth weight ratio ≥ 1.2 (aOR: 1.92, p < 0.05) were associated with prolonged IDI. CONCLUSION: Prolonged IDI is associated with an increased risk for neonatal acidemia and low 5-minute Apgar score, and with an increased rate of cesarean delivery, placental abruption, and hemoglobin drop ≥ 3 g/dL. Advanced maternal age, nulliparity, and twin birth weight ratio ≥ 1.2 are associated with prolonged IDI. KEY POINTS: · Prolonged was found to be associated with higher neonatal acidemia and lower 5-minute Apgar score.. · Prolonged IDI is also associated with increased rate of cesarean delivery, placental abruption, and blood loss.. · Advanced maternal age, birth weight discordancy, and nulliparity were associated with prolonged IDI..
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization classified coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) as a pandemic and recommends strict restrictions regarding most aspects of daily activities. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether the pandemic has changed the prenatal care and pregnancy outcome in pregnant women without COVID-19. METHODS: The authors conducted a cross-sectional study to describe changes in outpatient clinic visits and to compare the rates of cesarean and instrumental deliveries between two periods of time: March-April 2020 (during the COVID-19 outbreak) with March-April of the preceding year, 2019. RESULTS: During the COVID-19 outbreak, visits to obstetric triage, gynecologic triage, high-risk clinic, and ultrasound units decreased by 36.4%, 34.7%, 32.8%, and 18.1%, respectively. The medical center experienced a 17.8% drop in the total number of births (610 births) compared with March and April 2019 (742 births). During the outbreak women were more likely to be nulliparous (33.3% vs. 27.6%, P = 0.02) and present with hypertensive disorders during pregnancy (7.5% vs. 4%, P = 0.005) or gestational diabetes (13% vs. 10%, P = 0.03). More epidural analgesia was used (83.1% vs. 77.1%, P = 0.006). There were more operative vaginal deliveries during the outbreak (16.7% vs. 6.8%, P = 0.01). All other maternal and neonatal outcomes were comparable between the two periods. CONCLUSIONS: The medical facility experienced a major decline in all aspects of the routine obstetrics activities during the time of the pandemic. The higher rate of operative vaginal deliveries among nulliparous may be associated with the pandemic effect on the rate of high-risk patients.
