Expert Consensus on Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor-Based Therapies in the Modern Era of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Management in India.

India has a high prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with unique clinical characteristics compared to other populations. Despite advancements in diabetes therapy, a significant number of patients in India still experience poor glycemic control and complications. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors continue to be an important component of T2DM treatment due to their favorable efficacy and tolerability profile. Given the current scenario, there is a need to revisit the role of DPP-4 inhibitors in T2DM management in Indian patients. This consensus paper aims to provide guidance on the utilization of DPP-4 inhibitors in T2DM management from an Indian perspective. A consensus group of 100 experts developed recommendations based on an extensive literature review and discussions. The expert group emphasized the importance of timely glycemic control, combination therapy, and targeting the underlying pathophysiology of T2DM. The combinations of DPP-4 inhibitors with metformin and/or sodium-glucose transport protein-2 inhibitors are rationalized in this paper, considering their complementary mechanisms of action. This paper provides valuable insights for clinicians in optimizing the management of T2DM in the Indian population with the use of DPP-4 inhibitors and proposes an algorithm for selecting DPP-4 inhibitor-based therapies.

An update on the current characteristics and status of care for Muslims with type 2 diabetes fasting during Ramadan: the DAR global survey 2022.

BACKGROUND: Managing diabetes during Ramadan fasting is a challenge due lifestyle changes. We described the characteristics and patterns of care for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) during Ramadan 2020 and 2022. METHODS: Our study included multinational Muslims with T2DM who were during routine consultation. We collected data on demographics, fasting characteristics, and complications. Descriptive statistics, chi-square test, and multiple testing were performed. RESULTS: 12,529 patients participated. Mean age was 55.2 ± 11.8 years; 52.4% were females. Mean diabetes duration was 9.9 ± 7.4 years; 27.7% were with HbA1c >9% (75 mmol/mol) and 70% had complications. Metformin was the most used medication followed by insulin. 85.1% fasted ≥1 day; fasting mean duration was 27.6 ± 5.6 days. Hypoglycemia occurred in 15.5% of whom 11.7% attended emergency department or were hospitalized; this was significantly associated with age and/or duration of diabetes. Hyperglycemia occurred in 14.9% of whom 6.1% attended emergency department or were hospitalized and was also associated with age or duration of diabetes. 74.2% performed SMBG during fasting. 59.2% were educated on Ramadan fasting, with 89.7% receiving it during routine consultation. CONCLUSIONS: Ramadan fasting in T2DM is high. Multidisciplinary approach is required to mitigate complications. Our findings support current recommendations for safe fasting.

The goal of this survey was to describe the characteristics and current ways of care for Muslim patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus fasting during and after Ramadan 2020 and 2022. Most of the participants fasted a minimum of one day during Ramadan (85.1%). Overall, 15.5 and 14.9% reported low blood sugar levels or high blood sugar levels during fasting, respectively. Low blood sugar level was more reported in patients with older age, patients with longer diabetes duration, and women. High blood sugar level was more reported in patients with longer diabetes duration. Educational programs focusing on the risks occurring with fasting and practices that improve control of the disease will raise knowledge and awareness among patients with diabetes. Improving blood sugar control during Ramadan fasting remains a major need for both patients and healthcare providers who should collaborate to reduce the risk of diabetes-related problems.

MiniMed 780G system use in type 1 diabetes during Ramadan intermittent fasting: a systematic literature review and expert recommendations.

INTRODUCTION: This article offers a systematic literature review (SLR) on the use of the MiniMed 780G automated insulin delivery system (MM780G) in people with type 1 diabetes (PwT1D) during Ramadan intermittent fasting. It also presents consensus recommendations on the use of MM780G during the Ramadan period. METHODS: The SLR was performed following PRISMA methodology. The recommendations resulted from a consensus-forming process involving a panel of experts. The process considered evidence found in the SLR as well as the expert opinions. RESULTS: In total, 6 studies were included in the SLR. The evidence and expert opinions led to recommendations related to a) pre-Ramadan counseling of MM780G users who plan to fast, b) suggested MM780G settings, meal announcement strategy and safety aspects during Ramadan (including a contingency plan), and c) post-Ramadan transition into and out of Eid-al-Fitr festivities. DISCUSSION: The SLR findings showed that the MM780G maintain glycemic control at target in PwT1D during Ramadan (meeting CGM-based clinical targets proposed by the International Consensus on Time-in-Range) while ensuring low rates of hypoglycemia and diabetic ketoacidosis. Automated insulin delivery also helps PwT1D fast more days of Ramadan compared to users of other less advanced modalities of treatment. Pre-Ramadan guidance on specific aspects of the MM780G along with IDF-DAR counseling guidelines are recommended. There is still a challenge with post-Iftar hyperglycemia, which could potentially be mitigated by following the recommendations outlined in this article.

A Review on Affordable Combinations in Type 2 Diabetes Care: Exploring the Cost-Effective Potential of Glipizide + Metformin and Glimepiride + Metformin + Pioglitazone.

Management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) largely relies on medication adherence of individuals with diabetes to achieve optimal glycemic control. The economic burden of diabetes could impede adherence, leading to a reduction in treatment efficacy and increased risk of complications. Furthermore, monotherapy in diabetes is losing traction due to its ineffectiveness in achieving early and sustained optimal glycemic control in a significant proportion of the population. Hence, clinicians prefer combination treatment due to their improved efficacy and safety. Considering these factors, the current review highlights the safety and efficacy of the affordable combination therapies, a dual therapy, glipizide + metformin, and a triple-drug combination of glimepiride + metformin + pioglitazone and its applicability in the management of T2DM among individuals with diabetes in India.

Prandial Insulins: A Person-Centered Choice.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Postprandial hyperglycemia, or elevated blood glucose after meals, is associated with the development and progression of various diabetes-related complications. Prandial insulins are designed to replicate the natural insulin release after meals and are highly effective in managing post-meal glucose spikes. Currently, different types of prandial insulins are available such as human regular insulin, rapid-acting analogs, ultra-rapid-acting analogs, and inhaled insulins. Knowledge about diverse landscape of prandial insulin will optimize glycemic management. RECENT FINDINGS: Human regular insulin, identical to insulin produced by the human pancreas, has a slower onset and extended duration, potentially leading to post-meal hyperglycemia and later hypoglycemia. In contrast, rapid-acting analogs, such as lispro, aspart, and glulisine, are new insulin types with amino acid modifications that enhance their subcutaneous absorption, resulting in a faster onset and shorter action duration. Ultra-rapid analogs, like faster aspart and ultra-rapid lispro, offer even shorter onset of action, providing better meal-time flexibility. The Technosphere insulin offers an inhaled route for prandial insulin delivery. The prandial insulins can be incorporated into basal-bolus, basal plus, or prandial-only regimens or delivered through insulin pumps. Human regular insulin, aspart, lispro, and faster aspart are recommended for management of hyperglycemia during pregnancy. Ongoing research is focused on refining prandial insulin replacement and exploring newer delivery methods. The article provides a comprehensive overview of various prandial insulin options and their clinical applications in the management of diabetes.

Recommendations for management of diabetes and its complications during Hajj (Muslim Pilgrimage) - 2024 update.

Hajj is an obligatory duty for all healthy adult Muslims once in the lifetime subjected to the ability. Considering the 10.5 % global prevalence of diabetes coupled with the numbers of Muslims performing the Hajj, ∼ 1.8 million in 2023, it is estimated that Muslims with diabetes performing Hajj may exceed 340,000 this year. During Hajj the pattern and amount of their meal, fluid intake and physical activity are markedly altered. Many people with diabetes insist on doing the Hajj duty, thereby creating a medical challenge for themselves and their health care providers. It is therefore important that medical professionals be aware of the potential risks that may be associated with Hajj. People with diabetes may face many health hazards during Hajj including but not limited to the killer triad which might occur during Hajj: Hypoglycemia, Foot injury and Infections. Many precautions should be taken to prevent and treat these potentially serious complications. Risk stratification, medication adjustments, proper clinical assessment, and education before doing Hajj are crucial.

SGLT2i as a First-line Antihyperglycemic in the Management of Type 2 Diabetes in the Context of Indians: A Systematic Review and Consensus.

BACKGROUND: Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have been used for almost a decade and have proven to be effective not only in managing Type 2 diabetes (T2D), but their cardio and renal protective features make them very useful in managing patients with risk of multiple comorbidities. This systematic review was undertaken by the authors because there is no evidence currently available in India that has studied the suitability of SGLT2i as a first-line agent in patients newly diagnosed with T2D in India. MATERIALS AND METHODS: First, literature was searched to identify features that are considered important when deciding on a first-line agent for managing T2D. A total of 5 broad topics were identified-glycemic control, extra glycemic effects, antihyperglycemic combination therapy, safety, and cost-effectiveness. These domains had further subheadings, and a total of 16 domains were identified. Metformin is the drug of choice as a first-line agent in such situations and has been considered the gold standard for evaluating the effects of SGLT2i across these domains. A systematic literature review on each domain was conducted to compare SGLT2i with the gold standard in Indian patients newly diagnosed with T2D. Evidence was graded (levels of evidence (LoE)-A, B, and C), and recommendations (class of recommendation (CoR)-I, II, and III) were classified by the expert group as defined in the methodology. RESULTS: According to the systematic reviews conducted, 11 domains had Level A evidence, 2 domains (impact on lipids and gut microbiome) had Level B, and 3 domains had Level C (ß-cell function, renal protection, and glycemic variability) evidence. Based on evidence and expert opinion, the authors recommend SGLT2i as a first-line agent for managing newly diagnosed patients with T2D with a Class I recommendation for 13 domains and Class II for the remaining 3 (impact on lipids, gut microbiome, and ß-cell function). Although a poorer level of evidence (Level C) was available for the glycemic variability domain, the authors still reported this as Class I recommendations according to their expert opinion and consensus. CONCLUSION: This article advocates adopting SGLT2 inhibitors as the primary treatment choice for treating patients with newly diagnosed T2D in India.

The Scope of Pre- and Probiotics as an Add-on to Proton-pump Inhibitors in Various Clinical Indications.

OBJECTIVE: To understand the national pattern of proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) prescriptions and to disseminate evidence-based recommendations for using probiotics as an adjunct to PPIs across diverse clinical indications. METHODS: Healthcare professionals' (HCPs) inputs and views were collected through a survey (n = 1,007) and four round table meetings (RTMs, n = 4). A standardized questionnaire focusing on the utilization of PPIs in clinical practice was developed, deliberated upon, and assessed by experts specializing in the treatment of diverse acid-related gastrointestinal (GI) conditions across various geographical regions. RESULTS: Of the total 1,007 contributors, most (43.40%) opined that 10-30% of their patients were prescribed PPI for a long duration. The majority of contributors commonly prescribed PPIs for the prophylaxis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)-induced gastritis (70.90%), peptic ulcer disease (58.39%), and various GI conditions. The majority of contributors (91%) agreed or strongly agreed that long-term use of PPIs disturbs the GI flora. Antibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD) (78.05%) was the most preferred indication for using pre- and probiotics. The duration for co-prescription varied, with a substantial portion advocating for 1-4 weeks (49.65%), while others supported durations of 4-8 weeks or beyond. Around 85% of contributors/HCPs agreed or strongly agreed on prescribing pre- and probiotics as prophylaxis to prevent GI disturbances. The study emphasized the growing trend of patient-centered co-prescription of PPIs and pre-/probiotics, with a majority of contributors favoring this approach. CONCLUSION: The results underscore the importance of informed prescribing practices, including the co-prescription of probiotics, to mitigate potential side effects associated with long-term PPI use and optimize patient well-being.

Monitoring Endocrine Nursing in South Asia (MENSA).

Background: South Asian countries face the colossal challenge of tackling the massive burden of diabetes and other endocrine disorders. These patients grossly outnumber the specialists trained to deal with these conditions. A trained cadre of diabetes specialist nurses (DSN) and endocrine specialist nurses (ESN) might help bridge this gap. Exploring the perception of DSN/ESN among South Asian doctors will help to understand their role, responsibilities and future prospects. Methods: One hundred and seventy-four endocrinologists from South Asia participated in an online survey on their perception of DSNs and ESNs. Results: Out of the 174 respondents, 61 (35%) were currently working with DSN/ESN, 79 (45.4%) had worked in the past and 131 (75.2%) were willing to start recruiting or employ additional DSN/ESN in the future. The majority considered that the primary function of DSN and ESN is to educate on diabetes (n = 86, 96.6%) and endocrine disorders (n = 34, 57.6%), respectively, followed by anthropometry and initial work-up. Only a small minority felt they could write independent follow-up prescriptions (nurse-led clinics) [DSN - 16 (18%) and ESN - 3 (5.1%)]. Graduation with a certificate course in diabetes and basic endocrinology was considered a sufficient qualification by 68 (39.1%) respondents. Endocrinologists from countries other than India were more willing to recruit ESN/DSN in the future (89.7% vs 72.4%; P < 0.03) and approve a nurse-led clinic (62.1% vs 29.7%; P < 0.03). Upon multiple logistic regression, working in countries other than India was an independent predictor of future willingness to work with DSN/ESN (odds ratio (OR): 4.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.09-18.43, P = 0.03). Conclusion: DSN and ESN could facilitate the management of healthcare-seekers with diabetes and endocrine disorders. A certification course to train nurses on diabetes and basic endocrine disorders following graduation could be helpful. Major hindrances in creating a regular cadre of DSN/ESN were limited opportunities for career progression and lack of additional remuneration for services.