Comparative effectiveness of generic commercial versus locally customized clinical decision support tools to reduce prescription of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for patients with heart failure.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of 2 clinical decision support (CDS) tools to avoid prescription of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in patients with heart failure (HF): a "commercial" and a locally "customized" alert. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 2 CDS tools implemented within a large integrated health system. The commercial CDS tool was designed according to third-party drug content and EHR vendor specifications. The customized CDS tool underwent a user-centered design process informed by implementation science principles, with input from a cross disciplinary team. The customized CDS tool replaced the commercial CDS tool. Data were collected from the electronic health record via analytic reports and manual chart review. The primary outcome was effectiveness, defined as whether the clinician changed their behavior and did not prescribe an NSAID. RESULTS: A random sample of 366 alerts (183 per CDS tool) was evaluated that represented 355 unique patients. The commercial CDS tool was effective for 7 of 172 (4%) patients, while the customized CDS tool was effective for 81 of 183 (44%) patients. After adjusting for age, chronic kidney disease, ejection fraction, NYHA class, concurrent prescription of an opioid or acetaminophen, visit type (inpatient or outpatient), and clinician specialty, the customized alerts were at 24.3 times greater odds of effectiveness compared to the commercial alerts (OR: 24.3 CI: 10.20-58.06). CONCLUSION: Investing additional resources to customize a CDS tool resulted in a CDS tool that was more effective at reducing the total number of NSAID orders placed for patients with HF compared to a commercially available CDS tool.

Arrhythmic Effects of Cannabis in Ischemic Heart Disease.

Rationale: Cannabis use is increasing worldwide, especially among older individuals at risk for chronic ischemic heart disease (IHD). However, little is known about the arrhythmic effects of cannabis use in IHD. Accordingly, we prospectively assessed the relationship between cannabis use, heart rate (HR), and arrhythmias in healthy age-matched controls and subjects with IHD. Methods: Healthy controls (n=37, 57% men) and subjects with IHD (myocardial infarction ≥3 months ago; n=24, 58% men) who used cannabis wore a Zio® (iRhythm Technologies) monitor for 14 days. Noncannabis using ischemic subjects (n=35, 51% males) wore Zio monitors for standard clinical indications. Baseline HR was compared with average HR measured for 4 h following consumption and changes in HR and frequency of arrhythmias were correlated with cannabis use. Results: In controls, HR increased 20 min (4.99±6.7 bpm, p=0.08) after use, then declined 4 h following use (-7.4±7.7, p<0.001). Conversely, subjects with IHD showed minimal HR increase (1.6±3.9 bpm) and blunted HR decline (-3.4±5.6 bpm, p<0.001). Supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) (29.7% vs. 58.3%; p=0.04) and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) (5.6% vs. 47.8%, p=0.01) were the most frequently occurring arrhythmias in controls and IHD subjects, respectively. Incidence of SVT decreased as cannabis use increased in both groups. Conversely, NSVT tended to increase with increased use in controls, and was significantly more prevalent in IHD. However, overall arrhythmia burden did not differ between cannabis users and nonusers with IHD. Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate that chronic cannabis use is associated with only mild HR changes, which are blunted in IHD. In addition, our data suggest that among cannabis users, arrhythmias are more frequent in IHD subjects that in healthy subjects.

Safety and efficacy of IV theophylline for regadenoson-associated side effect reversal.

BACKGROUND: Aminophylline injection has been on an intermittent nation-wide shortage due to manufacturing delays leaving a need for an alternative reversal agent for regadenoson-associated side effects. Intravenous theophylline should be a logical acceptable pharmacological alternative; however, data regarding its safety and efficacy as a reversal agent are lacking. METHODS: Utilizing electronic medical records at the University of Colorado hospital, we identified patients ≥ 18 years of age who had a pharmacologic stress test using regadenoson during periods of aminophylline shortage (3/1/2013 to 5/31/2013 and 4/1/2018 to 8/30/2018) in which theophylline was used as an alternative antidote for side effect reversal. Intravenous theophylline was prepared by the inpatient pharmacy to a concentration of 0.8 mg/mL in a total volume of 100 mL D5W. Specific side effects and side effect resolution were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 122 patients evaluated, theophylline was administered in doses ranging from 40 to 75 mg with the majority receiving 40 mg. Complete resolution of regadenoson side effects occurred in 98 patients with 12 experiencing partial resolution and 1 without resolution. No adverse effects or events were reported. CONCLUSION: Due to limited availability of aminophylline, theophylline may be a safe and effective alternative to reverse regadenoson-associated side effects.

Evaluation of safety and efficacy outcomes of direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in normal and extreme body weights for the treatment of atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism.

Despite evolving evidence, the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with extremes of body weight remains controversial. This study aimed to measure the impact of DOACs compared to warfarin on safety and efficacy outcomes in extreme body weight patients. This multi-center, health system, retrospective study examined the outcomes of patients with all body weights and extreme body weights prescribed a DOAC (rivaroxaban, apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban) or warfarin for atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism over a 9-year period. The primary outcome was a composite of thromboembolism, symptomatic recurrent VTE, or severe bleeding; analyzed by pre-determined BMI cutoffs. A total of 19,697 patients were included in the study: 11,604 in the DOAC group and in the 8093 in the warfarin group. 295 patients were underweight and 9108 patients were pre-obese to obese class 3. After adjusting for potential confounders, warfarin patients had higher odds of experiencing the composite outcome compared to DOAC patients (OR 1.337, 95% CI 1.212-1.475). Additionally, obese patients were 24.6% more likely to experience the outcome compared to normal BMI patients. Adjusted modeling showed that warfarin patients experienced higher bleed rates compared to DOAC patients (OR 1.432, 95% CI 1.266-1.620). Obese patients were less likely to be diagnosed with a bleed (OR 0.749, 95% CI 0.658-0.854), and underweight patients were more likely to be diagnosed with a bleed (OR 1.522, 95% CI 1.095-2.115) compared to normal BMI patients. In conclusion, DOACs for atrial fibrillation or VTE in patients with extreme body weights appear safe and effective when compared to warfarin.

Comparative effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants and warfarin for the treatment of left ventricular thrombus.

Left ventricular (LV) thrombus is a complication of acute endomyocardial injury and chronic ventricular wall hypokinesis, resulting in increased risk of thromboembolic complications. Observational studies support the general safety and efficacy of warfarin for this indication. Limited data exists regarding the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for LV thrombus. This retrospective cohort study sought to compare the incidence of thromboembolic events, bleeding rates, and blood product administration in patients receiving a DOAC versus warfarin. A total of 949 patients met inclusion, 180 (19%) received a DOAC and 769 (81%) warfarin. For the primary endpoint of new onset thromboembolic stroke, no difference existed between treatments (DOAC: 7.8% vs warfarin: 11.7%, p = 0.13). When compared to warfarin, no difference existed in the composite of thromboembolic events (33% vs 30.6%, p = 0.53, respectively) or in GUSTO bleeding (10.9% vs 7.8%, p = 0.40, respectively). More patients on warfarin received blood products compared to those taking a DOAC (25.8% vs 13.9%, p < 0.001).DOACs may be an alternative to warfarin for the treatment of LV thrombus based on a retrospective assessment of thromboembolic events and GUSTO bleeding events within 90 days of diagnosis of LV thrombus. However, further prospective studies are warranted.

The effect of a pharmacist-led multidisciplinary transitions-of-care pilot for patients at high risk of readmission.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility and effect of a pharmacist-led transitions-of-care (TOC) pilot targeted to patients at high risk of readmission on process measures, hospital readmissions, and emergency department (ED) visits. SETTING: Academic medical center in Colorado. PRACTICE DESCRIPTION: Pharmacists enrolled patients identified as high risk for readmission in a TOC pilot from July 2014 to July 2015. The pilot included medication reconciliation, medication counseling, case management or social work evaluation, a postdischarge telephone call, and an expedited primary care follow-up appointment. PRACTICE INNOVATION: Implementation and evaluation of the pharmacist-led TOC pilot program with risk score embedded into the electronic health record. EVALUATION: Comparison of TOC-related process measures and clinical outcomes between pilot patients and randomly matched control patients included readmissions or ED visits at 30 and 90 days. RESULTS: We enrolled 34 pilot patients and randomly matched them to 34 control patients. The intervention took an average of 57.1 minutes for pharmacists to deliver. More pilot patients had a case management or social work note compared with control patients (88% vs. 59%; P = 0.006 [statistically significant]). Readmission rates in pilot versus nonpilot patients, respectively, were 18% versus 24% (P = 0.547) at 30 days and 27% versus 39% (P = 0.296) at 90 days. The composite outcome of a readmission or ED visit in pilot versus nonpilot patients was 24% versus 30% (P = 0.580) at 30 days and 36% versus 49% (P = 0.319) at 90 days. CONCLUSION: A pharmacist-led TOC pilot demonstrates potential for reducing hospital readmissions. The intervention was time intensive and led to creation of a TOC pharmacist role to implement medication-related transitional care.

Patient nonadherence to filling discharge medication prescriptions from the emergency department: Barriers and clinical implications.

PURPOSE: Barriers to and clinical implications of patient nonadherence to filling discharge medication prescriptions from the emergency department (ED) were evaluated. METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational analysis of patients discharged from the ED from April 2013 through May 2015 with medication prescriptions. Patients age 18-89 years who were seen in the ED and did not retrieve discharge medication prescriptions from the onsite, 24-hour ED discharge pharmacy were included in this study. Patients who did not pick up prescriptions were called and asked about barriers to prescription filling. These charts were then retrospectively reviewed and categorized. The primary study outcome was the frequency of nonadherence to filling discharge medications prescribed during the ED visit at the ED outpatient pharmacy. Secondary outcomes included identifying barriers to medication adherence, the rate of return ED visits within 30 days of ED discharge, and the rate of 30-day hospital admissions. Associations between patient and medication variables and the rates of return ED visits within 30 days of discharge and 30-day hospital admissions were analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 4,444 patients discharged from the ED with a prescription to be filled at the satellite pharmacy, 510 were nonadherent. Of these patients, 505 had complete chart information available for evaluation. A large proportion of nonadherent patients revisited the ED within 30 days of ED discharge. Multivariate logistic regression found payer class, ethnicity, and sex were independently associated with return ED visits. CONCLUSION: The majority of patients who received a prescription during an ED visit filled their discharge medications. Sex, ethnicity, and payer class were independently associated with nonadherence.