ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To verify the anatomical basis, ideal puncture sites, and potential pitfalls of the distal radial artery (dRA) in the anatomical snuffbox region for distal radial access (dTRA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Overall, 26 formalin-fixed upper limbs and computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the upper limbs of 168 consecutive patients were studied. Cadaveric dissection and dRA 3D reconstruction were used to evaluate the dRA route for dTRA. The puncture sites, dRA diameter, and angle of the dRA and tendons of the extensor pollicis brevis were also measured in the patients and cadavers. RESULTS: The cadaver dissection provided more insights than did the dRA 3D reconstruction. However, preoperative evaluation had better diagnostic accuracy (p=0.024). Puncture sites 1 and 3 had a high success rate (63.2% possible success rate, 191/302). The DISFAVOR theory was put forward, in which 8 types of potential pitfalls that may interrupt puncture procedure or lead to a surgical failure were observed, including occlusion, stenosis, tortuosity, arteriovenous fistula, angioma, different radial artery (RA) ramifications, radial veins, and cephalic veins. The mean diameter of dRA based on cadaver dissection and CTA was 2.53 (SD=0.73) and 2.63 (SD=0.69) mm, respectively. Furthermore, the minimum distance from the outer layer of dRA to the skin was 5.71 (SD=2.0) mm based on CTA. The angle between the dRA and tendons of extensor pollicis brevis (TEPB) based on cadaver dissection and CTA was 58.0° (SD=21.5°) and 51.8° (SD=16.6°), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Puncture sites 1 and 3 were more suitable for the dTRA, and we put forward the DISFAVOR theory to summarize the 8 types of potential pitfalls during the use of dTRA.
ABSTRACT
Background: Observational research has shown a correlation between inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) [comprising ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD)] and celiac disease. However, the relationship between these two diseases remains uncertain. Methods: We utilized two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) to estimate the bidirectional causal relationships between IBD and celiac disease. This study utilized data on single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from genome-wide association studies (GWASs). Heterogeneity, pleiotropy, and sensitivity analyses were also performed to evaluate the MR results. Results: There was a significant causal relationship between IBD and CD and celiac disease (e.g., IBD and celiac disease, inverse variance weighting (IVW) odds ratio (OR) = 1.0828, 95% CI = 1.0258-1.1428, p = 0.0039; CD and celiac disease, IVW OR = 1.0807, 95% CI = 1.0227-1.1420, p = 0.0058). However, in the reverse direction, we found only suggestive positive causality between celiac disease and CD (e.g., IVW OR = 1.0366, 95% CI = 1.0031-1.0711, p = 0.0319). No evidence of heterogeneity between genetic variants was found (e.g., IBD vs. celiac disease, MR-Egger Q = 47.4391, p = 0.6159). Horizontal pleiotropy hardly influenced causality (e.g., IBD vs. celiac disease, MR-Egger test: p = 0.4340). Leave-one-out analysis showed that individual SNPs did not influence the general results. Conclusion: Our MR analysis revealed a positive causal link between IBD and celiac disease in the European population. In addition, several recommendations for disease prevention and clinical management have been discussed.
ABSTRACT
Purpose: The CT scan is the best common screening test for pancreatic cancer recurrence after surgery. The goal of our meta-analysis was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT for pancreatic cancer recurrence. Methods: We examined PubMed and Embase for suitable papers between 2009 and 2022. The researchers considered studies that looked at the diagnostic usefulness of 18F-FDG PET/CT in identifying local and/or distant disease recurrence throughout the follow-up following pancreatic cancer resection. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Performance Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) method was used to evaluate the quality of each study. For each of the publications included, two researchers extracted data independently. The extracted data included general data (authors, year of publication), literature characteristics (country, type of literature, and design of study), characteristics of the patient (patients' number, mean or median age, and treatment regimen), and technical aspects (scanner, injection activity, and image analysis). Results: The analysis includes 7 trials with a total of 263 patients. The sensitivity and specificity of 18F-FDG PET/CT in detecting recurrent pancreatic cancer following definitive treatment were 0.89 (95 percent CI: 0.83-0.93) and 0.88 (95 percent CI: 0.72-0.96), respectively, according to the pooled estimates. PET/CT performed well in the diagnosis of recurrent pancreatic cancer, with an AUC of 0.94. (0.91-0.95). Conclusions: 18F-FDG PET-CT was found to be a reliable detection method in recurrent pancreatic tumor.
