Severe tracheobronchopathia osteochondroplastica in an asymptomatic patient.

Tracheobronchopathia osteochondroplastica (TO) is a rare condition affecting the lumen of the tracheobronchial tree. It is characterised by the presence of multiple osseous and cartilaginous nodules with posterior wall sparing. While it is a benign condition, it can cause narrowing of the tracheal lumen and subglottis to varying degrees. Approximately 400 cases have been reported worldwide, with an incidence of 0.3% in autopsies and between 1 in 125 and 1 in 5000 on bronchoscopy. As most patients are asymptomatic, this may contribute to underdiagnoses and relative low incidence. Severity of the condition is often unrelated to patient symptomatology. We present a patient with one of the most severe cases of TO seen at our institution. Despite being asymptomatic, significant tracheal and bronchial narrowing was found incidentally on laryngobronchoscopy.

Augmented Glutathione Absorption from Oral Mucosa and its Effect on Skin Pigmentation: A Clinical Review.

Treatment of dark skin with glutathione has become popular due to its depigmenting properties and low toxicity. Glutathione has been used topically, orally and parenterally in the management of dark skin. There are no clear published guidelines for management of skin pigmentation despite some clinical trials of shorter duration and small sample sizes. We examined published scientific and patient data to generate guidance for the clinician for managing hyperpigmentation using glutathione by orobuccal route. Various aspects of glutathione bioavailability were examined when administered by oral routes. Absorption of glutathione from the gastrointestinal tract is poor. Some trials have favored administering high oral doses to achieve therapeutic effect. General consensus remains against treatment of hyperpigmentation with glutathione by the oral route. Clinical and experimental evidence supporting significant glutathione absorption from orobuccal mucosa was examined. The latter is superior to the oral route since glutathione passes directly into systemic circulation resulting in a much higher rate of absorption compared to that achieved by oral intake. High blood levels thus achieved have therapeutic value. Treatment of hyperpigmentation with glutathione by the orobuccal route using hydroxypropyl cellulose (HPC) film was reviewed to formulate clinical guidance from published data. A future randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial should study treatment of hyperpigmentation with glutathione using oral dispersible HPC film, with longer-term follow-up and larger sample size. This paper will hopefully offer broad guidance for the clinician on use of glutathione for hyperpigmentation management, until outcomes of larger, longer duration trials become available.

Comparative Study of UMA Jeunesse Classic® and UMA Jeunesse Ultra®.

INTRODUCTION: The emergence of hyaluronic acid dermal fillers with lidocaine has transformed the minimally invasive treatment of wrinkles, lines and folds of the face. Patients can be treated quickly, painlessly and without the need for large doses of lidocaine. Therefore, it is important to scientifically evaluate the merits of lidocaine-containing products over those without. METHODS: The two products, with (UJU) and without lidocaine (UJ), were randomly injected into nasolabial folds of 75 healthy volunteers with varying skin types in a split face study, age ranging 26-60 years. Only 73 subjects completed the follow-up. There were 68 females and 5 males with medium-to-deep nasolabial folds. All subjects were randomly injected with the two products on one or the other side of the face. Patients were followed up for 9 months. RESULTS: Both products achieved significant improvement in the wrinkle severity score. Overall results were slightly better with UJU due to ease of injection, lack of pain and avoidance of topical or parenteral anaesthetic. In all other respects, differences in clinical data were not statistically significant. UJU® was preferred by patients and injectors due to less pain during and after injection as compared to UJ® (P < 0.0001). The overall rate of early and late complications with the two products was similar. Duration of maintenance of aesthetic effect between products also showed similarity. Optimum aesthetic effect was maintained in most cases for over 9 months with both products but patients in the 30-50-year age group did better. The patient acceptability rate was much higher with UJU. CONCLUSION: Clinical data from this study suggest that performance and outcomes of treatment of medium-to-deep nasolabial folds with UJ and UJU are quite similar. However, treatment with UJU offers enhanced patient comfort and is preferred by patients and injectors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

The impact of comorbidity upon determinants of outcome in patients with lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Survival from lung cancer remains poor in Scotland, UK. It is believed that comorbidity may play an important role in this. The goal of this study was to determine the value of a novel comorbidity scoring system (SCSS) and to compare it with the already established Charlson Comorbidity Index and the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS). We also wished to explore the relationship between comorbidity, mGPS and Performance Status (PS). In addition we investigated a number of standard prognostic markers and demographics. This study aimed to determine which of these factors most accurately predicted survival. METHODS: Between 2005 and 2008 all newly diagnosed lung cancer patients coming through the Multi-Disciplinary Teams (MDTs) in four Scottish Centres were included in the study. Patient demographics, World Health Organization/Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, clinico-pathological features, mGPS, comorbidity and proposed primary treatment modality were recorded. Univariate survival analysis was carried out using Kaplan-Meier method and the log rank test. RESULTS: This large unselected population based cohort study of lung cancer patients has demonstrated that a number of important factors have significant impact in terms of survival. It has gone further by showing that the factors which influence survival are different, depending upon the stage of cancer at diagnosis and the potential treatment strategy. The novel comorbidity scoring system, the SCSS, has compared very favourably with the more established CCI. CONCLUSION: This study has identified that a variety of factors are independent prognostic determinants of outcome in lung cancer. There appear to be clear differences between the early and late stage groups.

Comorbidities in lung cancer: prevalence, severity and links with socioeconomic status and treatment.

BACKGROUND: Survival from lung cancer remains poor in Scotland, UK. Although the presence of comorbidities is known to influence outcomes, detailed quantification of comorbidities is not available in routinely collected audit or cancer registry data. The aim of the present study was to assess the prevalence and severity of comorbidities in patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer across four centres throughout Scotland using validated criteria. METHODS: Between 2005 and 2008, all patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer coming through the multidisciplinary teams in four Scottish centres were included in the study. Patient demographics, WHO/Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, clinicopathological features and primary treatment modality were recorded. RESULTS: Details of 882 patients were collected prospectively. The majority of patients (87.3%) had at least one comorbidity, the most common being weight loss (53%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (43%), renal impairment (28%) and ischaemic heart disease (27%). A composite score was produced that included both number and severity of comorbidities. One in seven patients (15.3%) had severe comorbidity scores. There were statistically significant variations in comorbidity scores between treatment centres and between non-small cell lung carcinoma treatment groups. Disease stage was not associated with comorbidity score. CONCLUSIONS: There is a high prevalence of multiple, severe comorbidities in Scottish patients with lung cancer, and these vary by site and treatment group. Further research is needed to determine the relationship between comorbidity scores and survival in these patients.

Simple and Objective Prediction of Survival in Patients with Lung Cancer: Staging the Host Systemic Inflammatory Response.

Background. Prediction of survival in patients diagnosed with lung cancer remains problematical. The aim of the present study was to examine the clinical utility of an established objective marker of the systemic inflammatory response, the Glasgow Prognostic Score, as the basis of risk stratification in patients with lung cancer. Methods. Between 2005 and 2008 all newly diagnosed lung cancer patients coming through the multidisciplinary meetings (MDTs) of four Scottish centres were included in the study. The details of 882 patients with a confirmed new diagnosis of any subtype or stage of lung cancer were collected prospectively. Results. The median survival was 5.6 months (IQR 4.8-6.5). Survival analysis was undertaken in three separate groups based on mGPS score. In the mGPS 0 group the most highly predictive factors were performance status, weight loss, stage of NSCLC, and palliative treatment offered. In the mGPS 1 group performance status, stage of NSCLC, and radical treatment offered were significant. In the mGPS 2 group only performance status and weight loss were statistically significant. Discussion. This present study confirms previous work supporting the use of mGPS in predicting cancer survival; however, it goes further by showing how it might be used to provide more objective risk stratification in patients diagnosed with lung cancer.

Variation in comorbidity and clinical management in patients newly diagnosed with lung cancer in four Scottish centers.

BACKGROUND: Treatment and survival rates within Scotland for patients with lung cancer seem lower than in many other European countries. No study of lung cancer has attempted to specifically investigate the association between variation in investigation, comorbidity, and treatment and outcome between different centers. METHODS: Patient demographics, World Health Organization/Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, and primary treatment modality were recorded. In addition to recording the comorbidities present in each patient, the severity of each comorbidity was graded on a 4-point scale (0-3) using validated severity scales. Data were collected as the patient was investigated and entered in an anonymized format into a database designed for the study. RESULTS: Prospectively collected data from 882 patients diagnosed with lung cancer in four Scottish centers. A number of statistically significant differences were identified between centers. These included investigation, treatment between centers (i.e., surgical rates), age, tumor histology, smoking history, socioeconomic profile, ventilatory function, and performance status. Predictors of declining performance status included increasing severity of a number of comorbidities, age, lower socioeconomic status, and specific centers. CONCLUSIONS: This study has identified many significant intercenter differences within Scotland. We believe this to be the first study to identify nontumor factors independent of performance status that together limit the ability to deliver radical, possibly curative, therapy to our lung cancer population. It is only by identifying such factors that we can hope to improve on the relatively poor outlook for the majority of Scottish patients with lung cancer.

Histologic and manometric studies on the esophagus following endoscopic sclerotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this work was to study the histologic and manometric changes in the distal esophagus beyond 2 years following endoscopic sclerotherapy (EST) and/or surgical intervention, and to try to understand the etiological factors associated with these changes. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS: Forty patients, with an average age of 61.5 years, were studied for 2-12 years following sclerotherapy and/or surgical intervention. The causes of liver disease were alcoholic cirrhosis (78.6%), primary biliary cirrhosis (14.3%), and chronic aggressive hepatitis (7.1%). A predominant number of cases (65%) had a mesocaval interposition shunt due to the failure of EST, 32.5% EST alone, and 2.5% esophageal devascularization. All patients had esophageal manometry following mucosal biopsies taken in duplicate endoscopically from three levels of the distal esophagus. RESULTS: In the EST and shunt groups, 88.5% had manometric abnormalities, esophagitis, and chronic inflammatory changes. In the EST group, all but two patients had manometric abnormalities and chronic inflammatory changes. Analysis of the patient groups on the basis of the number of EST sessions and the amount of sclerosant injected showed that both histologic changes and dysmotility were more profound in those treated over five times with EST. The differences were significant. CONCLUSION: It appears that EST causes persistent manometric abnormalities and chronic inflammatory changes in the distal esophagus, the severity of which seems to vary directly with the frequency of sclerotherapy and not amount of sclerosant injected.