Concurrent Validity and Reliability of a New Smartphone Application for Measuring Cervical Range of Motion in Healthy Individuals.

BACKGROUND: Range of motion (ROM) measurement is an important part of physical therapy assessment and patient progress. Smartphones are user-friendly instruments and if proven to be reliable and valid, clinicians can use them for a variety of tasks including ROM measurement. OBJECTIVES: To determine concurrent validity and intra- and inter-rater reliability of the PhysioMaster application in measuring cervical ROM in both Android and iOS operating systems. METHODS: Forty-five healthy individuals (age 31.75 ± 11.94 yrs; 18 men, 27 women) completed this study. Two raters measured cervical ROM, three times each, using an Android phone for intra-rater and inter-rater reliability. With an interval time of 1-7 days after the first session, measurements were repeated by one of the raters once to measure intersession reliability. Validity was estimated by one of the raters using iPhone and Android phones one at a time while 3D motion analysis (3DMA) recorded cervical movements simultaneously. For reliability, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and for validity, Pearson correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman plots were used. RESULTS: ICC values of ≥0.76 and ≥0.84 demonstrated excellent intra-rater and inter-rater reliability, respectively. For concurrent validity, correlation between each phone and 3DMA was nearly perfect for all movements (0.93 ≤ r ≤ 0.97). CONCLUSION: PhysioMaster appears to be a valid and reliable application for measuring cervical ROM in healthy individuals.

Taking Action to Promote Diversity and Inclusion: One Program's Efforts Through Pathway Opportunities, Holistic Admissions, and Curricular Changes.

AIMS: Concerted, effective, and sustainable change in healthcare education programs is a critical step towards creating more diverse, inclusive, and equitable professions. This commentary demonstrates how one entry-level physical therapist education program, through a process of reflection, prioritization, and action, is taking steps to increase diversity, equity, and inclusivity within their program. RATIONALE: This article highlights initiatives that are leveraging existing partnerships and creating new ones to reach and mentor students from diverse communities, steps taken towards a more holistic and equitable admissions process, implementation of curricular changes to intentionally discuss the social determinants of health, and engagement of faculty and students to foster personal and professional development on diversity, equity, and inclusion topics. Outcomes to track the effectiveness of the strategies being used by each initiative are shared. CONCLUSION: To create active agents of change, education programs must create a diverse and equitable space for students and guide them to become leaders who can transform society. Steps taken by an entry-level physical therapist education program to implement strategies to promote diversity, equity and inclusion can serve as a road map for other healthcare professional programs.

Tailored Yoga Intervention for Postlumbar Spine Surgical Pain Management: A Feasibility Study.

Introduction: Severe pain, anxiety, and high opioid use are common following lumbar spine surgery (LSS). Yoga helps to reduce pain and anxiety, but it has not been considered for postsurgical care. The authors developed and tested the feasibility of a tailored yoga program designed for individuals undergoing LSS and explored clinical feasibility of yoga intervention on measures of pain, function, psychological status, and opioid use. Methods: Individuals scheduled for LSS were randomized into yoga versus control groups presurgery. Participants in the yoga group received tailored yoga sessions plus usual care, whereas participants in the control group received usual care only during the hospital stay post-LSS. In-person daily yoga sessions were individually presented and performed in the participant's hospital room. Feasibility was assessed by recruitment and retention rates, rate of yoga session completion, tolerance to yoga intervention, and ability to carry out planned assessment. Exploratory clinical outcomes included pain, psychological measures, Timed-Up-and-Go test, gait distance, and opioid use, during the hospital stay post-LSS. Results: Forty-one participants were enrolled, of which 30 completed. There were no dropouts. Planned assessments were completed within 45 min, suggesting no excessive burden on participants. Baseline variables were similar across both groups. The majority of participants participated in yoga intervention on the day of surgery or one day after surgery with acceptance rate of 100%. Participants showed good tolerance to yoga intervention on 0-4 tolerance scale and by their reports of exploratory clinical outcomes. Conclusion: This study indicates feasibility for a modified yoga program for postoperative care following LSS due to participant tolerance and retention. The results provide preliminary framework for future confirmatory studies that can assess the potential benefits of yoga in reducing pain, catastrophizing behavior, and opioid use and improving function. A modified yoga program focusing on diaphragmatic breathing, relaxation, and core isometric contraction exercises can be an important adjunct intervention for patients undergoing LSS. CTR Number: This trial was registered in UMIN CTR (https://rctportal.niph.go.jp/en/) with registration number: UMIN000032595.

Sleep quality in individuals with chronic low back pain and central sensitization.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Sleep problems are common in individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP). Central sensitization (CS) is present in a subgroup of individuals with CLBP. However, our knowledge about whether sleep quality varies between the subgroups of CLBP is limited. Therefore, we sought to examine whether the subgroup of CLBP with CS has poorer sleep quality than the subgroup without CS. METHODS: 2011 Fibromyalgia Survey (2011 FM survey) was used as a surrogate measure of CS to divide the CLBP participants into two subgroups: CLBP with CS and CLBP without CS. We also created a CS index comprising a set of quantitative sensory testing measures (i.e., pressure pain thresholds, conditioned pain modulation) to evaluate pain sensitivity. Sleep quality was assessed with Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Group differences about PSQI and CS index and associations between sleep quality and CS across the groups were analyzed. RESULTS: We included 60 participants with CLBP and 23 healthy controls (HCs). Overall, 80% of the participants with CLBP presented with poor sleep quality. Participants with CLBP with CS showed significantly higher PSQI scores (poorer sleep) than participants with CLBP without CS and HCs (p < 0.05). Both the 2011 FM survey and CS index were significantly correlated with sleep quality (r = 0.5870, p < 0.001 and r = -0.264, p = 0.04). Logistic regression models revealed that the FM status (odds ratio (OR) = 6.00, p = 0.02 [95% confidence interval: 1.31-42.1]), but not the CS index (OR = 1.11, p = 0.79 [95% CI: 0.48-2.71]) was associated with PSQI. After adjusting covariates, the results remained similar but became non-significant for the FM status. DISCUSSION: We found that sleep problems were more common and severe in those who exhibited signs of CS. Thus, clinicians may consider using 2011 FM survey to identify those with CS and co-existing sleep problems.

Protocol for Testing Yoga to Reduce Post-Lumbar Spine Surgery Pain: A Methodology Article.

Currently, acute postoperative pain during hospitalization is primarily managed by medications, and patients must adhere to restrictive postoperative precautions for 3 months following lumbar spine surgeries. Yoga can be an alternative approach to assist in acute and subacute postoperative pain management, anxiety, and return to function. The purpose of the present work was to develop and test the feasibility and explore the effectiveness of a tailored yoga program, delivered in-person during the hospital stay and electronically after hospital discharge, as a potential new avenue for postoperative care. This pilot study will use a crossover randomized controlled design. Individuals aged between 40 and 80 years who are scheduled for lumbar laminectomy and/or fusion, and who have not practiced regular yoga within the past 6 months at the time of enrollment, will be recruited and randomized to either a tailored yoga program (intervention group) or usual care (control group) during the hospital stay (phase one). Bearing in mind postoperative precautions, all subjects will be instructed to perform a home-based tailored yoga program delivered electronically via YouTube links for 8 weeks post-hospital discharge (phase two). The primary outcome measures assessing feasibility are adherence/compliance. Secondary outcome measures include pain, anxiety, function, sleep, perceived stress, and pain-catastrophizing behavior. Length of hospital stay and pain medication use, gait distance, and overall physical activity during hospitalization will also be collected. Finally, a qualitative interview will be obtained after completion of the hospital and home-based programs. This study will determine the feasibility of a tailored yoga program for acute and subacute postoperative lumbar spine surgery pain, anxiety, and functional outcomes.

The effect of age and gender on acute postoperative pain and function following lumbar spine surgeries.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Understanding the factors contributing to the variability in postoperative pain and function following lumbar spine surgeries (LSS) is necessary to plan inpatient rehabilitation and optimize surgical outcomes. In particular, variability due to age and gender has not been studied. This study's aim was to evaluate the variability in postoperative pain and function, during hospital stay, due to age and gender following LSS. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 585 patients who underwent LSS during their hospital stay. Univariate ANCOVA was performed to study the differences in postoperative pain, and multivariate ANCOVA was performed to study the differences in postoperative function (gait distance, independency combined score, and balance combined score) between age groups (older adults [≥65 years of age] vs. younger adults) and gender. RESULTS: Younger patients reported statistically, but not clinically, significant higher postoperative pain than older patients (ß = 0.652 [95% CI (0.382-0.986)], p < 0.001), and males reported statistically, but not clinically, significant lower postoperative pain than female patients (ß = -0.583 [95% CI (-0.825 to -0.252)], p < 0.001) with adjustment of covariates. Male patients walked significantly longer distance than female patients (ß = 0.272 [95% CI (0.112-0.432)], p = 0.001) with adjustment of covariates. However, these were clinically insignificant. With adjustment of preoperative diagnosis, type of surgery, severity of illness, and prior level of function, there was no statistically significant difference between age groups in walking distance, and between age and gender groups in independency combined score and balance combined scores. DISCUSSION: Following LSS, the difference in postoperative pain between age groups and gender are statistically but not clinically significant, suggesting patients require similar effective postoperative pain management regardless of age and gender. The apparent difference in age and gender in postoperative functional outcomes could be due to other factors.

Correlation Between Central Sensitization and Remote Muscle Performance in Individuals With Chronic Low Back Pain.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine associations between the degree of central sensitization (CS) and remote muscle performance in people with chronic low back pain (CLBP). METHODS: The 2011 fibromyalgia (FM) criteria and severity scales (2011 FM survey) were used as a surrogate measure of CS to divide the participants into 2 groups: FM-positive CLBP and FM-negative CLBP. Measures related to central sensitization included the 2011 FM survey and pressure pain threshold of the thumbnail. Measures related to muscle performance included neck flexor muscle strength and endurance and plantar flexor muscle strength. Between-groups and correlation analyses were performed. RESULTS: Sixty people with CLBP were enrolled (30 FM-positive, 30 FM-negative). There was no significant difference between the subgroups in age, sex, or pain duration (P > .05). The FM-positive CLBP group showed poorer neck flexor muscle endurance (P = .01) and plantar flexor muscle strength (P = .002) than the FM-negative CLBP group, whereas neck flexor muscle strength was not different between the groups (P = .175). Scores for FM and values for pressure pain thresholds of the thumbnail were associated with neck flexor muscle strength (respectively, r = -0.320, P = .013, and r = 0.467, P < .001), endurance (r = -0.242, P < .001, and r = 0.335, P = .009), and plantar flexor muscle strength (r = -0.469, P < .001, and r = 0.500, P < .001). CONCLUSION: We found associations between the degree of CS and remote muscle strength and endurance, suggesting that poor remote muscle performance is possibly a clinical sign of CS in people with CLBP.

The Association of Diabetes With Knee Pain Locations, Pain While Walking, and Walking Speed: Data From the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

OBJECTIVE: Osteoarthritis (OA) and diabetes mellitus (DM) often coexist and can result in negative outcomes. DM can affect pain and walking speed in people with knee OA; however, the impact of DM on OA is understudied. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between diabetes and knee pain locations, pain severity while walking, and walking speed in people with knee OA. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis was used. Data from 1790 individuals from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (mean [SD] age = 69 [8.7] years) with knee pain were included and grouped into knee OA and diabetes (n = 236) or knee OA only (n = 1554). Knee pain locations were categorized as no pain, localized pain, regional pain, or diffuse pain. Knee pain during a 20-m walk test was categorized as no pain, mild, moderate, or severe knee pain. Walking speed was measured using the 20-m walk test. Multinomial and linear regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: Diabetes was associated with regional knee pain (odds ratio [OR] = 1.77; 95% CI = 1.01-3.11). Diabetes was associated only with moderate (OR = 1.78; 95% CI = 1.02-3.10) or severe (OR = 2.52; 95% CI = 1.01-6.28) pain while walking. Diabetes was associated with decreased walking speed (B = -0.064; 95% CI = -0.09 to -0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes was associated with regional knee pain but not with localized or diffuse knee pain and was associated with moderate to severe knee pain while walking and slower walking speed in people with knee OA. IMPACT: Clinicians can use a knee pain map for examining knee pain locations for people with diabetes and knee OA. Knee pain during walking and walking speed should be screened for people with knee OA and diabetes because of the influence of diabetes on these parameters in this population. LAY SUMMARY: Diabetes might be associated with specific knee pain locations, pain during activities such as walking, and reduced walking speed in people with knee OA.

Quantifying Lumbar Mobilization With Inertial Measurement Unit.

OBJECTIVE: Lumbar mobilization is a standard intervention for the management of low back pain, yet ways to quantify lumbar mobilization are limited. An inertial measurement unit (IMU) is a small and inexpensive device that can be used to quantify lumbar mobilization. The objective of this study was to determine the validity and reliability of an IMU in measuring the amplitude of displacement of a clinician's hand movement during oscillatory lumbar mobilization. METHODS: An IMU was secured on a clinician's hand during application of mobilization forces at the L4 segment of 16 healthy participants. The validity of the IMU was tested against common laboratory methods of measurements (force plate and motion capture system). The reliability of the IMU measurements was determined between 2 clinicians (inter-rater reliability) and between 2 sessions (intra-rater reliability) by calculating percent error of measurement (%e) and limits of agreement (LOA). The reliability was considered high when |%e| ≤ 10% and |LOA| ≤ 20%; moderate when |%e| 10% to 20% and |LOA| 21% to 40%; and non-acceptable when |%e| > 20% and |LOA| > 40%. RESULTS: The IMU measurements had high correlation with the force plate measurements (rs = 0.94) and high agreement with the motion capture system measurements (%e = 4%, LOA = -11% and 20%). Both the inter-rater reliability (%e = 6%, LOA = -25% and 37%) and the intrarater reliability (%e = -1%, LOA = -29% and 27%) of IMU measurements were moderate. CONCLUSION: The IMU seems to be a valid device to measure the amplitude of a clinician's hand movement. The moderate reliability found in this study may not reflect poor reliability of the IMU as much as inconsistency in reapplication of lumbar mobilization.

Inertial sensors identified asymmetries in shank angular velocity at different gait speeds in individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Inertial sensors can detect between-limb asymmetries in shank angular velocity (SAV) during loading response of walking in individuals with ACL reconstruction (ACLR), which may be indicative of abnormal knee joint loading. However, it is unknown whether these SAV asymmetries would exist up to 6 months post-ACLR and how they differ from SAV asymmetries in uninjured healthy subjects. RESEARCH QUESTION: To investigate whether patients with ACLR show significant and meaningful between-limb SAV asymmetries during walking and walking fast at 4 and 6 months post-surgery and to determine whether limb asymmetries are related across gait tasks and time. METHODS: Fifteen individuals with ACLR participated in this prospective study. Testing occurred in clinical settings. Participants were instructed to walk and walk fast while wearing one inertial sensor on each shank. The average of sagittal plane SAV peaks during loading response of gait was calculated bilaterally. The smallest meaningful between-limb difference for SAV was calculated from uninjured healthy subjects (n = 16) to define the limit of meaningful SAV asymmetries in patients with ACLR. RESULTS: At 4 and 6 months post-ACLR, the involved limb had significantly smaller peak SAV during walking (P < .01, d = 0.69-0.85) and walking fast (P < .005, d = 1.03-1.07) compared to the uninvolved limb. A significant main effect of gait task on SAV asymmetries was found (P = .006, ηp2 = 0.451). Further, patients with ACLR exhibited meaningful SAV asymmetries at both time points for both gait speeds. Limb SAV asymmetries correlated between gait tasks and across time (r = 0.760-0.860, P < .001). SIGNIFICANCE: Individuals with ACLR presented with significant and meaningful SAV asymmetries during walking and walking fast at 4 and 6 months post-surgery. Greater limb SAV asymmetries persisted across gait tasks and time, with greater asymmetry was observed at a faster walking speed. Thus, inertial sensors are feasible to be used in clinical settings to identify SAV asymmetry during gait post-ACLR.

The Association of Diabetes with Knee Pain Severity and Distribution in People with Knee Osteoarthritis using Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Limited research has examined the association between diabetes mellitus (DM) and knee pain in people with osteoarthritis (OA). Therefore, this study aimed at examining the association between DM and knee pain severity, and to explore the association between DM and knee pain distribution (unilateral or bilateral versus no pain) in subjects with knee OA. This is a cross-sectional analysis of the baseline visit of individuals who were enrolled in the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Data of participants with knee OA were used for this analysis (n = 1319), and grouped into subjects with both knee OA and DM (n = 148) or knee OA only without DM (n = 1171). Pain severity was measured using a numeric rating scale from 0 to 10 over the past 7 and 30 days for each knee, and the more symptomatic knee with higher pain severity was chosen for analysis. DM was significantly associated with increased knee pain severity over 7 days (B 0.68; 95% CI 0.25-1.11) and over 30 days (B 0.59; 95% CI 0.17-1.01) after adjustments for all covariates, including age, gender, BMI, race, depression symptoms, composite OA score, use of pain medications, and knee injections. Multinomial regression showed that participants with knee OA and DM had 2.45 (95% CI 1.07-5.61) to 2.55 (95% CI 1.12-5.79) times higher likelihood of having unilateral and bilateral knee pain than those without DM and without knee pain. This study found that DM was associated with higher pain severity and unilateral and bilateral knee pain distribution.

Effect of Grade III Lumbar Mobilization on Back Muscles in Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Lumbar mobilization is a standard intervention for lower back pain (LBP). However, its effect on the activity of back muscles is not well known. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effects of lumbar mobilization on the activity/contraction of erector spinae (ES) and lumbar multifidus (LM) muscles in people with LBP. DESIGN: Randomized controlled study. METHODS: 21 subjects with LBP received either grade III central lumbar mobilization or placebo (light touch) intervention on lumbar segment level 4 (L4). Surface electromyography (EMG) signals of ES and ultrasound (US) images of LM were captured before and after the intervention. The contraction of LM was calculated from US images at L4 level. The normalized amplitude of EMG signals (nEMG) and activity onset of ES were calculated from the EMG signals at both L1 and L4 levels. RESULTS: Significant differences were found between the mobilization and placebo groups in LM contraction (p=0.03), nEMG of ES at L1 (p=0.01) and L4 (p=0.05), and activity onset of ES at L1 (p=0.02). CONCLUSION: Lumbar mobilization decreased both the activity amplitude and the activity onset of ES in people with LBP. However, the significant difference in LM contraction was small and may not have clinical significance.

Association between Opioid Dose, Acute Post-operative Pain and Walking Distance Following Lumbar Spine Surgery.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: The opioid doses on post-operative day 1 (POD1) is a major predictor of recovery in patients following lumbar spine surgery (LSS). However, the opioid doses vary widely in clinical practice. Thus, the objective of this study was to explore the associations between opioid doses on POD1, pain and function during a hospital stay in patients following LSS. METHODS: This study used medical records of patients who underwent LSS between January 2007 and March 2018. The patients were divided into three groups (high, medium and low dose) according to the amount of opioid (oral morphine equivalents; OME) taken on POD1. A propensity score matching across the three groups was performed to account for main confounding factors related to the opioid dose, pain intensity and gait distance, which identified 114 matched patients in each group. The difference of pain intensity and gait distance between the groups on POD1 was analysed. RESULTS: The OME in each group on POD1 was 168.75 ± 69.50 mg (high), 65.92 ± 13.28 mg (medium) and 16.90 ± 9.80 mg (low) (P < .0001). Pain intensity on the postoperative day 2 (POD2) and 3 (POD3) was not different between the groups (P > .05). Gait distance on POD2 and POD3 was different between the groups but did not reach the adjusted statistically significant level of 0.017: high (170.3 ± 152.77 feet) versus medium (247.57 ± 216.65 feet) dose on POD2 (P = .04); high (179.31 ± 135.722 feet) versus low (230.94 ± 145.74 feet) dose on POD3 (P = .03); and medium (196.98 ± 159.42 feet) versus low (261.00 ± 161.03 feet) dose on POD3 (P = .09). WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: The findings indicated that high dose opioids on POD1 did not translate into better outcomes of pain and gait in patients following LSS. In fact, patients in medium and low dose groups walked a greater distance on POD2 and POD3. Use of a functional outcome such as gait should be considered to optimize opioid dose effects.

Physical and Physiological Effects of Yoga for an Underserved Population with Chronic Low Back Pain.

BACKGROUND: Yoga has been shown useful in reducing chronic low back pain (CLBP) through largely unknown mechanisms. The aim of this pilot study is to investigate the feasibility of providing yoga intervention to a predominantly underserved population and explore the potential mechanisms underlying yoga intervention in improving CLBP pain. METHODS: The quasi-experimental within-subject wait-listed crossover design targeted the recruitment of low-income participants who received twice-weekly group yoga for 12 weeks, following 6-12 weeks of no intervention. Outcome measures were taken at baseline, preintervention (6-12 weeks following baseline), and then postintervention. Outcome measures included pain, disability, core strength, flexibility, and plasma tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α protein levels. Outcomes measures were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and paired one-tailed t-tests. RESULTS: Eight patients completed the intervention. Significant improvements in pain scores measured over time were supported by the significant improvement in pre- and post-yoga session pain scores. Significant improvements were also seen in the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire scores, spinal and hip flexor flexibility, and strength of core muscles following yoga. Six participants saw a 28.6%-100% reduction of TNF-α plasma protein levels after yoga, while one showed an 82.4% increase. Two participants had no detectable levels to begin with. Brain imaging analysis shows interesting increases in N-acetylaspartate in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and thalamus. CONCLUSION: Yoga appears effective in reducing pain and disability in a low-income CLBP population and in part works by increasing flexibility and core strength. Changes in TNF-α protein levels should be further investigated for its influence on pain pathways.

The prevalence of type 2 diabetes and associated risk factors with generalized osteoarthritis: a retrospective study using ICD codes for clinical data repository system.

OBJECTIVE: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has been associated with osteoarthritis (OA). T2DM may be associated with generalized OA (GOA ≥ 3 joints) rather than localized OA (LOA < 3 joints). The purpose of this study was to examine the prevalence of T2DM in people with GOA compared with LOA and to investigate the association between demographic risk factors and chronic diseases (i.e., T2DM, hypertension, dyslipidemia, neuropathy, and body mass index (BMI)) with GOA compared with LOA. METHODS: A retrospective review of data was performed, and patients with diagnostic codes for OA were selected. Identified codes included primary GOA, primary LOA, T2DM, hypertension, dyslipidemia, neuropathy, depression, anxiety, and sleep disorders. Information about BMI and medication list was obtained. Chi-square and logistic regression were performed to examine the prevalence and risk factors, respectively. RESULTS: Data from 3855 patients (mean age = 66.43 ± 11.02, 60.9% women) included patients with GOA (n = 1265) and LOA (n = 2590). The prevalence of T2DM was significantly greater among patients with GOA (25.8%) compared with those with LOA (12.0%); however, the GOA group were older. Based on age groups, T2DM was prevalent in 17.8% of GOA compared with 7.2% in LOA for younger adults (aged 45-64 years) and was prevalent in 28.8% of GOA compared with 15.7% in LOA for older adults (aged 65 years or older). The odds ratio of GOA increased in people with chronic diseases compared with those without including T2DM (odds ratio (OR) 1.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05-1.78, p = 0.02), hypertension (OR 1.99, CI 1.63-2.43, p < 0.001), and dyslipidemia (OR 3.46, CI 2.86-4.19, p < 0.001), adjusting for covariates. CONCLUSION: Higher prevalence of T2DM was found in people with GOA when compared with LOA across both age groups. T2DM, hypertension, and dyslipidemia were associated with GOA. Future research with longitudinal designs is needed to test the causality of this association.Key Points• The prevalence of type 2 diabetes in people with generalized osteoarthritis was almost double compared with localized osteoarthritis, although generalized osteoarthritis group were older.• Among people with osteoarthritis, the risk of generalized osteoarthritis is increased by 37% when people had type 2 diabetes, by 99% when people had hypertension, and by 246% when people had dyslipidemia.

A Subgroup of Chronic Low Back Pain Patients With Central Sensitization.

BACKGROUND: Our knowledge of central sensitization (CS) in chronic low back pain (CLBP) is limited. 2011 fibromyalgia criteria and severity scales (2011 FM survey) have been used to determine FM positive as a surrogate of CS. The major features of CS including widespread hyperalgesia and dysfunction of the descending inhibitory pathways can be identified by pressure pain threshold (PPT) and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) tests. The purpose of the study was to examine neurophysiological characteristics and psychosocial symptoms in a subgroup of FM-positive CLBP compared with FM-negative CLBP patients. METHODS: A total of 46 participants with CLBP and 22 pain-free controls completed outcome measures of the 2011 FM survey, PPT and CPM tests, and psychosocial questionnaires. Differences between FM-positive and FM-negative CLBP participants on these measures and correlations were analyzed. RESULTS: The 2011 FM survey identified 22 (48%) participants with CLBP as FM positive. FM-positive CLBP participants showed lower PPT values of the thumbnail (P=0.011) and lower back (P=0.003), lower CPM values of the thumbnail (P=0.002), and more severe pain catastrophizing, anxiety, and depression symptoms (P<0.05) than FM-negative CLBP participants. The 2011 FM scores were significantly correlated with the PPT and CPM values of the thumbnail and with psychosocial symptoms (P<0.001). DISCUSSION: Our findings suggest a subgroup of CLBP patients exhibiting with signs and symptoms of CS. Associations between subjective and objective CS measures indicate that the 2011 FM survey can be utilized to identify the presence of CS in CLBP in clinical practice.

Trunk Control Response to Unstable Seated Posture During Various Feedback Conditions in People with Chronic Low Back Pain.

AIMS: People with chronic low back pain (CLBP) tend to have altered postural control. Visual biofeedback may be used to restore postural control. The purpose of this pilot study was to investigate the effect of visual biofeedback on seated postural trunk control in subjects with CLBP, and to investigate the relationship between the postural control parameters and clinical tests. METHODS: Ten CLBP subjects (8 female, 2 male; age 40.6±5 yrs; BMI 25.06±2.93) and 10 healthy matched controls (8 female, 2 male; age 41.2±5.88 yrs; BMI 24.61±3.17) underwent seated postural assessment. Center of pressure (COP) parameters were collected under three experimental conditions: eyes-open, visual biofeedback, and eyes-closed. RESULTS: The results revealed that COP velocity was significantly different between healthy and CLBP subjects for each condition, both healthy and CLBP subjects had no differences in COP parameters between eyes-open and visual biofeedback conditions, and in subjects with CLBP, the straight leg raise clinical test had a strong negative correlation with all COP parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that 30-second visual biofeedback training did not improve the seated postural control of CLBP subjects, potentially due to the short duration of training, and that hamstrings muscle tightness or decreased sciatic nerve mobility was associated with worse postural control.

Using Electronic Health Record Activity to Represent Interdisciplinary Care Teams and Examining their Contribution to Hospital Length of Stay.

Modeling variance in patient outcomes using medical claims and other forms of aggregated administrative data may ignore significant contributions associated with providers who are not recorded in billing transactions. We examined the association between interdisciplinary provider factors and length of stay (LOS) for 1,099 lumbar spine surgery patients. Interdisciplinary provider "dose" (number of providers/case), "workload" (care of other patients), and "activity" factors were defined and generated. Hierarchical Regression models were used to test the impact of these provider factors controlling for the effect of socio-demographic and clinical factors. Interdisciplinary provider factors explained 12% of additional variance in LOS. EHR-based interdisciplinary care team representations hold promise in contributing to our understanding of health care delivery and quality. Keywords: interdisciplinary care, nursing documentation, workload, length of stay, electronic health records (EHR).

Brain Response to Non-Painful Mechanical Stimulus to Lumbar Spine.

Pressure application to the lumbar spine is an important assessment and treatment method of low back pain. However, few studies have characterized brain activation patterns in response to mechanical pressure. The objective of this study was to map brain activation associated with various levels of mechanical pressure to the lumbar spine in healthy subjects. Fifteen healthy subjects underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scanning while mechanical pressure was applied to their lumbar spine with a custom-made magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-compatible pressure device. Each subject received three levels of pressure (low/medium/high) based on subjective ratings determined prior to the scan using a block design (pressure/rest). Pressure rating was assessed with an 11-point scale (0 = no touch; 10 = max pain-free pressure). Brain activation differences between pressure levels and rest were analyzed. Subjective pressure ratings were significantly different across pressure levels (p < 0.05). The overall brain activation pattern was not different across pressure levels (all p > 0.05). However, the overall effect of pressure versus rest showed significant decreases in brain activation in response to the mechanical stimulus in regions associated with somatosensory processing including the precentral gyri, left hippocampus, left precuneus, left medial frontal gyrus, and left posterior cingulate. There was increase in brain activation in the right inferior parietal lobule and left cerebellum. This study offers insight into the neural mechanisms that may relate to manual mobilization intervention used for managing low back pain.