Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
Add more filters










Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 107(5): 1114-1128, 2022 11 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36162442

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to determine the etiology of febrile illnesses among patients from October 1, 1993 through September 30, 1999, in the urban community of Iquitos in the Amazon River Basin of Peru. Epidemiological and clinical data as well as blood samples were obtained from consenting patients at hospitals, health clinics and private residences. Samples were tested for arboviruses in cell cultures and for IgM and IgG antibodies by ELISA. Blood smears were examined for malaria, and sera were tested for antibodies to Leptospira spp. by ELISA and microscopic agglutination. Among 6,607 febrile patients studied, dengue viruses caused 14.6% of the cases, and Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus caused 2.5%, Oropouche virus 1.0%, Mayaro virus 0.4%, and other arboviruses caused 0.2% of the cases. Also, 22.9% of 4,844 patients tested were positive for malaria, and of 400 samples tested, 9% had evidence of acute leptospirosis. Although the study was not designed to assess the importance of these pathogens as a cause of human morbidity in the total population, these results indicate that arboviruses, leptospirosis, and malaria were the cause of approximately 50% of the febrile cases. Although the arboviruses that were diagnosed can produce asymptomatic infections, our findings increased the overall understanding of the relative health burden of these infections, as well as baseline knowledge needed for designing and implementing further studies to better assess the health impact and threat of these pathogens in the Amazon Basin of Peru.


Subject(s)
Arboviruses , Encephalitis Virus, Venezuelan Equine , Leptospirosis , Malaria , Humans , Peru/epidemiology , Rivers , Leptospirosis/epidemiology , Fever/epidemiology
5.
J Travel Med ; 13(2): 92-9, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16553595

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Infectious diarrhea is among the most common medical problems associated with military deployments and has been reported as a frequent problem for troops currently deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan. Lacking is information describing clinical presentation, risk behaviors, and treatment of travelers' diarrhea in this population. METHODS: An anonymous cross-sectional survey was conducted among 15,459 US military personnel deployed to Southwest Asia during 2003 to 2004. RESULTS: Overall, diarrhea was commonly reported (76.8% in Iraq and 54.4% in Afghanistan) and was frequently severe (more than six stools/d) (20.8% in Iraq and 14.0% in Afghanistan) or associated with fever (25.8%), vomiting (18% with diarrhea and 16.5% without), persistent symptoms (>14 d, 9.8%), or chronic symptoms (>30 d, 3.3%). Diarrhea was associated with time spent off military compounds and eating local food. Over 80% of respondents sought care for their symptoms, usually at the lowest echelon of care (field medic), and were most often treated with either loperamide or an antibiotic. Self-treatment with loperamide or Pepto-Bismol was also common and successful with only 9% of self-treated individuals reporting seeking further medical care. CONCLUSIONS: Infectious diarrhea is a common problem for US military personnel, and associated fevers and vomiting are more common than in past conflicts in the region. As with past studies, time spent off base and local food consumption, both more common in Iraq than Afghanistan, continue to be the most important risk factors for acquiring diarrhea. The majority of soldiers reported seeking care for diarrhea, but appropriate treatment, including self-treatment with over-the-counter medicines, was generally successful. Further studies should be conducted to evaluate appropriate treatment algorithms, including the use of self-treatment, for deployed military personnel.


Subject(s)
Diarrhea/epidemiology , Health Status Indicators , Military Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Self Care/statistics & numerical data , Warfare , Adult , Afghanistan/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diarrhea/prevention & control , Female , Humans , Incidence , Iraq/epidemiology , Male , Severity of Illness Index , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States
6.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 73(4): 713-9, 2005 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16222015

ABSTRACT

Historically, non-combat injuries and illnesses have had a significant impact on military missions. We conducted an anonymous cross-sectional survey to assess the prevalence and impact of common ailments among U.S. military personnel deployed to Iraq or Afghanistan during 2003-2004. Among 15,459 persons surveyed, diarrhea (76.8% in Iraq and 54.4% in Afghanistan), respiratory illness (69.1%), non-combat injuries (34.7%), and leishmaniasis (2.1%) were commonly reported. For all causes, 25.2% reported that they required intravenous fluids, 10.4% required hospitalization, and 5.2% required medical evacuation. Among ground units, 12.7% reported that they missed a patrol because of illness, and among air units, 11.7% were grounded because of illness. The incidence of diarrhea and respiratory infections doubled from the pre-combat to combat phases, and the perceived adverse impact of these illnesses on the unit increased significantly during the combat phase. Despite technologic advances in warfare and preventive medicine, illness and non-combat injuries have been common during operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, resulting in frequent transient decreases in operational efficiency.


Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries/epidemiology , Diarrhea/epidemiology , Leishmaniasis/epidemiology , Military Personnel , Respiratory Tract Diseases/epidemiology , Warfare , Afghanistan , Athletic Injuries/therapy , Back Injuries/epidemiology , Back Injuries/therapy , Data Collection , Diarrhea/therapy , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Incidence , Iraq , Leishmaniasis/therapy , Male , Respiratory Tract Diseases/therapy , Software
7.
Curr Gastroenterol Rep ; 4(4): 308-18, 2002 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12149177

ABSTRACT

Foodborne illnesses continue to cause substantial morbidity and mortality in the United States, primarily as gastroenteritis but occasionally as other syndromes as well. Most of these illnesses are caused by a variety of widely known infectious agents, principally viruses, and are probably the result of common mistakes in food handling in the home or in restaurants. The epidemiology of foodborne illness is evolving. Major changes in food production, distribution, and consumption have created opportunities for new pathogens to emerge and for old ones to reemerge, and the potential for widespread outbreaks is increasing. Antibiotic resistance in bacterial pathogens resulting from the widespread use of antimicrobial agents in animal husbandry is also an important concern. Clinicians must be aware of the changing epidemiology of foodborne illness to recognize and manage these conditions in the clinical setting. In addition, clinicians are critical in the reporting of recognized or suspected foodborne illness, so that public health authorities are able to investigate, understand, and ultimately better control them. A number of new techniques have been employed, and others under development will improve our ability to recognize and cope with foodborne diseases.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Disease Outbreaks , Food Contamination/prevention & control , Gastroenteritis/epidemiology , Gastroenteritis/microbiology , Virus Diseases/epidemiology , Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Bacterial Infections/therapy , Female , Food Microbiology , Gastroenteritis/therapy , Humans , Incidence , Male , Primary Prevention/methods , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , United States/epidemiology , Virus Diseases/therapy , Virus Diseases/virology
8.
Clin Infect Dis ; 34(Suppl 5): S215-28, 2002 Jun 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12019467

ABSTRACT

Afghanistan is in the midst of a profound humanitarian crisis resulting primarily from long-standing armed conflict, a devastating drought, and massive population migration. The economy, government, and health care system are in shambles. Currently, as many as 5 million Afghans are in camps either as refugees in neighboring countries or as internally displaced persons within Afghanistan. Much of the rest of the population is in dire need of basic essentials such as food, water, shelter, and basic medical care. Those attempting to carry out humanitarian relief face many daunting challenges, such as reaching remote locations, coping with a dangerous security situation, and working with limited resources. However, there are opportunities in the short run to save many lives and substantially improve the plight of Afghans by carrying out appropriate and effective emergency relief programs. Over the long term, effective medical and public health relief efforts will be an essential part of rehabilitating and rebuilding this devastated country.


Subject(s)
Altruism , Relief Work/organization & administration , Afghanistan , Humans , International Agencies/trends , Public Health/trends
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...