The anesthetic approach to repeated cesarean sections: A prospective cohort study.

Objective: Each repeat cesarean section (CS) potentially adds surgical complexity. The determination of appropriate anesthesia strategy to meet the surgical challenge is of crucial importance for the maternal and neonatal outcome. Study design: This prospective cohort study was conducted from 1-Jan-2021 to 31-Dec-2021 at a single large obstetric centre of all repeat CS. We compared the characteristics and the appropriateness of the anesthesia techniques for low-order repeat CS (LOR-CS) (1 or 2 previous CS) and high order repat CS (HOR-CS) group (3 or more repeat CS). Results: During the study period, 1057 parturients met the study entry criteria, with 821 parturients in the LOR-CS group and 236 parturients in the HOR-CS group. The use of spinal anesthesia was more common for HOR-CS 84.3%. Overall surgical time varied between LOR-CS (38 min, 29-49) and HOR-CS (42 min, 31-57) (p = 0.004).The rate of moderate and severe adhesions was relatively high in HOR-CS and the duration of overall surgical time for cases with mild adhesions was 38 min (29-48), for moderate adhesions was 44 min (34.8-56.5), and for severe adhesions was 56 min (44.8-74.3). There was no significant difference in the Estimated Blood Loss (EBL) between LOR-CS and HOR-CS, with values of 653 ± 292 ml vs. 660 ± 285 ml, respectively. Conclusion: Our data indicate that spinal anesthesia, standard monitoring and regular anesthetic setup are safe and suitable for the majority of HOR-CS, except in cases with high suspicion of placental accreta spectrum.

The anesthetic approach to a patient with placenta accreta spectrum.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Placenta accreta poses significant risk of morbidity and mortality to a laboring patient. Here we review available treatment options, highlight trends in bleeding prevention and diagnosis that have been shown to improve patient outcome, and provide best practice suggestions. We also discuss the decision-making process for choice of anesthesia, as it is not based on a gold-standard paradigm. RECENT FINDINGS: The use of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta has been gaining popularity around the world. It has been shown to cause an equivocal reduction in perioperative bleeding in placenta accreta spectrum (PAS), reduce the rate of hysterectomies, and is a safe and relatively easy technique. There are other invasive radiology techniques that have also proven to be beneficial in bleeding prevention: balloon occlusion of hypogastric arteries intraoperatively, internal iliac artery embolization, and intraoperative ligation of the hypogastric or uterine arteries. SUMMARY: Optimal management of PAS begins with early and definitive diagnosis. A multidisciplinary approach along with preparation of special equipment and the use of a check-list maximize the chance for success. Anesthesia could be done with all types of regional or under general, considering case-by-case factors but most importantly choosing according to the institution's best facility and skill.

Peripartum anesthetic management of women with SARS-CoV-2 infection in eight medical centers across three European countries: prospective cohort observation study.

OBJECTIVE: Several reports of obstetric anesthesia management have been published since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. We aimed to collect high-quality broad and detailed data from different university medical centers in several European Society of Anesthesiologist countries. METHODS: This prospective observational survey was performed in eight medical centers in Spain, Israel and Portugal from 1st April to 31st July 2020. Institutional review board approval was received at each participating center. Inclusion criteria: all women with a positive test for COVID-19. Retrieved data included maternal, delivery, anesthetic, postpartum details, and neonatal outcomes. Descriptive data are presented, and outcomes were compared for women with versus without respiratory signs and symptoms. RESULTS: Women with respiratory symptoms (20/12.1%) had significantly higher mean (standard deviation) temperature (37.2 °C (0.8) versus 36.8 °C (0.6)), were older (34.1 (6.7) years versus 30.5 (6.6)) and had higher body mass index kg m-2 - (29.5 (7.5) versus 28.2 (5.1)). Women with respiratory symptoms delivered at a significantly earlier gestational age (50% < 37 weeks) with a 65% cesarean delivery rate (versus 22.1% in the group without respiratory symptoms) and 5-fold increased rate of emergency cesarean delivery, 30% performed under general anesthesia. A higher rate of intrauterine fetal death (3%) was observed than expected from the literature (0.2-0.3%) in developed countries. There was no evidence of viral vertical transmission. CONCLUSION: Well-functioning neuraxial analgesia should be available to manage laboring women with respiratory symptoms, as there is a higher frequency of emergency cesarean delivery. We report a higher rate of undiagnosed parturient and intrauterine fetal death.

Programmed intermittent epidural bolus for labour analgesia during first stage of labour: a sequential allocation trial to determine the effective interval time between boluses of a fixed volume of 2.5 mL of bupivacaine 0.25% plus fentanyl 8 µg·mL-1.

PURPOSE: We studied the programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) time interval between boluses of 2.5 mL of bupivacaine 0.25% with fentanyl 8 µg·mL-1 to produce effective analgesia in 90% of women (EI90) during the first stage of labour. METHODS: In a double-blind sequential allocation trial using a biased coin up-and-down design to determine the EI90, the PIEB boluses of 2.5 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine plus fentanyl 8 µg·mL-1 were delivered at varying intervals-60, 50, 40, and 30 min. The primary outcome was the adequate response of the patient to the PIEB regimen, defined as no use of supplemental analgesia for six hours or until the first stage of labour was completed, whichever came first. The secondary outcomes were the upper sensory block level to ice, motor block and hypotension. The isotonic regression with extrapolation approach was used to estimate the EI90. RESULTS: In the 20 women studied, the estimated EI90 was 20 (95% CI, 5.9 to 28.8) min. For the secondary outcomes, we classified women into those assigned to 30 min (16 women) and those assigned to more than 30 min (four women). The median upper sensory block for women in the 30-min group and more than 30 min were T6 (or T5) and T7, respectively. No participants experienced motor block. Hypotension occurred in one patient in the 30-min group. CONCLUSION: The estimated EI90 for boluses of 2.5 mL of bupivacaine 0.25% with fentanyl 8 µg·mL-1 was 20 (95% CI, 5.9 to 28.8) min. These results suggest that there is no advantage in using this regimen compared with those reported in the literature using the same dose of bupivacaine in concentrations of 0.0625% and 0.125%. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03735771); registered 7 November 2018.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Nous avons étudié l'intervalle de temps d'administration programmée de bolus périduraux (PIEB) entre des bolus de 2,5 mL de bupivacaïne 0,25 % avec 8 µg·mL−1 de fentanyl nécessaire pour procurer une analgésie efficace chez 90 % des femmes (IE90) au cours du premier stade du travail obstétrical. MéTHODE: Dans une étude de répartition séquentielle à double insu utilisant une méthodologie de tirage au sort biaisé de haut en bas pour déterminer l'IE90, des bolus PIEB de 2,5 mL de bupivacaïne 0,25 % plus 8 µg·mL−1 fentanyl ont été administrés à des intervalles variables ­ 60, 50, 40 et 30 min. Le critère d'évaluation principal était une réponse adéquate de la patiente au régime de PIEB, définie comme aucun recours à une analgésie supplémentaire pendant six heures ou jusqu'à la fin du premier stade du travail, à la première condition obtenue. Les critères d'évaluation secondaires comportaient le niveau du bloc sensitif supérieur tel qu'établi par un test de glace, ainsi que la présence d'un bloc moteur et d'hypotension. Nous avons utilisé une méthode de régression isotonique avec une approche d'extrapolation pour estimer l'IE90. RéSULTATS: Chez les 20 femmes étudiées, l'IE90 estimé était de 20 (IC 95 %, 5,9 à 28,8) min. En ce qui touche aux critères d'évaluation secondaires, nous avons catégorisé les femmes selon qu'elles étaient assignées à recevoir un bolus aux 30 min (16 femmes) ou à des intervalles de plus de 30 min (quatre femmes). Le niveau du bloc sensitif supérieur médian pour les femmes dans le groupe 30 min et plus de 30 min se situait à T6 (ou T5) et T7, respectivement. Aucune participante n'a subi de bloc moteur. Une patiente dans le groupe à 30 min a subi un épisode d'hypotension. CONCLUSION: L'IE90 estimé pour les bolus de 2,5 mL de bupivacaïne 0,25 % avec 8 µg·mL−1 de fentanyl était de 20 (IC 95 %, 5,9 à 28,8) min. Ces résultats suggèrent qu'il n'y a aucun avantage à utiliser ce régime posologique plutôt que ceux rapportés dans la littérature utilisant une même dose de bupivacaïne à des concentrations de 0,0625 % et 0,125 %. ENREGISTREMENT DE L'éTUDE: www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03735771); enregistrée le 7 novembre 2018.

Anesthetic considerations for repeat cesarean section.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The prevalence of cesarean delivery is increasing worldwide despite the advance of Trial of Labor After Cesarean section. In many countries, a history of previous cesarean section is an almost absolute indication for a repeat cesarean section. The purpose of this review was to examine if the perioperative anesthetic management of patients with repeat cesarean section is different from the anesthetic management of patients with primary cesarean section. RECENT FINDINGS: This review discusses important topics, such as early diagnosis of cases with a potentially high risk for complications; the need for assessment of patients diagnosed with abnormal placentation; the importance of a multidisciplinary approach that includes interaction of the anesthesiologist, gynaecologist, and invasive radiologist; emphasizing the need for reinforcement of new methods of invasive procedures; management of massive bleeding, use of new technologies, and development of an institutional protocol for management of patients with abnormal placentation. SUMMARY: According to this review, we show that the management of patients with repeat cesarean section without abnormal placentation is almost the same as the management of patients for primary cesarean section. Timely diagnosis of patient with abnormal placentation and multidisciplinary approach is crucial for prevention of morbidity or even mortality.

Outcome of Peripartum Anesthesia in Women with Valvular Disease.

OBJECTIVE: Maternal heart disease is one of the major causes for mortality among parturients. In our study, we surveyed 220 patients with different valvular disorders who gave birth in our medical center in the years 2012-2018. The aim of this study was to characterize various valvular pathologies and compare the results of different anesthetic approaches. METHODS: In this retrospective study, the computerized system and file archive were searched for maternal valvular pathologies according to the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9). The women included in the study were defined as American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA)-II or more, who suffer from valvular heart disease. RESULTS: The most common pathology was mitral valve regurgitation (57.73% of all cardiac patients). Most women were defined as having mild insufficiency, and 82.68% had normal vaginal delivery. In 17.3% of patients who had cesarean section, the main type of anesthesia was neuraxial anesthesia (95.45%). The second most common pathology was tricuspid valve regurgitation (22.73%). Most patients (78%) had normal vaginal delivery, and epidural analgesia was used in 64.1%. A minority of cardiac patients in our study were patients with stenotic heart diseases, such as aortic stenosis, mitral stenosis and pulmonic stenosis (8.18%, 4.55%, and 1.36%, respectively). No complications were observed in the peripartum period. CONCLUSION: The use of regional anesthesia is recommended for all valvular pathologies without exception, as we observed no cases in which the severity of cardiac condition had not allowed the use of various types of regional anesthesia, for surgery or vaginal delivery.

General Versus Regional Anesthesia for Emergency Cesarean Delivery in a High-volume High-resource Referral Center: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: The choice of anesthesia for emergency cesarean delivery (CD) is one of the most important choices to make in obstetric anesthesia. In this study, we examine which type of anesthesia was used for emergency CD in our hospital, and how the choice affected the time from entry to the operation room until incision (TTI), time until delivery (TTD), and maternal/neonatal outcomes. METHODS: Retrospectively, we examined all emergency CD's performed in Shaare Zedek Medical Center between January-December 2018. Results: 1059 patients met the inclusion criteria, of which 7.7% underwent general anesthesia (GA), 36.2% - conversion from labor epidural analgesia to surgical anesthesia, 52% - spinal anesthesia and 4.1% - combined spinal epidural. We did not find a significant difference between the GA and conversion epidural groups in terms of TTI or TTD. Nevertheless, GA was found to be correlated to a high rate of blood-products requirement and ICU admission. The rate of newborns with an APGAR score of less than 7, in both first and fifth second after birth, was significantly higher in the GA group, as well as the need for NICU admission. CONCLUSION: This study clearly emphasizes that the TTI are shortest when using GA or conversion of labor epidural analgesia to surgical anesthesia. Meanwhile, GA is also linked to higher rates of admissions to ICU as well as poorer neonatal outcomes compared to the other groups. Additionally, our study uncovered a low rate of GA, and relatively low rate of regional anesthesia failure, which meets the accepted standards.

Anesthetic approach to postdural puncture headache in the peripartum period: An Israeli national survey.

BACKGROUND: Accidental dural puncture frequency among pregnant women is about 1.5%, while approximately 60% of these women will suffer from post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) that may be debilitating. METHODS: Following IRB approval, we conducted a national survey of the lead anesthesiologist in 23 labor and delivery rooms in Israel. Each survey inquired about medical center annual delivery volume, training program for residents, accidental dural puncture management, processing of information, and PDPH management strategies. RESULTS: Data were collected from all 23 surveyed hospitals. As for methods for PDPH prevention, in most hospitals (87%) a prophylactic epidural blood patch (EBP) is not considered. Injection of epidural normal saline after delivery as a preventive measure is never considered in most (78.3%) hospitals, while four (17.4%) hospitals reported of constitutive use of this technique and one hospital only occasionally. Duration of conservative treatment was 24-48 hours in 95.7% of PDPH cases. CONCLUSION: In this survey, different aspects of treatment and PDPH management were examined. EBP is considered the gold standard in treating PDPH, although prophylactic blood patch is ineffective. We observed a tendency of very low performance of both prophylactic EBP and epidural normal saline administration after delivery in most centers. Most hospitals perform EBP after 24-48 hours of conservative treatment, along with published recommendations that show increased EBP efficiency with this timeframe. In light of the survey information, we aim to reach a uniform literature-based management strategy across Israeli hospitals.

Concurrent medical conditions among pregnant women - ignore at their peril: report from an antenatal anesthesia clinic.

BACKGROUND: Care of pregnant women with concurrent medical conditions can be optimized by multidisciplinary antenatal management. In the current study we describe women with concurrent medical conditions who attended our antenatal anesthesia clinic over a 14-year period, 2002-2015 and, based on the findings, we suggest new policies, strategies and practices to improve antenatal care. METHODS: In 2002, an antenatal anesthesia clinic was established in Hadassah Medical Center. Each consultation focused on the concurrent medical condition. A written anesthesia strategy according to the medical condition and its anesthesia considerations was discussed and given to the patient. Data regarding clinic visits were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 451 clinic women attended the antenatal anesthesia clinic. Maternal age was 31.7 ± 6.0 years (mean ± SD), with gestational age of pregnancy 33.0 ± 5.4 weeks at the clinic visit. Musculoskeletal conditions (23% of all the women seen) were the most frequent concurrent conditions, followed by anesthesia related concerns 20%, neurologic conditions 19%, and cardiac conditions 15%. Women were provided plans that were deliberated carefully rather than being concocted during labor. CONCLUSIONS: A wide range of concurrent medical conditions was seen in the antenatal anesthesia clinic, however fewer women attended the clinic than expected according to known population frequencies of concurrent medical conditions. Women with concurrent medical conditions should have labor and anesthesia plans considered during the nine months of pregnancy, prior to delivery, and hospitals should have a means of obtaining this information in a timely manner. Finally, there is a need to develop additional antenatal anesthesia clinics.

Five years' experience in an anesthesiology antenatal clinic for high-risk patients.

INTRODUCTION: The aim, of this study is to describe our approach and outcomes in an outpatient anesthesia/analgesia antepartum clinic among ambulatory high-risk obstetric patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective evaluation of the activity of the anesthesiology antenatal clinic from its inception in 2010 until 2016 (a 5-year period). The clinic works in collaboration with the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. The catchment area of the study University Affiliated Hospital attends a multiethnic population characterized by high parity. RESULTS: There were 241 referrals over the 5 years, each of whom was discharged with a consult and a delivery management plan and 228 (95%) of which were performed as planned. Mean gestational age at consultation was 34.4 weeks (range: 20-37). There were no preconceptional consultation. No limitations regarding mode of anesthesia/analgesia was considered for 47% of the referrals. Nulliparous women accounted for 50% of the referrals and 17% were in their second pregnancy. The greatest number of referrals (30%) was for musculoskeletal conditions. No maternal death encountered. The mode of delivery was vaginal in 139 (65%) women; elective cesarean section in 44 (21%) women; and emergent cesarean section in 30 (14%) women. The neonatal outcomes were unremarkable; 210 (87%) in hospital births, 97.1% had an a 5' Apgar score of 9. CONCLUSION: Our findings reveal the need for high-risk obstetric patients consult with a dedicated obstetric anesthesiologist to devise a management plan for labor and delivery that is tailored to their comorbidity and obstetric status, to ensure an optimum outcome for mother and child.