Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 115(6): 1273-7; discussion 1277-8, 1998 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9628668

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There has been resurgent interest in coronary revascularization performed on the beating heart. Heretofore, there has been no long-term comparison of this technique to traditional coronary artery bypass with cardioplegia. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to provide a comparison of long-term survival and intervention-free outcome between patient groups subjected to coronary bypass accomplished with or without the use of cardiopulmonary bypass. METHOD: From June 1989 to July 1990, all patients treated for coronary revascularization by three surgeons were considered for coronary revascularization with the heart beating: 107 patients underwent coronary bypass on the beating heart, and 112 patients underwent revascularization with the aid of bypass with cardioplegia. Mean ages (65 +/- 10 years) and risk factors were identical. Patients operated on with the heart beating had 2.4 +/- 0.9 grafts versus 3.2 +/- 1.1 grafts for patients having cardiopulmonary bypass with cardioplegia. RESULTS: At 7-year follow-up, 86 of 107 (80%) patients operated on with the heart beating were alive versus 88 of 112 (79%) patients in whom cardiopulmonary bypass with cardioplegia was used. Cardiac deaths occurred in 13 of 107 (12%) patients in the former group versus 10 of 112 (9%) patients in the latter group. However, 32 of 107 patients operated on with the heart beating (30%) needed catheterization for their symptoms versus 18 of 112 (16%) patients in the bypass with cardioplegia group (p = 0.01). This results in 21 of 107 (20%) patients in the beating heart group needing angioplasty or a second coronary bypass versus only 8 of 112 (7%) patients in the bypass with cardioplegia group. No patient in the bypass with cardioplegia group required reoperation. Most of the reinterventions for the beating heart group were percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (15 of 21 [71%] patients). CONCLUSION: Despite one less graft per patient, survival and cardiac death rates were similar for the two groups. However, twice as many patients in the beating heart group required recatheterization (30% versus 16%), and 20% needed a second intervention. Only 7% of the bypass with cardioplegia group required reintervention. Limited revascularization of the beating heart provides long-term results comparable to full revascularization with cardiopulmonary bypass, but at the cost of a threefold increase in reinterventions.


Subject(s)
Cardiopulmonary Bypass , Coronary Artery Bypass/methods , Coronary Disease/surgery , Aged , Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary , Cardiac Catheterization , Cardiopulmonary Bypass/mortality , Coronary Artery Bypass/mortality , Coronary Disease/mortality , Death , Feasibility Studies , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Reoperation , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , Treatment Outcome
2.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 65(4): 1100-4, 1998 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9564935

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The public's and surgeons' perception of minimally invasive operations are frequently at odds. Nevertheless, real or perceived benefits may result from limiting skin and skeletal trauma. METHODS: Beginning in January 1996, we began approaching most infant and pediatric open heart procedures through an upper sternal split incision using a 1- to 3-inch skin opening and then extended this technique using a 2.5- to 3.5-inch incision for adult aortic and mitral valve replacement. RESULTS: A total of 82 patients, 57 infants and children and 25 adults, have been operated on using this approach (age range, newborn to 81 years). Operations accomplished through ministernotomy have included aortic valvotomy, arterial switch, tetralogy of Fallot, atrial or ventricular septal defect closure, aortic valve replacement, mitral valve replacement and repair, redo aortic or mitral valve replacement, double valve replacement, aortic root replacement, and complex arch reconstruction. In adults, the sternum was divided and then a T incision was made at the second, third, or fourth intercostal space. The mitral valve was reached through the roof of the left atrium. In children, a lower sternal split was used for atrial septal defect repairs. All cannulas were introduced through the ministernotomy incision, eliminating femoral cannulation. No new instruments, retractors, or ports were used. Mediastinal drainage was accomplished through a Blake drain connected to Heimlich-valved grenade suction. All but 2 patients were extubated immediately. Hospital stay was from 1 to 20 days (median 2 days). Patient and family acceptance is very high. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of this initial experience, we attempt all congenital cardiac and isolated adult valve operations through ministernotomy.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Surgical Procedures/methods , Microsurgery/methods , Sternum/surgery , Thoracotomy/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aorta/surgery , Aorta, Thoracic/surgery , Aortic Valve/surgery , Cardiac Catheterization , Child , Child, Preschool , Dermatologic Surgical Procedures , Drainage/instrumentation , Equipment Design , Heart Defects, Congenital/surgery , Heart Septal Defects, Atrial/surgery , Heart Septal Defects, Ventricular/surgery , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Intubation, Intratracheal , Length of Stay , Middle Aged , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures , Mitral Valve/surgery , Patient Satisfaction , Reoperation , Suction/instrumentation , Tetralogy of Fallot/surgery
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...