Evaluating the effectiveness of an online curriculum on caring for transgender and nonbinary patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:  It is well established that provider lack of knowledge in the field of transgender and nonbinary health is as ignificant barrier to care and that training in this area is lacking. This study examined how family medicine residents' self-confidence and medical knowledge in providing gender-affirming care changed after completing a novel, online curriculum on transgender and nonbinary care. METHODS: Thirty-nine family medicine residents were invited to complete the curriculum. Change inself-confidence was determined by the difference in scores on a Likert scale on a pre- and post-survey. Change in medical knowledge was assessed by examining the difference between pre- and post-test scores on a novel multiple-choice examination. RESULTS: Only 7% of current residents agreed that their current training is adequate in order to provide comprehensive primary care to transgender and nonbinary people. After completion of the curriculum, 100% of participants felt at least somewhat confident providing primary care to transgender and nonbinary people, including hormone therapy. Average medical knowledge post-test scores trended higher than the pre-test results (mean (SD) at pre = 11.2 (1.4) vs post = 14.6 (2.8)). CONCLUSIONS: An online, self-directed curriculum on caring for transgender and nonbinary patients in the primary care setting, including management of gender-affirming hormone therapy, has the potential to increase confidence and knowledge in this field, decreasing barriers to care for this population.

The Impact of a Web-Based Preintubation Preparation Module on the Knowledge, Confidence, and Behavior of Critical Care Fellows: A Single-Center Pilot Study.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to standardize airway management among critical care fellows and to evaluate whether the completion of a web-based preintubation airway preparation module improves their knowledge and behaviors in the identification and preparation of difficult airways. METHODS: Critical care experts used international guidelines to develop the module, which contained mandatory readings, brief lectures, and a case-based activity. We measured learner satisfaction, improvements in fellows' preintubation preparation knowledge, and safety-oriented behavior. The paired t-test was used to compare knowledge assessment scores and the chi-square test was used to compare the categorical variables in the evaluation of the behavior construct. RESULTS: All trainees (N = 14) completed the module and were satisfied with its contents and structure. Fellows logged 114 intubations during the study period. The mean score on the knowledge test increased (pre 79% vs post 90%, P = .02) postmodule and there was a significant increase in documentation of airway risk stratification in fellows' procedure notes (65.9% vs 72.9%, P = .049). All respondents were confident that they would be able to apply what they learned in the module into clinical practice and that their patients would likely benefit from their new knowledge. CONCLUSION: The implementation of an asynchronous web-based module on airway assessment and intubation preparation was feasible. The module was engaging, enhanced the knowledge of our trainees, and improved procedural documentation.

Emotional Intelligence and Burnout Related to Resident-Assessed Faculty Teaching Scores.

OBJECTIVE: Emotional intelligence (EI) is associated with job success in multiple fields, in part, because EI may mitigate stress and burnout. Research suggests these relationships may include teaching. Our purpose is to further explore the relationships between EI, burnout, and teaching for faculty surgeons. DESIGN: With IRB approval, surgical faculty were offered the opportunity to complete personal demographics, the Maslach Burnout Inventory, the SETQ-SMART assessment of teaching ability, and the SEF:MED self-assessment of emotional intelligence. Surgical residents rated faculty teaching ability using the SETQ-SMART SETTING: A medium-sized academic medical center in the Southeast approved to graduate 6 residents per year. PARTICIPANTS: ACGME surgical faculty and general surgical residents PGY1 to PGY5 including preliminary residents, were given the opportunity to participate. RESULTS: Faculty self-assessed teaching scores were significantly different from resident scores for nine (60%) faculty; three (33%) overrated their and 6 (67%) under rated their overall teaching ability, relative to resident ratings. The 3 SEF:MED scales correlated low-moderate to strongly with the SETQ-OTS: IS (r = 0.41, p = 0.13), EM (r = 0.67, p < 0.01), and EA (r = 0.43, p = 0.11). Overall, 8(53%) faculty scored moderate to high on at least 1 of the 3 MBI subscales. Overall self-rated faculty teaching scores correlated negatively with higher EE and DP and positively with PA (r = -0.08, -0.21, and 0.52, p = 0.047; respectively). EI negatively correlated with MBI-EE and DP and positively with PA (r = -0.31, -0.18, 0.45, respectively), though due to the small sample none reach statistical significance with alpha set to 0.05. CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, EI is positively correlated to surgical faculty members' teaching ability. Burnout was less strongly correlated with resident-assessed faculty teaching scores, but with similar trends. Finally, EI was correlated with MBI EE, DP, and PA as expected given the literature in other fields. Expanded study is warranted.

"What Do You Want to Learn or Work on Today?": Benefits and Barriers to Asking Residents for Self-identified Learning Goals.

BACKGROUND: In the emergency department (ED), residents and attendings may have a short-term relationship, such as a single shift. This poses challenges to learner assessment, instructional strategy selection, and provision of substantive feedback. We implemented a process for residents to identify goals for ED shifts; characterized residents' goals; and determined how goal identification affected learning, teaching, and feedback. METHODS: This was an observational study in a large, tertiary pediatric ED using mixed methods. Residents were asked to identify learning goals for each shift and were asked postshift if they had identified, accomplished, and/or received feedback on these goals. Goals were categorized by Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Core Competencies. Predictors of goal identification, accomplishment, and receipt of feedback were determined. Residents and attendings were interviewed about their experiences. RESULTS: We collected 306 end-of-shift surveys (74% response rate) and 358 goals and conducted 29 interviews. We found that: 1) Goal setting facilitated perceived learning. Residents identified goals 54% of the time. They accomplished 89% of and received feedback on 76% of goals. 2) Residents' perceived weaknesses, future practice settings, and available patients informed their goals. Most goals mapped to patient care (59%) or medical knowledge (37%) competencies. 3) Goal identification helped attendings determine residents' needs. 4) Ideal goals were specific and achievable. 5) Common barriers were busyness of the ED and difficulty creating goals. Residents were less likely to identify goals (odds ratio [OR] = 0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.41 to 0.94) and receive feedback on busy evening shifts (OR = 0.19, 95% CI = 0.10 to 0.37) and were most likely to receive feedback overnight (OR = 3.66, 95% CI = 1.87 to 7.14). CONCLUSIONS: Asking residents to identify goals for ED shifts as an instructional strategy facilitated perceived learning, goal accomplishment, and receipt of feedback. Resident-driven goal identification is a simple and effective instructional strategy that physicians can incorporate into their precepting in the ED.

Faculty perceptions of student plagiarism and interventions to tackle it: a multiphase mixed-methods study in Qatar.

BACKGROUND: The widespread use of the internet and other digital resources has contributed to the escalation of plagiarism among medical students and students of other healthcare professions. Concerns were raised by faculty at Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar (WCM-Q), a branch of Weill Cornell Medicine of Cornell University in New York, who had been observing plagiarism in students' assignments. METHODS: To identify the extent of plagiarism practices and their contributing factors, a two-phase mixed-method research study was conducted, comprising a survey administered in 2013, followed by longitudinal interventions, and a second survey in 2017 to measure the impact of the interventions. RESULTS: By Phase II, overall observed plagiarism incidents per year decreased from 44 to 28%, and the number of faculty who observed no plagiarism incidents increased significantly from 12 to 37%. The faculty concerned about student plagiarism decreased by 33% [53.1 to 20%] between Phase I and Phase II. CONCLUSION: When students are provided with information regarding what constitutes plagiarism and their institution's policy in response to plagiarism incidents, they are less likely to engage in such practices.

The Process of Developing an Assessment Checklist for Simulated Infant Respiratory Distress Using a Modified Delphi Method: A Mixed Methods Study.

Introduction Assessing clinical performance, such as managing respiratory distress, in clinical trainees is challenging yet important. Our objective was to describe and evaluate an integrative and iterative approach to developing a checklist measuring simulated clinical performance for infant respiratory distress. Methods We implemented a five-step modified Delphi process with an embedded qualitative component. An implementation period occurred followed by a second qualitative data collection. Validity evidence was collected throughout the process. Results A 19-item assessment checklist was developed for managing infant respiratory distress by medical student learners in a simulation-based setting. The iterative process provided content validity while the qualitative data provided response process validity. Cohen kappa was 0.82 indicating strong rater agreement. The assessment checklist was found to be easy to use and measure what was intended. Conclusion We developed an accurate and reliable assessment checklist for medical student learners in a simulation-based learning setting with high interrater reliability and validity evidence. Given its ease of use, we encourage medical educators and researchers to utilize this method to develop and implement assessment checklists for their interventions.

A Comparison of Guided Video Reflection versus Self-Regulated Learning to Teach Knot Tying to Medical Students: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVES: Self-regulated learning has been proposed as a resource saving alternative for learning knot tying. However, this may be hindered by the Dunning-Kruger effect. A potential alternative is guided video reflection. The objectives of this study are to compare the performance and self-assessment abilities amongst medical students learning knot tying using either a traditional self-regulated approach versus guided video reflection. DESIGN: This randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial used a pre-post-retention test design. All knot tying performances were video recorded and assessed nonsequentially by blinded evaluators using a modified Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills tool. PARTICIPANTS: This study recruited 31 first- and second-year medical students and 6 senior urology residents from Western University in Canada. RESULTS: At baseline, the performances of the experts were significantly higher than the experimental groups (F3,85 = 9.080, p < 0.001). After the intervention, there was a significant increase in the performance for both experimental groups compared to the pretest period (p < 0.001). The scores between the experimental groups were not significantly different (p = 0.338). The improved performances of both groups were sustained on retention testing (p < 0.001). The self-assessment abilities were accurate for both experimental groups at baseline. However, at the post-test period the accuracy was poor (interclass correlation 0.361) for the self-regulated group, while remaining moderately (interclass correlation 0.685) accurate for the reflection group. CONCLUSIONS: Students using guided video reflection were able to achieve competency and maintained their knot tying skills to the same degree as those who used the self-regulated approach. These results may be due to the positive effects of reflection on self-assessment abilities and subsequent improvement in goal setting for further practice.

Is Video Laryngoscopy the Optimal Tool for Successful Intubation in a Neonatal Simulation Setting? A Single-Center Experience.

Background Endotracheal intubation is a skill required for resuscitation. Due to various reasons, intubation opportunities are decreasing for health care providers. Objective To compare the success rate of video laryngoscopy (VL) and direct laryngoscopy (DL) for interprofessional neonatal intubation skills in a simulated setting. Methods This was a prospective nonrandomized simulation crossover trial. Twenty-six participants were divided into three groups based on their frequency of intubation. Group 1 included pediatric residents; group 2 respiratory therapists and transport nurses; and group 3 neonatal nurse practitioners and physicians working in neonatology. We compared intubation success rate, intubation time, and laryngoscope preference. Results Success rates were 100% for both DL and VL in groups 1 and 2, and 88.9% for DL and 100% for VL in group 3. Median intubation times for DL and VL were 22 seconds (interquartile range [IQR] 14.3-22.8 seconds) and 12.5 seconds (IQR 10.3-38.8 seconds) in group 1 ( p = 0.779); 17 seconds (IQR 8-21 seconds) and 12 seconds (IQR 9-16.5 seconds) in group 2 ( p = 0.476); and 11 seconds (IQR 7.5-15.5 seconds) and 15 seconds (IQR 11.5-36 seconds) in group 3 ( p = 0.024). Conclusion We conclude that novice providers tend to perform better with VL, while more experienced providers perform better with DL. In this era of decreased clinical training opportunities, VL may serve as a useful tool to teach residents and other novice health care providers.

The PreDoc Program: Pipeline Healthcare Apprenticeship Program through the Lens of a Neurologist.

This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended. Objective: The PreDoc program is a longitudinal apprenticeship aimed at increasing college student interest in pursuing a healthcare career. This program offers the continuity of clinical, research, and educational exposure in academic medicine utilizing a career immersion approach that allows a graduated level of responsibility, experience, and leadership opportunities. Methods: Students get an asynchronous/synchronous curriculum under the direction of academic physicians committed to boosting the pipeline. Training in critical career development skills including "goal setting," professionalism, communication, and time management are provided to Pre-Docs by their senior peers and program leaders. Results: Since the implementation of the PreDoc program in 2013, 28 students have enrolled in the program. Twenty-three students completed the survey; 100% ranked the program quality as good/excellent. Students reported more interest in academic medicine (n=19, 83%), neurology (n=18, 78%), and sleep medicine (n=18, 78%). A majority of the students reported that they were extremely likely to pursue a medical career (n=20, 87%). All students have completed or are in the process of completing at least one scholarly product. Conclusions: The PreDoc program has been successful in promoting college student scholarly productivity in healthcare and in garnering student interest in academic medicine, particularly in neurology.

Questioning Style and Pimping in Clinical Education: A Quantitative Score Derived from a Survey of Internal Medicine Teaching Faculty.

Construct: Pimping is a controversial pedagogical technique in medicine, and there is a tension between pimping being considered as "value adding" in some circumstances versus always unacceptable. Consequently, faculty differ in their attitudes toward pimping, and such differences may be measurable and used to inform future research regarding the impact of pimping on learner outcomes. BACKGROUND: Despite renewed attention in medical education on creating a supportive learning environment, there is a dearth of prior research on pimping. We sought to characterize faculty who are more aggressive in their questioning style (i.e., those with a "pimper" phenotype) from those who are less threatening. APPROACH: This study was conducted between December 2015 and September 2016 at Johns Hopkins University. We created a 13-item questionnaire assessing faculty perceptions on pimping as a pedagogical technique. We surveyed all medicine faculty (n = 150) who had attended on inpatient teaching services at two university-affiliated hospitals over the prior 2 years. Then, using responses to the faculty survey, we developed a numeric "pimping score" designed to characterize faculty into "pimper" (those with scores in the upper quartile of the range) and "nonpimper" phenotypes. RESULTS: The response rate was 84%. Although almost half of the faculty reported that being pimped helped them in their own learning (45%), fewer reported that pimping was effective in their own teaching practice (20%). The pimping score was normally distributed across a range of 13-42, with a mean of 24 and a 75th percentile cutoff of 28 or greater. Younger faculty, male participants, specialists, and those reporting lower quality of life had higher pimping score values, all p < .05. Faculty who openly endorsed favorable views about the educational value of pimping had sevenfold higher odds of being characterized as "pimpers" using our numeric pimping score (p ≤ .001). CONCLUSIONS: The establishment of a quantitative pimping score may have relevance for training programs concerned about the learning environment in clinical settings and may inform future research on the impact of pimping on learning outcomes.

Team deliberate practice in medicine and related domains: a consideration of the issues.

A better understanding of the factors influencing medical team performance and accounting for expert medical team performance should benefit medical practice. Therefore, the aim here is to highlight key issues with using deliberate practice to improve medical team performance, especially given the success of deliberate practice for developing individual expert performance in medicine and other domains. Highlighting these issues will inform the development of training for medical teams. The authors first describe team coordination and its critical role in medical teams. Presented next are the cognitive mechanisms that allow expert performers to accurately interpret the current situation via the creation of an accurate mental "model" of the current situation, known as a situation model. Following this, the authors propose that effective team performance depends at least in part on team members having similar models of the situation, known as a shared situation model. The authors then propose guiding principles for implementing team deliberate practice in medicine and describe how team deliberate practice can be used in an attempt to reduce barriers inherent in medical teams to the development of shared situation models. The paper concludes with considerations of limitations, and future research directions, concerning the implementation of team deliberate practice within medicine.

Sex and gender in medical education: a national student survey.

BACKGROUND: Gender- and sex-specific medicine is defined as the practice of medicine based on the understanding that biology (dictated by sex chromosomes) and social roles (gender) are important in and have implications for prevention, screening, diagnosis, and treatment in men and women. In light of the many ways that sex and gender influence disease presentation and patient management, there have been various initiatives to improve the integration of these topics into medical education curriculum. Although certain schools may include the topics, their impact on the student body's knowledge has not been as fully studied. By studying the opinions of US allopathic and osteopathic-enrolled students on the extent to which their schools address these topics and their understanding of these topics, this study examined the role of gender specific medicine in the US medical school curriculum. METHODS: An email solicitation with link to an anonymous survey was sent to approximately 35,876 student members of five US medical student organizations. The survey instrument consisted of yes/no, multiple choice, and attitude awareness questions. Data was analyzed as a complete data set to evaluate national trends and via subset analysis using chi-square, paired t test, and one-way anova. RESULTS: A total of 1097 students responded. The majority of respondents strongly agreed that sex and gender medicine (SGBM) improves patient management (96.0 %) and should be included as a part of the medical school curriculum (94.4 %). Only 2.4 % of participants agreed that SGBM is the same as Women's Health. When asked specifically about inclusion of an identified sex and gender-based medicine curriculum at their institution, students answered not sure at 40.8, 25.1, 19.1, and 20.3 % from first year to fourth year, respectively. Males reported a higher rate of exposure to SGBM content areas (in medical history taking, domestic violence) than women. CONCLUSIONS: Medical students recognize the differentiation between SGBM principles and women's health, and understand the translational value of sex and gender-specific principles in the clinical setting. However, current curricular offerings fall short of providing students with adequate coverage of specific evidence-based health differences.

Tracking development of clinical reasoning ability across five medical schools using a progress test.

PURPOSE: Little is known about the acquisition of clinical reasoning skills in medical school, the development of clinical reasoning over the medical curriculum as a whole, and the impact of various curricular methodologies on these skills. This study investigated (1) whether there are differences in clinical reasoning skills between learners at different years of medical school, and (2) whether there are differences in performance between students at schools with various curricular methodologies. METHOD: Students (n = 2,394) who had completed zero to three years of medical school at five U.S. medical schools participated in a cross-sectional study in 2008. Students took the same diagnostic pattern recognition (DPR) and clinical data interpretation (CDI) tests. Percent correct scores were used to determine performance differences. Data from all schools and students at all levels were aggregated for further analysis. RESULTS: Student performance increased substantially as a result of each year of training. Gains in DPR and CDI performance during the third year of medical school were not as great as in previous years across the five schools. CDI performance and performance gains were lower than DPR performance and gains. Performance gains attributable to training at each of the participating medical schools were more similar than different. CONCLUSIONS: Years of training accounted for most of the variation in DPR and CDI performance. As a rule, students at higher training levels performed better on both tests, though the expected larger gains during the third year of medical school did not materialize.

Can patient-centered attitudes reduce racial and ethnic disparities in care?

PURPOSE: Patient-centeredness has been advocated to reduce racial/ethnic disparities in health care quality, but no empirical data support such a connection. The authors' purpose was to determine whether students with patient-centered attitudes have better performance and are less likely to demonstrate disparities with African American compared with white standardized patients (SPs). METHOD: Third-year medical students were assessed by SPs at the Clinical Educational Center of the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in 2002. One African American and one white actor were trained as SPs for each of four case scenarios; students were randomly assigned to interact with either SP for each case. Before the exam, students were surveyed about their attitudes towards patient-centered medicine. Students with and without patient-centered attitudes were compared with regard to their performance with African American and white SPs. Outcome measures were student exam scores in interpersonal skill, history taking, physical exam, and counseling. RESULTS: All 177 of eligible students participated in all four case scenarios. With white SPs, students with patient-centered attitudes performed similarly to students without patient-centered attitudes in all four areas. However, with African American SPs, students with patient-centered attitudes performed significantly better than students without patient-centered attitudes in interpersonal skills (71.4 versus 69.4, P = .010), history taking (63.8 versus 61.1, P = .003), and counseling (92.1 versus 88.7, P = .002) and not significantly different in physical exam performance (73.6 versus 68.6, P = .311). CONCLUSIONS: Patient-centered attitudes may be more important in improving physician behaviors with African American patients than with white patients and may, therefore, play a role in reducing disparities.

The teaching effectiveness of standardized patients.

Teaching nursing students therapeutic communication skills begins in the classroom and extends to the clinical environment. The usual method of instruction consists of random patient encounters observed by faculty and measures of competence that rely on paper-and-pencil tests. Using standardized patients (SPs) offers an alternative approach to the traditional method of teaching. Standardized patients are individuals who have been carefully trained to present an illness or scenario in a standardized, unvarying manner. This pilot study compared use of SPs with the usual method of instruction in a class of undergraduate nursing students. Results indicated that students who participated in the SP method overwhelmingly described the experience as positive, creative, and meaningful. No significant differences were found between the two groups on measures of interpersonal skills, therapeutic communication skills, and knowledge of depression

Use of "standardized examinees" to screen for standardized-patient scoring bias in a clinical skills examination.

BACKGROUND: Clinical skills examinations using standardized patients (SPs) are important in documenting the proficiency of trainees. "Standardized examinees" (SEs) are individuals trained to a specific level of performance; they can be used as internal controls in a high-stakes, clinical skills examination. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether SEs can be trained to portray a specified level of confidence and whether SPs' checklist scoring is affected by the personal manner of the examinee. METHODS: Eight SEs were trained as "students" and trained to achieve a failing score on six cases in an National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) Prototype Clinical Skills Examination. Four SEs were coached to be confident in manner, and 4 were coached to be insecure. Checklist scores were compared. Seven lay reviewers scored the SEs as confident or insecure on a behavioral assessment form. RESULTS: SEs were not detected as simulations. There was no difference between the checklist scores of confident versus insecure SEs, but their manner was rated as significantly different on all scales in the behavioral assessment. CONCLUSIONS: SEs can be trained to a specified performance level and a desired level of confidence. In this small study, personal manner did not affect SPs' checklist scoring. The use of the SEs provides a mechanism to screen for bias in high-stakes SP examinations.

The physician's role in discussing organ donation with families.

Federal Conditions of Participation from the Health Care Financing Administration (now the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) introduced in 1998 require that all families be presented the option of organ and tissue donation when death is imminent. The perception that physicians were being excluded from participating in this process led to a resolution at the American Medical Association House of Delegates meeting in December 1999, calling on the American Medical Association Council on Scientific Affairs to review the Conditions of Participation "to ensure that there is no prohibition of physician involvement in the organ donation process..." The number of organs procured for transplantation in the United States is insufficient to meet needs. Families' hospital experiences significantly affect their decisions to donate organs. Discussing severe brain injury, brain death, and organ donation after brain death with families is a specialized form of end-of-life decision-making and care in the intensive care unit; however, the knowledge, skills, and attitudes necessary for physicians and nurses to promote good end-of-life decision-making are widely variable. The federal Conditions of Participation require that those making requests of families for organ donation receive specific training. They do not prohibit physician involvement in initiating organ donation requests, provided these individuals are properly trained. Physicians have an important role in caring for patients and families in these circumstances, and the care they provide is enhanced through training, attention to the special issues involved, and collaboration with organ procurement organization personnel.