Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Grad Med Educ ; 9(6): 716-720, 2017 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29270260

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In 2013, milestone ratings became a reporting requirement for emergency medicine (EM) residency programs. Programs rate each resident in the fall and spring on 23 milestone subcompetencies. OBJECTIVE: This study examined the incidence of straight line scoring (SLS) for EM Milestone ratings, defined as a resident being assessed the same score across the milestone subcompetencies. METHODS: This descriptive analysis measured the frequencies of SLS for all Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited EM programs during the 2015-2016 academic year. Outcomes were the frequency of SLS in the fall and spring milestone assessments, changes in the number of SLS reports, and reporting trends. Chi-square analysis compared nominal variables. RESULTS: There were 6257 residents in the fall and 6588 in the spring. Milestone scores were reported for 6173 EM residents in the fall (99% of 6257) and spring (94% of 6588). In the fall, 93% (5753 residents) did not receive SLS ratings and 420 (7%) did, with no significant difference compared with the spring (5776 [94%] versus 397 [6%]). Subgroup analysis showed higher SLS results for residents' first ratings (183 of 2136 versus 237 of 4220, P < .0001) and for their final ratings (200 of 2019 versus 197 of 4354, P < .0001). Twenty percent of programs submitted 10% or more SLS ratings, and a small percentage submitted more than 50% of ratings as SLS. CONCLUSIONS: Most programs did not submit SLS ratings. Because of the statistical improbability of SLS, any SLS ratings reduce the validity assertions of the milestone assessments.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence/standards , Education, Medical, Graduate/standards , Educational Measurement/methods , Emergency Medicine/education , Internship and Residency/standards , Accreditation/standards , Female , Humans , Male , Specialty Boards , United States
3.
Acad Emerg Med ; 20(7): 724-9, 2013 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23782404

ABSTRACT

The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) has outlined its "Next Accreditation System" (NAS) that will focus on resident and residency outcome measurements. Emergency medicine (EM) is one of seven specialties that will implement the NAS beginning July 2013. All other specialties will follow in July 2014. A key component of the NAS is the development of assessable milestones, which are explicit accomplishments or behaviors that occur during the process of residency education. Milestones describe competencies more specifically and identify specialty-specific knowledge, skills, attitudes, and behaviors (KSABs) that can be used as outcome measures within the general competencies. The ACGME and the American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM) convened an EM milestone working group to develop the EM milestones. This article describes the development, use within the NAS, and challenges of the EM milestones.


Subject(s)
Accreditation/standards , Clinical Competence/standards , Emergency Medicine/education , Quality of Health Care , Education, Medical, Graduate/standards , Female , Humans , Internship and Residency/standards , Male , United States
5.
Am J Emerg Med ; 28(3): 385.e5-8, 2010 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20223404

ABSTRACT

Posterior sternoclavicular joint dislocations (PSCJDs) are extremely rare, emergent injuries. We present an unprecedented case of a 16-year-old boy without any initial history or signs of trauma who died of a brachiocephalic vein laceration secondary to an occult PSCJD. The pathophysiology, treatment, and diagnosis of PSCJD are discussed.


Subject(s)
Brachiocephalic Veins/injuries , Joint Dislocations/etiology , Sternoclavicular Joint/injuries , Accidental Falls , Adolescent , Fatal Outcome , Humans , Male
8.
Ann Emerg Med ; 41(4): 513-29, 2003 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12658252

ABSTRACT

Patients with severely increased blood pressure often present to the emergency department. Emergency physicians evaluate and treat hypertension in various contexts, ranging from the compliant patient with well-controlled blood pressure to the asymptomatic patient with increased blood pressure to the critically ill patient with increased blood pressure and acute target-organ deterioration. Despite extensive study and national guidelines for the assessment and treatment of chronically increased blood pressure, there is no clear consensus on the acute management of patients with severely increased blood pressure. In this article, we examine the broad spectrum of disease, from the asymptomatic to critically ill patient, and the dilemma it creates for the emergency physician in deciding how and when in the process to intervene.


Subject(s)
Emergency Treatment/methods , Hypertension/therapy , Acute Disease , Aftercare , Antihypertensive Agents/classification , Antihypertensive Agents/pharmacology , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Blood Pressure Determination , Case Management , Emergencies , Emergency Medicine/methods , Emergency Medicine/standards , Emergency Treatment/standards , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Hypertension/diagnosis , Hypertension/etiology , Mass Screening , Physician's Role , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Severity of Illness Index
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL