Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Burn Care Res ; 45(1): 4-7, 2024 Jan 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37797268

ABSTRACT

Social media platforms can serve as a readily accessible tool for burn education, potentially reducing the incidence and severity of burn injuries. Previous studies have investigated the quality of online burn education videos on platforms such as YouTube. Here, we review the quality of such videos on TikTok, a newer and rapidly growing platform. TikTok was searched for English videos using 29 keywords (hashtags) such as #burn, #education, #prevention, and #management. The first 30 videos per hashtag were screened. Videos were categorized by content and creator. Two independent reviewers assessed the quality of the included videos using the Global Quality Scale (GQS). Metrics such as views, commentary, and likes were also examined. Of 535 screened videos, 72 met inclusion criteria. 47% (n = 34) were on management, 33% (n = 31) education, and 10% (n = 7) prevention. Only 6% (n = 4) cited sources. The median GQS score was 3.0 (IQR: 2.0-3.0, max 4.0). 50% (n = 36) were made by healthcare professionals with a median GQS score of 3.0 (IQR: 2.0-3.0, max 4.0) compared to 2.0 (IQR: 2.0-3.0, max 4.0) in nonhealthcare professionals (n = 36). Viewership varied from 41 to 4.2 million views. Overall, there is a lack of high-quality educational information on TikTok. This rapidly expanding and dynamic platform may provide an opportunity to direct individuals to higher quality resources.


Subject(s)
Burns , Education, Distance , Social Media , Humans , Burns/therapy , Educational Status , Benchmarking , Video Recording
2.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38148442

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The demographic proportions of plastic surgery trials approximating real-world disease have not well been studied. Judicious trial representation is essential in evaluation of treatments across diverse patient populations. Herein, we investigate sex, racial, and ethnic disparities in patient enrollment across burn trials. METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis of participants enrolled in high-quality, with reduced risk of bias, randomized controlled trials (RCT) on burns registered on clinicaltrials.gov under the query "burn." Completed RCTs reporting at least two demographic groups, employing double masking or greater, and with results accessible through the registry or publications were included. Trial characteristics (sponsor country, site location, initiation year, study phase, masking) and demographic data (sex, race, ethnicity per US reporting guidelines) were collected. The Global Burden of Disease database provided sex-based burn disease burdens. The primary outcome was the population-to-prevalence ratio of enrolled female participants. Secondary outcomes included representation of racial and ethnic populations as related to study blinding, phase, and study/sponsor locations. RESULTS: Of 546 records, 39 trials met the inclusion criteria (2919 participants). All trials reported sex demographics, with females comprising 37.02% of all participants (PPR = 0.71, 95% CI [0.59, 0.82], likely indicating underrepresentation against their empiric disease burden). Only 7 and 9 trials reported ethnicity and race, respectively, although not comprehensively. Among trials reporting race or ethnicity, Caucasians and Black persons comprised 57.52% and 21.80% of participants, respectively, while only 9.80% had Hispanic/Latino ethnicity. Severe underreporting of race and ethnicity precluded much of secondary significance testing across study variables. CONCLUSIONS: Females are likely underrepresented in high-quality, US-registered burn trials, unreflective of their real-world disease burden. Further, severe underreporting of race and ethnicity was noted. Future trials should enroll diverse demographics and equitable populations for promotion of study generalizability.

3.
Gels ; 9(7)2023 Jul 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37504470

ABSTRACT

An evolving field, nanotechnology has made its mark in the fields of nanoscience, nanoparticles, nanomaterials, and nanomedicine. Specifically, metal nanoparticles have garnered attention for their diverse use and applicability to dressings for wound healing due to their antimicrobial properties. Given their convenient integration into wound dressings, there has been increasing focus dedicated to investigating the physical, mechanical, and biological characteristics of these nanoparticles as well as their incorporation into biocomposite materials, such as hydrogel scaffolds for use in lieu of antibiotics as well as to accelerate and ameliorate healing. Though rigorously tested and applied in both medical and non-medical applications, further investigations have not been carried out to bring metal nanoparticle-hydrogel composites into clinical practice. In this review, we provide an up-to-date, comprehensive review of advancements in the field, with emphasis on implications on wound healing in in vivo experiments.

4.
Laryngoscope ; 133(11): 2837-2845, 2023 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36896873

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: A deviated nasal septum (DNS) can result in an anatomical obstruction and impact lung function through prolonged suboptimal inspiration. Given the improvements in respiration reported by patients following septoplasty or septorhinoplasty (with or without inferior turbinate reduction), our study investigated the effect of these procedures on pulmonary function through a systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, Cochrane Databases, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. REVIEW METHODS: The review was registered with PROSPERO [CRD42022316309]. The study population was composed of adult patients (18-65) who were symptomatic with confirmed DNS. Extracted outcomes (pre-operative versus postoperative) included the six-minute walk test (6MWT) and pulmonary function tests (FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC, FEF25-75, PEF). Meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model. RESULTS: Three studies included measures of the 6MWT in meters and all three found a statistically significant increase in the distance walked after surgery with a mean difference of 62.40 m (95% CI 24.79-100.00). Statistically significant improvements in PFT outcomes were observed with a standard mean difference of 0.72 for FEV1 (95% CI 0.31-1.13), 0.63 for FVC (95% CI 0.26-1.00), and 0.64 for PEF (95% CI 0.47-0.82). Of the twelve studies which measured PFT outcomes, six showed statistically significant improvements, three studies showed mixed results, and three studies found no difference in PFT outcomes between pre-and post-surgery testing. CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that pulmonary function does improve after nasal surgery for DNS, but the high heterogeneity observed in the meta-analyses indicates that the evidence supporting this conclusion is low. Laryngoscope, 133:2837-2845, 2023.


Subject(s)
Nasal Obstruction , Rhinoplasty , Adult , Humans , Nasal Septum/surgery , Rhinoplasty/methods , Respiratory Function Tests , Postoperative Period , Lung/surgery , Nasal Obstruction/surgery
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...