Assessing Risk Factors and Comorbidities in the Treatment of Chronic Pain: A Narrative Review.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Chronic pain affects a significant portion of the population globally, making it a leading cause of disability. Understanding the multifaceted nature of chronic pain, its various types, and the intricate relationship it shares with risk factors, comorbidities, and mental health issues like depression and anxiety is critical for comprehensive patient care. Factors such as socioeconomic status (SES), age, gender, and obesity collectively add layers of complexity to chronic pain experiences and pose management challenges. RECENT FINDINGS: Low SES presents barriers to effective pain care, while gender differences and the prevalence of chronic pain in aging adults emphasize the need for tailored approaches. The association between chronic pain and physical comorbidities like cardiovascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and diabetes mellitus reveals shared risk factors and further highlights the importance of integrated treatment strategies. Chronic pain and mental health are intricately linked through biochemical mechanisms, profoundly affecting overall quality of life. This review explores pharmacologic treatment for chronic pain, particularly opioid analgesia, with attention to the risk of substance misuse and the ongoing opioid epidemic. We discuss the potential role of medical cannabis as an alternative treatment with a nuanced perspective on its impact on opioid use. Addressing the totality and complexity of pain states is crucial to individualizing chronic pain management. With different types of pain having different underlying mechanisms, considerations should be made when approaching their treatment. Moreover, the synergistic relationship that pain states can have with other comorbidities further complicates chronic pain conditions.

Cefiderocol (Fetroja) as a Treatment for Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia.

With increasing resistance to conventional antibiotic treatments, especially among gram-negative bacilli, the search for new antibiotics has become critical on a global scale. Among infections with multidrug-resistant bacteria is hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), which is nosocomial pneumonia in patients who have been hospitalized for more than 48 hours. HAP carries a high mortality rate and continues to be a challenge with regard to adequate treatment. The typical multidrug-resistant gram negatives found in HAP include Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Acinetobacter baumannii. Many new antibiotics have been studied and tested against these pathogens as possible solutions, and the search continues. Cefiderocol, a novel siderophore cephalosporin, is effective against these pathogens. Cefiderocol is an iron-chelating agent that makes use of iron pumps on the membrane of bacteria via a catechol moiety on the C3 side chain of the molecule. This allows for easy access into the cytoplasm, where it can inhibit peptidoglycan synthesis by binding to penicillin-binding proteins. Cefiderocol displays linear pharmacokinetics and is mainly excreted through the kidneys. It is well tolerated in healthy individuals but may need adjustments of dosage in patients with impaired renal function. Studies have shown that both healthy subjects and those with impaired renal function experienced some adverse effects, including nausea, diarrhea, abdominal pain, and increased creatinine kinase; however, these adverse effects were limited and experienced in placebo groups. It has demonstrated efficacy in treating infections caused by many multidrug-resistant gram-negative pathogens and has demonstrated high stability against many classes of b-lactamases. There have been multiple phase 3 trials, such as the CREDIBLE-CR trial and the APEKS-NP trial, that demonstrated efficacy in treated nosocomial pneumonia caused by multidrug-resistant gram negatives, such as carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, compared to the best available treatment. While clinical data remain limited, a few studies are showing clinical efficacy and few adverse effects. Cefiderocol demonstrated effectivity in treating multidrug-resistant gram-negative pneumonia in patients with multiple comorbidities, such as chronic kidney disease, chronic-obstructive pulmonary disease, and diabetes mellitus. Cefiderocol shows promise as a novel antimicrobial agent in treating multidrug-resistant gram-negative in HAP.

Valley Fever: Pathogenesis and Evolving Treatment Options.

Coccidioidomycosis, also termed Valley fever, is a fungal infection caused by the inhalation of Coccidioides endospores. Once inhaled by a human host, the arthroconidia endospores travel to the lungs' alveoli to transform into spherules that grow and rupture to release more endospores. In the host immune response, macrophages, neutrophils, and dendritic cells will recognize the fungal antigen, producing pro-inflammatory cytokine. Th2 lymphocytes (type 2 helper T cells) are theorized to be the main human defense against Coccidioides given that Th2 deficiency is seen in patients with disseminated forms of the disease. A common triad of symptoms of coccidioidomycosis, also called "desert rheumatism," include fever, erythema nodosum, and arthralgia, often accompanied by a respiratory problem. In a clinical setting, along with the evaluation of symptoms, a medical provider may also test the patient's blood using antibody tests or perform microscopy to directly detect the presence of Coccidioides in a patient tissue sample for confirmation of a diagnosis. Imaging modalities may also be used to determine lung involvement and assess disease progression. A majority of coccidioidomycosis cases do not require specific treatment and will resolve on their own, so an approach with symptomatic treatment in mind is appropriate. If symptoms do not resolve, azoles or amphotericin B may be used, with the standard drug of choice being fluconazole (Diflucan, Pfizer, New York, New York, United States). Treatment varies depending on the immunocompetency of the patient. To name a few, pregnant patients and those with history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or transplantation require special considerations.

Preoperative laboratory testing: Implications of "Choosing Wisely" guidelines.

Preoperative laboratory testing is often necessary and can be invaluable for diagnosis, assessment, and treatment. However, performing routine laboratory tests for patients who are considered otherwise healthy is not usually beneficial and is costly. It is estimated that $18 billion (U.S.) is spent annually on preoperative testing, although how much is wasteful remains unknown. Ideally, a targeted and comprehensive patient history and physical exam should largely determine whether preprocedure laboratory studies should be obtained. Healthcare providers, primarily anesthesiologists, should remain cost-conscious when ordering specific laboratory or imaging tests prior to surgery based on available literature. We review the overall evidence and key points from the Choosing Wisely guidelines, the identification of potential wasteful practices, possible harms of testing, and key clinical findings associated with preoperative laboratory testing.