Low- versus high-dose combination of midazolam-ketamine for oral premedication in children for ophthalmologic surgeries.

INTRODUCTION: Midazolam and ketamine are useful for oral premedication in children to allay anxiety. We compared the effects of midazolam with a combination of high- and low-dose ketaminemidazolam as an oral premedication. METHODS: This is a randomised, controlled prospective study conducted in 87 children who were scheduled for ophthalmologic surgeries. Group M received oral midazolam 0.5 mg/kg, Group MKL received oral midazolam 0.25 mg/kg and ketamine 3 mg/kg, and Group MKH received midazolam 0.5 mg/kg and ketamine 6 mg/kg. Standard general anaesthesia technique was used. Sedation levels and ease of parental separation were noted. RESULTS: A linear increasing trend in sedation was seen in the preoperative sedation scores of all the three groups. At 30 minutes, 23 children in Group MKH had good sedation scores as opposed to 20 in Group MKL and 12 in Group M. The best parental separation time was much shorter in the combination groups. There were no statistically significant differences in the parental separation scores, mean response to induction and mask acceptance. The time to reach Aldrete score of 10 was shorter in Group MKL (22 +/- 5 min) and Group M (36 +/- 1 min) compared to Group MKH (52 +/- 2 min). Group MKH had a higher incidence of excessive salivation compared to the other groups. CONCLUSION: A combination of low-dose midazolam and ketamine is as effective as high-dose midazolam and ketamine for achieving optimum anxiolysis and a faster recovery, with a lower incidence of excessive salivation in children undergoing ophthalmic surgery.

Oral ketamine or midazolam or low dose combination for premedication in children.

This randomized controlled trial was designed to evaluate whether the combination of low dose oral midazolam (0.25 mg/kg) and low dose oral ketamine (3 mg/kg) provides better premedication than oral midazolam (0.5 mg/kg) or oral ketamine (6 mg/kg). Seventy-eight children of ASA physical status I or II scheduled for elective ophthalmic surgery were randomly divided into three groups and given premedication in the holding area 30 minutes before surgery. Two subjects from each group vomited the medication and were excluded, leaving 72 subjects for further analysis. The onset of sedation was earlier in the combination group than the other two groups. At 10 minutes after premedication 12.5% in the combination group had an acceptable sedation score compared with none in the other two groups. After 20 minutes 54% in the combination group had an acceptable sedation score, 21% in the midazolam group and 16% in the ketamine group (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the parental separation score, response to induction and emergence score. The mean time for best parental separation score was significantly less in the combination group (19+/-8 min) than either the midazolam (28+/-7) or ketamine (29+/-7 min) groups (P<0.05). Recovery was earlier in the combination group, as the time required to reach a modified Aldrete score of 10 was significantly less in the combination group (22+/-5 min) than in the oral midazolam (36+/-11 min) or ketamine (38+/-8 min) groups. The incidence of excessive salivation was significantly higher in the ketamine alone group (P<0.05). In conclusion, the combination of oral ketamine (3 mg/kg) and midazolam (0.25 mg/kg) has minimal side effects and gives a faster onset and more rapid recovery than ketamine 6 mg/kg or midazolam 0.5 mg/kg for premedication in children.

A patient with congenital complete heart block undergoing multiple exposures to general anaesthesia.

We present a patient with congenital complete heart block who underwent multiple anaesthetic exposures for eye examination and bilateral cataract surgery. The diagnosis was made during the first general anaesthetic. Various complications encountered during the multiple exposures are discussed.

Management of post-strabismus nausea and vomiting in children using ondansetron: a value-based comparison of outcomes.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of prophylactic ondansetron versus early ondansetron treatment in the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in children undergoing strabismus repair using clinically meaningful outcomes and value-based principles. METHODS: One hundred and fifty children were randomly assigned to either prophylactic (P) or early symptomatic treatment only (T) group (n = 75). Children in group P received ondansetron 100 micrograms kg-1 i.v. and those in group T received placebo at the end of the procedure. After surgery, at the earliest sign of nausea or vomiting, children in both groups received ondansetron 100 micrograms kg-1 i.v. Besides the incidence of PONV, non-surrogate (fast tracking time, duration of stay in the postanaesthesia care unit (PACU) and parental satisfaction scores), therapeutic (numbers needed to prevent and treat) and pharmacoeconomic (cost to benefit a child and cost per PONV-free child) outcome measures were evaluated. RESULTS: The incidences of PONV in the immediate, early, late and first 24-h periods were significantly less in group P (20, 12, 19 and 35% respectively) than in group T (37, 29, 47 and 72%, P < 0.05). Time to achieve fast-track eligibility and duration of PACU stay were significantly shorter in group P (P < 0.001). Children in group P had superior mean (SD) parental satisfaction scores (8.2 (1.8)) compared with those in group T (6.8 (1.7), P < 0.001). The number needed to prevent PONV was 2 and the number needed to treat PONV was 9. The cost to benefit a child was more than fourfold less and the cost per PONV-free child was 35% less in group P. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with early symptomatic treatment with ondansetron, prophylactic ondansetron shortened fast-tracking time and duration of PACU stay and improved parental satisfaction and therapeutic outcomes at a lower direct cost.

Anaesthetic management of a patient with Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy.

Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy is a rare form of muscular dystrophy associated with cardiac implications such as cardiomyopathy and arrhythmias leading to sudden death. We describe the anesthetic management of a patient with Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy who presented for orthopaedic surgery and discuss the disorder and its potential anaesthetic implications.

A dose response study of clonidine with local anesthetic mixture for peribulbar block: a comparison of three doses.

UNLABELLED: Clonidine prolongs anesthesia and analgesia of local anesthetics in various neural blocks as well as the duration of retrobulbar block. We assessed the dose-response relationship of clonidine added to lidocaine in peribulbar block. Sixty patients undergoing cataract surgery were given peribulbar block with 7 mL of 2% lidocaine and hyaluronidase with either saline (Control) or clonidine in 0.5-microg/kg (0.5 Clon), 1.0-microg/kg (1.0 Clon), or 1.5-microg/kg (1.5 Clon) doses. The onset and duration of lid and globe akinesia, globe anesthesia and analgesia, postoperative analgesic requirement, and adverse effects (hypotension, bradycardia, hypoxia, sedation, and dizziness) were recorded. The success rate and onset of block were comparable in all groups. The duration of lid and globe akinesia, globe anesthesia and analgesia was significantly (P < 0.01) prolonged in patients receiving 1.0 and 1.5 microg/kg clonidine as compared with the Control group. Perioperative pain scores and analgesic requirement were significantly less in these groups. 0.5 microg/kg clonidine did not increase the duration of anesthesia and analgesia significantly. Hypotension and dizziness were observed more in patients receiving 1.5 microg/kg clonidine as compared with other groups. We conclude that 1.0 microg/kg clonidine with a mixture of lidocaine (2%) significantly prolonged the duration of anesthesia and analgesia after peribulbar block with limited side effects. IMPLICATIONS: We studied the effect of the addition of 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 microg/kg clonidine to a lidocaine-hyaluronidase mixture on the onset and duration of peribulbar block and perioperative analgesia. A dose of 1.0 microg/kg produced a significant increase in duration of anesthesia and analgesia with minimal side effects.

Dexamethasone is a cost-effective alternative to ondansetron in preventing PONV after paediatric strabismus repair.

This study evaluated the antiemetic efficacy, cost-effectiveness and clinical utility of prophylactic ondansetron and dexamethasone compared with placebo in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in 135 children (2-15 yr, ASA I-II) undergoing strabismus repair. After induction with halothane and nitrous oxide in oxygen or i.v. thiopental, the children received i.v. dexamethasone 1 mg kg(-1) to a maximum of 25 mg, ondansetron 100 microg kg(-1) to a maximum of 4 mg or placebo (n=45). Episodes of PONV were recorded for the first 24 h after the operation. True outcome measures (parental satisfaction score, duration of stay in the postanaesthesia care unit and fast tracking time), therapeutic outcome measures (number needed to prevent (NNTP) PONV) and the cost to benefit a child with each drug were analysed. The incidence and severity of PONV in the first 24 h were significantly less in the dexamethasone and ondansetron groups than in the placebo group (P<0.05). The incidence (P=0.04) and severity (P=0.03) of PONV at the 6-24 h epoch were significantly less in the dexamethasone group than in the ondansetron group. Recovery time (P=0.07), fast tracking time (P=0.6), parental satisfaction scores (P=0.08) and NNTP PONV were comparable (NNTP=2) in both the ondansetron and the dexamethasone group. The cost to benefit a child with dexamethasone was approximately 22 times less than that of ondansetron.

Combination of droperidol and ondansetron reduces PONV after pediatric strabismus surgery more than single drug therapy.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric strabismus surgery is associated with a very high incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting [(PONV) 44-88%]. Droperidol (10-75 microg kg(-1)) and ondansetron (50-150 microg kg(-1)) have shown variable success in reducing the incidence and severity of PONV. Combination of these two drugs has shown promising results. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of these two drugs in reducing the incidence and severity of PONV in pediatric strabismus surgery. METHODS: After institutional approval and parental informed consent, 240 children of ASA physical status I and II of either sex, aged 1-15 years were included in this study. None of the children received any premedication and a standardized anesthesia technique was used for all the children. They were prospectively randomized to one of the four treatment groups. Group PP received normal saline placebo intravenously after induction and at the end of the procedure. Group DP received droperidol 25 microg kg(-1) after induction and normal saline at the end. Group OP received ondansetron 150 microg kg(-1) after induction and saline at the end. Group DO received droperidol 15 microg kg(-1) after induction and ondansetron 100 microg kg(-1) at the end. RESULTS: Combination prophylaxis resulted in a lower incidence of PONV (13%) as compared to placebo (62.5%, P<0.001), ondansetron (37%, P<0.001), or droperidol (32%, P<0.01). CONCLUSION: Droperidol 15 microg kg(-1) in combination with ondansetron 100 microg kg(-1), administered at the induction and end of the operative procedure respectively, is more effective than either drug given individually in reducing the incidence of PONV after strabismus surgery.

Safety and efficacy of peribulbar block as adjunct to general anaesthesia for paediatric ophthalmic surgery.

METHODS: Fifty children (age 5-14 years, ASA I-II) undergoing elective ophthalmic surgery were chosen for the study. Of these, 25 received intravenous pethidine (control group) and 25 received a peribulbar block (block group) for perioperative analgesia, and were monitored intraoperatively and postoperatively by an investigator blinded to the analgesic technique. RESULTS: Intraoperative values of haemodynamic variables were significantly higher in the control group (P < 0.01). Requirement for intraoperative rescue analgesic and postoperative analgesia was higher in the control group (P < 0.05 and P < 0.001, respectively). Children in the block group had lower postoperative pain scores at all times. Incidence of oculocardiac reflex was significantly higher (P < 0.001) in the control group. Seventy-six percent of children in the control group had postoperative nausea and vomiting compared to 20% children in the block group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: There were no complications related to the block. Peribulbar block appears to be a safe and useful analgesic technique for paediatric ophthalmic surgery.

Effects of peribulbar bupivacaine as an adjunct to general anaesthesia on peri-operative outcome following retinal detachment surgery.

Sixty premedicated, ASA physical status I or II patients weighing > 25 kg scheduled for elective retinal detachment repair were randomly assigned to receive either peribulbar block with 10 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine (block group) or intravenous morphine 150 microg.kg-1 (morphine group), prior to the induction of general anaesthesia (n = 30 in each group). Patients were evaluated for intra-operative oculocardiac reflex, peri-operative pain relief, recovery from anaesthesia and postoperative nausea and vomiting. Apart from significantly reducing the incidence of oculocardiac reflex (30% vs. 70%, p = 0.0019), peribulbar bupivacaine also attenuated the severity of the reflex. Postoperative pain relief was superior in the block group. More block group patients had the maximum recovery score in the immediate postoperative period (80% vs. 27%, p < 0. 0001) and they achieved complete recovery significantly faster than the morphine group (17.3 (14.7) min vs. 66.7 (29.7) min, p < 0.0001). The incidence (40% vs. 77%, p = 0.004) and severity of postoperative nausea and vomiting were significantly less in the block group. In summary, peribulbar bupivacaine, when administered together with general anaesthesia, attenuated oculocardiac reflex, provided comparable intra-operative and superior postoperative analgesia, resulted in significantly earlier and better recovery from anaesthesia, and significantly reduced the incidence and severity of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Intra-ocular pressure and haemodynamic changes after tracheal intubation and extubation: a comparative study in glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous children.

This prospective, controlled study was conducted to compare the effects of tracheal intubation and extubation on intra-ocular pressure changes and haemodynamic parameters in paediatric patients with and without glaucoma. The children were scheduled for intra-ocular surgery. Twenty children with normal intra-ocular pressure and 15 with glaucoma were studied. A standardised general anaesthetic was administered to both groups. After 5 min of anaesthesia, intra-ocular pressure, heart rate and noninvasive blood pressure were measured. These measurements were repeated 30 s and 2 min after tracheal intubation. Further measurements were taken before, and 30 s and 2 min after extubation. The increase in intra-ocular pressure after intubation was greater in the glaucomatous group than in the normal group. The increase in intra-ocular pressure was greater after extubation than intubation in both groups, but was similar in the two groups. However, because of the already increased intra-ocular pressure in glaucomatous children, they may be at an increased risk of visual damage after intubation and extubation.

Effect of timing of ondansetron administration on incidence of postoperative vomiting in paediatric strabismus surgery.

This prospective, randomized, double-blinded study evaluated the effect of the timing of ondansetron administration on its antiemetic efficacy in children undergoing elective strabismus surgery. One hundred and twenty children aged one to 15 years, ASA physical status 1 or 2, were randomly allocated to receive intravenous ondansetron 100 micrograms/kg either at induction (Group 1) or at the end of the surgery (Group 2). All patients had general anaesthesia induced and maintained with nitrous oxide and halothane, muscle relaxation with vecuronium, endotracheal intubation, reversal with neostigmine and glycopyrrolate, and pethidine 0.5 mg/kg analgesia. Episodes of nausea and vomiting were evaluated at 0 to 2, 2 to 6 and 6 to 24 hour intervals by a blinded observer. Demographic data, duration of anaesthesia, type of surgery, incidence of previous postoperative nausea or vomiting and motion sickness and number of patients who developed oculocardiac reflex requiring atropine treatment were similar in both groups. The incidence of emesis in the first 24 hours following surgery was similar in both groups (35% Group 1, 33.3% Group 2, P = 1.00). Severity of emesis (median number of emetic episodes, rescue antiemetic requirement and mean time to the onset of first episode of emesis) and mean time to discharge from the post anaesthesia care unit were also similar in the two groups. We conclude that the timing of ondansetron administration either before or after the surgical manipulation of extraocular muscles had similar antiemetic efficacy following strabismus surgery in children.

Prophylactic ondansetron in prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting following pediatric strabismus surgery: a dose-response study.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the antiemetic effectiveness, dose-response, and clinical usefulness of prophylactic ondansetron in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in children undergoing strabismus repair. METHOD: The authors observed 180 children, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II, 2-12 yr of age, who were undergoing strabismus repair. After induction of anesthesia with halothane and nitrous oxide in oxygen or intravenous thiopental, children received either placebo (saline) or intravenous ondansetron in doses of 25, 50, 75, 100, and 150 /microg/kg (n = 30). The trachea was intubated and ventilation was controlled. Perioperative analgesic and fluid requirements were standardized. Episodes of nausea and vomiting were recorded for the first 24 h postoperatively. Data such as nonsurrogate (parental satisfaction scores and duration of postanesthesia care unit stay) and therapeutic (numbers needed to prevent and harm) outcome measures were collected. RESULTS: The incidences of PONV in the placebo and 25-, 50-, 75-, 100-, and 150-,microg/kg ondansetron groups were 83, 77, 47, 30, 30, and 27%, respectively. The incidence was less in the 75(P = 0.002), 100- (P = 0.002), and 150-microg/kg (P < 0.001) ondansetron groups compared with placebo. Duration of stay in the postanesthesia care unit was shorter in the 75-, 100-, and 150-microg/kg ondansetron groups (P < 0.002) compared with the placebo group. Parental assessment scores for the child's perioperative experience and the positive number needed to prevent PONV were also better and favorable in the 75-, 100-, and 150-microg/kg ondansetron groups compared with the placebo group. The incidence (P > 0.99) and severity (P = 0.63) of PONV were similar in the 75- and 150-microg/kg ondansetron groups. Surrogate, nonsurrogate, and therapeutic outcome measures revealed that 75 microg/kg ondansetron provided the same benefits as did 100 and 150 microg/kg. CONCLUSION: The routine prophylactic use of ondansetron at a dose of 75 microg/kg is as effective as 150 microg/kg in preventing PONV and improving the "true" outcome measures after strabismus repair in children.

Comparative effects of intravenous ketorolac and pethidine on perioperative analgesia and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) for paediatric strabismus surgery.

BACKGROUND: Corrective strabismus surgery is associated with moderate pain and a very high incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Ketorolac tromethamine, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, is a popular analgesic in adults. There are only limited published data on the use of intravenous ketorolac for paediatric analgesia perioperatively. This study evaluated and compared the emetic and analgesic effect of ketorolac with pethidine and its suitability for this kind of surgery. METHODS: Following institutional ethics committee approval and parental consent, 52 ASA class I children of age 2.5 to 15 yr were randomised to receive either ketorolac 0.9 mg kg-1 or pethidine 0.5 mg kg-1 given intravenously (i.v.). A blinded observer assessed recovery by Steward's method immediately after arrival at the post anaesthesia care unit (PACU), pain by validated Objective Pain Score (OPS) at 0 h, 1/2 h and 1 h after arrival at the PACU and PONV by Numeric Rank Score at specified time intervals. RESULTS: There were no differences in demographic data, anaesthesia time or surgery duration. Recovery scores, OPS and postoperative analgesic requirement were similar in both groups. PONV at various time intervals for the first 24 h, occurred more frequently in the pethidine group as compared to the ketorolac group (P < 0.001) There were no side effects observed with either drug. CONCLUSION: Ketorolac in a dose of 0.9 mg kg-1 i.v. at the induction of anaesthesia is as effective as pethidine 0.5 mg kg-1 i.v. as an analgesic and is associated with significantly less PONV.

Comparison of anti-emetic effects of ondansetron, metoclopromide or a combination of both in children undergoing surgery for strabismus.

This prospective, randomized and double-blinded study was designed to evaluate the anti-emetic efficacy of a combination of ondansetron and metoclopramide in 100 ASA physical status I and II children of either sex and 1-15 years of age undergoing elective surgery for strabismus. A standardized anaesthetic technique and post-operative analgesia were used for all the children. Children were divided into four groups. They received saline, metoclopromide 250 micrograms kg-1, ondansetron 150 micrograms kg-1 or a combination of metoclopramide 150 micrograms kg-1 and ondansetron 100 micrograms kg-1 intravenously immediately after the insertion of an intravenous cannulae. There were no differences between the groups in their age, gender, weight, duration of surgery, number of muscles subjected to surgery or intravenous fluids received. In the first 24 post-operative hours, 18 (72%) patients in the placebo group, 15 (60%) patients in the metoclopramide group, 10 (40%) patients in the ondansetron group and 11 (44%) patients in the combination group had nausea or vomiting. The overall incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting was significantly (P < 0.05) lower in the combination group and in the ondansetron group compared with the placebo group. Nine (36%) patients in both the placebo and the metoclopramide groups and one (4%) patient in the ondansetron group required rescue anti-emetic treatment. None of the patients in the combination group required rescue anti-emetic and this was significantly less (P < 0.01) when compared with the placebo and the metoclopramide groups. Recovery and sedation scores were comparable in all the four groups. A combination of metoclopramide 150 micrograms kg-1 and ondansetron 100 micrograms kg-1 administered prior to surgery was not found to be more effective than ondansetron 150 micrograms kg-1 alone for the prophylaxis of nausea and vomiting following surgical repair of strabismus in paediatric patients.

Effects of spinal anaesthesia on metabolic processes.

A study conducted at P.G.I., Chandigarh to find out the effect of spinal anaesthesia on arterial blood gases, blood glucose, and pyruvate-lactate during spinal anaesthesia. All patients received night sedation of oral diazepam in dose of 0.2 mg/kg body weight. No narcotic/antisialogogue premedication was given to any patient. All patients received spinal anaesthesia with 5% lignocaine (hyperbaric), in lateral position. All patients received normal saline intravenously as a maintenance fluid. Blood samples for the measurement of blood pyruvate, lactate levels and arterial blood gas analysis were collected preoperatively, 10 minutes after the administration of spinal anaesthesia after fixation of drug, and half hour after the end of operative procedure. Even though there was continued rise in blood sugar levels intraoperatively, which persisted in postoperative period, the values were within normal clinical range. Blood lactate levels and blood pyruvate levels remained unchanged. Hypocapnoea observed intra-operatively in our report is attributed to hyperventilation. There was 12.44% fall in bicarbonate level. (P > .001) which even though statistically significant did not alter the pH. We conclude that spinal anaesthesia up to T8 level does not affect the metabolic processes.

The influence of intrathecal fentanyl on the characteristics of subarachnoid block for caesarean section.

Forty healthy parturients scheduled for elective Caesarean section were randomly allocated to receive either 0.3 ml 0.9% saline (control group, n = 20), or 15 micrograms (0.3 ml) fentanyl (treatment group, n = 20) added to 2.5 ml 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine given intrathecally in the sitting position. A sensory block to T4 was achieved after 6.5 min in those who received fentanyl compared to 8.0 min in the control group; this was not significantly different. The highest level of sensory block achieved in both groups was similar. Ephedrine was required earlier (p < 0.05) in those who received fentanyl but the total requirement of ephedrine intra-operatively was similar. Fentanyl significantly improved the quality of intra-operative surgical anaesthesia as none of the patients in the treatment group complained of discomfort compared with seven in the control group (p < 0.05). Similarly those in the treatment group had better comfort scores as evaluated by visual analogue score (p < 0.01). Regression of anaesthesia to T12 took longer (184 vs 156 min, p < 0.05) in those who received fentanyl but this did not affect the total requirement of morphine in the first 24 h after operation. There was no difference in the incidence of side effects in the mother and no adverse effects were detected in the baby. The results indicate that adding 15 micrograms fentanyl to hyperbaric bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia markedly improves intra-operative anaesthesia for Caesarean section.

Prophylactic metoclopramide administered immediately after the induction of anesthesia has no effect on the incidence of postoperative emesis after strabismus surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of metoclopramide (0.25 mg/kg) administered IV immediately after induction of general anesthesia for the prevention of postoperative emesis in children undergoing, elective strabismus surgery. DESIGN: Double blind, randomized. SETTING: Operation-theater. SUBJECTS AND INTERVENTIONS: Seventy six non premedicated children of ASA class 1 and 2 were randomly allocated to receive either normal saline or metoclopramide immediately after the induction of general anesthesia. All children received a standardized similar anesthetic technique. Postoperative analgesia consisted of oral indomethacin. RESULTS: The incidence of postoperative emesis in the metoclopramide group was 60% versus 71% in a placebo group (p < 0.05). The incidence of severe emesis (2 or > 2 vomiting) was similar in the placebo group (34.20%) and metoclopramide group (21.05%). There were no adverse reactions like excessive sedation, extrapyramidal signs and hemodynamic depression in either placebo or metoclopramide group. CONCLUSIONS: Metoclopramide in a dose of 0.25 mg/kg administered intravenously prior to manipulation of eyeball is devoid of the effects but is not effective in preventing postoperative emesis in children undergoing strabismus surgery.