Profound Impact of Insurance Payor and Socioeconomic Status in Total Hip Arthroplasty Outcomes: Results From a High Volume Tertiary Care Center.

BACKGROUND: Dual eligible Medicare/Medicaid patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) have worse outcomes compared to other insurance payors. Prior literature fails to control for the heterogeneity of care provided amongst a large cohort of hospitals and surgeons as well as differences in patient populations treated. This study compares dual eligible THA patients and Medicaid and Medicare only THA patients at a single high volume tertiary center. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent THA for aseptic osteoarthritis of the hip over a three-year period with either Medicaid or Medicare insurance. 3,329 THA patients were included, of which 439 were Medicaid payor, 182 were dual eligible, and 2,708 were Medicare payor. Groups were compared using appropriate tests for direct comparisons and regression analysis. RESULTS: Dual eligible patients were less likely to be white and married, and were more likely to be current smokers and have COPD, liver disease, renal disease, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) compared to Medicare patients. These patients also had a lower age-adjusted Charleson Comorbidity Index when compared to Medicare patients (2.4 vs 3.4, P < .001). When controlling for smoking status, age, BMI and major medical comorbidities, dual eligible and Medicaid patients had increased length of stay (LOS) (0.58, 0.66 days, P < .001), higher risk of discharge to subacute rehabilitation (RR 1.97, 3.19, P < .001), and dual eligible patients more often returned to the ED within 90 days (RR 2.74, P < .001) compared to Medicare patients. CONCLUSION: This study supports the implementation of socioeconomic risk stratification efforts to properly evaluate value-based healthcare metrics in total hip arthroplasty patients.

Safely Implementing the Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Methodological Approach to Minimizing the Learning Curve.

INTRODUCTION: Orthopaedic surgeons often cite concern for a learning curve as a barrier to adopting the direct anterior approach (DAA) for total hip arthroplasty (THA) while transitioning from other approaches. Studies both assessing and describing a practical approach and strategy to safely accomplish this transition, as well as the effect on clinical outcomes, are not well described. METHODS: This prospective study compares a single surgeon's operative results and complications for the first consecutive 100 direct anterior THA to the last 100 consecutive posterior THA after 7 years in practice. The regimented and disciplined learning strategy used to implement the DAA is detailed in this study. The data were analyzed using univariate and multivariate regression models. RESULTS: Univariate analyses identified significant differences in sex, age, Asian race, and diagnostic cause for THA between the two cohorts. Multivariate analyses controlled for these differences and showed that relative to posterior THA, direct anterior THA cases were associated with 7-minute longer procedures (P = 0.002) and lengths of stay that were 0.7 days fewer (P = 0.013). No significant differences were present in the estimated blood loss, and importantly, no significant differences in death or surgical complication rates between cohorts. DISCUSSION: This study suggests that the DAA for THA can be safely implemented without the increased and adverse risk to the patient when a structured learning process is maintained and meticulously performed.

Discharge Home is Associated With Decreased Early Complications Following Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Primary total hip (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) volume has increased over the past decade. Patients discharged home (HD) have demonstrated improved postoperative outcomes compared with non-home discharge (NHD) patients. We reviewed trends in HD over the past decade and compared complication rates between HD and NHD primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA) patients. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was performed on TJA cases and patients were grouped by discharge type. Trends in the prevalence of HD were compared by chi-square test, from 2011 to 2016. Univariate and bivariate statistics were performed. Multivariate logistic and propensity score-matched analyses were used to control for confounding variables. RESULTS: During the 6-year review, HD increased significantly for THA (71.2% to 83.6%) and TKA (65.6% to 80.7%). Overall HD was 75.4% of THA and 71.0% of TKA patients. Propensity matching identified 16,580 THA pairs and 34,952 TKA pairs. Compared with NHD patients, HD patients had shorter operative times, were younger, and had shorter lengths of stay. Controlling for confounders, the HD patients had lower risk of death within 30 days, lower risk of major medical morbidity, decreased risk of reoperation, and decreased risk of readmission compared with NDH patients. Multivariate models demonstrated similar findings. CONCLUSION: HD in both THA and TKA independently predicts decreased early (30-day) postoperative complications after controlling for confounding variables. Given the improved outcomes, we advocate for continued emphasis on HD rather than NHD when clinically appropriate.

Developing Sustainable Orthopaedic Care in Northern Tanzania: An International Collaboration.

There is a devastating lack of access to surgical care, including orthopaedic surgery, in low- and middle-income countries. Similar to other low- and middle-income countries, Tanzania has a severe shortage of trained orthopaedic surgeons. The surgeons available are inundated with acute trauma care and musculoskeletal infections; elective procedures are infrequently performed and the burden of neglected care continues to rise annually. Over the past several years, our interdisciplinary team of both American and Tanzanian members has worked to understand the current local cultural and economic barriers to increasing surgical capacity, ensuring surgical safety, delivering affordable care, providing adequate patient follow-up, and improving surgical education. We propose a new paradigm for the delivery of musculoskeletal care and creation of sustained surgical capacity in this setting by building an Orthopaedic Center of Excellence in Moshi, Tanzania, augmented by international partner institutions year-round. This initiative is a public-private partnership led by the University of Pennsylvania in conjunction with Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Center. A growing number of contributors, including the Tanzanian Health Ministry, several universities, and industry partners, including general electric (GE) Health Care Africa, are currently helping to advance this concept into reality. Through our model, we aim to increase surgical capacity and quality, as well as enhance local surgical education, with the ultimate objective of training the next generation of African surgeons in the latest surgical techniques and equipment.