Coronary microvascular dysfunction in patients with Takotsubo syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The pathophysiology of Takotsubo syndrome (TTS) remains incompletely understood. While coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is a potential pathophysiologic mechanism, evidence is limited. OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate CMD in patients with TTS. METHODS: Consecutive patients diagnosed with TTS were included and underwent coronary angiography with invasive microvascular function evaluation, including fractional flow reserve, Coronary Flow Reserve (CFR), Index of Microcirculatory Resistance (IMR), and Resistive Reserve Ratio (RRR). Patients had an echocardiography evaluation during their index admission and at approximately 6 weeks. RESULTS: Thirty patients were included (mean age 74 ±9, 90 % female). Twenty-five patients (83 %) had at least one abnormal coronary microvascular function parameter. Abnormal parameters included CFR<2.5 in 20 patients (67 %), IMR>25 in 18 patients (60 %), and RRR<3.5 in 25 (83 %). Longer time from symptoms to angiography correlated with a higher CFR (r = 0.51, P<0.01), and had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.793 (95 % CI 0.60-0.98) for pathologic CFR. Patients with emotional trigger had a lower rate of pathologic IMR compared with non-emotional trigger (36 % vs 81 %, p = 0.01). Follow up echocardiography performed at a median of 1.5 months (IQR 1.15-6) showed an improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction for all patients (from mean of 40 % to 57 %). CONCLUSION: CMD was present in most patients with TTS. The role of microvascular function in TTS may vary according to the clinical presentation and RRR may be more sensitive for the diagnosis of CMD in TTS.

Exercise limitation in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: combined stress echocardiography and cardiopulmonary exercise test.

AIMS: The study aims to investigate exercise-limiting factors in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) using combined stress echocardiography and cardiopulmonary exercise test. METHODS AND RESULTS: A symptom-limited ramp bicycle exercise test was performed in the semi-supine position on a tilting dedicated ergometer. Echocardiographic images were obtained concurrently with gas exchange measurements along predefined stages of exercise. Oxygen extraction was calculated using the Fick equation at each activity level. Thirty-six HCM patients (mean age 67 ± 6 years, 72% men, 18 obstructive HCM) were compared with age and sex-matched 29 controls. At rest, compared with controls, E/E' ratio (6.26 ± 2.3 vs. 14 ± 2.5, P < 0.001) and systolic pulmonary artery pressures (SPAP) (22.6 ± 3.4 vs. 34 ± 6.2 mmHg, P = 0.023) were increased. Along with the stages of exercise (unloaded; anaerobic threshold; peak), diastolic function worsened (E/e' 8.9 ± 2.6 vs. 13.8 ± 3.6 P = 0.011; 9.4 ± 2.3 vs. 18.6 ± 3.3 P = 0.001; 8.7 ± 1.9 vs. 21.5 ± 4, P < 0.001), SPAP increased (23 ± 2.7 vs. 33 ± 4.4, P = 0.013; 26 ± 3.2 vs. 40 ± 2.9, P < 0.001; 26 ± 3.5 vs. 45 ± 7 mmHg, P < 0.001), and oxygen consumption (6.6 ± 1.7 vs. 6.8 ± 1.6, P = 0.86; 18.1 ± 2.2 vs. 14.6 ± 1.5, P = 0.008; 20.3 ± 3 vs. 15.1 ± 2.1 mL/kg/min, P = 0.01) was reduced. Oxygen pulse was blunted (6.3 ± 1.8 vs. 6.2 ± 1.9, P = 0.79; 10 ± 2.1 vs. 8.8 ± 1.6, P = 0.063; 12.2 ± 2 vs. 8.2 ± 2.3 mL/beat, P = 0.002) due to an insufficient increase in both stroke volume (92.3 ± 17 vs. 77.3 ± 14.5 P = 0.021; 101 ± 19.1 vs. 87.3 ± 15.7 P = 0.06; 96.5 ± 12.2 vs. 83.6 ± 16.1 mL, P = 0.034) and oxygen extraction (0.07 ± 0.03 vs. 0.07 ± 0.02, P = 0.47; 0.13 ± 0.02 vs. 0.10 ± 0.03, P = 0.013; 0.13 ± 0.03 vs. 0.11 ± 0.03, P = 0.03). Diastolic dysfunction, elevated SPAP, and the presence of atrial fibrillation were associated with reduced exercise capacity. CONCLUSIONS: Both central and peripheral cardiovascular limitations are involved in exercise intolerance in HCM. Diastolic dysfunction seems to be the main driver for this limitation.

Traditional Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction in Women and Men: A Single-Center Study.

INTRODUCTION: Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is common in patients with and without obstructive epicardial coronary artery disease (CAD). Risk factors for the development of CMD have not been fully elucidated, and data regarding sex-associated differences in traditional cardiovascular risk factors for obstructive CAD in patients with CMD are lacking. METHODS: In this single-center, prospective registry, we enrolled patients with nonobstructive CAD undergoing clinically indicated invasive assessment of coronary microvascular function between November 2019 and March 2023. Associations between coronary microvascular dysfunction, traditional cardiovascular risk factors, and sex were assessed using univariate and multivariate regression models. RESULTS: Overall, 245 patients with nonobstructive CAD were included in the analysis (62.9% female; median age 68 (interquartile range: 59, 75). Microvascular dysfunction was diagnosed in 141 patients (57.5%). The prevalence of microvascular dysfunction was similar in women and men (59.0% vs. 57.0%; p = 0.77). No association was found between traditional risk factors for coronary atherosclerosis and CMD regardless of whether CMD was structural or functional. In women, but not in men, older age and the presence of previous ischemic heart disease were associated with lower coronary flow reserve (ß = -0.29; p < 0.01 and ß = -0.15; p = 0.05, respectively) and lower resistive reserve ratio (ß = -0.28; p < 0.01 and ß = -0.17; p = 0.04, respectively). CONCLUSION: For the entire population, no association was found between coronary microvascular dysfunction and traditional risk factors for coronary atherosclerosis. In women only, older age and previous ischemic heart disease were associated with coronary microvascular dysfunction. Larger studies are needed to elucidate risk factors for CMD.

Smoking and Respiratory Diseases in Patients with Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Coronary microvascular disease (CMD) is common in patients with and without obstructive coronary artery disease, and is associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Respiratory-related variables are associated with pulmonary and systemic microvascular dysfunction, while evidence about their relationship with CMD is limited. We aim to evaluate respiratory-related variables as risk factors of CMD. METHODS: This is an observational, single-center study enrolling consecutive patients undergoing invasive evaluation of coronary microvascular function in the catheterization laboratory. Patients with evidence of obstructive coronary artery disease or with missing data were excluded. Associations between respiratory-related variables and indices of CMD were assessed using univariate and multivariate regression models. RESULTS: Overall, 266 patients (mean age 67 ± 11 years, 59% females) were included in the current analysis. Of those, 155 (58%) had evidence of CMD. Among the respiratory variables, independent predictors of CMD were current smoking (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 2.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-5; P = .01) and obstructive sleep apnea (AOR 5.7; 95% CI, 1.2-26; P = .03), while chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was not. Among ever-smokers, higher smoking pack-years was an independent risk factor for CMD (median 35 vs 25 pack-years, AOR 1.09; 95% CI, 1.04-1.13; P < .01), and was associated with higher rates of pathologic index of microcirculatory resistance and resistive reserve ratio. CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing invasive coronary microvascular evaluation, current smoking and obstructive sleep apnea are independently associated with CMD. Among smokers, higher pack-years is a strong predictor for CMD. Our findings should raise awareness for prevention and possible treatment options.

The Mechanism of Effort Intolerance in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease: A Combined Stress Echocardiography and Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test.

AIM: We used a combined stress echocardiography and cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) to explore effort intolerance in peripheral arterial disease (PAD) patients. METHODS: Twenty-three patients who had both PAD and coronary artery disease (CAD) were compared with twenty-four sex- and age-matched CAD patients and fifteen normal controls using a symptom-limited ramp bicycle CPET on a tilting dedicated ergometer. Echocardiographic images were obtained concurrently with gas exchange measurements along predefined stages of exercise. Oxygen extraction was calculated using the Fick equation at each activity level. RESULTS: Along the stages of exercise (unloaded; anaerobic threshold; peak), in PAD + CAD patients compared with CAD or controls, diastolic function worsened (p = 0.051 and p = 0.013, respectively), and oxygen consumption (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively) and oxygen pulse (p = 0.0024 and p = 0.0027, respectively) were reduced. Notably, oxygen pulse was blunted due to an insufficient increase in both stroke volume (p = 0.025 and p = 0.028, respectively) and peripheral oxygen extraction (p = 0.031 and p = 0.038, respectively). Chronotropic incompetence was more prevalent in PAD patients and persisted after correction for beta-blocker use (62% vs. 42% and 11%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In PAD patients, exercise limitation is associated with diastolic dysfunction, chronotropic incompetence and peripheral factors.

Cardiologic Manifestations in Omicron-Type Versus Wild-Type COVID-19: A Systematic Echocardiographic Study.

Background Information about the cardiac manifestations of the Omicron variant of COVID-19 is limited. We performed a systematic prospective echocardiographic evaluation of consecutive patients hospitalized with the Omicron variant of COVID-19 infection and compared them with similarly recruited patients were propensity matched with the wild-type variant. Methods and Results A total of 162 consecutive patients hospitalized with Omicron COVID-19 underwent complete echocardiographic evaluation within 24 hours of admission and were compared with propensity-matched patients with the wild-type variant (148 pairs). Echocardiography included left ventricular (LV) systolic and diastolic, right ventricular (RV), strain, and hemodynamic assessment. Echocardiographic parameters during acute infection were compared with historic exams in 62 patients with the Omicron variant and 19 patients with the wild-type variant who had a previous exam within 1 year. Of the patients, 85 (53%) had a normal echocardiogram. The most common cardiac pathology was RV dilatation and dysfunction (33%), followed by elevated LV filling pressure (E/e' ≥14, 29%) and LV systolic dysfunction (ejection fraction <50%, 10%). Compared with the matched wild-type cohort, patients with Omicron had smaller RV end-systolic areas (9.3±4 versus 12.3±4 cm2; P=0.0003), improved RV function (RV fractional-area change, 53.2%±10% versus 39.7%±13% [P<0.0001]; RV S', 12.0±3 versus 10.7±3 cm/s [P=0.001]), and higher stroke volume index (35.6 versus 32.5 mL/m2; P=0.004), all possibly related to lower mean pulmonary pressure (34.6±12 versus 41.1±14 mm Hg; P=0.0001) and the pulmonary vascular resistance index (P=0.0003). LV systolic or diastolic parameters were mostly similar to the wild-type variant-matched cohort apart from larger LV size. However, in patients who had a previous echocardiographic exam, these LV abnormalities were recorded before acute Omicron infection, but not in the wild-type cohort. Numerous echocardiographic parameters were associated with higher in-hospital mortality (LV ejection fraction, stroke volume index, E/e', RV S'). Conclusions In patients with Omicron, RV function is impaired to a lower extent compared with the wild-type variant, possibly related to the attenuated pulmonary parenchymal and/or vascular disease. LV systolic and diastolic abnormalities are as common as in the wild-type variant but were usually recorded before acute infection and probably reflect background cardiac morbidity. Numerous LV and RV abnormalities are associated with adverse outcome in patients with Omicron.

Systematic lung ultrasound in Omicron-type vs. wild-type COVID-19.

AIMS: Preliminary data suggested that patients with Omicron-type-Coronavirus-disease-2019 (COVID-19) have less severe lung disease compared with the wild-type-variant. We aimed to compare lung ultrasound (LUS) parameters in Omicron vs. wild-type COVID-19 and evaluate their prognostic implications. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-two consecutive patients with Omicron-type-COVID-19 underwent LUS within 48 h of admission and were compared with propensity-matched wild-type patients (148 pairs). In the Omicron patients median, first and third quartiles of the LUS-score was 5 [2-12], and only 9% had normal LUS. The majority had either mild (≤5; 37%) or moderate (6-15; 39%), and 15% (≥15) had severe LUS-score. Thirty-six percent of patients had patchy pleural thickening (PPT). Factors associated with LUS-score in the Omicron patients included ischaemic-heart-disease, heart failure, renal-dysfunction, and C-reactive protein. Elevated left-filling pressure or right-sided pressures were associated with the LUS-score. Lung ultrasound-score was associated with mortality [odds ratio (OR): 1.09, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01-1.18; P = 0.03] and with the combined endpoint of mortality and respiratory failure (OR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.07-1.22; P < 0.0001). Patients with the wild-type variant had worse LUS characteristics than the matched Omicron-type patients (PPT: 90 vs. 34%; P < 0.0001 and LUS-score: 8 [5, 12] vs. 5 [2, 10], P = 0.004), irrespective of disease severity. When matched only to the 31 non-vaccinated Omicron patients, these differences were attenuated. CONCLUSION: Lung ultrasound-score is abnormal in the majority of hospitalized Omicron-type patients. Patchy pleural thickening is less common than in matched wild-type patients, but the difference is diminished in the non-vaccinated Omicron patients. Nevertheless, even in this milder form of the disease, the LUS-score is associated with poor in-hospital outcomes.

Rapid 8-Zone Lung Ultrasound Protocol is Comparable to a Full 12-Zone Protocol for Outcome Prediction in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients.

OBJECTIVES: Safety precautions limit the clinical assessment of hospitalized Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. The minimal exposure required to perform lung ultrasound (LUS) paired with its high accuracy, reproducibility, and availability make it an attractive solution for initial assessment of COVID-19 patients. We aim to evaluate whether the association between sonographic findings and clinical outcomes among COVID 19 patients is comparable between the validated 12-zone protocol and a shorter, 8-zone protocol, in which the posterior lung regions are omitted. METHODS: One hundred and one COVID-19 patients hospitalized in a dedicated COVID-19 ward in a tertiary referral hospital were examined upon admission and scored by 2 LUS protocols. The association between the scores and a composite outcome consisting of death, transfer to the intensive care unit (ICU) or initiation of invasive or noninvasive mechanical ventilation was estimated and compared. RESULTS: LUS scores in both the 8- and the 12-zone protocols were associated with the composite outcome during hospitalization (hazard ratio [HR] 1.21 [1.03-1.42, P = .022] and HR 1.13 [1.01-1.27, P = .037], respectively). The observed difference in the discriminatory ROC-AUC values for the 8- and 12-zone scores was not significant (0.767 and 0.754 [P = .647], respectively). CONCLUSION: A short 8-zone LUS protocol is as accurate as the previously validated, 12-zone protocol for prognostication of clinical deterioration in nonventilated COVID-19 patients.