Public Health Dashboards in Overdose Prevention: The Rhode Island Approach to Public Health Data Literacy, Partnerships, and Action.

As the field of public health rises to the demands of real-time surveillance and rapid data-sharing needs in a postpandemic world, it is time to examine our approaches to the dissemination and accessibility of such data. Distinct challenges exist when working to develop a shared public health language and narratives based on data. It requires that we assess our understanding of public health data literacy, revisit our approach to communication and engagement, and continuously evaluate our impact and relevance. Key stakeholders and cocreators are critical to this process and include people with lived experience, community organizations, governmental partners, and research institutions. In this viewpoint paper, we offer an instructive approach to the tools we used, assessed, and adapted across 3 unique overdose data dashboard projects in Rhode Island, United States. We are calling this model the "Rhode Island Approach to Public Health Data Literacy, Partnerships, and Action." This approach reflects the iterative lessons learned about the improvement of data dashboards through collaboration and strong partnerships across community members, state agencies, and an academic research team. We will highlight key tools and approaches that are accessible and engaging and allow developers and stakeholders to self-assess their goals for their data dashboards and evaluate engagement with these tools by their desired audiences and users.

Comprehensive testing and rapid dissemination of local drug supply surveillance data in Rhode Island.

BACKGROUND: The North American overdose crisis has continued at unprecedented rates with more than 100,000 overdose deaths estimated to have occurred in the United States in 2022. Regional variations in overdose rates signify differences in local drug supplies. State-level drug supply surveillance systems have been limited in their ability to document and communicate the rapidly changing drug supplies which can hinder harm reduction efforts at the community level. We sought to address by piloting a two-year, community-engaged local drug supply surveillance program in Rhode Island (RI). METHODS: The first set of samples (n = 125) were collected from May 2022 to January 2023 across RI and included used paraphernalia (e.g., cookers), refuse (e.g., baggies), and product. Samples were tested using comprehensive toxicology testing approaches via liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC-QTOF-MS). Results were disseminated to participants and the broader public across platforms. RESULTS: Fentanyl was detected in 67.2% of all samples tested. 39.2% (n = 49) of samples were expected to be fentanyl. Xylazine was detected in 41.6% of all samples-always in combination with fentanyl-and no samples were expected to contain xylazine. In expected stimulant samples (n = 39), 10% contained fentanyl and/or analogues as major substances and 30.8% contained trace amounts of fentanyl and/or analogues. In expected stimulant samples, 15.4% contained xylazine with fentanyl. No opioids or benzodiazepines were detected in expected hallucinogen or dissociative samples (n = 7). In expected benzodiazepine samples (n = 8), no opioids were detected. CONCLUSIONS: Our results describe part of the local drug supply in Rhode Island, including a presence of NPS and adulterants (e.g., designer benzodiazepines, xylazine). Importantly, our findings underscore the feasibility of developing a community-driven drug supply surveillance database. Expanding drug supply surveillance initiatives is imperative for improving the health and safety of people who use drugs and informing public health approaches to addressing the overdose crisis.

Association of medical cannabis licensure with prescription opioid receipt: A population-based, individual-level retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The endocannabinoid system has been implicated in physiological processes fundamental to pain, giving plausibility to the hypothesis that cannabis may be used as a substitute or complement to prescription opioids in the management of chronic pain. We examined the association of medical cannabis licensure with likelihood of prescription opioid receipt using administrative records. METHODS: This study linked registry information for medical cannabis licensure with records from the prescription drug monitoring program from April 1, 2016 to March 31, 2019 to create a population-based, retrospective cohort in Rhode Island. We examined within-person changes in receipt of any opioid prescription and receipt of an opioid prescription with a morphine equivalent dose of 50 mg or more, and of 90 mg or more. RESULTS: The sample included 5,296 participants with medical cannabis license. Medical cannabis licensure was not associated with the odds of filling any opioid prescription (OR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.94-0.1.05) or the odds of filling a prescription with a morphine equivalent dose of 50 mg or more (OR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.84-1.04) and 90 mg or more (OR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.86-1.15). CONCLUSION: Medical cannabis licensure was not associated with subsequent cessation and reduction in prescription opioid use. Re-scheduling of cannabis will allow for the conduct of randomized controlled trials to determine the efficacy of medical cannabis as an alternative to prescription opioid use or a complement to the use of lower doses of prescription opioids in patients with chronic pain.