Incomplete bowel obstruction caused by sigmoid colon cancer in an inguinal hernia: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Most colon cancers that develop in the intestinal tract within the inguinal hernia sac are identified by incarceration. However, treatment methods for these cases vary depending on the pathology. Cases showing perforation or abscess formation require emergency surgery for infection control, while cases with no infection generally involve oncological resection, with laparoscopic surgery also being an option. We encountered a case of Incomplete bowel obstruction secondary to sigmoid colon cancer within the hernial sac. We report the process leading to the selection of the treatment method and the surgical technique, along with a review of the literature. CASE PRESENTATION: A 79-year-old man presented to our hospital complaining of a left inguinal bulge (hernia) and pain in the same area. The patient had the hernia for more than 20 years. Using computed tomography, we diagnosed an incomplete bowel obstruction caused by a tumor of the intestinal tract within the hernial sac. Since imaging examination showed no signs of strangulation or perforation, we decided to perform elective surgery after a definitive diagnosis. After colonoscopy, we diagnosed sigmoid colon cancer with extra-serosal invasion; however, we could not insert a colorectal tube. Although we proposed sigmoid resection and temporary ileostomy, we chose the open Hartmann procedure because the patient wanted a single surgery. For the hernia, we simultaneously used the Iliopubic Tract Repair method, which does not require a mesh. Eight months after the surgery, no recurrence of cancer or hernia was observed. CONCLUSIONS: We report a case of advanced sigmoid colon cancer with a long-standing inguinal hernia that later became incomplete bowel obstruction. Although previous studies have used various approaches among the available surgical methods for cancer within the hernial sac, such as inguinal incision, laparotomy, and laparoscopic surgery, most hernias are repaired during the initial surgery using a non-mesh method. For patients with inguinal hernias that have become difficult to treat, the complications of malignancy should be taken into consideration and the treatment option should be chosen according to the pathophysiology.

Clinicopathological Features of Remnant Gastric Cancer After Gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Remnant gastric cancer (RGC) encompasses all cancers arising from the remnant stomach. Various studies have reported on RGC and its prognosis, but no consensus on its surgical treatment and postoperative management has been reached. Moreover, the correlation between the clinicopathological characteristics and long-term outcomes of RGC remains unclear. This study investigated the clinicopathological factors associated with the long-term survival of RGC patients. METHODS: The medical records (March 1993-September 2020) of 104 RGC patients from Tokyo Medical University Hospital database were analyzed. Of these 104 patients, the medical records of 63 patients who underwent surgical curative resection were analyzed using R. Kaplan-Meier plots of cumulative incidence of RGC were made. Differences in survival rates were compared using the log-rank test. Prognostic factors were analyzed using multivariate Cox regression analysis (P < .05). RESULTS: Of the 104 RGC patients, 63 underwent total remnant stomach excision. The median time from the first surgery to the total excision was 10 years. The 5-year survival rate of the 63 RGC patients was .55 ((95% CI); .417-.671). The clinicopathological factors that were significantly associated with the long-term outcome of the RGC patients were tumor diameter (≥3.5 cm), presence or absence of combined resection of multiple organs, tumor invasion (deeper than T2), TNM stage, and postoperative morbidity. The multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that tumor invasion depth was the only independent prognostic factor for RGC patients [HR (95% CI): 5.49 (2.629-11.5), P ≤ .005]. CONCLUSIONS: Among prognostic factors, tumor invasion depth was the only independent factor affecting RGC's long-term outcome.

Should the splenic hilar lymph node be dissected for the management of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction?

BACKGROUND: Splenic hilar lymphadenectomy is not recommended for advanced proximal gastric cancer that does not invade the greater curvature according to the results of the previous studies. The efficacy of splenic hilar lymphadenectomy for type II and type III adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction and easy spread to the greater curvature of the stomach remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of splenic hilar lymphadenectomy and identify the risk factors for metastasis to splenic hilar nodes. METHODS: We examined patients who underwent R0/1 gastrectomy for Siewert types II and III at a single high-volume center in Japan. We analyzed the metastatic incidence, therapeutic value index, and risk factors for splenic hilar lymph node metastasis. RESULTS: We examined 126 patients (74, type II; 52, type III). Splenectomy was performed in 76 patients. Metastatic incidence and the therapeutic value index of splenic hilar lymph nodes in patients with type II and type III tumors were 4.5% and 0, and 21.9% and 9.4, respectively. In the patients who underwent splenectomy, we identified Siewert type III tumors (odds ratio: 6.93, 95% confidence interval: 1.24-38.8, p = 0.027) and tumor location other than the lesser curvature (odds ratio: 7.36, 95% confidence interval: 1.32-41.1, p = 0.023) to be independent risk factors. The metastatic incidence (46.2%) and therapeutic value index (15.4) were high in patients with both risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Splenic hilar lymphadenectomy may contribute to the survival of patients with Siewert type III tumors, especially when the predominant location is not the lesser curvature.

Use of Polyglycolic Acid Sheets for the Prevention of Pancreatic Fistula after Laparoscopic Gastrectomy: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) indications have been extended to advanced gastric cancer requiring expansive lymph node dissection. Despite the huge benefits of this minimally invasive surgery, major complications such as postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) remain a concern. With technical advances in surgical procedures, the treatment outcomes of gastric cancer surgery have improved. However, effective methods for preventing POPF have not yet been established. Herein, we examined the usefulness of polyglycolic acid (PGA) sheets for preventing POPF after LG. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed 142 patients who underwent curative LG at our institution between January 2017 and August 2022. The 142 patients were divided into 2 groups; PGA group (n = 61): the site of lymph node dissection at the superior margin of the pancreas and pancreatic head was covered with PGA sheets, and nPGA group (n = 81): the site was not covered. We retrospectively compared the short-term surgical outcomes including POPF incidence. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the background factors between the 2 groups and in the incidence of Grade II or higher postoperative complications according to the Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification. However, the incidence of CD Grade II or higher POPF was significantly lower in the PGA group than in the nPGA group (.0% vs 2.3%, respectively, P = .007). CONCLUSIONS: There was no POPF in any of the 61 patients in the PGA group. This outcome suggests that POPF incidence may be reduced by covering the lymph node dissection site with PGA sheets after LG.

Clinical Impact of Surgical Sarcopenia on Long-term Survival.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Preoperative sarcopenia is associated with various cancers and affects the long-term prognosis of patients. After gastrectomy for gastric cancer, dynamic changes in body composition occur, and sarcopenia becomes more apparent after surgery than before surgery. However, the relationship between sarcopenia in the early postoperative period and long-term survival is not fully understood. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of surgical sarcopenia on long-term outcomes of patents with gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included 408 patients who underwent curative gastrectomy (distal or total gastrectomy) for gastric cancer at the Kanagawa Cancer Center from December 2013 to November 2017. Sarcopenia was defined using the skeletal muscle index (SMI), using computed tomography (CT) one month after gastrectomy. We compared the long-term outcomes between patients with and without sarcopenia. RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 83.2% and 91.4% in the surgical and non-surgical sarcopenia groups, respectively. The hazard ratio (HR) of surgical sarcopenia for OS was 2.410 (95% confidence interval (CI)=1.321-4.396). In addition, surgical sarcopenia was associated with non-cancer-related deaths and deaths from other cancers. CONCLUSION: Patients with surgical sarcopenia after gastrectomy should be carefully monitored not only for gastric cancer recurrence but also for the occurrence of other diseases, including other cancers.

Feasibility and Safety of Oral Nutritional Supplementation with High-Density Liquid Diet After Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Patients requiring total gastrectomy for gastric cancer experience a decrease in food intake leading to severe body weight loss after surgery. This loss may be prevented using a high-density liquid diet of high caloric content and minimal volume. This phase II study evaluated the feasibility and safety of a high-density liquid diet (UpLead®; Terumo Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) after total gastrectomy. METHODS: UpLead® (1 pack, 100 mL, 400 kcal/day) was administered after surgery for 28 days. The primary endpoint was the % relative dose intensity of 28 days of UpLead intake®. The secondary endpoint was % body weight loss at 1 and 3 months after surgery. The sample size was 35 considering expected and threshold values of 80 and 60%, respectively, with a one-sided alpha error of 10% and statistical power of 80%. RESULTS: Among 35 patients enrolled before surgery between April 2018 and December 2019, 29 patients who could initiate UpLead® after surgery were analyzed. Seven patients had interrupted UpLead® intake due to taste intolerance (n = 6) and due to a duodenal stump fistula (n = 1). The remaining 22 patients completed 28 days of UpLead® intake, including temporary interruption, with no associated adverse events. The median relative dose intensity was 25.8% (95% confidence interval: 20.6-42.0%). The median body weight loss at 1 and 3 months after surgery was 7.2% (range: 3.2-13.9%) and 13.1% (range: 2.5-20.4%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Oral nutritional supplementation with a high-density liquid diet (UpLead®) was safely administered but was not feasible after total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Clinical trial registration number UMIN000032291.

Long-term surgical outcomes of gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma and mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms.

BACKGROUND: Neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) and mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm (MiNEN) are extremely rare subtypes of gastric cancer. MiNEN is a mix of carcinomatous components and neuroendocrine neoplasm in the same lesion. NEC and MiNEN have a poor prognosis, are difficult to diagnose, and have no established treatment. Herein, we assessed the clinicopathological characteristics and long-term surgical outcomes of gastric NEC and MiNEN patients in our hospital. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed 1538 patients pathologically diagnosed with gastric cancer and who underwent curative surgical resection at our institution between January 1999 and October 2021. Of these patients, 25 (1.6%) were pathologically diagnosed with neuroendocrine neoplasms. From these 25 patients, we retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathological characteristics and surgical outcomes of 13 (0.8%) patients pathologically diagnosed with NEC or MiNEN. RESULTS: The NEC and MiNEN patients consisted of 11 men and 2 women [mean age, 74 (62-84) years]. The preoperative histological diagnoses were NEC (n = 4) and adenocarcinoma (n = 9). The final pathological diagnoses were large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC; n = 7) and MiNEN (n = 6). Total gastrectomy was the most common surgical procedure (9/13, 69.2%), followed by distal gastrectomy (3/13, 23.1%) and proximal gastrectomy (1/13, 7.7%). Immunohistochemical staining showed 8 CD56-positive patients. All 13 patients were positive for chromogranin A and synaptophysin. The mean Ki-67 value was 64.8 (0-95)%, and the mean mitotic score was 107.9 (0-400). Nine patients survived without recurrence postresection. The median postresection overall survival time was 68.7 (8.0-129) months. The 5-year survival rate was 0.75 ([95% CI] 0.408-0.912). CONCLUSION: The surgical treatment outcomes of NEC and MiNEN patients were relatively favorable. Although evidence concerning the effectiveness of surgery alone is meager, radical resection as part of multidisciplinary treatment including chemotherapy can potentially improve prognosis.

The Glasgow Prognostic Score Before Curative Resection May Predict Postoperative Complications in Patients with Gastric Cancer.

PURPOSE: Despite improvements in surgical techniques and devices and perioperative care of gastric cancer (GC), the rate of postoperative complications still has not decreased. If patients at high risk for postoperative complications could be identified early using biomarkers, these complications might be reduced. In this study, we investigated usefulness of the preoperative Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) as a predictive factor for complications after surgery in patients with stage II/III GC. METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of 424 patients who underwent curative surgery for pathological stage II/III GC from February 2007 to July 2019 at a single center. The GPS was assessed within 4 days before surgery. To identify independent risk factors for postoperative complications, univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using a Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: The numbers of patients with a GPS of 0, 1, and 2 were 357, 55, and 12, respectively. The rate of complications after surgery was significantly higher among patients with a GPS of 1 or 2 than among patients with a GPS of 0 (p = 0.008). Multivariate analysis identified a GPS of 1 or 2 as an independent predictive factor for postoperative complications (p = 0.037). CONCLUSION: The preoperative GPS may be a useful predictive factor for postoperative complications in patients with stage II/III GC. Being aware of the risk of complications after surgery as indicated by the GPS before surgery may promote safe and minimally invasive surgery that we expect will improve outcomes in patients with a GPS of 1 or 2.

Preoperative Utility of the Glasgow Prognostic Score on Outcomes of Patients with Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer.

PURPOSE: To assess the utility of the Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) obtained before curative resection for predicting outcomes in patients with advanced gastric cancer (GC). METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of 337 consecutive patients with GC who underwent curative surgery for locally advanced gastric cancer between January 2003 and June 2014. GPS was assessed within 4 days prior to surgery. RESULTS: The number of patients with GPS scores of 0, 1, and 2 was 302, 26, and 9, respectively. There was significantly more blood loss during surgery and more postoperative complications in the GPS 1/2 group than in the GPS 0 group. Patients in the GPS 1/2 group had significantly poorer overall survival than those in the GPS 0 group (p = 0.001). On multivariate analysis, GPS 1/2 was identified as an independent factor for poor survival (p = 0.019). CONCLUSION: GPS before curative resection might be a useful predictive factor for perioperative complications and survival in locally advanced GC.

Comparison of the Dietary Intake Loss Between Total and Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The changes of dietary intake (DI) after gastrectomy have not been objectively reported. It has not been clear how much DI loss is experienced after total gastrectomy (TG) in comparison to after distal gastrectomy (DG). This study quantified the changes of DI after gastrectomy, and clarified how much DI loss is experienced after TG. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective observational study. Patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer were enrolled. The DI loss was evaluated at 1 and 3 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients underwent TG, and 117 patients underwent DG. The median %DI loss of the overall study population at 1 and 3 months after surgery was -9.3% and -3.6%. The median %DI loss at 1 and 3 months postoperatively was -15.6% and -5.3% in TG group, -8.9% and -3.3% in DG group (p=0.10 and 0.49, respectively). CONCLUSION: The patients experienced DI loss of approximately 10% at 1 month after gastrectomy. Patients who received TG tended to show a greater %DI loss at 1 month postoperatively.

Prognostic Factors for Gastric Cancer Patients With One Stage IV Factor who Underwent Conversion Surgery.

BACKGROUND/AIM: To identify prognostic factors for patients with stage IV gastric cancer (GC) and a single stage IV factor before chemotherapy who underwent conversion surgery (R0 resection). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study retrospectively analysed 32 GC patients with a single stage IV factor before chemotherapy and who underwent conversion surgery (R0 resection) between January 2001 and September 2015. The univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify independent prognostic factors. RESULTS: The five-year survival rate was 39.6%, and the median survival time was 47.0 months. In the univariate analysis, diffuse-type according to Lauren classification was significantly associated with worse overall survival (p<0.001). In the multivariate analysis, diffuse-type was selected as an independent prognostic factor (hazard ratio=15.970, 95% confidence interval=3.804-67.043, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Diffuse-type may be a useful prognostic factor in GC patients with a single stage IV factor who undergo conversion surgery (R0 resection).

Is sufficient experience performing open gastrectomies necessary to start laparoscopic distal gastrectomy training?

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic gastrectomy has become a standard procedure for treatment of gastric cancer, and hence, the opportunity for trainees to perform open gastrectomies may decrease. We investigated whether laparoscopic distal gastrectomy, performed by surgical trainees without sufficient experience performing open gastrectomies, was feasible and safe. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We compared short-term outcomes in patients when laparoscopic distal gastrectomies were performed by experienced trainees (ET group; n = 124) and inexperienced trainees (IT group; n = 98) from 2013 to 2019. RESULTS: The operation time was significantly shorter in the ET group (median time: 253 minutes vs 286 minutes, P < 0.001). The incidence of grade ≥ 2 postoperative complications did not differ significantly between the groups. In the multivariate analysis, experience performing open gastrectomies was not an independent predictor of postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic distal gastrectomies performed by trainees, with insufficient experience performing open gastrectomies, are as feasible and safe as that performed by ET.

Association Between Lymph Node Ratio and Survival in Patients with Pathological Stage II/III Gastric Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Lymph node ratio (LNR), defined as the ratio of metastatic nodes to the total number of examined lymph nodes, has been proposed as a sensitive prognostic factor in patients with gastric cancer (GC). We investigate its association with survival in pathological stage (pStage) II/III GC and explore whether this is a prognostic factor in each Union for International Cancer Control pStage (7th edition). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively examined 838 patients with pStage II/III GC who underwent curative gastrectomy between June 2000 and December 2018. Patients were classified into low-LNR (L-LNR), middle-LNR (M-LNR), and high-LNR (H-LNR) groups according to adjusted X-tile cutoff values of 0.1 and 0.25 for LNR, and their clinicopathological characteristics and survival rates were compared. RESULTS: The 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) rates postsurgery showed significant differences among the groups (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that LNR was a significant predictor of poor RFS [M-LNR: hazard ratio (HR) 3.128, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.254-4.342, P < 0.001; H-LNR: HR 5.148, 95% CI 3.546-7.474, P < 0.001] and OS (M-LNR: HR 2.749, 95% CI 2.038-3.708, P < 0.001; H-LNR: HR 4.654, 95% CI 3.288-6.588, P < 0.001). On subset analysis stratified by pStage, significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of the RFS curves of pStage II and III GC (P < 0.001 and < 0.001, respectively) and OS curves of pStage II and III GC (P = 0.001 and < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: High LNR is a predictor of worse prognosis in pStage II/III GC, including each substage.

Risk factors analysis and stratification for microscopically positive resection margin in gastric cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Cancer cells are often found postoperatively at surgical resection margins (RM) in patients with gastric cancer because of submucosal infiltration or hesitation to secure adequate RM. This study was designed to evaluate risk factors for microscopic positive RM and to clarify which patients should undergo intraoperative frozen section diagnosis (IFSD). METHODS: Patients who underwent R0/1 gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma between 2000 and 2018 in a single cancer center in Japan were studied. We divided the patients into a positive RM group and negative RM group according to the results of definitive histopathological examinations. We performed multivariate analysis to analyze risk factors for positive RM by and used the identified risk factors to risk stratify the patients. RESULTS: A total of 2757 patients were studied, including 49 (1.8%) in the positive RM group. The risk factors significantly associated with positive RM were remnant gastric cancer (odds ratio [OR] 4.7), esophageal invasion (OR 6.3), tumor size ≥80 mm (OR 3.9), and a histopathological diagnosis of undifferentiated type (OR 3.6), macroscopic type 4 (OR 3.7), or pT4 disease (OR 4.6). On risk stratification analysis, the incidence of positive RM was 0.1% without any risk factors, increasing to 0.4% with one risk factor, 3.1% with two risk factors, 5.3% with three risk factors, 21.3% with four risk factors, and 85.7% with five risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of macroscopically positive RM increased in patients who have risk factors. IFSD should be performed in patients who have four or more risk factors.

Impact of the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio on the Survival of Patients with Gastric Cancer Treated with Nivolumab Monotherapy.

BACKGROUND: In 2017, nivolumab monotherapy was shown to be effective as third- or later-line therapy in patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we investigated the relationship between the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and the outcomes of nivolumab monotherapy in patients with gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The long-term outcomes and treatment responses to nivolumab monotherapy were assessed in patients with gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer. We compared patients with a NLR > 2.5 and those with a NLR ≤ 2.5 at the time of starting nivolumab monotherapy. RESULTS: The proportion of patients who have received three or more regimens was higher in the NLR > 2.5 group than in the NLR ≤ 2.5 group. The disease control rate was significantly worse in the NLR > 2.5 group than in the NLR ≤ 2.5 group (23% and 46%, respectively; p = 0.044). Overall survival was significantly better in the NLR ≤ 2.5 group than in the NLR > 2.5 group. Multivariate analysis showed that the macroscopic type, primary site resection, and the NLR were independent prognostic factors for overall survival (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval], 2.586 [1.286-5.203], 0.473 [0.260-0.861], and 1.736 [1.007-2.992], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the NLR is an independent prognostic factor in patients with gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer treated with nivolumab monotherapy. Careful attention must be paid when nivolumab monotherapy is used to treat patients with gastric cancer with a NLR > 2.5.

Effect of Muscle Mass Loss After Esophagectomy on Prognosis of Oesophageal Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: To assess the prognostic effect of muscle loss after esophagectomy and before discharge. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study retrospectively analysed 159 consecutive patients with oesophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer who underwent esophagectomy between August 2011 and October 2015. Body composition was evaluated one week before surgery and at discharge using a bioelectrical impedance analyser. RESULTS: The median rate of muscle mass loss (RMML) was 4.38% (range=-3.3 to +18.8). Patients with increased RMML had significantly poorer outcomes of overall survival than those with decreased RMML (p=0.015). On multivariate analysis, RMML [≥4.38, hazard ratio (HR)=2.033, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.018-5.924, p=0.044) and pathological tumour depth (≥2, HR=3.099, 95%CI=1.339-7.172, p=0.008) were selected as independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: RMML after esophagectomy is indicative of poor prognosis in patients with esophageal cancer.

The Prognostic Value of the Perioperative Systemic Inflammation Score for Patients With Advanced Gastric Cancer.

AIM: We examined whether the perioperative systemic inflammation score (SIS), which describes systemic inflammation and/or malnutrition, affected the tumor recurrence and survival in advanced gastric cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study retrospectively analyzed 160 patients with stage II/III gastric cancer who underwent curative resection at the Kanagawa Cancer Center. The SIS was evaluated before surgery, one week after surgery and one month after surgery, as determined by the serum albumin level (cut-off value=4.0 g/dl) and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (cut-off value=4.44). RESULTS: A high SIS at one month after surgery was identified as an independent predictor for overall survival [hazard ratio (HR)=2.143, p=0.020] and showed a marginal significance for the relapse-free survival (HR=1.814, p=0.053) in multivariate analyses. CONCLUSION: The SIS at one month after surgery is a useful biomarker for predicting the long-term outcome in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Impact of Postoperative Complications on Recurrence in Patients With Stage II/III Gastric Cancer Who Received Adjuvant Chemotherapy With S-1.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the impact of postoperative complications (PCs) in patients with pathological stage (pStage) II or III gastric cancer (GC) who received adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 after curative surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Altogether, data for 226 patients were examined retrospectively. The relationship between PCs and clinicopathological features and survival were examined. RESULTS: Recurrence-free survival was significantly worse in the group with PCs than in the PC-negative group. On multivariate analysis, having PCs of grade 2 or more was an independent risk factor for recurrence (hazard ratio=1.721; 95% confidence intervaI=1.014-2.920; p=0.044). In addition, for each pStage analysis, having PCs of grade 2 or more was a risk factor for recurrence even in patients with pStage II GC. CONCLUSION: PC of grade 2 or more was an independent risk factor for recurrence in patients with pStage II GC who received adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 after curative gastrectomy. Thus, for patients with PCs, even for those with pStage II GC, more effective adjuvant chemotherapy, such as S-1 plus docetaxel, may be needed.

Relationship Between the Waiting Times for Surgery and Survival in Patients with Gastric Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Surgery for gastric cancer should be performed as soon as possible after diagnosis. However, sometimes the waiting time for surgery tends to be longer. The relation between the waiting time for surgery and survival in patients with gastric cancer remains to be fully investigated. METHODS: This retrospective, single-center cohort study evaluated patients with gastric cancer who underwent curative surgery from 2006 through 2012 at Kanagawa Cancer Center in Japan. Patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy were excluded. The waiting time for surgery was defined as the time between the first visit and surgery. We investigated whether the waiting time for surgery has a linear negative impact on outcomes by using a Cox regression model with clinical prognostic factors. RESULTS: In total, 801 patients were eligible. The median waiting time was 45 days (range 10-269 days). The restricted cubic spline regression curve showed that the adjusted time-specific hazard ratios of waiting times did not indicate a linear negative trend on survival between 20 and 100 days (p = 0.759). In the Cox model with a quartile of waiting times, waiting times in the 32-44-day group, 43-62-day group, and ≥63 day groups were not associated with poorer overall survival as compared with the ≤31 day group (HR: 1.01, 95% CI 0.63-1.60, p = 0.984, HR: 1.17, 95% CI 0.70-1.94, p = 0.550, HR: 1.06, 95% CI 0.60-1.88, p = 0.831, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: There was no negative relation between the waiting time for surgery (within 100 days) and survival in patients with gastric cancer.

Feasibility and safety of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy performed by trainees supervised by an experienced qualified surgeon.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic gastrectomy is becoming more commonly performed, but acquisition of its technique remains challenging. We investigated whether laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LDG) performed by trainees (TR) supervised by a technically qualified experienced surgeon (QS) is feasible and safe. METHODS: The short-term outcomes of LDG were assessed in patients with gastric cancer between 2008 and 2018. We compared patients who underwent LDG performed by qualified experienced surgeons (QS group) with patients who underwent LDG performed by the trainees (TR group). RESULTS: The operation time was longer in the TR group than in the QS group (median time: 270 min vs. 239 min, p < 0.001). The median duration of the postoperative hospital stay was 9 days in the QS group and 8 days in the TR group (p = 0.003). The incidence of postoperative complications did not differ significantly between the two groups. Grade 2 or higher postoperative complications occurred in 18 patients (12.9%) in the QS group and 47 patients (11.7%) in the TR group (p = 0.763). Grade 3 or higher postoperative complications occurred in 9 patients (6.4%) in the QS group and 17 patients (4.2%) in the TR group (p = 0.357). Multivariate analysis showed that the American Society of Anesthesiologist Physical Status was an independent predictor of grade 2 or higher postoperative complications and that gender was an independent predictor of grade 3 or higher postoperative complications. The main operator (TR/QS) was not an independent predictor of complications. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy performed by trainees supervised by an experienced surgeon is a feasible and safe procedure similar to that performed by experienced surgeons.