Chapter 3: Management of kidney injury caused by cancer drug therapy, from clinical practice guidelines for the management of kidney injury during anticancer drug therapy 2022.

Cisplatin should be administered with diuretics and Magnesium supplementation under adequate hydration to avoid renal impairment. Patients should be evaluated for eGFR (estimated glomerular filtration rate) during the treatment with pemetrexed, as kidney injury has been reported. Pemetrexed should be administered with caution in patients with a CCr (creatinine clearance) < 45 mL/min. Mesna is used to prevent hemorrhagic cystitis in patients receiving ifosfamide. Febuxostat is effective in avoiding hyperuricemia induced by TLS (tumor lysis syndrome). Preventative rasburicase is recommended in high-risk cases of TLS. Thrombotic microangiopathy could be triggered by anticancer drugs and there is no evidence of efficacy of plasma exchange therapy. When proteinuria occurs during treatment with anti-angiogenic agents or multi-kinase inhibitors, dose reductions or interruptions based on grading should be considered. Grade 3 proteinuria and renal dysfunction require urgent intervention, including drug interruption or withdrawal, and referral to a nephrologist should be considered. The first-line drugs used for blood pressure elevation due to anti-angiogenic agents are ACE (angiotensin-converting enzyme) inhibitors and ARBs (angiotensin receptor blockers). The protein binding of drugs and their pharmacokinetics are considerably altered in patients with hypoalbuminemia. The clearance of rituximab is increased in patients with proteinuria, and the correlation with urinary IgG suggests similar pharmacokinetic changes when using other antibody drugs. AIN (acute interstitial nephritis) is the most common cause of ICI (immune checkpoint inhibitor)-related kidney injury that is often treated with steroids. The need for renal biopsy in patients with kidney injury that occurs during treatment with ICI remains controversial.

Phase II study of biweekly cetuximab plus mFOLFOX6 or mFOLFIRI as second-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer and exploratory analysis of associations between DNA methylation status and the efficacy of the anti-EGFR antibody: T-CORE1201.

Background: Little is known about the biweekly combined use of cetuximab and chemotherapy as second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Recently, DNA methylation status has been reported to be a new possible predictor of the efficacy from the anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody treatment. The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy and safety of biweekly cetuximab plus mFOLFOX6 or mFOLFIRI as a second-line treatment for KRAS exon 2 wild-type mCRC. We also investigated the predictability of DNA methylation status on the efficacy of the EGFR antibody-containing treatment. Methods: Patients who were refractory or intolerant to the first-line chemotherapy were enrolled and received biweekly cetuximab plus mFOLFOX6 or mFOLFIRI. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Tumor evaluations were performed every 2 months using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) version 1.1. Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. DNA methylation status of colorectal cancer cells was defined by a modified MethyLight assay. Results: Sixty-six cases were enrolled. The median PFS (mPFS) was 5.1 [95% confidence interval (CI), 3.8-7.6] months. The median overall survival (mOS) was 12.7 (95% CI, 7.5-15.3) months. Grade 3 or higher neutropenia occurred in 53.0% of patients, whereas skin disorders with a grade 3 or higher occurred in <15% of patients. In multivariate analysis, DNA methylation status could not be an independent predictor of PFS [hazard ratio (HR), 1.43; P=0.39] and OS (HR, 2.13; P=0.086). However, in RAS/BRAF wild-type patients, the mPFS and mOS in the low-methylated colorectal cancer (LMCC) group was numerically better than those in the highly-methylated colorectal cancer (HMCC) group, although the difference was not statistically significant [mPFS: 8.5 (95% CI, 6.1-10.9) vs. 3.3 (95% CI, 1.2-not reached) months, P=0.79; ΔmPFS, 5.2 months; mOS: 15.3 (95% CI, 11.9-23.5) vs. 6.5 (95% CI, 3.1-not reached) months, P=0.53; ΔmOS, 8.8 months]. Conclusions: Biweekly cetuximab plus mFOLFOX6 or mFOLFIRI is a useful second-line therapy for mCRC. DNA methylation status warrants further exploration as a predictive biomarker for anti-EGFR efficacy in mCRC.

Cisplatin Plus Capecitabine After Adjuvant S-1 in Metastatic Gastric Cancer: A Phase II T-CORE1102 Trial.

BACKGROUND/AIM: This phase II study assessed the efficacy of capecitabine plus cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer refractory to adjuvant S-1. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This single-arm, open-label, multicenter, phase II study was conducted by Tohoku Clinical Oncology Research and Education Society (T-CORE) in Japan. Patients aged ≥20 years with advanced HER2-negative gastric cancer that was refractory to S-1 were enrolled. Patients received 80 mg/m2 cisplatin on day 1 intravenously and 1,000 mg/m2 capecitabine twice daily from day 1 to day 14, in 3-week cycles. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The threshold overall response rate (ORR) was estimated to be 15%. The secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), time to treatment failure, ORR, and toxicities. RESULTS: In total, 21 patients were enrolled from seven hospitals. The median patient age was 63 years. Nineteen patients received the protocol treatment. Median PFS was 3.7 months [90% confidence interval (CI)=2.7-5.6 months], which did not reach the predefined threshold of 4.0 months. ORR was 5.9% (95%CI=0.0-17.1%). Median OS was 11.9 months (95% CI 6.3-19.4 months). Febrile neutropenia was observed in 5.3% of patients. The most frequently observed grade 3 non-hematologic toxicities were nausea (15.8%) and hyponatremia (15.8%). CONCLUSION: The addition of a fluoropyrimidine to a platinum agent after adjuvant therapy is not suitable for gastric cancer.

Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2020 for the Clinical Practice of Hereditary Colorectal Cancer.

Hereditary colorectal cancer (HCRC) accounts for < 5% of all colorectal cancer cases. Some of the unique characteristics commonly encountered in HCRC cases include early age of onset, synchronous/metachronous cancer occurrence, and multiple cancers in other organs. These characteristics necessitate different management approaches, including diagnosis, treatment or surveillance, from sporadic colorectal cancer management. There are two representative HCRC, named familial adenomatous polyposis and Lynch syndrome. Other than these two HCRC syndromes, related disorders have also been reported. Several guidelines for hereditary disorders have already been published worldwide. In Japan, the first guideline for HCRC was prepared by the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR), published in 2012 and revised in 2016. This revised version of the guideline was immediately translated into English and published in 2017. Since then, several new findings and novel disease concepts related to HCRC have been discovered. The currently diagnosed HCRC rate in daily clinical practice is relatively low; however, this is predicted to increase in the era of cancer genomic medicine, with the advancement of cancer multi-gene panel testing or whole genome testing, among others. Under these circumstances, the JSCCR guidelines 2020 for HCRC were prepared by consensus among members of the JSCCR HCRC Guideline Committee, based on a careful review of the evidence retrieved from literature searches, and considering the medical health insurance system and actual clinical practice settings in Japan. Herein, we present the English version of the JSCCR guidelines 2020 for HCRC.

Phase II Study of the Reuse of Trastuzumab with Docetaxel beyond Progression after First-Line Treatment in Second-Line Treatment for Unresectable, Metastatic Gastric Cancer (T-CORE1203).

Whether trastuzumab use beyond disease progression is beneficial in second-line treatment for patients with unresectable human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive gastric cancer remains to be elucidated. We conducted this phase II study to assess whether trastuzumab plus docetaxel was effective for patients with previously treated advanced HER2-positive gastric cancer. This trial was a single-arm, open-label, multicenter, phase II study, conducted by Tohoku Clinical Oncology Research and Education Society (T-CORE). Patients aged 20 years or older who had advanced HER2-positive gastric cancer and were refractory to trastuzumab, fluoropyrimidine, and cisplatin were enrolled. Patients were treated with 6 mg/kg trastuzumab and 60 mg/m2 docetaxel every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate. The threshold overall response rate was estimated to be at 15%. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival, 6-month survival rate, overall survival, and toxicities. A total of 27 patients were enrolled from 7 hospitals. The median age was 67 years. Partial response was seen in 3 patients among the 26 evaluated patients. The overall response rate was at 11.5% (90% confidence interval 1.2%-21.8%). The median progression-free survival was 3.2 months, the 6-month survival rate was 85%, and the median overall survival was 11.6 months. Febrile neutropenia was observed in 14.8%. The most frequently observed grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity was anorexia (14.8%). The primary endpoint was not achieved. The results support a current consensus that the continuation of trastuzumab in second-line therapy for gastric cancer is not a recommended option.

Phase II study of trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) therapy in elderly patients with colorectal cancer (T-CORE1401): geriatric assessment tools and plasma drug concentrations as possible predictive biomarkers.

PURPOSE: The current study aimed to determine the efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil for elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer. METHODS: This single-arm, open-label, multicenter, phase II study included elderly patients aged 65 years or more who had fluoropyrimidine-refractory advanced colorectal cancer and received trifluridine/tipiracil (70 mg/m2, days 1-5 and 8-12, every 4 weeks). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), while secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), toxicities, association between efficacy and geriatric assessment scores, and association between toxicity and plasma drug concentrations. RESULTS: A total of 30 patients with a mean age of 73 years were enrolled. Median PFS was 2.3 months (95% confidence interval, 1.9-4.3 months), while median OS was 5.7 months (95% confidence interval, 3.7-8.9 months). Patients had an ORR of 0%, with 57% having stable disease. Grade 4 neutropenia was observed in 13% of the patients. Patients with a higher G8 score (15 or more) showed longer PFS than those with a lower G8 score (median 4.6 vs. 2.0 months; p = 0.047). Moreover, patients with grade 3 or 4 neutropenia showed higher maximum trifluridine concentrations than those with grade 1 or 2 neutropenia (mean 2945 vs. 2107 ng/mL; p = 0.036). DISCUSSION: The current phase II trial demonstrated that trifluridine/tipiracil was an effective and well-tolerated option for elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Moreover, geriatric assessment tools and/or plasma drug concentration monitoring might be helpful in predicting the efficacy and toxicities in elderly patients receiving this drug. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000017589, 15/May/2015 (The University Hospital Medical Information Network).

Patient perceptions of curability and physician-reported disclosures of incurability in Japanese patients with unresectable/recurrent cancer: a cross-sectional survey.

BACKGROUND: Although reports have described the perceptions of curability among patients with unresectable/recurrent cancer and the quality of death and dying, the association between patients' perceptions and physicians' disclosures of incurability remained unexplored. This survey aimed to evaluate the association between patients' perceptions of curability and physicians' disclosures of incurability. METHODS: In this cross-sectional, multicenter, observational study in Japan, we asked outpatients with unresectable/recurrent solid cancers about their perceptions of incurability. The patient inclusion criteria were unresectable/recurrent solid cancer, failure of first-line chemotherapy and an age ≥ 20 years. Additionally, we surveyed their primary responsible physicians regarding disclosures to patients regarding incurability. RESULTS: Although we estimated the necessary sample size as 250, we discontinued recruitment because the responsible researcher transferred to another hospital. Among the 135 included and surveyed patients, 39% responded that their cancer was incurable, 33% responded that their cancer was curable and 23% responded 'I don't know' or 'I don't wish to answer'. No significant association was observed between patients' perceptions of curability and physician-reported disclosures of incurability. CONCLUSION: In this Japanese population, 39% of patients with unresectable/recurrent solid cancers perceived that their cancers were incurable. However, such perceptions did not appear to be significantly affected by physician-reported disclosures. We recommend additional research to determine the best disclosure method to ensure that patients truly understand their disease status.

Intermittent Withdrawal of Oxaliplatin for Alleviating Neurotoxicity during Oxaliplatin-Based Chemotherapy for Japanese Patients with Inoperable or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Phase 2 Multicenter Study.

Oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy is a well-established regimen for patients with inoperable and metastatic colorectal cancer. However, one of the major limitations of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy is sensory neuropathy. It was previously reported that introduction of intermittent oxaliplatin treatment to an oxaliplatin-based regimen has a significant benefit on efficacy or safety. Here, we prospectively assessed whether efficacy and safety of first-line chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer are achieved by introduction of withdrawal of oxaliplatin treatment for a certain period (intermittent oxaliplatin treatment). The primary endpoint of the present study is to assess the progression free survival time on patients treated with chemotherapy (mFOLFOX6 (levofolinate, 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin combination therapy) plus bevacizumab or CapeOX (oxaliplatin and capecitabine combination therapy) plus bevacizumab) with intermittent oxaliplatin treatment. Bevacizumab is a humanized anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody. Median progression-free survival by the mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab with intermittent oxaliplatin treatment or the CapeOX plus bevacizumab with intermittent oxaliplatin treatment were 10.6 months (95% confidential interval [CI], 8.3-13.4 months) or 8.0 months (95% CI, 4.2-16.8 months), respectively. Overall response rate by the mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab with intermittent oxaliplatin treatment or CapeOX plus bevacizumab with intermittent oxaliplatin treatment was 55.1% or 42.1%, respectively. Grade 3 or 4 neuropathy was observed in 4.1% or 10.5% of patients treated with mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab with intermittent oxaliplatin treatment or CapeOX plus bevacizumab with intermittent oxaliplatin treatment, respectively. Introduction of intermittent oxaliplatin treatment has improved severe neuropathy in mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab regimen without reducing treatment efficacy.

[Molecular Targeted Therapies for Hereditary Cancer Syndrome].

Development of molecular targeted drugs has achieved remarkable improvement of systemic cancer therapy. Recently, the several molecular targeted drugs have become available which associated with the status of responsible genes for hereditary cancer syndrome. These drugs would allow to establish specific strategy for hereditary cancer syndrome or sporadic cancers with similar biological phenotype with hereditary cancer. Genetic tests for the diagnosis of hereditary cancer syndrome will have the meaning of biomarker for predicting the efficacy of these molecular targeted drugs. This review summarized the molecular targeted drugs including immune checkpoint inhibitors with potential effects for hereditary cancer syndrome, such as anti-PD-1 antibody for Lynch syndrome, PARP inhibitor for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome, multi-kinase inhibitor for multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2.

A phase II study of nab-paclitaxel in combination with ramucirumab in patients with previously treated advanced gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab)-paclitaxel was developed to improve paclitaxel solubility and does not need premedication to avoid infusion-related reactions associated with solvent-based (sb)-paclitaxel. We conducted a phase II trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus ramucirumab combination therapy for previously treated advanced gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with unresectable advanced gastric cancer refractory to first-line chemotherapy were administered nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1, 8 and 15, plus ramucirumab 8 mg/kg intravenously on days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. The primary end-point was Independent Review Committee (IRC)-assessed overall response rate (ORR). Secondary end-points were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), safety and quality of life (QOL). RESULTS: Forty-five patients were enrolled; 43 received the study treatment. The ORR assessed by the IRC was 54.8% (90% confidence interval [CI] 41.0-68.0) and the primary end-point was met. The DCR was 92.9% (95% CI 80.5-98.5). The IRC-assessed median PFS was 7.6 months (95% CI 5.4-8.1). The median OS was not reached at the data cutoff. The main treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events were decreased neutrophil count (76.7%), decreased white blood cell count (27.9%), anaemia (11.6%), decreased appetite (7.0%), febrile neutropenia (4.7%), hypertension (4.7%) and proteinuria (4.7%). No treatment-related deaths occurred. No QOL deterioration was observed during study treatment. CONCLUSION: Nab-paclitaxel plus ramucirumab combination therapy shows promising activity and manageable toxicities and could be a useful second-line treatment option for patients with previously treated advanced gastric cancer.

First-line chemotherapy with S-1 alone or S-1 plus cisplatin for elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer: a multicenter propensity score matched study.

BACKGROUND: Fluoropyrimidine and platinum combination is the standard treatment for advanced or recurrent gastric cancer (AGC). However, fluoropyrimidine monotherapy is commonly used for elderly patients with AGC because of its good tolerability. METHODS: In this multicenter retrospective study, we collected clinical data of AGC patients aged 70 years or older, treated with S-1 alone or S-1 plus cisplatin (SP) as the first-line treatment between January 2009 and December 2011. Propensity score matched cohorts (PSMC) were used for reducing the confounding effects to compare efficacy and safety between the two treatment groups. Cox regression analysis was performed to clarify the prognostic factors. RESULTS: PSMC (n = 109 in each group) were selected from among 444 eligible patients (S-1 group, 210; SP group, 234); the S-1 group included more patients deemed unfit for intensive chemotherapy than the SP group (e.g., higher age, poorer PS, poor renal function). In the PSMC, patients' characteristics were comparable between groups, except the male ratio (S-1 group, 64.2%; SP group, 77.1%; p = 0.04). No significant differences were observed in either overall survival [hazard ratio (HR) 0.93, p = 0.63] or progression-free survival (HR 1.09, p = 0.61). Severe adverse events (AEs) and hospitalization due to AEs were more frequent in the SP group than in the S-1 group (p < 0.001 each). CONCLUSION: Our findings do not support the survival benefit of SP over S-1 in elderly patients with AGC. We are now conducting a prospective comparative study to optimize treatment strategy and explore applicability of the geriatric assessment for these patients.

Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) Guidelines 2016 for the Clinical Practice of Hereditary Colorectal Cancer (Translated Version).

Hereditary colorectal cancer accounts for less than 5% of all colorectal cancer cases. Some of the unique characteristics that are commonly encountered in cases of hereditary colorectal cancer include early age at onset, synchronous/metachronous occurrence of the cancer, and association with multiple cancers in other organs, necessitating different management from sporadic colorectal cancer. While the diagnosis of familial adenomatous polyposis might be easy because usually 100 or more adenomas that develop in the colonic mucosa are in this condition, Lynch syndrome, which is the most commonly associated disease with hereditary colorectal cancer, is often missed in daily medical practice because of its relatively poorly defined clinical characteristics. In addition, the disease concept and diagnostic criteria for Lynch syndrome, which was once called hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer, have changed over time with continual research, thereby possibly creating confusion in clinical practice. Under these circumstances, the JSCCR Guideline Committee has developed the "JSCCR Guidelines 2016 for the Clinical Practice of Hereditary Colorectal Cancer (HCRC)," to allow delivery of appropriate medical care in daily practice to patients with familial adenomatous polyposis, Lynch syndrome, or other related diseases. The JSCCR Guidelines 2016 for HCRC were prepared by consensus reached among members of the JSCCR Guideline Committee, based on a careful review of the evidence retrieved from literature searches, and considering the medical health insurance system and actual clinical practice settings in Japan. Herein, we present the English version of the JSCCR Guidelines 2016 for HCRC.

microRNA-193a-3p is specifically down-regulated and acts as a tumor suppressor in BRAF-mutated colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to identify miRNAs specifically dysregulated in BRAF-mutated colorectal cancer, which could lead to a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying oncogenesis of this malignant subtype of colorectal cancer. METHODS: Candidate dysregulated miRNAs were selected in genome-wide miRNA expression array analysis using a screening set composed of 15 BRAF-mutated and 15 non-KRAS/BRAF-mutated colorectal cancers. The miRNA expressions were validated in another set of patients. The functional roles of the miRNAs were analyzed by cell growth and invasion assays. The association between miRNA expression status and the clinical outcome of patients treated with various chemotherapies was analyzed. RESULTS: Within the top five of the miRNAs screened, we validated miRNA-31 (miR-31) and miR-135b as up-regulated, while miR-193a-3p was down-regulated in BRAF-mutated cancer. Moreover, miR-193a-3p inhibited cell growth, and invasion of colorectal cancer cells. Low miR-193a-3p expression was associated with shorter progression-free survival in patients who received anti-EGFR therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Our results disclose a novel tumor suppressive role of miR-193a-3p in colorectal cancer. These results could lead to novel therapeutic strategies for colorectal cancer, particularly in BRAF-mutated colorectal cancer.

The G8 screening tool enhances prognostic value to ECOG performance status in elderly cancer patients: A retrospective, single institutional study.

BACKGROUND: Some elderly cancer patients, even with good Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS), have poor survival outcomes and cannot tolerate standard therapy. Few studies have detailed the associations between the G8 screening tool, ECOG-PS, and overall survival (OS) in such patients. METHODS: Cancer patients, aged 70 years or older, were assessed for G8 and classified into three groups according to their G8 score: <11 as the low score group, 11-14 as the intermediate score group, and >14 as the high score group. We retrospectively analyzed the association between G8 score and OS in all patients and for each ECOG-PS-categorized group. RESULTS: Out of 264 enrolled patients, most patients (87%) with solid tumor were categorized as TNM stage IV. ECOG-PS was 0 or 1 in 215 patients and ≥2 in 48; there was missing data for one patient. Among all patients, the low score group with a median OS of 7.7 months survived significantly less than both the high score group with a median OS of 25.6 months [Hazard ratio (HR) 3.48; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.96-6.63; p < 0.0001] and the intermediate score group with a median of 15.6 months (HR 1.83; 95% CI, 1.28-2.65; p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, TNM stage and G8 score were independent prognostic factors for OS. When patients with an ECOG-PS of 0 or 1 were analyzed, patients with a lower G8 score showed significantly shorter OS than patients with a higher score when any two groups were compared. CONCLUSION: This novel classification of the G8 score contributes to prompt identification of patients with poor prognosis and improved the prognostic value of ECOG-PS. Using G8 with ECOG-PS may be helpful in deciding treatment for elderly patients with advanced cancer.

Efficacy and safety of gemcitabine plus docetaxel in Japanese patients with unresectable or recurrent bone and soft tissue sarcoma: Results from a single-institutional analysis.

BACKGROUND: Combination therapy with gemcitabine and docetaxel has been reported to be a good therapeutic strategy for patients with soft tissue sarcoma. The aim of the present study was to analyze the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine with docetaxel in Japanese patients with advanced bone and soft tissue sarcoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the effect of gemcitabine and docetaxel therapy on overall response, progression-free survival, overall survival, and toxicity in 42 patients with bone or soft tissue sarcoma who had received the therapy between October 2006 and September 2015, at Tohoku University Hospital. RESULTS: The median age was 55 years; 23 patients were men, and 19 were women. Eight had bone sarcoma and 34 had soft tissue sarcoma. Forty patients (95%) had previously been treated with one or more chemotherapeutic regimens. The overall response rate was 6.9% and the disease control rate was 55%. The median progression-free survival was 2.3 months and the median overall survival was 14.3 months. Grade 3 or more neutropenia and febrile neutropenia were observed in 74% and 4.8% of all patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: The response rate was lower and myelosuppression was more frequently observed than in other previous reports. On the other hand, most of toxicities were enough manageable. In addition, some patients had long survival with a good response. Our study supports the notion that gemcitabine and docetaxel therapy is a good therapeutic option for treating patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma as well as bone sarcoma, also in Asian populations.

Nab-paclitaxel versus solvent-based paclitaxel in patients with previously treated advanced gastric cancer (ABSOLUTE): an open-label, randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Weekly administration of solvent-based paclitaxel is one of the standard second-line chemotherapy regimens for advanced gastric cancer. Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) was developed to improve the solubility of paclitaxel and does not need premedication to avoid infusion-related reactions associated with solvent-based paclitaxel. Additionally, higher doses of nab-paclitaxel can be administered over a shorter infusion time and at higher drug concentrations compared with solvent-based paclitaxel. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel versus solvent-based paclitaxel in patients with previously treated advanced gastric cancer. METHODS: We did a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial at 72 institutions in Japan. Patients aged 20 years or older with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma refractory to a fluoropyrimidine-containing first-line chemotherapy regimen, with progressive disease or a relapse fewer than 24 weeks after the final dose of adjuvant chemotherapy were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive intravenous nab-paclitaxel (260 mg/m2) every 3 weeks (on day 1 of a 21-day cycle), weekly nab-paclitaxel (100 mg/m2, on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle), or weekly solvent-based paclitaxel (80 mg/m2, on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle). Randomisation was done with the minimisation method, with stratification for previous use of docetaxel, presence of peritoneal metastases, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status. The primary endpoint was overall survival in the full analysis set, which included all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study drug, with a non-inferiority margin of 1·25 for the hazard ratio. This trial is registered with Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center Clinical Trial, number JapicCTI-132059, and has been completed. FINDINGS: Between March 13, 2013, and May 14, 2015, 741 patients were randomly assigned to nab-paclitaxel every 3 weeks (n=247), weekly nab-paclitaxel (n=246), or weekly solvent-based paclitaxel (n=248). Median follow-up for overall survival was 9·99 months (IQR 6·05-15·05). Median overall survival was 10·3 months (95% CI 8·7-11·4) in the group that received in the nab-paclitaxel every 3 weeks, 11·1 months (9·9-13·0) in the weekly nab-paclitaxel group, and 10·9 months (9·4-11·8) in the weekly solvent-based paclitaxel group. Weekly nab-paclitaxel was non-inferior to weekly solvent-based paclitaxel (hazard ratio 0·97, 97·5% CI 0·76-1·23; non-inferiority one-sided p=0·0085), whereas nab-paclitaxel every 3 weeks was not non-inferior to solvent-based paclitaxel (1·06, 95% CI 0·87-1·31; non-inferiority one-sided p=0·062). The main grade 3 or worse adverse drug reactions were neutropenia (158 [65%] of 244 patients in the group that received nab-paclitaxel every 3 weeks vs 99 [41%] of 241 patients in the weekly nab-paclitaxel group vs 71 [29%] of 243 patients in the weekly solvent-based paclitaxel group), peripheral sensory neuropathy (49 [20%] vs six [2%] vs six [2%]), and febrile neutropenia (30 [12%] vs seven [3%] vs two [1%]). Hypersensitivity reactions were less frequent with nab-paclitaxel every 3 weeks (two [1%] patients) and weekly nab-paclitaxel (three [1%] patients) than with weekly solvent-based paclitaxel (13 [5%] patients). Four treatment-related deaths were reported overall (pneumonia in one patient in the group that received nab-paclitaxel every 3 weeks, febrile neutropenia/pneumonia in one patient, and septic shock in one patient in the weekly nab-paclitaxel group, and respiratory disease/interstitial lung disease in one patient in the weekly solvent-based paclitaxel group). INTERPRETATION: As the trial showed that weekly nab-paclitaxel was non-inferior to weekly solvent-based paclitaxel in terms of overall survival, the advantages of the nab-paclitaxel formulation make it a potential regimen for second-line treatment of gastric cancer. FUNDING: Taiho Pharmaceutical.