Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int Wound J ; 20(1): 85-91, 2023 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35637544

ABSTRACT

Plastic surgeons commonly encounter patients with facial lacerations and/or abrasions in the emergency room. If they are properly treated, facial wounds generally heal well without complications. However, infection can sometimes cause delayed wound healing. We performed wound culture for the early detection of infection and to promote the healing of infected facial wounds. We included 5033 patients with facial wounds who visited the emergency room of Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital between January 2018 and February 2021. Among them, 104 patients underwent wound culture. We analysed the pathogens isolated and the patients' age, sex, wound site, mechanism of injury, wound healing time, time from injury to culture, time to culture results, and dressing methods used. Pathogens were isolated in slightly less than half of the patients (38.46%); among them, Staphylococcus epidermidis was the most common (47.5%). Methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci were isolated in six (15%) patients. Patients with complicated wounds had a longer mean wound healing time (10.83 ± 5.91 days) than those with non-complicated wounds (6.06 ± 1.68 days). Wound culture of complicated facial wounds resulted in the isolation of various types of pathogens, including antibiotic-resistant bacteria and fungi. We recommend the use of wound culture for early detection of infection to prevent delayed wound healing.


Subject(s)
Lacerations , Soft Tissue Injuries , Wound Infection , Humans , Lacerations/therapy , Wound Healing , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Soft Tissue Injuries/drug therapy , Wound Infection/therapy , Wound Infection/drug therapy
2.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 101(32): e29924, 2022 Aug 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35960094

ABSTRACT

Pediatric lacerations are frequently encountered by plastic surgeons in the emergency room. Since pediatric patients cannot cooperate due to the anxiety and pain occurring during the suture procedure, sedation is induced. Since commonly used drugs inducing shallow sedation such as chloral hydrates are insufficient to perform procedures, the need or deep sedation has been increased. In our experience, inducing sedation with ketamine is safe and allows for accurate procedures. A total of 106 pediatric patients aged between 3 months to 5 years who visited the emergency room between August 2020 and January 2021 were included in this study. Of the 106 patients, 54 were sedated using ketamine, and the remaining 52 patients who did not cooperate were operated under local anesthesia, and these were set as the control group. The patients were intravenously injected with ketamine 1.5-2.0 mg/kg ketamine while monitoring the blood oxygen saturation, end-tidal CO2, and other vital signs. The patients were discharged as a complete awakening was confirmed by physicians. The number of patients who received sedation induced by ketamine was 54 and the number of patients who underwent the procedure without sedation was 52. The mean induction time of a single injection was 35.3 ± 11.3 minutes, and that of additional injection was 253.5 ±â€…54.1 minute. The total procedure time of the ketamine group was 20.3 ±â€…11.85 minutes, and that of the nonketamine group was 19.31 ±â€…10.50 minutes (P = .454). No statistically significant differences were found between the 2 groups. The need for sedation during the suture procedure in an emergenc9y room has been arising not only for reducing pain and anxiety, but also for safe and accurate procedures and scar minimization. Based on the parental satisfaction and the safety of the procedure, using ketamine is more effective than other drugs and should be used more actively.


Subject(s)
Facial Injuries , Ketamine , Lacerations , Child , Conscious Sedation/methods , Humans , Hypnotics and Sedatives/therapeutic use , Infant , Ketamine/therapeutic use , Lacerations/surgery , Midazolam , Pain
3.
Arch Craniofac Surg ; 22(4): 204-208, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34474544

ABSTRACT

Sebaceous carcinoma is a malignant neoplasm that usually arises in the sebaceous glands of the eyelids. Its pathogenesis is unknown; however, irradiation history, immunosuppression, and use of diuretics are known risk factors. The mainstay of treatment for sebaceous carcinoma of the eyelid is wide surgical resection with a safety margin of 5 to 6 mm, which often results in full-thickness defects. The reconstruction of a full-thickness defect of the eyelid should be approached using a three-lamella method: a mucosal component replacing the conjunctiva, a cartilage component for the tarsal plate, and a flap or skin graft for the skin of the eyelid. In this case, a fullthickness defect of the upper eyelid was reconstructed after tumor removal using a combination of a nasal septum chondromucosal composite graft and a forehead transposition flap, also known as a "Fricke flap." The flap was designed to include a line of the eyebrow on the lower margin of the flap to replace the eyelash removed during tumor excision. The wound healed completely, without any early or late complications, and the outcome was satisfactory.

4.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 100(23): e25907, 2021 Jun 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34114986

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: If wounds are infected with bacteria resistant to an empirical antibiotic regimen, effective wound treatment will be delayed. This can delay wound healing and lengthen hospital stays, increasing the costs to patients. Long-term antibiotic use can also result in minor and major complications, such as diarrhea, antibiotic resistance, or life-threatening leukopenia. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria make wound treatment even more difficult. Traditionally, surgeons thought that adequate infection control should be established before soft tissue coverage. However, wounds infected by MDR do not heal well with this traditional method and there are no optimal treatment guidelines for MDR bacteria-contaminated wounds.We reviewed 203 patients who underwent vascularized flap surgery from 2012 to 2019 to cover wounds. Class IV and I wounds were compared according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention classification. Class IV was further classified as antibiotic-resistant (ARB) and antibiotic-sensitive (ASB) bacteria. Wound size, mode, location, pathogens, healing time, and basic demographics were evaluated. Data were compared using Cramer's V and one-way ANOVA or independent t tests.The average healing time was longer in the ARB (19.7 [range 7-44] days) and ASB (17.9 [range 2-36] days) groups than in the Clean group (16.5 [range 7-28] days). Healing time differed in the 3 groups (P = .036). It was longer in the class IV group than in the class I group (P = .01). However, it was not statistically different between the ARB and ASB groups (P = .164).In our study the difference in healing time was small when vascularized tissue transfer was done in ARB-infected wound compared with ASB-infected and clean wound. It is necessary to perform surgery using vascularized tissue for the infected wound of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Bacteria , Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation , Wound Infection , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/classification , Bacteria/classification , Bacteria/drug effects , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Female , Humans , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/methods , Middle Aged , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Republic of Korea/epidemiology , Surgical Flaps , Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation/adverse effects , Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation/methods , Wound Healing , Wound Infection/epidemiology , Wound Infection/microbiology , Wound Infection/physiopathology , Wound Infection/therapy
5.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 99(51): e23789, 2020 Dec 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33371149

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: Skin cancer diagnoses are rising due to increasing ultraviolet ray exposure and an aging population. The complete surgical excision of skin cancer, including a normal tissue, has been the widely performed and determining the adequate safety margin is essential. In this study, we compared the preoperative thickness and width of skin cancer by ultrasonography with the measurements by histopathologic findings.A total of 211 patients were enrolled in this study and ultrasonography was performed on 30 patients. The width (long and short axis) and thickness of the skin cancers were measured using electronic calipers of ultrasonographic calipers preoperatively and microscope postoperatively.The skin cancers were basal cell carcinoma (n = 17), squamous cell carcinoma (n = 10), Merkel cell carcinoma (n = 1), mucinous carcinoma (n = 1), and sebaceous carcinoma (n = 1). The mean width (long and short axis) and thickness of the cancers measured by ultrasonography was 1.25 (0.76) cm, 0.96 (0.65) cm, and 0.37 (0.28) cm. The measurements by histopathology was 1.24 (0.84) cm, 0.95 (0.65) cm, and 0.27 (0.24) cm. Kendall's tau-b correlation coefficient between measurements by ultrasonography and histopathology was as follows: long axis, r = 0.733, P < .001; short axis, r = 0.671, P < .001; thickness, r = 0.740, P < .001. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient between measurements by ultrasonography and histopathology was as follows: long axis, r = 0.865, P < .001; short axis, r = 0.829, P < .001; thickness, r = 0.842, P < .001. The difference in mean thickness between the total excised tissue and the skin cancer was 0.29 (0.43) cm (range 0.05-0.40 cm) in basal cell carcinoma and 0.56 (0.58) cm (range 0.05-2.22 cm) in squamous cell carcinoma.Ultrasonography can accurately measure the width and thickness of skin cancer and predict the safety margins of the wide excision. Preoperative ultrasonography is a good diagnostic tool for surgical planning. Additional studies with larger populations are needed to quantify the range of vertical safety margins.


Subject(s)
Margins of Excision , Skin Neoplasms/surgery , Ultrasonography/methods , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Treatment Outcome , Ultrasonography/standards , Ultrasonography/statistics & numerical data
6.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 99(33): e21516, 2020 Aug 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32871998

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Breast filler injections are less commonly used due to their associated complications, such as pain and foreign body reactions. Yet, these fillers are often administered illegally, resulting in aesthetic or life-threatening complications. These are treated by removing the foreign material, and the breasts are reconstructed using silicone implants or autologous tissue/fat injection. PATIENT CONCERNS: Case 1. A 45-year-old woman with polyacrylamide gel injections in both breasts visited our clinic for breast pain and tenderness. Grade I ptosis was observed in each breast, without skin necrosis and discoloration. Case 2. A 51-year-old woman, with unknown breast filler injections, visited our clinic for painful masses. Intraoperatively, massive amounts of foreign material had severely infiltrated the nearby tissues; thus, an immediate breast reconstruction could not be performed. Three months later, severe deformities including shrinkage and irregular breast skin surfaces were observed. DIAGNOSIS: Case 1. Multiple cystic lesions, fluid collection in the retromammary spaces, and diffuse infiltration were observed on mammography, computed tomography, and ultrasonography. Case 2. Multiple cystic lesions, calcified areas, and diffuse infiltrations in the axillae and retromammary spaces were observed on mammography, computed tomography, and ultrasonography. INTERVENTIONS: Case 1. The foreign material was removed and the breasts were reconstructed using silicone implants into subpectoral pocket with acellular dermal matrices (Alloderm, Lipocell Corporation). Case 2. A delayed reconstruction was undertaken using silicone implants covered by latissimus dorsi muscle flaps, 3 months after the foreign material removal. OUTCOMES: Case 1. The foreign material was removed and there were no complications such as foreign body reaction, capsular contracture. Ptosis was corrected and both breasts were symmetric with proper projection. Case 2. Residual foreign material was removed and there were no complications such capsular contracture, implant malposition. CONCLUSION: Massive injections of foreign materials into the breast can cause severe infiltration and associated foreign body reactions. By a near-complete removal of the foreign materials and breast reconstruction using silicone implants, we achieved satisfactory results, without complications such as wound disruption, capsular contracture, and implant malposition.


Subject(s)
Acrylic Resins/adverse effects , Dermal Fillers/adverse effects , Foreign-Body Reaction/surgery , Mammaplasty/methods , Mastodynia/surgery , Female , Foreign-Body Reaction/chemically induced , Humans , Mastodynia/chemically induced , Middle Aged
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...