Effect of liraglutide on lipids in patients with type 2 diabetes: a pilot study.

The mechanism for the cholesterol-lowering effect of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) remains unknown in patients with type 2 diabetes. We evaluated the effect of liraglutide on serum lipid profiles, including cholesterol synthesis and absorption markers, during daily clinical practice in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. We enrolled 38 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were not treated with a GLP-1 RA (≥20 years of age, HbA1c ≥6.5%). Liraglutide, a GLP-1 RA, was administered subcutaneously once a day for three months to these patients. Blood samples and body weights were collected at 0, 1, and 3 months. Total cholesterol (TC) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) at 1 month, and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) and calculated TC at 1 and 3 months, were decreased, while the cholesterol synthesis and cholesterol absorption markers were unchanged by this treatment. In patients with LDL-C levels over 100 mg/dL, LDL-C, non-HDL-C, TC, and calculated TC levels were decreased significantly by the treatment at 1 and 3 months, and the cholesterol absorption marker, campesterol, was decreased at 3 months. The administration of liraglutide for 3 months decreased non-HDL-C and calculated TC significantly, while the cholesterol synthesis and absorption markers were not changed by this treatment.

Effects of ipragliflozin on the development and progression of kidney disease in patients with type 2 diabetes: An analysis from a multicenter prospective intervention study.

AIMS/INTRODUCTION: Type 2 diabetes mellitus is the leading cause of kidney failure worldwide, but few effective long-term treatments are available. METHODS: This was an investigator-initiated multicenter prospective intervention study in which ipragliflozin (50 mg) was administered once daily, and glycemic control, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and adverse events were evaluated until 104 weeks after starting research. RESULTS: There were 407 patients analyzed. In the eGFR ≥90 group and eGFR ≥60 to <90 group, eGFR had significantly decreased compared with baseline at all time points from 4 to 104 weeks. There were significant increases in the eGFR ≥45 to <60 groups compared with baseline at 36 weeks (2.3 ± 1.0) and 52 weeks (2.6 ± 1.2). Comparison between the eGFR <60, urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio >300 group and the eGFR <60, urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio <300 group showed a greater reduction in eGFR in the former (-5.4 ± 2.4 vs 3.3 ± 1.1) at 12 weeks and was maintained to 104 weeks. In any group, eGFR did not significantly decrease until 104 weeks compared with 4 weeks. The urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio after 52 weeks and after 104 weeks was significantly decreased compared with baseline in the eGFR ≥90 group. CONCLUSIONS: Ipragliflozin lowers eGFR and corrects hyperfiltration in patients with high eGFR (eGFR ≥60). In patients with low eGFR (eGFR ≥30 to <60), ipragliflozin has the possibility of increasing eGFR and exerting a renoprotective effect.

Effectiveness of Ipragliflozin for Reducing Hemoglobin A1c in Patients With a Shorter Type 2 Diabetes Duration: Interim Report of the ASSIGN-K Study.

BACKGROUND: Ipragliflozin is a selective sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor. The ASSIGN-K study is investigating the efficacy and safety of ipragliflozin for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in the real-world clinical setting. METHODS: Japanese T2DM patients with inadequate glycemic control despite diet and exercise with/without pharmacotherapy were enrolled in an investigator-driven, multicenter, prospective, observational study examining the efficacy and safety of ipragliflozin treatment (50 mg/day for 52 weeks). We performed interim analysis after 24 weeks. RESULTS: In 367 patients completing 24-week ipragliflozin therapy, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) decreased significantly from 8.07% at baseline to 7.26% in week 24 (P < 0.001). The change in HbA1c from treatment initiation to week 24 was -0.88% in patients < 65 years old versus -0.55% in those ≥ 65 years and -0.92% in men versus -0.70% in women (all P < 0.001). When baseline HbA1c was < 7%, 7% to < 8%, and ≥ 8%, the change was -0.18%, -0.45%, and -1.48%, respectively (P = 0.5352, P < 0.001, and P < 0.001, respectively). When baseline body mass index (BMI) was < 25, 25 to < 30, and ≥ 30, the change was -1.05%, -0.65%, and -0.87%, respectively (all P < 0.001). Multiple regression analysis showed that HbA1c decreased more in patients with a higher baseline HbA1c or shorter duration of diabetes. An HbA1c < 7% was achieved in 33.3% of the patients, and their baseline HbA1c was significantly lower than that of patients failing to achieve it (P < 0.001). Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 106/451 patients (23.5%), including 29.1% of patients aged 65 or older. Common AEs were vulvovaginal candidiasis (3.1%) and genital pruritus (1.8%). Serious AEs included urinary tract infection, unstable angina, and ketosis, which occurred in patients who did not suspend medication during acute illness. CONCLUSIONS: Ipragliflozin significantly improved HbA1c in T2DM patients with inadequate glycemic control. Improvement in HbA1c was significant irrespective of age, sex, baseline HbA1c, or BMI, but efficacy was greater with a higher baseline HbA1c and shorter duration of diabetes. For safe continuation of treatment, patients should be advised to suspend medication during acute illness.

Ipragliflozin Improves Glycemic Control and Decreases Body Fat in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

BACKGROUND: Ipragliflozin, a sodium-glucose transporter 2 inhibitor, was administered to patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus for 24 weeks to evaluate its effect on glycemic control and body composition. METHODS: This was an investigator-initiated multicenter prospective intervention study in which ipragliflozin (50 mg) was administered once daily and glycemic control, blood pressure, body weight (BW), body composition (measured by a biological impedance method), the lipid profile, and adverse events were evaluated after 4, 12, and 24 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: Efficacy and safety up to 24 weeks of ipragliflozin therapy were analyzed in 367 patients and 451 patients, respectively. Hemoglobin A1c decreased significantly from 8.07% at the start of ipragliflozin therapy to 7.26% in week 24 (P < 0.001). Fasting and postprandial blood glucose levels were significantly reduced by ipragliflozin. In week 24, there were significant decreases from baseline in BW (-2.6 kg), waist circumference (-2.9 cm), and body fat mass (-1.9 kg) (P < 0.001). The body water mass and mineral mass were decreased significantly by 0.5 and by 0.1 kg, respectively (P < 0.001), whereas the protein mass did not change significantly. Intracellular water mass did not change significantly, whereas extracellular water mass showed a significant decrease of 0.5 kg (P < 0.001). Muscle mass did not change in the upper and lower limbs, but that of the trunk decreased significantly (P < 0.001). There was a significant decrease in the fasting triglyceride level and a significant increase in fasting high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level, while low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was unchanged. Adverse events occurred in 23.5% of the patients, with a high frequency of genital infections, such as vulvovaginal candidiasis (3.1%) and genital pruritus (1.8%). Adverse drug reactions were noted in 13.7% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of ipragliflozin for 24 weeks improved glycemic control and decreased BW. Reduction of body fat accounted for more than 70% of the total weight loss and reduction of extracellular water accounted for about 20%.

Effect of Switching from Sulphonylurea to Repaglinide Twice or Three Times Daily for 4 Months on Glycemic Control in Japanese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.

Objective Switching from sulfonylureas to repaglinide in patients with type 2 diabetes improves glycemic control; however, the optimal dosage has not been fully evaluated. We designed to show that repaglinide was equivalent to sulfonylurea in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. We herein evaluated whether we could switch from sulfonylureas to repaglinide twice or thrice daily in Japanese adult patients who had been treated with anti-diabetic drugs, including sulfonylureas, and whose conditions were moderately well-controlled. Methods A total of 78 patients taking less than half the Japanese maximum dose of sulfonylurea were randomized into three groups: 26 in group A (switching from sulfonylureas to taking 0.25 or 0.5 mg of repaglinide just before breakfast and dinner twice daily), 27 in group B (switching from sulfonylureas to taking 0.25 or 0.5 mg of repaglinide just before meals thrice daily), and 25 in group C (continuing to take sulfonylurea). Blood samples were collected at 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 months following the initiation of the maintenance period. Results The HbA1c and glycoalbumin levels did not significantly differ among the three groups after 4 months of treatment. Conclusion With the assumption that 1 mg of glimepiride is equivalent to 1.25 mg of glibenclamide or 40 mg of gliclazide, the administration of repaglinide (0.44 mg/meal) twice and thrice daily is similar to the efficacy of sulfonylurea (glimepiride 1.63-1.98 mg/day) after four months of treatment in Japanese patients with moderately well-controlled type 2 diabetes (HbA1c, 7-7.5%).

Correction: Efficacy and Safety of Ipragliflozin in Japanese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Interim Outcome of the ASSIGN-K Study.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.14740/jocmr2417w.].

Efficacy and Safety of Ipragliflozin in Japanese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Interim Outcome of the ASSIGN-K Study.

BACKGROUND: Ipragliflozin is a sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor that can improve glycemic control and reduce body weight and blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We evaluated the efficacy and safety of ipragliflozin in the real-world clinical setting, with a focus on the changes of body composition up to 3 months of treatment. METHODS: This was a prospective multicenter interventional trial. We investigated changes of the blood pressure, body composition, blood glucose, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), ketone bodies, lipids, and insulin after treatment with ipragliflozin (50 - 100 mg/day) for 12 weeks in Japanese patients with T2DM who showed poor glycemic control despite receiving diet and exercise therapy with or without oral antidiabetic drugs for more than 12 weeks. RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty-seven subjects were included in the efficacy analysis up to 12 weeks of treatment and 301 subjects were included in the safety analysis. From baseline to 12 weeks, HbA1c showed a change of -0.68% (95% confidence interval (CI): -0.83, -0.53) and fasting blood glucose showed a change of -23.9 mg/dL (95% CI: -30.5, -17.2), with both parameters displaying a significant reduction (P < 0.001). The difference of body weight from baseline was -1.82 kg (95% CI: -2.14, -1.50), and it also showed significant reduction (P < 0.001). Analysis of body composition revealed that body fat changed by -1.46 kg (95% CI: -1.79, -1.14, P < 0.001) and body water changed by -0.37 kg (95% CI: -0.60, -0.14, P < 0.01). Laboratory tests demonstrated improvement of liver function and the lipid profile. Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 22.6% of the subjects, with frequent events being vulvovaginal candidiasis in 2.7% and cystitis in 2.0%. Serious AEs occurred in three subjects. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with T2DM, ipragliflozin improved glycemic control after 1 month of treatment and caused weight loss by reducing body fat more than body water.

Comparison of the administration of teneligliptin every day versus every other day in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized non-inferior test.

The half life (t1/2 ) of teneligliptin is 24.2 hours. Accordingly, we hypothesized that the administration of teneligliptin every other day might improve glycemic control. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of the administration of teneligliptin every other day in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. Fifty-one patients were randomly assigned to receive treatment with 20 mg of teneligliptin every day (Group A) or 20 mg of teneligliptin every other day (Group B) for 12 weeks. HbA1c, glycoalbumin (GA), 1,5-anhydroglucitol (1,5-AG), lipid, blood pressure, body weight, urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio, overall treatment satisfaction level, adverse events and drug adherence were all measured. Forty-seven patients completed this study, and the HbA1c, GA, and 1,5-AG levels in group B were found to be decreased to the same extent as those in group A. No distinct differences in the overall treatment satisfaction level, adverse events, or drug adherence were seen between the two groups at 12 weeks. The administration of teneligliptin every other day had a similar efficacy, patient satisfaction level, and safety compared with its administration every day. This information will be useful for reducing the economic load without changing the patients' satisfaction and glycemic control.

Effect of repaglinide, administered two or three times daily for 3 months, on glycaemic control in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy, safety and compliance of repaglinide, administered either two or three times daily, regarding glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: Japanese adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus, who had been treated without sulphonylureas or glinides for >3 months, were randomly assigned to two groups to receive either 0.25 mg repaglinide, oral, twice daily (group A) or 0.25 mg repaglinide, oral, three times daily (group B). Glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c), glycoalbumin (GA) and 1,5-anhydroglucitol (1,5-AG) levels were measured at 0, 1, 2 and 3 months after treatment commenced. RESULTS: Out of 43 patients who enrolled (group A, n = 22; group B, n = 21), 33 patients completed the trial (group A, n = 16; group B, n = 17). No significant between-group differences in HbA1c, GA, or 1,5-AG levels were seen at 1-3 months. No severe hypoglycaemic episodes or other adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Minimal-dose repaglinide administered twice daily was similar in efficacy and safety to three-times-daily administration, in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Administration of repaglinide twice daily could be an alternative regimen for patients who cannot take repaglinide three times daily.

Glycemic control after addition of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor alogliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes showing inadequate response to thrice-a-day treatment with α-glucosidase inhibitors.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the effect of addition of alogliptin, while continuing the α-glucosidase inhibitor (αGI) administration at the same or reduced dose, or discontinuing the drug, on the glycemic control in type 2 diabetic patients showing inadequate response to αGI treatment. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter interventional study trial. Subjects were randomly assigned to treatment with alogliptin alone (Intake 0 group), or alogliptin in addition to an αGI administered once-/twice-/thrice-daily (Intake 1, 2 and 3 groups). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in glycemic control were measured. RESULTS: The HbA1c and glycoalbumin levels at 1 and 3 months were significantly lower than the values at the baseline in the Intake 1, 2 and 3 groups, but not the Intake 0 group. The body weight at 3 months was significantly lower than that at the baseline in the Intake 3 group. There were no significant differences in the degree of satisfaction or participating volition recorded, before and after the start of the study treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of alogliptin to once-/twice-daily administration of an αGI may be effective for obtaining improved glycemic control, without lowering the treatment satisfaction level, in type 2 diabetic patients.

Impact of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor vildagliptin on glucose tolerance and ß-cell function and mass in insulin receptor substrate-2-knockout mice fed a high-fat diet.

Type 2 diabetes is characterized by diminished pancreatic ß-cell mass and function. Glucagon-like peptide-1 has been reported to increase islet cell proliferation and reduce apoptosis of ß-cells in rodents. In this study, we explored the effect of chronic administration of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor vildagliptin on glucose tolerance, ß-cell function, and ß-cell mass in Irs2-knockout (Irs2(-/-)) mice. Wild-type and Irs2(-/-) mice were fed a high-fat diet for 20 wk, with or without vildagliptin. In both genotypes of mice, vildagliptin significantly decreased the area under the curve (0-120 min) of blood glucose and increased the insulin response to glucose during the oral glucose tolerance test. In the oral glucose tolerance test performed 1 d after discontinuation of vildagliptin administration, the area under the curve (0-120 min) of blood glucose was still significantly decreased and the insulin response to glucose was significantly increased in the Irs2(-/-) mice treated with vildagliptin as compared with the values in the mice not treated with vildagliptin. Histochemical analysis of the pancreatic islets revealed significant increase of the ß-cell mass and decrease in the proportion of terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling-positive ß-cells but no significant increase of the bromodeoxyuridine incorporation in Irs2(-/-) mice treated with vildagliptin. Our results suggest that vildagliptin improved glucose tolerance and increased the ß-cell mass by reducing ß-cell apoptosis in the Irs2(-/-) mice, and that the reduction of ß-cell apoptosis by vildagliptin was independent of the Irs2 expression in the cells.

Evaluation of organ-specific glucose metabolism by ¹8F-FDG in insulin receptor substrate-1 (IRS-1) knockout mice as a model of insulin resistance.

OBJECTIVE: Insulin resistance (IR) is a physiological condition in which the body produces insulin but does not result in a sufficient biological effect. Insulin resistance is usually asymptomatic but is associated with health problems and is a factor in the metabolic syndrome. The aim of the present study is to clarify organ-specific insulin resistance in normal daily conditions using [(18)F]-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D: -glucose ([(18)F]-FDG). METHODS: The biodistribution of [(18)F]-FDG was examined in insulin receptor substrate-1 (IRS-1) knockout mice, an animal model of skeletal muscle insulin resistance, and C57BL/6J (wild-type) mice with and without insulin loading. Mice received 0.5 MBq of [(18)F]-FDG injected into the tail vein, immediately followed by nothing (control cohorts) or an intraperitoneal injection of 1.5 mU/g body weight of human insulin as an insulin loading test. Blood glucose concentrations for all of the experimental animals were assessed at 0, 20, 40, and 60 min post-injection. The mice were subsequently killed, and tissue was collected for evaluation of [(18)F]-FDG biodistribution. The radioactivity of each organ was measured using a gamma counter. RESULTS: In the absence of insulin, the blood glucose concentrations of wild-type mice (132 ± 26 mg/dl) and IRS-1 knockout mice (134 ± 18 mg/dl) were not significantly different. Blood glucose concentrations decreased following insulin administration, with lower concentrations in wild-type mice than in knockout mice at 20, 40, and 60 min. A statistically significant difference in [(18)F]-FDG uptake between wild-type mice and IRS-1 knockout mice was confirmed in the heart, abdominal muscle, and femoral muscle. With insulin loading, [(18)F]-FDG uptake in the heart, back muscle, and abdominal muscle was significantly increased compared to without insulin loading in both wild-type mice and knockout mice. CONCLUSION: Our results showed that IR significantly affected [(18)F]-FDG uptake in the heart in normal daily conditions. IR was associated with decreased [(18)F]-FDG uptake in the heart and was readily observed in the absence of insulin loading. [(18)F]-FDG-positron emission tomography (PET) could be a useful tool for evaluating insulin resistance in images by investigating tissue-specific differences in [(18)F]-FDG uptake.

Ezetimibe decreases SREBP-1c expression in liver and reverses hepatic insulin resistance in mice fed a high-fat diet.

Ezetimibe inhibits intestinal cholesterol absorption, thereby reducing serum cholesterol. Recent studies suggest that ezetimibe affects liver steatosis and insulin resistance. We investigated the impact of ezetimibe on insulin sensitivity and glucose metabolism in C57BL/6 mice. We analyzed 4 mouse groups fed the following diets: normal chow (4% fat) for 12 weeks, normal chow for 10 weeks followed by normal chow plus ezetimibe for 2 weeks, high-fat chow (32% fat) for 12 weeks, and high-fat chow for 10 weeks followed by high-fat chow plus ezetimibe for 2 weeks. In the normal chow + ezetimibe group, ezetimibe had no impact on body weight, fat mass, lipid metabolism, liver steatosis, glucose tolerance, or insulin sensitivity. In the high-fat chow + ezetimibe group, ezetimibe had no impact on body weight or fat mass but significantly decreased serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglyceride, and glutamate pyruvate transaminase levels; liver weight; hepatic triglyceride content; and hepatic cholesterol content and increased the hepatic total bile acid content. In association with increases in IRS-2 and Akt phosphorylation, ezetimibe ameliorated hepatic insulin resistance in the high-fat chow + ezetimibe group, but had no effect on insulin sensitivity in primary cultured hepatocytes. A DNA microarray and Taqman polymerase chain reaction revealed that ezetimibe up-regulated hepatic SREBP2 and SHP expression and down-regulated hepatic SREBP-1c expression. SHP silencing mainly in the liver worsened insulin resistance, and ezetimibe protected against insulin resistance induced by down-regulation of SHP. Ezetimibe down-regulated SREBP-1c in the liver and reversed hepatic insulin resistance in mice fed a high-fat diet.

Self-injection of insulin using appropriate supportive devices in handicapped subjects with diabetes.

BACKGROUND: To self-inject insulin, individuals with diabetes must be able to attach the needle to the injector, recognize the appropriate insulin dosage, detach the needle from the injector, and perform a series of operations necessary for the actual injection. These tasks require a grip strength that is strong enough to hold the necessary devices, eyesight, the use of both hands, and at least a minimum intellectual capacity. Subjects who are unable to grasp or handle the devices required for insulin injection often have difficulties with the self-injection of insulin. METHODS: We treated four diabetes patients who had trouble grasping objects and using both hands. One patient had lost five fingers in an accident, two patients had suffered from ischemic cerebral infarction resulting in complete one-sided hemiplegia with no movement in one arm, and one patient had limited muscular power in an arm as a result of spinal cord disease. The plasma glucose control was poor, and the initiation of insulin therapy was necessary in each of these patients. In three cases, we used a commercially available self-injection device (HumaHelper; Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Kobe, Japan) to enable self-injection; in the fourth case, we used a newly manufactured device similar to HumaHelper. RESULTS: All the patients were able to inject insulin by themselves using the appropriate supplementary devices. The blood glucose control of all the patients subsequently improved. CONCLUSION: Existing or newly manufactured supportive devices can enable handicapped subjects to self-inject insulin.