ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: With the change in Step 1 score reporting, Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK) may become a pivotal factor in resident selection. This systematic review and meta-analysis seeks to synthesize existing observational studies that assess the relationship between Step 2 CK scores and measures of resident performance. METHOD: The authors searched MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus databases using terms related to Step 2 CK in 2021. Two researchers identified studies investigating the association between Step 2 CK and measures of resident performance and included studies if they contained a bivariate analysis examining Step 2 CK scores' association with an outcome of interest: in-training examination (ITE) scores, board certification examination scores, select Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education core competency assessments, overall resident performance evaluations, or other subjective measures of performance. For outcomes that were investigated by 3 or more studies, pooled effect sizes were estimated with random-effects models. RESULTS: Among 1,355 potential studies, 68 met inclusion criteria and 43 were able to be pooled. There was a moderate positive correlation between Step 2 CK and ITE scores (0.52, 95% CI 0.45-0.59, P < .01). There was a moderate positive correlation between Step 2 CK and ITE scores for both nonsurgical (0.59, 95% CI 0.51-0.66, P < .01) and surgical specialties (0.41, 95% CI 0.33-0.48, P < .01). There was a very weak positive correlation between Step 2 CK scores and subjective measures of resident performance (0.19, 95% CI 0.13-0.25, P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: This study found Step 2 CK scores have a statistically significant moderate positive association with future examination scores and a statistically significant weak positive correlation with subjective measures of resident performance. These findings are increasingly relevant as Step 2 CK scores will likely become more important in resident selection.
Subject(s)
Internship and Residency , Humans , United States , Educational Measurement , Licensure, Medical , Clinical Competence , Certification , Observational Studies as TopicABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is often seen in patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE). Risk stratification of PE patients is useful in predicting mortality risk and hospital course. However, rates or predictors of DVT or proximal DVT (popliteal, femoral, common femoral, or iliac thrombosis) have not been studied in the highest-risk patients who receive catheter-directed therapy (CDT) for their PE. A single-center retrospective analysis of patients referred for CDT for confirmed PE was conducted to evaluate rates and predictors of DVT or proximal DVT and the impact on short-term outcomes. In 137 consecutive patients undergoing CDT for PE with available lower-extremity ultrasound, the rates of DVT and proximal DVT in PE patients receiving CDT were 76.6% and 65.0%, respectively. Rates of DVT (P=.68) and proximal DVT (P=.72) did not differ between high-risk or non-high risk PE patients. The only significant factor associated with presence of concomitant DVT was previous DVT (P=.045). The presence of a concomitant DVT or proximal DVT was not associated with an increase in all-cause mortality or hospitalization at 30 days or 1 year compared with an absence of concomitant DVT or proximal DVT. The results of this study suggest that patients with PE clinically requiring CDT have high rates of concomitant DVT and proximal DVT, prior DVT predicts concomitant DVT, and the presence of DVT is not associated with additional risk in this already high-risk population of patients.
