ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs) have shown contradictory results in patients with advanced gastro-oesophageal junction/gastric cancer(GOJ/GC). AIM: to identify specific patient subgroups that would derive survival benefit from ICIs. METHODS: a subgroup meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials(RCTs) was carried out. RESULTS: four phase-III-RCTs were identified with data on the following variables: primary location(Gastric vs GOJ); age(≤ 65 vs >65); gender(male vs female); ECOG PS(0 vs 1); ethnicity (Asian vs non-Asian), histology(intestinal vs diffuse), PD-L1 expression(≥ 1% vs < 1%). PD-L1 positivity was significantly associated with survival benefit from ICIs (HR: 0.82, p 0.047), with a significant interaction between PD-L1 expression and ICI efficacy (interaction HR: 1.41, p 0.02). Numerically, the second most relevant interaction was ICI efficacy and gender, with ICI being more effective in males. CONCLUSION: The PD-L1 positive patient subgroup derives significant survival benefit from ICI in GOJ/GC, however other predictors are eagerly needed to further refine patient selection.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Stomach Neoplasms , Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy , Esophagogastric Junction , Female , Humans , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors , Male , Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor , Stomach Neoplasms/drug therapySubject(s)
Stomach Neoplasms , Esophagogastric Junction , Humans , Immunotherapy , Lymph Nodes , Nivolumab , Stomach Neoplasms/therapyABSTRACT
The gene encoding the receptor tyrosine kinase ERBB2, also known as HER2, is amplified and/or overexpressed in up to 15% of breast cancers. These tumours are characterised by an aggressive phenotype and poor clinical outcome. Although therapies targeted at ERBB2 have proven effective, many patients fail to respond to treatment or become resistant and the reasons for this are still largely unknown. Using a high-throughput functional screen we assessed whether genes found to be recurrently amplified and overexpressed in ERBB2+ve breast cancers mediate resistance to the ERBB2-targeted agent lapatinib. Lapatinib-resistant ERBB2-amplified breast cancer cell lines were screened, in the presence or absence of lapatinib, with an RNA interference library targeting 369 genes recurrently amplified and overexpressed in both ERBB2-amplified breast cancer tumours and cell lines. Small interfering RNAs targeting a number of genes caused sensitivity to lapatinib in this context. The mechanisms of resistance conferred by the identified genes were further investigated and in the case of NIBP (TRAPPC9), lapatinib resistance was found to be mediated through NF-κB signalling. Our results indicate that specific amplified and/ or overexpressed genes found in ERBB2-amplified breast cancer may mediate response to ERBB2-targeting agents.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/genetics , Genes, erbB-2 , Quinazolines/pharmacology , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Cell Line, Tumor , Female , High-Throughput Screening Assays , Humans , Lapatinib , RNA Interference , RNA, Small Interfering/geneticsABSTRACT
Overexpression of the receptor tyrosine kinase ERBB2 (also known as HER2) occurs in around 15% of breast cancers and is driven by amplification of the ERBB2 gene. ERBB2 amplification is a marker of poor prognosis, and although anti-ERBB2-targeted therapies have shown significant clinical benefit, de novo and acquired resistance remains an important problem. Genomic profiling has demonstrated that ERBB2+ve breast cancers are distinguished from ER+ve and 'triple-negative' breast cancers by harbouring not only the ERBB2 amplification on 17q12, but also a number of co-amplified genes on 17q12 and amplification events on other chromosomes. Some of these genes may have important roles in influencing clinical outcome, and could represent genetic dependencies in ERBB2+ve cancers and therefore potential therapeutic targets. Here, we describe an integrated genomic, gene expression and functional analysis to determine whether the genes present within amplicons are critical for the survival of ERBB2+ve breast tumour cells. We show that only a fraction of the ERBB2-amplified breast tumour lines are truly addicted to the ERBB2 oncogene at the mRNA level and display a heterogeneous set of additional genetic dependencies. These include an addiction to the transcription factor gene TFAP2C when it is amplified and overexpressed, suggesting that TFAP2C represents a genetic dependency in some ERBB2+ve breast cancer cells.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Gene Amplification/genetics , Receptor, ErbB-2/genetics , Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism , Transcription Factor AP-2/metabolism , Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Cell Line, Tumor , Female , Gene Expression Profiling , Humans , MCF-7 Cells , RNA Interference , RNA, Small Interfering , Receptor, ErbB-2/biosynthesis , Transcription Factor AP-2/biosynthesisABSTRACT
Expression profiling studies have suggested that HER2-amplified breast cancers constitute a heterogeneous group that may be subdivided according to their ER status: HER2-amplified ER-positive breast carcinomas that fall into the luminal B cluster; and HER2-amplified ER-negative cancers which form a distinct molecular subgroup, known as the erbB2 or HER2 subgroup. ER-negative breast cancer differs significantly from ER-positive disease in the pattern, type, and complexity of genetic aberrations. Here we have compared the genomic profiles of ER-positive and ER-negative HER2-amplified cancers using tiling path microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). Validation of the differentially amplified regions was performed in an independent series of 70 HER2-amplified breast cancers. Although HER2-amplified cancers had remarkably complex patterns of molecular genetic aberrations, ER-positive and ER-negative HER2-amplified breast carcinomas shared most molecular genetic features as defined by aCGH. Genome-wide Fisher's exact test analysis revealed that less than 1.5% of the genome was significantly differentially gained or lost in ER-positive versus ER-negative HER2-amplified cancers. However, two regions of amplification were significantly associated with ER-positive carcinomas, one of which mapped to 17q21.2 and encompassed GJC1, IGFBP4, TNS4, and TOP2A. Chromogenic in situ hybridization analysis of an independent validation series confirmed the association between ER status and TOP2A amplification. In conclusion, although hormone receptor status does not determine the overall genetic profile of HER2-amplified breast cancers, specific genetic aberrations may be characteristic of subgroups of HER2 breast cancers.