Safety and Effectiveness of Liv.52 DS in Patients With Varied Hepatic Disorders: An Open-Label, Multi-centre, Phase IV Study.

Background The hepatoprotective function of polyherbal formulation Liv.52 in chronic liver diseases is well recognized in published literature. The objective of this open-label, phase IV study was to further strengthen and validate its safety and effectiveness using a large patient pool in a real-world scenario and provide scientific data on symptomatic improvement and supportive treatment in liver function with improvement in quality of life. Methods Adult patients of either sex with one or more clinical symptoms like fatigue, nausea, anorexia, abdominal pain or discomfort, muscle cramps, jaundice, or any other signs and symptoms with a history suggestive of mild-to-moderate hepatic disorders like alcoholic liver disease (ALD), non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), drug-induced hepatotoxicity, or hepatitis were treated with two Liv.52 DS tablets (oral) twice daily for 12 weeks. Results Out of the 1000 enrolled patients, 962 (96%) completed the study with the following subgroups ALD: 375 (38.9%), NAFLD: 379 (39.3%), drug-induced hepatotoxicity: 78 (8.1%), hepatitis: 130 (13.5%). The mean age of enrolled patients was 37.7 years, and the majority of them, 785 (78.5%) were men. The common adverse events observed (with >1.5% incidence) in the study were abdominal pain: 26 (2.6%) and headache: 17 (1.7%). Liv.52 showed statistically significant improvement (P<0.0001) in various clinical signs and symptoms in the majority of patients namely, fatigue: 357/723 (49%), anorexia: 485/620 (78.2%), jaundice: 48/52 (92%). Majority of the patients showed significant improvements from baseline to end of 12 weeks in the liver function test parameters namely, aspartate aminotransferase: 633/840 (75.36%), alanine aminotransferase: 592/729 (81.21%), serum bilirubin: 244/347 (70.32%), alkaline phosphatase: 279/355 (78.59%) with P<0.0001 for all parameters. Statistically significant improvement (P<0.005) was also seen in all the components of the chronic liver disease questionnaire (CLDQ) scores from baseline to 12 weeks. Conclusions The study demonstrated that Liv.52 was hepatoprotective and well tolerated in the study population after treatment for 12 weeks. Significant improvements were seen in clinical signs and symptoms, laboratory parameters of liver function, and CLDQ scores from baseline to 12 weeks. No significant or new safety signals emerged from this study.

Factors associated with unexplained sudden deaths among adults aged 18-45 years in India - A multicentric matched case-control study.

BACKGROUND OBJECTIVES: In view of anecdotal reports of sudden unexplained deaths in India's apparently healthy young adults, linking to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection or vaccination, we determined the factors associated with such deaths in individuals aged 18-45 years through a multicentric matched case-control study. METHODS: This study was conducted through participation of 47 tertiary care hospitals across India. Cases were apparently healthy individuals aged 18-45 years without any known co-morbidity, who suddenly (<24 h of hospitalization or seen apparently healthy 24 h before death) died of unexplained causes during 1 st October 2021-31 st March 2023. Four controls were included per case matched for age, gender and neighborhood. We interviewed/perused records to collect data on COVID-19 vaccination/infection and post-COVID-19 conditions, family history of sudden death, smoking, recreational drug use, alcohol frequency and binge drinking and vigorous-intensity physical activity two days before death/interviews. We developed regression models considering COVID-19 vaccination ≤42 days before outcome, any vaccine received anytime and vaccine doses to compute an adjusted matched odds ratio (aOR) with 95 per cent confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Seven hundred twenty nine cases and 2916 controls were included in the analysis. Receipt of at least one dose of COVID-19 vaccine lowered the odds [aOR (95% CI)] for unexplained sudden death [0.58 (0.37, 0.92)], whereas past COVID-19 hospitalization [3.8 (1.36, 10.61)], family history of sudden death [2.53 (1.52, 4.21)], binge drinking 48 h before death/interview [5.29 (2.57, 10.89)], use of recreational drug/substance [2.92 (1.1, 7.71)] and performing vigorous-intensity physical activity 48 h before death/interview [3.7 (1.36, 10.05)] were positively associated. Two doses lowered the odds of unexplained sudden death [0.51 (0.28, 0.91)], whereas single dose did not. INTERPRETATION CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 vaccination did not increase the risk of unexplained sudden death among young adults in India. Past COVID-19 hospitalization, family history of sudden death and certain lifestyle behaviors increased the likelihood of unexplained sudden death.

Post COVID sequelae among COVID-19 survivors: insights from the Indian National Clinical Registry for COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: The effects of COVID-19 infection persist beyond the active phase. Comprehensive description and analysis of the post COVID sequelae in various population groups are critical to minimise the long-term morbidity and mortality associated with COVID-19. This analysis was conducted with an objective to estimate the frequency of post COVID sequelae and subsequently, design a framework for holistic management of post COVID morbidities. METHODS: Follow-up data collected as part of a registry-based observational study in 31 hospitals across India since September 2020-October 2022 were used for analysis. All consenting hospitalised patients with COVID-19 are telephonically followed up for up to 1 year post-discharge, using a prestructured form focused on symptom reporting. RESULTS: Dyspnoea, fatigue and mental health issues were reported among 18.6%, 10.5% and 9.3% of the 8042 participants at first follow-up of 30-60 days post-discharge, respectively, which reduced to 11.9%, 6.6% and 9%, respectively, at 1-year follow-up in 2192 participants. Patients who died within 90 days post-discharge were significantly older (adjusted OR (aOR): 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.03), with at least one comorbidity (aOR: 1.76, 95% CI: 1.31, 2.35), and a higher proportion had required intensive care unit admission during the initial hospitalisation due to COVID-19 (aOR: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.08, 2.06) and were discharged at WHO ordinal scale 6-7 (aOR: 49.13 95% CI: 25.43, 94.92). Anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination (at least one dose) was protective against such post-discharge mortality (aOR: 0.19, 95% CI: 0.01, 0.03). CONCLUSION: Hospitalised patients with COVID-19 experience a variety of long-term sequelae after discharge from hospitals which persists although in reduced proportions until 12 months post-discharge. Developing a holistic management framework with engagement of care outreach workers as well as teleconsultation is a way forward in effective management of post COVID morbidities as well as reducing mortality.

Characterizing the third wave of COVID-19: An analysis from the National Clinical Registry of COVID-19.

Background & objectives: Data from the National Clinical Registry for COVID-19 (NCRC) were analyzed with an aim to describe the clinical characteristics, course and outcomes of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in the third wave of the pandemic and compare them with patients admitted earlier. Methods: The NCRC, launched in September 2020, is a multicentre observational initiative, which provided the platform for the current investigation. Demographic, clinical, treatment and outcome data of hospitalized COVID-19 patients were captured in an electronic data portal from 38 hospitals across India. Patients enrolled during December 16, 2021 to January 17, 2022 were considered representative of the third wave of COVID-19 and compared with those registered during November 15 to December 15, 2021, representative of the tail end of the second wave. Results: Between November 15, 2021 and January 17, 2022, 3230 patients were recruited in NCRC. Patients admitted in the third wave were significantly younger than those admitted earlier (46.7±20.5 vs. 54.6±18 yr). The patients admitted in the third wave had a lower requirement of drugs including steroids, interleukin (IL)-6 inhibitors and remdesivir as well as lower oxygen supplementation and mechanical ventilation. They had improved hospital outcomes with significantly lower in-hospital mortality (11.2 vs. 15.1%). The outcomes were better among the fully vaccinated when compared to the unvaccinated or partially vaccinated. Interpretation & conclusions: The pattern of illness and outcomes were observed to be different in the third wave compared to the last wave. Hospitalized patients were younger with fewer comorbidities, decreased symptoms and improved outcomes, with fully vaccinated patients faring better than the unvaccinated and partially vaccinated ones.