Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 193(1): 217-224, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35278150

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: BRCA1/2 founder pathogenic variants (PVs) occur in various populations, but data on the mutational spectrum in Africans are limited. We examined BRCA1/2 PVs in breast cancer patients of Ethiopian Jewish (EJ) origin. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed BRCA1/2 test results and clinical features of EJ breast cancer patients from seven medical institutions. We obtained heterozygote carrier rates in affected individuals from the laboratories of the largest Israeli HMO (Clalit). Population carrier frequency was determined in EJ controls. RESULTS: We identified three recurrent BRCA2 PVs in 11 EJ breast cancer patients (9 females, 2 males): c.7579delG, c.5159C > A, and c.9693delA. Only c.5159C > A was previously reported in Africans. In women, mean age at diagnosis was 35.7y; 8/9 were diagnosed with advanced disease. All tumors were invasive, 4/9 were triple negative. Only 3/11 carriers had relevant family history. Carrier rate in high-risk breast cancer patients was 11% (3/28; 95%CI [2.3%, 28.2%]). Combined carrier rate among controls was 1.8% (5/280; 95%CI [0.6%, 4.1%]). CONCLUSION: EJs harbor 3 recurrent BRCA2 PVs presenting with relatively severe breast cancer morbidity. Combined with the high BRCA2 carrier rate in the EJ population, these findings merit increasing awareness in this community and suggest that a culturally adapted population screening approach may be warranted.


Subject(s)
BRCA2 Protein , Breast Neoplasms, Male , Breast Neoplasms , Jews , BRCA2 Protein/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/ethnology , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Breast Neoplasms, Male/ethnology , Breast Neoplasms, Male/genetics , Ethiopia/epidemiology , Female , Founder Effect , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Humans , Jews/genetics , Male , Retrospective Studies
2.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol ; 57(5): 813-820, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32202684

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the yield and utility of the routine use of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) for prenatal genetic diagnosis in a large cohort of pregnancies with normal ultrasound (US) at the time of genetic testing, compared with pregnancies with abnormal US findings. METHODS: We reviewed all prenatal CMA results in our center between November 2013 and December 2018. The prevalence of different CMA results in pregnancies with normal US at the time of genetic testing ('low-risk pregnancies'), was compared with that in pregnancies with abnormal US findings ('high-risk pregnancies'). Medical records were searched in order to evaluate subsequent US follow-up and the outcome of pregnancies with a clinically relevant copy-number variant (CNV), i.e. a pathogenic or likely pathogenic CNV or a susceptibility locus for disease with > 10% penetrance, related to early-onset disease in the low-risk group. RESULTS: In a cohort of 6431 low-risk pregnancies that underwent CMA, the prevalence of a clinically significant CNV related to early-onset disease was 1.1% (72/6431), which was significantly lower than the prevalence in high-risk pregnancies (4.9% (65/1326)). Of the low-risk pregnancies, 0.4% (27/6431) had a pathogenic or likely pathogenic CNV, and another 0.7% (45/6431) had a susceptibility locus with more than 10% penetrance. Follow-up of the low-risk pregnancies with a clinically significant early-onset CNV revealed that 31.9% (23/72) were terminated, while outcome data were missing in 26.4% (19/72). In 16.7% (12/72) of low-risk pregnancies, an US abnormality was discovered later on in gestation, after genetic testing had been performed. CONCLUSION: Although the background risk of identifying a clinically significant early-onset abnormal CMA result in pregnancies with a low a-priori risk is lower than that observed in high-risk pregnancies, the risk is substantial and should be conveyed to all pregnant women. © 2020 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.


Subject(s)
Chromosome Disorders/diagnosis , DNA Copy Number Variations , Microarray Analysis/statistics & numerical data , Prenatal Diagnosis/methods , Adult , Chromosome Disorders/embryology , Chromosome Disorders/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Microarray Analysis/methods , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome/genetics , Pregnancy, High-Risk/genetics , Prevalence , Ultrasonography, Prenatal/statistics & numerical data
3.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol ; 53(5): 676-685, 2019 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30155922

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Traditionally, amniocentesis is performed between 17 and 23 weeks of gestation. This enables decisions regarding the course of pregnancy to be made before viability. Less frequently, amniocentesis is performed in the third trimester. Advanced genomic technologies such as chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) provide more detailed information about the fetus compared with traditional G-banded chromosomal analysis. The aim of this study was to assess the indications for and safety of late amniocentesis, genetic-test results (especially in the context of CMA technology) and outcome of pregnancies that underwent the procedure after 24 weeks. METHODS: Medical records were analyzed retrospectively of all women in whom amniocentesis was performed at a gestational age of 24 + 0 to 38 + 6 weeks, at Hadassah Medical Center, between June 2013 and March 2017. Parameters investigated included indications for late amniocentesis, complications, CMA results and pregnancy outcome. RESULTS: During the study period, 291 women (303 fetuses, 277 singleton and 14 twin pregnancies; in two twin pairs, one fetus was terminated before amniocentesis) underwent late amniocentesis. CMA was performed in all instances of amniocentesis. The most frequent indication was abnormal sonographic finding(s) (204/303 fetuses, 67%). Preterm delivery occurred in 1.7% and 5.1% of pregnancies within the first week and within 1 month following the procedure, respectively. Aneuploidy was detected in nine (3%) fetuses and nine (3%) others had a pathogenic/likely pathogenic copy number variant, suggesting that CMA doubled the diagnostic yield of traditional karyotyping. Maximal diagnostic yield (17.5%) was achieved for the subgroup of fetuses referred with abnormal sonographic findings in two or more fetal anatomical systems. Variants of uncertain significance or susceptibility loci were found in another nine (3%) fetuses. CONCLUSIONS: In pregnancies undergoing late amniocentesis, CMA increased detection rates of fetal abnormalities and had a shorter turnaround time compared with traditional chromosomal analysis; therefore, late amniocentesis may serve as a helpful tool for detecting fetal abnormalities or reassuring parents following late-appearing abnormal sonographic findings. However, CMA may expose findings of uncertain significance, about which the couple should be precounseled. The procedure appears to be safe. Copyright © 2018 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.


Subject(s)
Amniocentesis/statistics & numerical data , Congenital Abnormalities/diagnosis , Microarray Analysis/statistics & numerical data , Time Factors , Adult , Amniocentesis/methods , Congenital Abnormalities/embryology , Female , Gestational Age , Humans , Microarray Analysis/methods , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Trimester, Third , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies
4.
Public Health Genomics ; 16(4): 174-83, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23816973

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Advances in genomics may eventually lead to genetic susceptibility screening of the general population, regardless of a personal or familial history of the disease in question. Yet, little is known about clinicians' attitudes toward such programs. We explored attitudes of family practitioners, medical geneticists and genetic counselors toward genetic screening of the general Ashkenazi-Jewish population for the common founder mutations in BRCA1/2 and LRRK2 genes (which increase the risk of hereditary breast/ovarian cancers and Parkinson's disease, respectively). METHODS: Participants (n = 204) completed a specially designed questionnaire, distributed by e-mail, regular mail or in-person. RESULTS: Slightly more than half (52%) were in favor of BRCA screening, while the vast majority (86%) opposed to LRRK2 screening. About two-thirds (68%) of the respondents supported pre-test genetic counseling. Attitudes were largely independent of professional background and sociodemographic characteristics, though a correlation was found with personal interest in genetic self-testing for the above genes. Adverse psychological impact and discrimination in insurance and employment were the major concerns cited by respondents with regard to screening programs. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the availability of measures for prevention and/or treatment is a major factor in the attitudes of healthcare providers toward population screening for late-onset conditions.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Genes, BRCA1 , Genes, BRCA2 , Genetic Predisposition to Disease/genetics , Genetic Testing , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Jews/genetics , Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases/genetics , Adult , Age Factors , Age of Onset , Aged , DNA Mutational Analysis , Employment , Female , Founder Effect , Genetic Counseling/psychology , Genetic Predisposition to Disease/psychology , Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome/genetics , Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome/prevention & control , Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome/psychology , Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome/therapy , Humans , Jews/psychology , Leucine-Rich Repeat Serine-Threonine Protein Kinase-2 , Male , Mutation/genetics , Parkinson Disease/genetics , Parkinson Disease/prevention & control , Parkinson Disease/psychology , Parkinson Disease/therapy , Prejudice , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL